Tuesday, April 29, 2025
Home Blog Page 82

Kenyan MP demands law to combat FARTING on planes

0

A Kenyan MP has demanded a law to combat farting on planes as she believes it can cause ‘discomfort and insecurity on board’ flights.

Lilian Achieng Gogo made the comments while parliament was talking about possible amendments to a law on offences committed on aircrafts.

The request follows a bizarre row which broke out in Kenya’s Homa bay county assembly last month after a lawmaker accused a colleague of ‘polluting the air’.

The MP in question denied the claims and the speaker ordered air fresheners to be brought to the chamber to tackle the problem.

Ms Gogo, the MP for Rangwe constituency in western Kenya, said: ‘There is one irritant that it is often ignored, and this is the level of farting within the aircraft.

‘If this is not managed well it can cause discomfort and insecurity on board.’

The politician suggested introducing anti-flatulent drugs, which would be available for crews to give out if needed, reports the BBC.

She also said that passing wind on an aircraft was ‘terrible within the plane’ and could cause airline passengers to fight with each other.

Ms Gogo also spoke about the problem of some passengers drinking too much while flying. (DailyMail)

RELIGIOUSITY, SOCIETY & OUR OBNOXIOUS UNIVERSE

0

If anything is keeping me up at night about Gambia, its how we’re completely out of touch with the realities affecting our lives, because we’ve simply been intellectually misplaced. We get preached daily that this world is only temporal and therefore, our focus and energy should be directed to the hereafter. Well this world is still here, and as may be temporal for individuals, it seems not to any viewer that looks through the broader view of the lineage of descendants. We must take part in efforts to make this world better place for us and posterity, and Prayer alone cannot facilitate this. We cannot just focus on the hereafter while outsourcing our thinking to others like the West to help us with solutions to our earthly problems.  Religion is a beautiful institution that aims to promote virtues of tolerance, love, peace, morality and integrity which are important cornerstones of any civilisation. They provide special effect that are stress reducing – control predictability, understanding causality, and the social support that comes with it. This convenience will no doubt resonate with Gambians, as is often demonstrated in our sense of reasoning, but it also promotes ineptitude, constricts our imagination, stifle creativity and innovation, and consequently solutions to our real life problems eludes us.

 

The reality is we live in an aggressively cruel universe – The one not only characterised by persistent poverty and pandemic disease but also, as revealed to us by our telescopes, a space that’s full of mayhem such as monstrous gamma-ray burst, matter crushing gravitational fields, deadly pulsars, matter hungry black holes, stars dying in supernova explosion, possibilities of asteroids and comets colliding with our planet. And ofcause those nearer to us such as earthquakes that bury us; microorganisms such as virus and bacteria that infects us; volcanos that incinerate us; cancers that eats us; tsunami etc. Our philosophy as Gambian is if prayer cannot protect us, let us be protected by coincidences.

 

While science is making tremendous strides in understanding the underlying principles of problems and providing solutions the for preservation of life and to better human experience, it is often deemed a competitor to our religious beliefs and treated with cynicism, scepticism and sometimes completely denounced by religion fanatics in our midst. The scepticism part is understandable as it is common amongst scientists themselves which is why the biggest bounty of praise and reward are accorded to scientists who’ve found flaws in established paradigms. The truth is religion and science have no common ground and the two are irreconcilable approaches to knowing. Because one employs experimental verification and study of objects and phenomena while the other is simply based on faith.  Religious scholars are yet to make prediction of events that has so far occurred. By prediction I mean precise statement about untested behaviour of objects and phenomena logged before it occurs. In science, we often here the weather forecasted, though not always accurate. Another approach employed by religious fanatics is to tweak the translation and interpretation of religious scripts in a language to conform to some scientific discoveries. Isaac Newton, the man hailed as one of the greatest intellect to ever lived, spent a significant chunk of his life trying to understand the nature of the universe using philosophies derived from religious scripts. It was a futile effort. Then came the wealthy billionaire Sir John Templeton who established the Templeton foundation that seeks out a myriad of widely published religious friendly scientists. The foundation’s pursuit is to establish harmony and consilience between science and religion awarding an annual cash price that exceeds that of a Nobel Price. No success is thus far registered. To me science is not a competitor to religion but a discipline established by the instructions of religion. God told “Igraa” to prophet Muhammed (PBUH) and made learning obligatory on us. Understanding cause and effect! That’s all science is doing. Religion should be confined to the service to God and the salvation of the soul, while science is supported by all to unravel the nature of this world to better human existence. Conflating the two, especially in a manner that seeks to discredit scientific discoveries is embracing ignorance and its self-limiting. However, a recent study in the US showed 40% of scientists in America belongs to one of the religions. This in reference to the finding that 90% of Americans belong to a religion, means either atheists somewhat gravitate to science, or science diminishes religious believes in people. Drawing a distinction between the two is the key.

 

In the past great minds will not hesitate to invoke God at the frontier of knowledge when dazzled in the sea of ignorance. Isaac Newton for example, when studying our solar system, was astonished, that the gravitational push and full between the sun and the the earth, and that of earth and other 6 planets cannot explain the stability of our solar system. He claimