Friday, May 9, 2025
Home Blog Page 2

Former Gambian Justice Minister Tambedou Denies Wrongdoing in Jammeh Asset Sales

By Hadram Hydara

Former Gambian Justice Minister Abubacarr Tambedou has issued a forceful rebuttal to an investigative report by The Republic alleging irregularities in the sale of ex-dictator Yahya Jammeh’s forfeited assets, denying personal benefit, judicial interference, or favouritism toward associates.

The Republic’s April 30 article accused Tambedou’s ministry of circumventing court processes to sell Jammeh’s assets—including luxury vehicles, real estate, and shares—at “a fraction of their worth,” alleging corruption in transactions involving his now-wife Binta Sompo Ceesay’s company, MOAB Capital.

The report claimed officials bypassed procurement rules, manipulated court orders, and allowed politically connected buyers to acquire assets cheaply.

In a 12-point rejoinder, Tambedou dismissed the allegations as “inaccuracies” fuelled by “speculation,” insisting all decisions were lawful and transparent.

Tambedou accused the outlet of selective quoting and ignoring evidence he provided, stating: “They chose to publish… with inaccuracies.” He defended his 2019–2023 decisions as adhering to “rule of law,” stressing Cabinet and judicial approvals.

Below is Tambedou’s full rejoinder verbatim:

Rejoinder to the Article published by The Republic on 1 May 2015 titled “The Assets of Gambia’s former dictator go for a song”

This clarification is issued in response to inaccuracies and the selective use of my responses, which misrepresented the facts in The Republic’s story regarding the sale of the former president’s assets.

Here is a summary of it:

  • I have never directly or indirectly benefited from the sale of the assets of former President Yahya Jammeh. The story by The Republic did not contain specific allegations of embezzlement, fraud, or my personal involvement in the acquisition of the assets.
  • The MOJ did not use any back-door means to circumvent the court’s decision not to unfreeze Jammeh’s assets. We went back to the drawing board after the court’s initial rejection of our application, obtained new information that supported our case, and filed a fresh application. The Chief Justice appointed a new judge to hear the case.
  • The receiver appointed by the court, on the MOJ’s recommendation, was never sacked – much more doing so illegally. The appointment was temporary and lapsed naturally. We hired a new receiver based on a Janneh Commission recommendation.
  • I had no prior relationship with Alpha Barry of Alpha Kapital. I became acquainted with him during my tenure as minister, and our relationship developed through his work as receiver.
  • Ceesay, who years later became my wife, had no role in the sale of the assets. I was not involved in the allocation of land to her. In fact, the initial plot of land was taken from her. The subsequent allocation was unsuitable for her intended business, so she returned it and requested a refund, which was not fully paid.

The Republic first contacted me on April 25, 2025, with a long list of questions on their investigation into Jammeh’s assets. When I enquired about a deadline, I was told that I had until Wednesday 30th April 2025 – only five days – to send in my response. Despite my busy schedule, I managed to provide The Republic with as much information as I could remember within the deadline, in line with my commitment to upholding the principles of transparency and accountability. I further pointed them to further evidence to clarify some of the wrong information they have, but they chose to ignore it, and published their story – with those inaccuracies – the following day.

I hereby reproduce below my exchanges with The Republic for the record:

* Republic:

The records we have obtained show the Ministry of Justice under you has sacked a Court–appointed Receiver— Augustus Prom, without due process. This was heavily criticised by Justice Amina Ceesay Saho who appointed Augustus Prom. Was this decision of your ministry legal?

  1. 1. Response:

The court-appointed-receiver, Augustus Prom, who was appointed under the Anti-Money laundering Act and not under the Companies Act, was never sacked or terminated. Based on their previous experience in the liquidation of the Carnegie Company, Augustus Prom was contacted by the MOJ and terms agreed after negotiations. The MOJ thereafter filed an application before the high court for a temporary freezing order and specifically requested the court to appoint Augustus Prom as interim receiver under the Act. The MOJ opted for this approach so that the businesses that were still in operation and which had many people in employment would not be shut down by a total freezing order. We wanted someone to continue with the businesses on a caretaker basis until a final decision is made on those businesses.

As you can see from the decision of the high court issued in May 2017 to freeze the assets, the freezing order was only valid for an initial period of 180 days subject to further extensions. This was why the MOJ kept going back to the court to extend this period. Without these extensions, the temporary freezing order, which included the appointment of Augustus Prom as interim Receiver, would automatically elapse after the expiry of the 180-day period. By granting the MOJ further extensions at the expiry of each 180-day period, the high court accepted that this was how the law operated.

Following the publication of the Janneh Commission Report, the MOJ did not need any further extensions of the freezing order from the high court because from that moment on, the government was to be guided by the Janneh Commission recommendations.

Regarding Augustus Prom, notwithstanding the explicit recommendation of the Janneh Commission that a new receiver be appointed to replace Augustus Prom, the MOJ refrained from immediately terminating the appointment of Augutus Prom in favour of allowing the 180-day period to continue until it elapsed. In other words, the court-appointed-receiver, Augustus Prom, was never sacked or terminated. Instead, his appointment as interim receiver was allowed to continue until its natural end together with the temporary freezing order granted by the high court. Until the specific recommendation of the Janneh Commission to replace Augustus Prom, there were no plans to do so, and Augustus Prom would have likely continued as receiver even though it would not have been pursuant to the temporary high court freezing order which had elapsed.

* Republic:

After the termination of the services of the Receiver, Justice Saho’s court stopped having vital updates on a significant number of assets it froze at the request of your ministry at the time. By terminating the receiver, would you agree that you have removed a vital aspect of transparency that accessibility to court records afford and oversight that a sitting judge who froze the assets would have provided?

  1. Response:

First, I reiterate that the receiver was not terminated. Second, the role of the high court was limited to the temporary freezing of the assets and the appointment of an interim receiver. As stated above, once the Janneh Commission concluded its proceedings and submitted its Report to the government, and by allowing the period of the temporary freezing order to elapse after 180 days, all other aspects of the order also elapsed including the mandate of the interim receiver, Augustus Prom. To have allowed the high court to continue to have any role, oversight or otherwise, in the implementation of the Janneh Commission recommendations would have been without legal basis or precedent and would, in all probability, have amounted to judicial overreach. The 1997 Constitution is clear as to where the responsibility lies for implementing recommendations of a presidential commission of inquiry and it’s certainly not in the high court (see Supreme Court decision in the Kharafi case).

* Republic:

Justice Saho challenged the legality of the early sales or use of assets of ex-president Yahya Jammeh that were done while the inquiry was ongoing. What do you say to this, as the attorney general at the time, considering a number of sales were done by state institutions such as the Janneh Commission, Sheriff Division and Ministry of Finance?

  1. Response:

It would be helpful to know how Justice Saho challenged the legality of the early sales or use of Jammeh’s assets. In any case, relevant sections of the 1997 Constitution and the legal notice establishing the Janneh Commission gave the Commission powers to make interim orders as it deemed fit. Therefore, the Janneh Commission’s mandate was sufficiently broad enough to allow it to take measures to prevent further loss or damage to property while the inquiry was ongoing. I cannot recall any sale of assets by the Ministry of Finance while the Janneh Commission inquiry was ongoing. However, assuming even that the Ministry of Finance was engaged in some sales like vehicles while the inquiry was ongoing, I can confirm that the MOJ had advised both the office of the President through the secretary general, and the Minister of Finance at the time, that the vehicles that were found on State property including at the State House, should be presumed to be vehicles belonging to the State until the contrary was established. It may well be that it was based on this advice that the Ministry of Finance took over legal responsibility of the luxury vehicles as the Ministry responsible for assets acquired for use by the government. Therefore, as the court freezing order only affected assets that belonged to former President Jammeh and associates etc, the vehicles that the Ministry of Finance took over belonged to the category of assets which would have fallen outside the scope of the freezing order and that the Ministry of Finance could not have acted illegally in so far as they followed established government procedure in the sale of these vehicles even if the sales occurred while the Janneh Commission inquiry was ongoing.

* Republic:

In 2018, the ministry of justice made an application before Justice Amina Ceesay Saho to release a number of lands belonging to ex-president Yahya Jammeh within the Tourism Development Area. This process followed a letter you wrote to the Commission requesting for the release of the same plots. Justice Saho refused. Your ministry, instead of appealing Justice Saho’s decision, brought the same application before a vacation judge, Justice Ebrima Jaiteh, and got him to release the TDA plots without informing him of Justice Saho’s decision. Justice Jaiteh confirmed to us this was an abuse of process. Do you agree?

  1. Response:

I disagree that submitting two separate applications before courts of similar jurisdiction could be qualified automatically as an abuse of process. To simplify a complex legal process, allow me to give an example to illustrate that this was not an uncommon approach. For instance, if we take the example of bail applications, a refusal of an application for bail by the high court allows an applicant to appeal the decision but at the same time it does not preclude the submission of a fresh bail application again before the high court even though the option of appeal against the previous refusal is still available to an applicant. However, there are conditions for this approach including the establishment of a new fact or additional information which was not provided in the first bail application.

Similarly, in the case of the applications for the release of TDA lands, and upon the refusal of the first application by Justice Saho, the MOJ submitted a second fresh application again at the high court with additional information and arguments. It was not a case of res judicata. I encourage you to compare the two applications submitted by the MOJ for the release of the TDA lands for their differences. One can only assume that Justice Jaiteh granted the State’s application based on the merits and facts presented to him. Otherwise, if Justice Jaiteh would have considered other extraneous factors in arriving at his decision on the application, that would have amounted to an abuse of discretion by the judge. In any case, a legal position adopted by a high court judge does not legally foreclose that matter.

Moreover, it is rather unfortunate that the approach taken by the MOJ is being made to look like something done in bad faith by linking the timing of the new application to the court vacation period. Justice Saho’s refusal decision was issued on the last day of the legal term on 30th July 2023 before the start of the high court vacation on 1st August 2023. The MOJ submitted a second fresh application which fell during the court vacation that started on 1st August 2023, only a day after Justice Saho’s refusal decision was issued on 30th July 2023.

In any event, this was a genuine legal process in which the State made an application before the courts, and it is for the parties in legal proceedings to determine the legal strategies that represent their best interests in the process and not any judge. The MOJ considered all options and decided to submit a fresh application having regard, among other things, to the reasoning contained in the first refusal decision.

Furthermore, the MOJ is not responsible for the assignment of cases at the high court. As far as I know, that is the responsibility of the Chief Justice and the MOJ could not have known which judge the second application was going to be assigned to. For all that the MOJ knew, the second application could have also been assigned to Justice Saho for her consideration. The MOJ therefore had no control whatsoever over which Judge gets assigned which matters.

Finally, I have always adhered strictly to judicial decisions. Even when the court of appeal issued its unprecedented decision in the kharafi case requiring, for the first time under Gambian law, an additional procedure before the government white paper could be implemented, I was the one who advised the president and government to unilaterally suspend the sale of the assets pending the outcome of an appeal to the Supreme Court even though the government could have continued with the sale of the assets because Jammeh was not a party to the kharafi proceedings neither was the sale of his assets the subject of the court of appeal decision. There was nothing in the kharafi decision that required the government to stop the sale of the assets and if I or anyone close to me had had any vested personal interests, I would not have advised for the immediate suspension of the sale of the assets. I took this position based on my strong adherence to and respect for the rule of law, and the need to safeguard the rights of Jammeh himself (yes, even Jammeh has rights) against any potential prejudice. As a matter of fact, the court of appeal decision in the Kharafi case remains an isolated case. There was no precedent for it and no other court in the country has followed it since. Ultimately, the Supreme Court of the Gambia, in July 2021, vindicated my position on the law by overturning the Kharafi court of appeal decision, and ruling that no additional procedure was required by the government to implement its white paper.

* Republic:

Our assessment of records of the Janneh Commission and the High Court has shown that, included in the list of plots Justice Jaiteh released was a 6.10-hectare land, with leased number K355/2009, stretching from Djembe Beach to Palma Junction. At this location, MOAB Capital— owned by a one-time friend of yours whom you now married, Binta Sompo Ceesay, was allocated a plot. A parliamentary inquiry later found that this plot was even allocated to Binta without due process, expressing doubt if she would have even paid the 5% levy had GT Board staff not filed a petition to parliament to investigate, among others, the allocation.  Haven’t you abused a court process to release a land that comes to benefit a close friend who, according to parliament, was allocated without due process?

  1. Response:

Let me start by making this very clear: at no time throughout my time as AG did I ever make any decision based on my personal interests or those associated with me. All the decisions that I made were based on impartial and professional reasons which could objectively be justified.

The decision to seek the release of the TDA lands was a government decision. The MOJ was instructed by Cabinet to seek the immediate release of the TDA lands for two principal reasons: first, this would allow for the urgent allocation of the lands by The Gambia Tourism Board to several investors that were flooding into the country at the time including the FTI group which had plans to build a five-star hotel, and to enable the government demarcate an ideal location for the construction of infrastructure for the impending OIC summit; second, and more generally, the government wanted to be able to deal with State lands unhindered and unrestrained. At that time, the government was mostly motivated by the potential for job creation that comes with the construction of new hotels. Groups like FTI had a history of investments in the country and the government was eager to facilitate their quick return. The FTI group, which was equally eager to return to the country, had even identified potential locations for the construction of their five-star hotel. Unfortunately, the locations they had identified fell within the frozen TDA Jammeh lands.

The government was convinced that unlike other private properties that Jammeh had acquired, the TDA lands will ultimately revert to the State either by recommendation of the Janneh Commission or by some other State action since the allocations were prima facie unlawful in the first place. So, together with the imperative to allocate land to potential investors, the government decided not to wait for the conclusion of the Janneh Commission proceedings which was taking longer than anticipated before dealing with this special category of frozen land. It became a question of when and not if the TDA lands would revert to the state. In such an inevitable situation, the government decided to act to the benefit of the country’s tourism industry. Based on these reasons, the MOJ was instructed by Cabinet to seek the immediate release of the TDA lands.

Given the above, it is out of place to contend that I abused a court process to release a land that comes to benefit a close friend. This contention is particularly absurd when one considers that the application by MOAB Capital for land allocation occurred in 2019, one year after the release of the TDA lands in 2018. Therefore, there was no abuse of court process and there were no personal motivations.

* Republic:

We have interviewed a number of GT Boards who filed a petition to parliament to investigate the land allocation to MOAB and others. And one of them who directly worked on the process told us that when they raised the irregularities associated with the allocation, the former GT Board director Abdoulie Hydara told them that the plot was allocated to the Attorney General Abubacarr Tambadou. What do you say to the allegations that the plot allocated to MOAB was yours and that the company was a front?

  1. Response:

I can confirm that the plot allocated to MOAB was not mine. If I wanted land to be allocated to me for investment purposes in the TDA, I would have done so in my personal capacity. There is no rule of law or government practice that prohibited this. On the contrary, the policy and precedent of allocating government land to public officials is well known. However, since I might have, on a few occasions, innocuously enquired about progress in the matter on her behalf, I will not rule out the possibility that this could have created the perception that I was an interested party. In any event, this matter is no longer relevant as Ms Ceesay, on my advice after we got married, had since abandoned her interest in any GTB land allocation including her rejection of land that was recently allocated to her by the GTB in the Tanji area.

* Republic:

Alpha Barry, according to the testimonies we have, is an acquaintance of yours, so was Binta Ceesay who, according to many witnesses we spoke to, served as a sales agent in the auction being conducted by Alpha Kapital. Isn’t it conflict of interest when your actions or decisions go to benefit people close to you?

  1. Response:

Ms Ceesay had no role whatsoever in the sale of the assets. It makes no sense to attribute the role of a sales agent in a closed bidding process. How does that work in practice? What would be her role in such a process? Sometimes people say things without much reflection. How can there be a sales agent in a closed bidding process? For your further information, this is how the Jammeh assets sale process unfolded at the time, and you decide how else anyone outside could have played any role in this process:

  1. The decision to forfeit and dispose of the assets was based on recommendations made by a legally constituted presidential commission of inquiry (the Janneh commission) established pursuant to the 1997 constitution in order to, inter alia, recover monies misappropriated by Jammeh and his close associates
  2. This recommendation was accepted without reservation by the government through the White Paper issued in reaction to the Janneh commission report as required by the 1997 constitution
  3. Cabinet thoroughly reviewed every sentence on every page of the draft White Paper and extensively deliberated to reach consensus on all recommendations including the forfeiture and disposal of the assets
  4. Every option for the implementation of the assets recovery process was carefully considered including through the possible use of the Assets Management and Recovery Corporation(AMRC) of the government which was ruled out because, in addition to the limitations placed on its jurisdiction in the establishment Act, the AMRC itself was also the subject of inquiry by the Janneh Commission which made specific adverse findings against certain managers of the Corporation who were complicit in Jammeh’s unlawful acquisition of AMRC properties. Therefore, there was an obvious conflict of interest. Furthermore, the Janneh Commission concluded that but for lack of adequate time, it would have inquired further into AMRC activities, and recommended that the government conduct this inquiry
  5. The President thereafter established a Ministerial Committee to supervise the process of sale of the assets on behalf of the government and to handle third party claims over properties as recommended by the Janneh commission
  6. The ministerial committee in turn established a Technical Committee, comprising the solicitor general, and permanent secretaries of the ministries of finance, lands, tourism and agriculture, to review the list of all the assets in the Janneh commission report for various potential usages and make recommendations in a report to the ministerial committee for approval and/or endorsement. A report was prepared and submitted as requested.
  7. The recommendations for sale of any asset made by the technical committee in its report was reviewed, discussed and, where appropriate, approved and/or endorsed by consensus of the ministerial committee comprising the ministers of justice, lands, tourism and agriculture.
  8. These ministries were identified based on the locations of the properties listed in the Janneh commission report and the jurisdiction over land administration in the localities such as the tourism development area, the agricultural farms etc
  9. To maintain the integrity of the process, the minister of finance at the time was excluded from the ministerial committee to avoid a conflict of interest as he was the subject of a specific adverse finding by the Janneh commission and was consequently sanctioned by the government through the White Paper as recommended by the commission.
  10. Nevertheless, the ministry of finance was a critical partner in this national assets recovery process and since the permanent secretary at the ministry of finance at the time was unaffected by the Janneh commission findings, he was included in the technical committee
  11. The sale of any assets was conducted only after these inter-ministerial consultations at both the technical and ministerial levels and only after final approval by consensus of the ministerial committee
  12. A new receiver, Alpha Kapital Advisory, was identified and appointed to replace the previous receiver, Augustus Prom, as recommended by the Janneh commission. The new receiver was thereafter instructed by the Ministerial Committee to proceed with the public auction of properties specifically identified by the Ministerial Committee.
  13. The two successive receivers were locally renowned and internationally recognized, credible, and respected professionals in their field and both were paid the standard industry practice fee of between 5-10% commission, inclusive of taxes and other costs, and based on the various activities to be undertaken. This was also based on a precedent set by the government in the liquidation of the Carnegie company. (See also the Republic article on the offer for sale of the aircrafts by US-based Viridis Aviation Partners).
  14. All the assets were initially valued by government valuers under the instructions of the Janneh commission during its proceedings and the valuation price of each property was reflected in the Janneh commission’s report which is publicly available
  15. A second valuation of the assets was conducted by an independent professional valuer under the instructions of the new receiver
  16. The sale of the assets was thereafter conducted by public auction (in the form of a closed bidding process) as recommended by the Janneh commission and accepted by the government through the White Paper
  17. The higher price of the two different valuations conducted by the Janneh commission and the receiver, respectively, was used as the baseline price for each property sold by public auction, and this basic fact can be established by a simple comparison of the valuation prices of each asset listed in the Janneh commission report and the ultimate sale price of the asset. These facts are easily verifiable.
  18. All the assets sold were advertised in local newspapers or through the website created by the receiver for this sole purpose and in order to attract the most responsive bids locally and internationally
  19. The sealed bids for the sale of the assets were all opened in the office of the solicitor general in the presence of other Ministry officials. I was never present and none of my family members or friends at the time had bought any of the assets.
  20. The receiver submitted periodic reports to the Ministerial Committee on the progress of the sales.

Regarding my relationship with Ms Ceesay, please note that as far back as 2010 (evidence available), I hired and appointed her as my agent to rent out my property situated in Bijilo while I was living and working abroad. She successfully rented out the property to the Resident Rep of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in The Gambia and continued to manage the property on my behalf at an annual fee for her services. This was the start of our professional relationship. She was also acting for other members of my family particularly my brothers and was managing some of our family properties for a fee. She therefore had a historical relationship with my family. This professional relationship continued after I became a Cabinet Minister in 2017. Even though I was now back in the country, I still engaged her services to continue to manage my property.

Sometime around mid 2019, I instructed Ms Ceesay, at a fee, to sell a family property located in Fajara Golf Course. She identified a buyer for the property and negotiated a price which was paid by the purchaser, one Abdou Sanyang (who can be reached by telephone on xxxxxxx phone number was provided to The Republic). The purchaser was represented by the late Bola Carrol. A deed of assignment was duly executed, and a copy can be provided if requested, as well as a copy of the Power of Attorney that was given to Ms Ceesay to execute the sale. By sheer coincidence, this private land sale transaction occurred around the time that the sale of Jammeh’s assets had commenced. The poor lady would have been seen around my office especially in the second half of 2019 when she was helping to facilitate the sale of a private property. As this period also coincided with the sale of the Jammeh assets, it, most likely, must have given rise to the speculations that she was somehow involved in the Jammeh assets sale process whereas this was utterly untrue. It was a mere temporal coincidence between a private land sale and the sale of the Jammeh assets, nothing more.

Regarding my relationship with Mr Alpha Barry, I note that the question you have asked is premised on the assumption that the appointment of Alpha Kapital was done in my personal capacity. That is incorrect. While the MOJ might have been the focal point ministry and had conveyed the appointment of Alpha Kapital, this was done on behalf of the Ministerial Committee which approved the appointment and not in any personal capacity.

In any event, I first met Mr Alpha Barry in my office in 2018 when he came as part of a delegation from the FTI group together with Mr Mustapha Njie of TAF Global and others. If I recall correctly, they had come to discuss about the likelihood of the release of the TDA lands and possible timelines as the FTI group had urgent plans to build a five-star hotel in an appropriate location. I believe that they were referred to me by my ministerial colleagues. Up until this point in time, I had never had any sort of relationship, personal or professional, with Mr Barry, let alone describe the relationship as an acquaintance. Before this first encounter, however, I had heard much about him when he was a senior partner at Deloitte and Touche, a renowned international chartered accountancy firm with a branch in The Gambia. It was only in the course of his work as receiver that Mr Barry and I developed a closer relationship, and this is not an isolated case. In the course of my time in office, I have cultivated many personal relationships with people that I had no previous connections to.

* Republic:

In an appearance before the lawmakers in 2020, you claimed that Alpha Kapital was recommended by the Janneh Commission. We spoke to staff and one commissioner of the Commission. They denied any knowledge of recommending Alpha Kapital to handle sales of the assets of the former president. Did you deliberately misinform the parliament to justify hiring Alpha Kapital?

  1. Response:

I have never for a single moment misinformed the National Assembly on this or any other matters and I believe that you might have misunderstood my statement at the National Assembly. I had clearly said that in accordance with the explicit and specific recommendation of the Janneh Commission, a new receiver, Alpha Kapital, was appointed to replace Augustus Prom. In other words, it was the explicit recommendation of the Janneh Commission to appoint a new receiver and replace Augustus Prom, and that Alpha Kapital was appointed by the government as a result. This was what I had conveyed to the National Assembly. For ease of reference, please find the statement I made before the Assembly in 2020: “In July 2019, based on the recommendation of the Commission, Alpha Kapital Advisory, a reputable local chartered accountancy firm, was appointed to take over from Augustus Prom, another reputable local accountancy firm”.

* Republic:

Alpha Kapital was hired to execute sales of assets and shares in businesses that were forfeited to the state. Don’t you think that a hire for such services should have been done transparently and through mechanisms laid out in the GPPA Act? Would you agree Alpha was hired to RENDER SERVICES to the government which was to reward him millions and should therefore be advertised?

  1. Response:

The appointment of a new receiver, Alpha Kapital, to replace Augustus Prom was an explicit and specific Janneh Commission recommendation directed at the government. It should be noted that in many respects, commissions of inquiry have powers equivalent to that of the high court. In this case, the Janneh Commission limited itself to the recommendation for the appointment of a new receiver by the government which had the constitutional and legal mandate to implement the said recommendation. This gave the government sufficient grounds to identify and appoint a receiver without subjecting this action to another process. Furthermore, due to the special nature of commissions of inquiry, and the implementation actions flowing therefrom, no appointments, including that of commissioners, counsel, or executive secretaries, is advertised even though it could also be argued that they “render a service” in a broad sense. This was the case for appointments to similar positions held in the Janneh Commission. Also, when Augustus Prom was identified by the MOJ to the high court for appointment in the freezing order, no advertisement was done. Similarly, when the Janneh commission appointed Augustus Prom first, and then later, Foresight Accountancy and Audit Partners as temporary receivers for the Ocean Bay and Sunbeach hotels, no advertisements were done. The point here is that given the sensitive nature of assets recovery processes in general, the exercise usually involves a high degree of confidentiality, and more importantly, demands trust in the reputation, integrity and independence of the entity undertaking the recovery process. Consequently, it is difficult to find any jurisdiction around the world where appointments in a national asset recovery process are subjected to public advertisements. Even when the government identified entities abroad to assist with the asset recovery process outside the country, this was not subjected to a public advertisement.

* Republic:

In the sale of the assets of the former president, we noticed that there were a number of assets and shares, amounting to hundreds of millions, that were transactions conducted between the receiver (Alpha Kapital) and the government institutions like Gambia Ports Authority, Social Security, Central Bank, among others. In the light of the fact that these assets and shares could simply be transferred, were these transactions not just meant to generate the receiver money?

  1. Response:

As you know, the government and SOEs are separate legal entities. They are not legally the same entity. Therefore, their respective assets cannot be simply transferred from one to another without a legal process, reason why government sometimes borrows money from SOEs like SSHFC or gives loans to others like NAWEC instead of simply transferring monies. Consequently, the act of simply transferring forfeited assets belonging to the state to these SOEs at zero cost would have been unlawful and would have meant the loss of income for the government. The sale of the assets to the SOE’s was therefore lawful and it was the duty of the receiver to conduct these sales in accordance with their mandate.

*Republic:

In our assessment of the report on the sale of Jammeh’s assets, we realised a property belonging to Bubacarr Sompo Ceesay was sold back to the family for only D150, 000 more than the price Jammeh bought it for 15 years ago. Sales report released by your ministry has shown this property was valued. Wasn’t this property given to the Sompo at a giveaway price, considering Jammeh (through Kanilai Family Farms) bought this through a legitimate transaction of a Judicial sale by the Sheriff of the High Court?

  1. Response:

Here are the facts on this issue:

The Ministerial Committee (see Response 7(5) above) was also mandated by the President to handle pending 3rd party claims to some of the forfeited properties as recommended by the Janneh Commission. Based on this, the Committee divided the 3rd party claims in three broad categories:

  1. Claims which are currently the subject of ongoing litigation at the courts.

 

  1. Claims made by persons whose properties were the subject of a judicial sale by the Sheriff.

 

  • Claims by others who had, on the face of the record, voluntarily sold their properties to former President Jammeh.

 

  • Claims which are currently the subject of ongoing litigation at the courts

This category affected about 18 properties. The category stemmed from claims that President Jammeh forcefully acquired the said properties from their owners. They include 15 properties that originally belonged to Baba K. Jobe and one claimed by Banta Kaira. The Ministerial Committee decided to allow the legal process to continue to its logical end without interference.

 

  • Claims made by persons whose properties were the subject of a judicial sale by the Sheriff

This category affected 4 properties. The category stemmed from complaints by 3 claimants that President Jammeh, with the complicity of the Sheriff’s Division of the High Court at the time, deliberately undervalued their properties with the specific objective of enabling President Jammeh to acquire same below the fair market value at the time. They included the Futurelec building, one property that belonged to Modou Peulh, and two properties that belonged to Baboucar Sompo Ceesay. The Ministerial Committee decided that in order to resolve these third party claims on a win-win basis for all, the claimants should be given the right of first refusal to purchase back the said properties at the same price that was paid by President Jammeh, plus the cost of improvements to the properties, if any, which is to be determined by an independent valuer, and the valuation fees, all of which shall be added to the purchase price of the properties. This decision ensured that this category of properties would have effectively been sold for twice the price that President Jammeh had paid for them, half the price having already been paid by President Jammeh and the other half to be paid by the claimants. Accordingly, Futurelec, Modou Peulh, and Baboucar Sompo Ceesay were offered the opportunity to re-purchase their properties and were given 30 days from the date of notification to do so in one full payment, and that the properties shall only be transferred to their proper names failing which the opportunity will be withdrawn from them. To the best of my knowledge, only one of the two properties was re-purchased by the Sompo Ceesay family on these conditions.

 

  • Claims by others who had, on the face of the record, voluntarily sold their properties to former President Jammeh

This category stemmed from claims by those who, on the face of the record, voluntarily sold their properties to President Jammeh but who were now claiming that the circumstances under which they were made to sell their properties, notwithstanding the appearance of free will, were coercive or made under duress or with threats. The Ministerial Committee was yet to decide on this category of claimants, but it seemed in all likelihood at the time that the claims under this category would be decided on a case-by-case basis depending on the individual circumstances of each case.

  • The Ministerial Committee was also aware that at least in one case, the Janneh Commission had recommended that the claimant, Ms Ida Faal, wife of the late Jobe Dollar, be given an opportunity to purchase back the family property on Kairava Avenue within one year because of the special circumstances of her case. This recommendation was accepted by the Government in its White Paper. The Ministerial Committee had endorsed this approach and Ms Faal was deemed to have been given a period of one year from the date of publication of the Government White Paper to complete payment for the said property failing which the Government reserved the right to take action on it.

* Republic:

A letter we saw suggests this transaction was paid for by Binta, though the property is now in the names of the three children she had with Mr Sompo. Isn’t it the case that she is also an indirect beneficiary of this ‘fire sale’?

  1. Response:

There was no “fire sale”. I refer you to my response above. If a decision was made at the time by the family to put the names of their children on the property, then that is a private matter that I cannot comment on.

Ba

NAWEC, Karpowership End Seven-Year Electricity Deal

By: The Fatu Network Editorial

NAWEC and Karpowership have officially ended their electricity supply agreement, bringing a seven-year partnership to a close.

In a statement released on May 2, NAWEC said, “The National Water and Electricity Company (NAWEC) formally announces the conclusion of its contractual agreement with Karpowership, effective today 2nd May, 2025.”

Karpowership confirmed the contract was not renewed, stating, “As of May 2, 2025, our electricity supply agreement with NAWEC has come to an end, following NAWEC’s decision not to renew the contract.”

NAWEC acknowledged Karpowership’s role since 2018, when it began supplying a large portion of the country’s power needs through its floating power plant. “We sincerely appreciate the dedication, professionalism, and collaboration that Karpowership has demonstrated throughout the years,” NAWEC said.

Karpowership highlighted the scale of its contribution, saying, “At the height of our operations, we supplied up to 40% of the country’s total electricity demand.”

Both parties pointed to a shift in The Gambia’s energy strategy. “As part of The Gambia Energy Road Map 2022–2040, NAWEC is transitioning towards greater energy independence, including the reactivation of its own generators and the continued expansion of sustainable domestic energy sources,” NAWEC explained.

Karpowership also mentioned its wider impact. “We implemented numerous community development initiatives—from in-kind donations to infrastructure enhancements and programs supporting children’s welfare.”

NAWEC assured the public that “measures are in place to minimize disruptions and maintain stable electricity supply during this transition.”

Karpowership said it will conclude its operations in the country by the end of the month, “in full compliance with local regulations,” and added, “It has been an honor to serve the people of The Gambia.”

The company also stated, “We remain open to future collaborations that support the country’s energy ambitions and broader development goals.”

“KMC is One of the Dirtiest Municipalities in Africa” – Information Minister Fires Back at Mayor Bensouda

Written By: Seringe ST Touray

In a rebuttal to claims made by Kanifing Municipal Council (KMC) Mayor Talib Ahmed Bensouda, Information Minister Dr. Ismaila Ceesay launched a scathing critique of the opposition mayor’s leadership and political ambitions during a recent appearance on Peter Gomez’s “Coffee Time” radio program.

Dr. Ceesay did not mince words when addressing what he described as the deplorable sanitation conditions in KMC, declaring it “one of the dirtiest municipalities on the African continent.” When challenged by the host about this characterization, the minister stood firm, saying, “The ones I’ve visited, I found KM to be the dirtiest. And that is a fact.”

The Information Minister cited specific examples, urging listeners to “walk across the street from Senegambia towards Turntable” and visit areas like “Bundung” and “Ebo Town” to witness the conditions firsthand. He further claimed to receive regular complaints about the state of local markets, particularly mentioning “the Tallinding market, Latrikunda market,” where he alleged that “toilets are not even fit for human usage.”

According to Dr. Ceesay, these issues stem from Mayor Bensouda “focusing too much on politics” while ignoring the services he was elected to provide. He accused the mayor of “going around making false statements and misleading the public, which we [the ruling government] think is not good politics.”

When the host suggested that Bensouda had improved waste management compared to his predecessors, Dr. Ceesay firmly disagreed, alleging instead that only a few people, including “some of his [Talib’s] friends and family, are benefiting from the Mbalit project, but not the general populace.” The Mbalit project is a waste management initiative launched by KMC.

The minister also refuted Bensouda’s claims about farmer support, stating that the current government has invested “close to a billion dollars to help farmers.” He detailed specific subsidies, including buying groundnuts at “$38,000 per ton” despite having to resell at “$20,000 per ton,” representing an “$18,000 per ton” subsidy. He also mentioned reducing fertilizer prices from “$2,600” to “$1,150” per bag. “Let farmers speak for themselves. He’s not the advocate for farmers,” Dr. Ceesay stated.

Perhaps most controversially, Dr. Ceesay characterized Bensouda’s suggestion that the president’s re-election would lead to an authoritarian regime as “very disingenuous, dishonest, and tasteless.” He then made the explosive claim that under Bensouda’s United Democratic Party, “the game has been turned into a dynasty” and that it has become “a family business.”

When pressed by the host to substantiate these allegations about a dynasty, Dr. Ceesay refused to provide specific names but maintained that “someone like that, if given a country, will turn this country into a dynasty. It’s going to be a family affair.” He added, “And Gambians are not sleeping.”

The Information Minister concluded by accusing Bensouda of providing “false information” regarding OIC vehicles used by ministers, claiming that the mayor “lied about the cost” and “lied in the comparison with the project vehicles,” asserting that “the specs are not the same” and “the manner in which they were procured is not the same.”

This heated exchange highlights the growing political tensions between the central government and the opposition-led Kanifing Municipality as The Gambia continues its democratic journey. With Mayor Bensouda having previously hinted at ambitions for higher office, and the central government viewing him as a potential political threat, these confrontations may well intensify as the country moves forward.

From Banjul to Berlin: Nyima Jadama Uses Media to Empower Women and Migrants

By: Michaella Faith Wright

Berlin-based TV presenter and media trainer Nyima Jadama is using her voice and platforms to amplify marginalized communities—from her native Gambia to Germany—through compelling storytelling, advocacy, and empowerment.

A Gambian-born journalist, speaker, and trainer, Jadama has become a prominent figure in Berlin’s media scene while staying rooted in her mission to drive social change. Speaking to The Fatu Network, she reflected on how her journey into media was fueled by a deep passion for storytelling and a commitment to giving voice to the voiceless.

“I’ve always believed that our stories matter—that representation is power,” she said. “Media is more than just information; it’s a tool for empowerment and transformation, especially for women, migrants, and young people.”

Jadama began her career as a journalist in The Gambia, where her work focused on truth-telling and women’s empowerment. Now based in Germany, she hosts Nyima’s Bantaba and the Unfiltered Podcast on ALEX Berlin (TV & Radio), where she leads open conversations on migration, integration, gender, and politics.

She is also the founder of the Bantaba Academy for Migrants and Refugees, a media literacy initiative helping newcomers in Berlin gain the skills and confidence to tell their own stories. “I launched the academy because I saw a gap—many migrants wanted to share their realities but lacked the tools to do so effectively,” Jadama explained.

Back home, Jadama leads the #YoMIL Project in The Gambia, training young women in media to challenge gender inequality. She also plays a key role in the Migrant Media Network Gambia, where she has led national campaigns on migration awareness and digital advocacy.

Jadama holds diplomas in Law and Cross Media Communication and is currently pursuing a degree in Media and Communication Management at Macromedia University in Berlin. “Everything I do is driven by purpose,” she said. “If I can use my voice to break barriers, so can you.”

Bridging Generations & Breaking Myths: NYC Dialogue Exposes the Harsh Truth Behind the European Dream

By Alieu Jallow

In a bid to address the growing concern of irregular migration among Gambian youth, the National Youth Council (NYC) convened an intergenerational dialogue on Tuesday, April 29, 2025, that brought together youth leaders, community elders, security personnel, and other key stakeholders.

The forum, held in Gunjur, Kombo South, aimed to foster mutual understanding and collaboration across age groups regarding the root causes and consequences of irregular migration.

The dialogue sought to bridge the generational divide by creating a platform where young people could openly engage with older generations, share experiences, and collectively explore local opportunities to tackle unemployment and other drivers of migration.

Speaking at the event, Omar Bah, Peace, Security, and Justice Officer at the NYC, emphasized the objective of the dialogue as a sensitization effort to better inform youth, stakeholders, and security agencies about the realities of irregular migration and the opportunities that exist within the country.

“The dialogue is very important as it helped to close that gap between the older generation and the youth for people to understand, like this is a concerted effort. Everyone has to put their hands on deck because when it comes to migration, no one in this country can at least tell us that he or she is not affected directly,” he said.

Bah also discussed how similar dialogues held across various regions have helped rebuild trust between the government, communities, and young people, many of whom have grown disillusioned by government efforts due to widespread misconceptions about deportation.

“In all the communities we went to young people, and even the stakeholders have trusted us in any information that we are giving them, because we went with people that have high experience, high knowledge in the subject matter, like we are with an expert from the Gambia Immigration Department under the immigration unit, and also our executive director, who is also discussing some of the opportunities available and we also have other resource persons who are discussing some of the issues that are affecting young people,” he outlined.

The discussions also explored the socio-economic and security impacts of irregular migration. Inspector Lamin Jammeh, a security expert from the Gambia Immigration Department’s Migration Unit, took participants through how trafficking networks prey on desperate youth and highlighted the emotional and financial toll irregular migration imposes on families.

Participants expressed how the insights gained would reshape their perceptions of irregular migration.

Yaya Sowe, District Youth Chairperson of Kombo South, noted the timeliness of the intervention, especially considering Gunjur’s geographical location and the recent migration-related tragedies that have impacted the community. Sowe pledged to use his platforms, both online and through his radio program, to further spread the message.

“As a youth leader and also part of many youth organisations in Kombo South and currently having a radio program at Gunjur Janneh Koto FM, I will use those platforms from Gunjur radio and the youth organisation I’m working with to sensitise people,” he stated.

Amienata Njie, a female representative from Kombo North, clarified that she is not against migration but encouraged young people to take the legal and safer route. She plans to organise a community “bantaba” in her district to extend the conversation locally.

“I will be organising a community Bantaba because I am not a social media type to discuss irregular migration,” she said.

As one of the key outcomes, the NYC pledged to sustain these dialogues nationwide and champion youth-centred, community-driven development models to reduce the allure of risky migration routes.

This intergenerational dialogue represents a significant step forward in addressing The Gambia’s migration crisis through inclusive, locally driven solutions that resonate with both young and old alike.

Kurang Slams PDOIS for Lack of Internal Democracy

By Dawda Baldeh

Alhagie Mamadi Kurang, leader of the opposition movement Youth for Change, has criticised the PDOIS leadership style, accusing the party of lacking internal democracy.

A seasoned teacher and accountant who turned politician, Kurang made these remarks on the show ‘Sunu Reew’ on Eye Africa TV.

He claimed that the party is run by one-man decisions, asserting that others are not allowed to make decisions.

“If you ask me, I will tell you PDOIS is about Halifa. There is no internal democracy in PDOIS because Halifa makes all the decisions,” he said.

Accordingly, Mr. Kurang noted from 2021 to last December that there was no activity because Halifa was in complete hibernation.

“I attended a few press conferences and stopped attending because I didn’t know the arguments. You only sit there for two hours without having a say,” he added.

He acknowledged PDOIS’s contribution to strengthening democracy in the country but slammed the party for not allowing others to make decisions or scrutinise the leadership.

On a possible move for Sallah to contest the 2026 presidential election, Mr. acknowledged that Halifa has every constitutional right to contest, but noted that he should hand over the baton.

Narrating an allegation of internal conflict, Halifa asked if Kurang had ever approached him since joining PDOIS to seek clarity on issues within the party.

“Did you ever come to me to ask about issues within PDOIS?” he asked.

In response, Kurang confirmed he only spoke to Sallah at the party bureau and twice on the phone.

Honourable Sallah also talked about the PDOIS constitution, which he said is accessible to everyone within the party.

Sallah narrated that he was not aware of anyone fearing to speak about the party.

Noting that such allegations are new to him. He added: “Everyone in PDOIS is equal.”

Responding to questions on allegations that only Halifa and Sedia speak on behalf of the party, Sallah responded, “the central committee has no power to choose a presidential candidate, National Assembly, councillor or any other position.”

Halifa noted that his party is committed to preparing young people to take leadership positions, indicating that in the past parliamentary and councillor elections, all their candidates were below 35 years, but Mr. Kurang challenged this statement.

“I’m a National Assembly contestant for the party, and since the election, no one has sent me a message. I met a contestant in Nuimi who told me that he left PDOIS because after losing the election, no one even bothered to text him,” Kurang said.

The leadership of the party refuses to organise any activity, and for those of us on the ground, any activity we organise they will say is not the story of PDOIS.

“PDOIS will say they have women and youth representatives, but where are those activities since 2021? In the West Coast, the coordinator resigned, and for two years, there was a push and pull to replace him. But this was a problem, and it ended with a meeting at the Bureau,” he added.

For Mr. Kurang, Halifa is the leader and the spokesperson who has the final say in everything within the party.

Kurang revealed that he once went to the PDOIS bureau for a meeting, and he was embarrassed by the PDOIS secretary, who stopped him at the gate.

“The systemic humiliation of people who disagreed with the PDOIS leadership is evident. Honourable Sallah make laws and changes laws at his will,” Kurang responded.

According to him, PDOIS has good policies, but the administration is very weak and run by one man.

“Since I joined PDOIS in 2021, every year we talked about the resolution of the member register for a petty is that 40 years old,” he revealed

Kurang stated that he listened to Halifa talking about the weakness of the agricultural sector.

“PDOIS is operating like the agricultural sector in the country.

The secretary-general has an invisible hand that makes all decisions,” he explained.

Kurang told the panel that after the 2021 parliamentary election, most of the PDOIS contestants were frustrated with the way they were treated.

In response, Halifa denied the allegations and challenged Mr. Kurang or any other PDOIS member to show evidence.

“Touch Traoré, and You Touch Africa”: GAP Leader Demands Protection for Burkina Faso’s President

By Dawda Baldeh

As Western powers ramp up criticism of Burkina Faso’s military leader, Captain Ibrahim Traoré—accusing him of exploiting the country’s gold reserves at the expense of its citizens—an Africa-wide movement is emerging in defense of the embattled leader.

Captain Traoré, who rose to power in 2022 through a military coup, is being hailed by supporters as a transformative figure despite surviving multiple assassination attempts. Now, amid growing tensions, the Gambia Action Party (GAP) has joined those calling for his protection.

Musa Ousainou Yali Batchilly, GAP’s leader, urged African leaders and citizens alike to rally around Traoré in the face of what he described as increasing Western hostility.

“To all the lovers of Africa, and every genuine son and daughter of the soil, this is your call to rise,” Batchilly declared. “Captain Ibrahim Traoré, the youngest president in the world and a true revolutionary in the spirit of Thomas Sankara, is under attack.”

Batchilly argued that Traoré is being targeted by Western powers for championing a vision of Africa free from neocolonial control.

“His only crime,” he said, “is rejecting the chains of Western domination and demanding dignity for his people. For that, he is now in the crosshairs of those same foreign powers that have long orchestrated coups, assassinations, and destabilization across our continent.”

The GAP leader’s remarks come as some Gambians prepare to protest perceived foreign interference in Burkina Faso’s affairs. Batchilly criticized France and the United States for supporting regimes he claims are aligned with foreign interests, while leaders like Traoré face pressure for asserting independence.

“France and America continue to prop up puppet leaders who kneel to foreign interests while their people suffer in poverty and despair. But Traoré is not one of them. He speaks truth to power and dares to chart a new course. That is what makes him a threat to the enemies of African progress.”

He warned that Africans will not idly watch another leader be toppled for defying imperialist agendas.

“We will not stand by as another visionary is silenced or overthrown to appease foreign powers. The time has come for patriots, Pan-Africanists, and freedom fighters to stand united.”

According to Batchilly, defending leaders like Traoré is essential to protecting Africa’s sovereignty. He called on citizens across the continent to show solidarity through peaceful mobilization.

“From Dakar to Dar es Salaam, from Lagos to Lusaka—rise for Traoré. This is not just about Burkina Faso. This is about the future of Africa.”

He also called on institutions including the African Union, ECOWAS, civil society, students, and activists to rally behind Traoré.

“Organize peaceful protests, raise your voices online, and send a clear message: Touch Traoré, and you touch Africa. Harm him, and you awaken the wrath of a billion hearts.”

Batchilly concluded by invoking the legacy of African icons like Thomas Sankara, Patrice Lumumba, and Kwame Nkrumah, saying Traoré stands in their revolutionary tradition.

“Captain Traoré is not alone,” he said. “He is carried by the spirits of those who dreamed of an Africa that governs itself—with pride, purpose, and power.”

Senegal Announces Significant Wage Increases for Domestic Workers and Household Staff

By: The Fatu Network Editorial

The Senegalese Ministry of Labor, Employment, and Relations with Institutions has announced a significant increase in the minimum wages for domestic workers and household staff, effective immediately.

Signed on April 25, 2025, by Minister Abass Fall, the new wages replace those set in 2009. The adjustments vary by professional category, with the first category seeing an increase from 42,714 CFA to 64,223 CFA per month, and the seventh category rising from 53,318 CFA to 76,996 CFA.

This move is in line with several regulations, including Decree No. 2023-1710 on the guaranteed interprofessional minimum wage (SMIG) and the guaranteed agricultural minimum wage (SMAG), as well as other laws aimed at strengthening social protection for workers.

The decree revokes the previous minimums set in December 2009, and the implementation of this new policy will be overseen by the Director-General of Labor and Social Security, with the official publication in the “Journal Officiel.” This wage increase is part of the government’s ongoing efforts to improve the working and living conditions of domestic workers in Senegal.

“Our Goal Is to Sit with Barrow and Diomaye” — Yankuba Darboe on Kombo-Foni Mayors’ Push for Cross-Border Dialogue

Written by: Alieu Jallow

Brikama Area Council Chairman Yankuba Darboe has announced plans to initiate high-level discussions with President Adama Barrow and Senegalese President Bassirou Diomaye Faye to address critical challenges facing the Kombo/Foni Mayors’ Association—an initiative established to promote grassroots diplomacy and cross-border collaboration between The Gambia and Senegal.

The association, which was created to foster peacebuilding, cooperation, and dialogue on development issues in border communities, convened its fourth meeting in Bwiam. Speaking at the event, Chairman Darboe told The Fatu Network that engaging the two heads of state is key to ensuring the association achieves its objectives.

“Our main goal is to sit down with President Barrow and also meet President Diomaye Faye. The challenges we face are not mine alone, but shared by the mayors of Foni and Kombo. We want both leaders to understand our issues and help us find solutions,” he said.

Darboe acknowledged that the association is still in its early stages and has yet to implement significant initiatives. However, he outlined some of their plans, including the organisation of cross-border trade fairs and environmental efforts such as tree planting.

“We plan to host border trade fairs, such as ‘Lumos’, between the two countries. On the environmental side, we’ve already taken steps in tree planting. Our first initiative started in Jululung, and we followed up in The Gambia, where we were able to acquire a large number of seedlings—something that would have otherwise been costly for the council,” he explained.

The chairman emphasized the need for political will from both governments to address ongoing cross-border challenges and to create an enabling environment for trade and cooperation.

“We have sister organisations, like the Senegalo-Gambian Association, and we’re also looking to collaborate with the Gambia and Senegalese Chambers of Commerce. Through joint efforts, we hope to engage the relevant authorities to ease trade between our communities. This type of trade directly benefits local governments, as taxes and dues are paid on both sides of the border,” he added.

Alfusainey Jammeh, Mayor of Jinnack in Senegal’s Département de Bignona, expressed optimism that such diplomatic efforts could revive the association’s relevance and pave the way for stronger sub-regional cooperation.

He also called for unity and reconciliation, especially in light of the historical tensions linked to the Casamance conflict.

“Let us work together in solidarity and harmony. Let us build a legacy that our children and future generations will benefit from,” he urged.

As the Kombo/Foni Mayors’ Association positions itself as a key platform for cross-border engagement, the commitment from local leaders such as Chairman Darboe and Mayor Jammeh reflects a growing momentum toward peace, development, and regional integration. With planned engagements at the presidential level, stakeholders are hopeful that this dialogue will mark a turning point in addressing community needs and strengthening bilateral ties.

“Unless they want to come and shoot the tires of the bulldozers, we are going to continue working”

Written by: Seringe S.T. Touray

In the municipality of Kanifing, our most densely populated urban area, Mayor Talib Ahmed Bensouda faces a political battle that reveals the complex power dynamics in post-Jammeh Gambia. A recent interview on Peter Gomez’s “Coffee Time” radio program provides insight into the challenges of local governance that Bensouda alleges occur when central authorities view municipal success as potentially threatening.

Elected as an opposition candidate, Bensouda has spent his tenure navigating what he describes as systematic attempts by the central government to undermine his administration’s effectiveness. Despite these challenges, he claims significant achievements in waste management, institutional reform, and infrastructure development.

“We’ve achieved a lot. I think where we found KMC and where it is now is a huge difference,” Bensouda stated during the interview. “Number one I always say is the institutional reform. KMC was a well-known political place, political bureau for the then APRC. It was used to propel their politics.”

According to Bensouda, the transformation from a partisan political bureau to a service-oriented institution has not been without resistance. During the interview, he described what he characterizes as a pattern of interference from central government officials who he claims view his success as politically threatening.

Perhaps the most revealing segment of the interview concerns KMC’s ambitious road network project, which Bensouda describes as “by far the most ambitious municipal project in the history of this country.” The project aims to build 15 kilometers of feeder roads and 6 kilometers of drains, entirely funded by local taxpayers’ money without international grants or loans.

Bensouda claims what should have been celebrated as local government initiative instead became a battleground with central authorities. He explains how initial cooperation from the National Roads Authority (NRA) allegedly dissolved after the project gained public attention:

“The design of the roads was done by the NRA. We don’t have the ability to design roads in-house,” Bensouda explained. “From the design stage, the council approved the roads. We moved to the procurement stage. The procurement stage was the same team involved. Actually, the current contractor was recommended by NRA.”

The relationship allegedly soured after the project’s public launch. “Once we launched it and then it became news and it became of course all the fanfare, etc., that’s when we started getting signals that something is brewing,” Bensouda recounted.

According to the mayor, officials suddenly invalidated previously signed agreements and imposed new requirements that he considers financially impossible:

“They called our team and said, look, we have to review the MOU. We actually don’t approve the road designs,” Bensouda stated. “They said, well, first of all, the roads need to be widened because people need to be able to park on the roads. Secondly, there should be allocation of budget for the movement of services… Thirdly, the roads need lights. Fourthly, if I remember correctly, the roads should involve the demolition of homes.”

Bensouda views these demands as “an administrative tactic to block the project,” noting that “with all these things, the project will run into the billions.”

Despite what he characterizes as obstruction, Bensouda remains defiant: “Unless they want to come and shoot the tires of the bulldozers, we are going to continue working.”

The interview reveals another challenge Bensouda identifies: control over key personnel. In our country, local councils cannot hire or fire their own staff, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), who is appointed by the central government.

“These are issues that impede on our ability to deliver services,” Bensouda explained. “We cannot hire our own people. We cannot fire our own people.” He compared this to running a media organization: “Imagine West Coast Radio, you couldn’t hire your team or fire your team. It would be dysfunctional.”

This arrangement, according to Bensouda, led to years of conflict when the central government appointed a CEO who allegedly bypassed council authority. The subsequent legal battles, he claims, severely impacted municipal operations:

“We experienced a slowdown in all productivity at every level of the council. We experienced confusion. Every staff that had a grievance used that opportunity to see how they could partner with the ministry and fight council and cripple council,” Bensouda stated.

Perhaps most candidly, Bensouda asserts that the government’s actions against him are politically motivated. When discussing a commission of inquiry established to investigate his administration, he stated:

“It can inflict reputational damage… there would be an attempt to block my future political career, because a lot of them perceive me as a future political threat for higher office.”

When asked if he considers himself such a threat, Bensouda responded simply: “I consider myself one.”

The interview presents a picture of a young, ambitious mayor who claims to be determined to deliver services despite significant obstacles. It also raises questions about local governance systems and the relationship between municipal and central government authorities.

Bensouda argues for greater autonomy for local governments, pointing out that there are already oversight mechanisms in place:

“The FPAC committee, Finance Public Accounts Committee, oversees all council’s accounts. The National Audit Office audits us annually. The ministry should create regulations and have oversight function and be sending quarterly inspectors to ensure the council is complying with the regulations and the laws of The Gambia.”

Despite facing what he describes as “all these assaults,” Bensouda claims that his administration has maintained services throughout: “We were never late on salaries during these three years. We were able to maintain the delivery of services.”

He points to his electoral success as vindication: “I won by doubling my votes in 2018. I captured more council seats than in 2018. I had reduced the opposition in my council from seven to four.”

As our country continues its democratic journey, the relationship between central and local government illustrated in this interview highlights the ongoing development of our governance structures and the challenges that arise in balancing local autonomy with national oversight.

For Mayor Bensouda, the path forward appears clear despite the alleged obstacles: “I always say it’s a public office, it’s not my home. There’s nothing personal about it. It’s a fight, it’s a game, I guess, to them, but it’s a dangerous game. They’re playing with people’s lives.”

“He Nearly Killed Me”: Fatoumata Speaks Out After Alleged Hammer Attack by Husband

By Dawda Baldeh

Fatoumata Keita, a resident of Mamuda village (WCR), is recovering in hospital after surviving a brutal assault allegedly carried out by her husband, Abdoulie Bojang. The attack, which left her hospitalized at Ndemban Clinic since Friday, followed a series of ongoing marital issues, she told The Fatu Network in an exclusive interview.

According to Fatoumata, the incident was preceded by a strange encounter with police in Sanyang. On Thursday, she said, officers unexpectedly contacted her to inform her that Abdoulie had filed a report against her – though they refused to disclose the content of the complaint. When she arrived at the station, she found her husband absent.

“The police asked me to wait while they tried to reach him,” she recalled. “They called him several times, but he eventually switched off his phone.”

Later that day, Fatoumata said Abdoulie contacted her and instructed her to leave for her parents’ home until further notice, hinting at a possible separation. “I asked him why, and he assured me he hadn’t divorced me – just that I should wait for him,” she said.

She noted that while he was away for prayers at the mosque, she locked herself in her room. Upon his return, Abdoulie banged on the door, demanding she open it.

“When I finally opened it, he told me to move my child, who I was breastfeeding. He grabbed my neck and pulled out a hammer from behind. He struck me several times – I covered my head while screaming for help,” she recounted. Fatoumata said she eventually managed to escape and run outside for safety.

The Fatu Network has obtained disturbing images of her injuries, as well as x-ray scans that reveal the extent of the assault. Speaking from her hospital bed, Fatoumata described the ordeal as “horrific,” adding that the attack happened while she was breastfeeding her two-month-old baby, with her one-year-six-month-old also on the bed.

“Since the incident, I haven’t heard anything from the police, and Abdoulie is still walking around freely,” she said. “He nearly killed me.” Attempts by The Fatu Network to reach the police for comment have so far been unsuccessful.

“That’s the Power of the System We’ve Built”: DSS Tracker Recovers Stolen D2.5M Truck

A Tippa truck valued at 2.5 million dalasis, recently stolen near the Sukuta Traffic Lights, was located and recovered within an hour, thanks to a tracking device installed by Damia Security Solutions (DSS). The vehicle was traced within seconds and found in Sinchu Wuri, about one kilometer from the Senegalese border. The swift recovery also led to the arrest of the suspects involved in the theft, with the vehicle owner assisting the police with the ongoing investigation.

Commenting on the recovery, DSS founder Adama Damia Drammeh told The Fatu Network, “When we say real-time tracking, we mean it. Within minutes, we helped recover a 2.5 million dalasi asset. That’s the power of the system we’ve built.”

Damia Security Solutions (DSS), the first and only Gambian-owned vehicle tracking company, tracks and protects over 200 vehicles across the country. Their services include real-time tracking, geo-fencing, and remote engine cut-off, offering businesses and individuals greater security and operational control. DSS’s tracking solutions are used by a variety of clients, including Africell and The Fatu Network, which partnered with the company in 2024.

Operating from 103 Kombo Sillah Drive, Churchill’s Town, DSS continues to grow its footprint in The Gambia’s security sector, providing tailored tracking systems to help safeguard valuable assets.

Unity Crucial for Opposition in December 2026 Presidential Election; Urgent Call for Transparent Appointment of New IEC Chief by President Barrow

OPINION

By Bakary J. Janneh

The political atmosphere is taking shape as The Gambia prepares for the crucial December 2026 presidential election.

Yet, one reality is becoming increasingly clear: unless opposition parties rally together and form a united front, President Adama Barrow and his National People’s Party (NPP) led coalition are poised to retain power with relative ease.

Since assuming office, President Barrow has demonstrated political resilience, navigating through challenges while strengthening his coalition. The NPP, alongside its partners, enjoys the advantage of incumbency, access to state machinery, and a relatively stable support base. Without significant counterbalancing from the opposition, the scales are tipped heavily in favour of the current administration.

Opposition fragmentation has historically undermined efforts to mount a serious challenge in Gambian elections. Different ideological positions, leadership rivalries, and a lack of a coherent strategy have often allowed ruling parties to triumph with divided votes since independence. If these parties, including the UDP, PDOIS, GDC, and others, fail to forge a strategic alliance or common platform, they risk repeating the same mistakes, much to the dismay of their supporters.

Moreover, institutional readiness is equally vital. A key step toward ensuring a credible election is the appointment of a new chairman for the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC). Since the retirement of the former commission chairman, there is a growing concern among stakeholders that delays in naming a successor could compromise preparations for the 2026 polls.

There is an urgent need for President Barrow to act swiftly and transparently in appointing a qualified, impartial chairman before mid-2025. The credibility of the election process hinges on the perception of independence and professionalism at the IEC. Any suspicion of manipulation or political favouritism could erode public trust and destabilise the post-election atmosphere.

The next few months will be critical. For the opposition, the path to victory lies in coalition building, strategic candidate selection, and issue-based campaigning.
For the President, ensuring a fair and credible electoral process will be a legacy-defining moment. Gambians deserve a free, fair, and competitive election, one that strengthens the country’s growing democratic culture.

The clock is ticking, and the choices made now will determine the outcome in December 2026 and the political future of The Gambia.

“Another Important Milestone”: Gambia Signs Four Agreements with Chinese Province

By: The Fatu Network Editorial

The Government of The Gambia has signed four Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) with representatives from the Province of Heilongjiang, a northeastern region of the People’s Republic of China known for its agricultural and industrial development. The agreements, signed at the State House in Banjul and witnessed by President Adama Barrow, are aimed at strengthening bilateral ties and promoting socio-economic development.

According to a government statement, the signing ceremony “marks another important milestone in efforts to strengthen bilateral ties and contribute meaningfully to the socio-economic advancement” of both The Gambia and Heilongjiang Province.

The four MOUs signed are:

  1. Water and Sports Facilities Development
    An agreement to build water and sports facilities was signed by the Minister and Chief of Staff at the President’s Office. The government noted that the initiative is “part of efforts to revitalise the sports sector and ensure greater access to clean water.”

  2. Free Cataract Surgery Programme
    The Minister for Health, Dr. Ahmadou Lamin Samateh, signed an agreement to provide free cataract surgeries. The statement said, “This agreement will allow patients to undergo eye operations at no cost,” supporting the government’s objective of expanding access to healthcare services.

  3. Talent Exchange and Training
    An MOU to establish a framework for skill development and knowledge-sharing was signed by the Secretary to Cabinet and Head of the Civil Service. The programme is “designed to empower the workforce through talent exchanges and capacity-building initiatives,” the government explained.

  4. Provision of Non-Genetically Modified Rice Seeds
    A fourth agreement focuses on the provision of non-genetically modified rice seeds to help improve agricultural output. According to the government, “this supports the ambition to transform the agricultural sector into a vibrant and high-yielding engine of growth.”

In a separate signing, Longjian Company of China signed four contracts with Gambian institutions covering infrastructure and agriculture projects. These included agreements with the National Road Authority for the construction of the BB Bridge at Kotu and for road maintenance, an agreement with the ROOTs Programme to enhance seed production, and another with the Gambia Investment and Export Promotion Agency (GIEPA) on land rehabilitation to support rice cultivation.

“The Government of The Gambia welcomes these investments, which are critical to the realisation of national development goals,” the statement said. Following the signing ceremony, President Barrow hosted a private dinner in honour of the visiting Chinese delegation.

“This War Is to Free Us from Slavery” — Captain Ibrahim Traoré Rallies Burkinabé Forces

By: Seringe ST Touray

Burkina Faso’s President, Captain Ibrahim Traoré, recently delivered a defiant address on national television, calling on his country’s youth and defense forces to stay resolute against what he described as external manipulation aimed at destabilizing their efforts.

Captain Traoré’s speech, directed primarily at the military and the public—particularly those involved in the nation’s defense and resistance, such as members of the military and paramilitary groups like the Volunteers for the Defense of the Homeland (VDP)—stated that Burkina Faso is trapped in a “very complicated system,” one into which, as he put it, “most of you who are young like me, we were born.” However, he argued, “that’s not what can allow Burkina to thrive.” The Burkinabé leader outlined that the country faces a clear choice: “Either we accept to fight, or we remain slaves forever.”

Traoré warned against internal manipulation, saying, “there are those who are slaves in their minds. They can only serve their master. And those people try every time to manipulate you.” He urged fighters and citizens alike to “stay focused” and “not pay attention to certain remarks even on some media,” cautioning that “not everyone is obliged to be patriotic.” Those serving on the frontlines, he said, are “the first patriots,” and must ignore critics and “close your ears and move forward.”

In a particularly pointed part of his speech, Captain Traoré singled out a so-called NGO, which it is implied refers to Human Rights Watch, accusing the organization of working against Burkina Faso’s interests. He criticized the organization for producing reports alleging abuses by the Burkinabé Defense and Security Forces (FDS) and Volunteers for the Defense of the Homeland (VDP). “This so-called NGO produces reports claiming that the FDS and the VDP commit abuses,” he said. “It went in here, it came out there.” He argued that the purpose of such reports was “to tarnish the morale of our forces, to scare them, to prevent them from being able to fight.”

This accusation follows a report released by Human Rights Watch on April 25, 2024, which alleged that the Burkinabé army executed at least 223 civilians, including 56 children, in two northern villages, Nodin and Soro. The report detailed how soldiers separated villagers into groups and shot them at point-blank range, with survivors recounting that soldiers ensured there were no survivors by shooting at those already on the ground. The Burkinabé government rejected these allegations, describing the report as baseless and part of a broader effort to discredit the country’s defense forces.

Captain Traoré went further, linking the activities of the NGO to broader instability in the Sahel, alleging that similar false reports helped justify the 2011 intervention that toppled Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi. “They made false reports and gave them to those who wanted to create a rebellion so that people would intervene and overthrow Gaddafi,” he said. “And the powder keg ended up being poured into the Sahel.” Blaming the NGO for the resulting chaos, he added, “We must file a complaint against this NGO because it is responsible for these false reports it made to support this thesis of attacking Libya.”

He also questioned the moral authority of international human rights organizations, declaring, “They have no moral lessons to give us. Let them go defend human rights all over the world first before coming here.” Throughout his address, Captain Traoré emphasized national pride and historical resilience. “They see us as subhumans. They see us as slaves,” he said, accusing external actors of maintaining a colonial mindset. “They have never changed their mindset.” He added, “It’s up to us to show them that we are not slaves and we will never accept this state of affairs.”

Referring to the sacrifices of African soldiers during World War II, he reminded the nation, “You are the descendants of those same ancestors who went to defend others, who liberated the world from Nazism. Today you are fighting for your lands.” Captain Traoré rejected international criticism of Burkina Faso’s security operations, saying, “These same individuals dare to create terms to tarnish you. We oppose this, we will never agree.” In his view, foreign interest in Burkina Faso stems from its natural resources: “Continue to defend your lands. It is your wealth that interests these people. It’s our gold, it’s our minerals that interest them.”

He alleged that entire villages have been displaced for resource exploitation and vowed that Burkinabé forces would “reclaim our lands, our wealth.” “This war,” he said, “is to free us from slavery. It’s for our independence.” Encouraging citizens to remain steadfast, Captain Traoré urged them to draw strength from their cultural heritage: “Draw from your cultural resources, from what you have been shaped by since the village, draw from it and wage this war. Stay focused and stay strong.”

President Barrow Congratulates NPP on Half Die By-Election Victory, Predicts Landslide in 2026

By: The Fatu Network Editorial

Following the National People’s Party’s (NPP) victory in the Half Die Ward by-elections, President Adama Barrow has congratulated the party’s candidate, Bettlomy Colly, along with the NPP’s regional leadership and supporters.

In a statement issued by NPP Deputy Spokesperson Seedy SK Njie, President Barrow described the result as “a clear indication and demonstration of the trust and confidence Banjul and Gambians continue to place in the National People’s Party.” He congratulated Bettlomy Colly, NPP Regional Chairman Ousman Abou Wadda, and members of the Banjul NPP committee, as well as the youth and elders of Banjul for their support.

Barrow linked the victory to ongoing infrastructure projects in Banjul, noting that “billions of Dalasi invested in road, sewage, and drainage rehabilitation projects” are nearing completion. He also cited plans for “a multi-million Dalasi Half-Die football pitch rehabilitation project” expected to begin soon.

The President stated that his government remains committed to continuing infrastructure development across the country. “This victory is not just a win for the NPP but a triumph for development, democracy, good governance, and the rule of law,” he said.

Looking ahead to the 2026 presidential election, Barrow expressed optimism, saying he anticipates “nothing short of a landslide victory.”

The statement concluded with a message of thanks: “Thank you, Half-Die! Thank you, Banjul! Thank you, Gambia!”

“We Trusted the System, But They Betrayed Us”: Land Victim Condemns Government Over Court-Defying Demolitions

By: Alieu Jallow

A victim of the recent demolitions at Old Yundum, Abdoulie Jeng, has expressed outrage over what he describes as a blatant disregard of a High Court injunction by the Ministry of Lands, Regional Government, and Religious Affairs, particularly its Department of Physical Planning.

Jeng, a business owner, said they purchased the land from the Manjang Kunda family. After the acquisition, claims emerged that the land was government-reserved. They pursued a legal case against the Ministry of Lands at the Brikama High Court, which granted an injunction in their favor on March 9, 2023.

“The court granted us an injunction, but their lawyer only appeared for the second to fourth sittings. However, each time he appeared, when asked to produce the government’s white paper proving the land was reserved, there was no response. This was during Abba Sanyang’s tenure, and to date, the case remains ongoing. We have invested over D35 million and later resold the land to Gambians. However, the demolition has had a devastating impact,” Jeng said.

Court documents seen by The Fatu Network show that on March 16, 2023, the Brikama High Court, presided over by Hon. Justice S.B. Tabally, granted an interim injunction restraining the Ministry, its agents, and servants from “demolishing, entering, or interfering” with the disputed property pending the hearing and determination of the case. The suit was filed by S & J Properties Company Limited on behalf of the residents. The court order reads:

“An interim injunction against the defendant restraining whether by themselves, their agents, servants, workers or whoever from demolishing, entering, or causing to be entered and/or interfering with the suit land or any part situated in Old Yundum, Kombo North District, West Coast Region, The Gambia, measuring 335 m x 185 m x 304 m x 65 m or thereabout pending the determination of the motion on notice.”

A formal notice from Antouman A.B. Gaye & Co, dated April 9, 2025, acting for the plaintiffs, was also sent to the Department of Physical Planning, warning that the Ministry’s actions constituted contempt of court and could attract serious legal consequences.

Despite the court order, demolition activities were reportedly carried out, sparking outrage among the affected individuals.

Jeng explained that the notice issued to them only questioned whether their clients had a fencing permit. Criticizing the Physical Planning Department’s actions, he stated:

“I want to inform the public that Physical Planning’s actions towards citizens are unacceptable, especially when they ruin the lives and livelihoods of the people.”

He further emphasized that the government’s failure to protect private investments harms the national economy:

“If Gambians, both at home and abroad, are hustling to invest their money back into their country, and the government cannot safeguard these investments, then you are damaging the economy. Neither the Ministry of Lands nor Physical Planning has been economically vibrant. During the regimes of both Jawara and Yahya Jammeh, there were no demolitions of this nature.”

Jeng expressed disappointment, noting that many Gambians had perceived the current administration as peaceful and progressive. He also outlined his company’s contributions to President Adama Barrow’s 2021 presidential campaign:

“At S & J Properties, when Barrow launched his 2021 presidential campaign, particularly in the North Bank starting from Farafenni to Sami, we bought 35 motorcycles to support the campaign. Personally, I sponsored a lady to contest as an independent candidate for the National Assembly for the Niani constituency, provided her with a car and a driver, and after she won, I advised her to join the NPP,” he said.

This latest development adds to the growing concerns over land administration in the country, following incidents such as the Sukuta Salaji demolitions, and highlights the broader issue of respect for court orders in The Gambia, particularly in disputes involving state authorities and private citizens.

Almameh Gibba Celebrates Graduation with Master’s Degree in International Relations

By: The Fatu Network Editorial

Hon. Almameh Gibba, the National Assembly Member for Foni Kansala, has announced his graduation with a Master’s Degree in International Relations and Diplomacy from the University of The Gambia.

In a heartfelt message shared on Friday, April 26th, 2025, Hon. Gibba expressed his gratitude, saying, “With immense joy and a heart full of gratitude, I, Hon. Almameh Gibba, National Assembly Member for the proud people of Foni Kansala Constituency, wish to extend my heartfelt appreciation and sincere thanks to all those who supported me throughout this remarkable journey.”

He described the achievement as a “shared victory” with his family, constituents, and supporters. “Your unwavering love, prayers, and support brought me here,” he said. “I was deeply humbled by the overwhelming show of joy, the kind words, and the recognition I received—from friends, family, and even strangers.”

Hon. Gibba emphasized that his academic pursuit was motivated by a desire to serve his constituents better. “I did not pursue this degree just for the title, but to be better equipped to serve my people with knowledge, wisdom, and dignity,” he stated. “Higher education empowers, enlightens, and prepares us to face the complexities of our modern world.”

He also delivered a message of inspiration to young people in his constituency and beyond, urging them not to be limited by their circumstances. “If I can achieve this while serving as your representative, then you too can reach even greater heights,” he encouraged.

Concluding his message, Hon. Gibba paid tribute to his late parents and thanked all his supporters, saying, “Abaraka! Abaraka! Abaraka! May Allah SWT reward you all abundantly.”

Sabally Rallies Support for NPP Candidate in Half Die Ward By-Election

By: The Fatu Network Editorial

Momodou Sabally, Adviser to President Adama Barrow, speaks to a journalist at Half Die Ward in Banjul on election day, confidently supporting NPP candidate Bartholomew Bolo Colley.

Praising the youth of Half Die and Banjul for their support in sports development, Sabally said, “They know which party and which candidate can bring sports infrastructural development, and that’s Bolo,” before inviting the journalist to a party at State House.

When asked about Momodou Saro – who was initially linked to the People’s Alliance Party (PAP) – Sabally dismissed the party’s relevance, saying, “A party that I don’t know about in this country has no weight, so it doesn’t matter. It’s statistically insignificant.”

His comments come after information emerged that PAP, led by Ebrima Tabora Manneh, had reportedly withdrawn from the Half Die Ward by-election to support the People’s Progressive Party (PPP) candidate against the NPP.

Senegalese Student Captured Fighting for Russia in Ukraine

By: The Fatu Network Editorial

Malick Diop, a young Senegalese student from Keur Mandoubé in Koungheul, has been captured by Ukrainian forces while fighting alongside the Russian army. In a video circulated online, Diop, exhausted and wearing a Russian uniform, confirms, “I am from Senegal.”

According to reports from RFM (Radio Futurs Médias, a major Senegalese radio network), Diop was part of the 8th cohort of engineering and law students at the Alioune Diop University of Bambey. “I knew him; he welcomed me when I was a new student,” recalled Astou Ndiaye, who added that Diop left for Russia due to financial struggles and “did not want to stay in the country anymore.”

After studying for two years in Russia and failing to reach Germany, Diop allegedly joined the Russian army out of desperation. His former classmates are now urging the Senegalese government and the Ukrainian consulate to intervene swiftly to ensure his safety and repatriation.

Reset password

Enter your email address and we will send you a link to change your password.

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

Sign up with email

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

By clicking the «SIGN UP» button you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Powered by Estatik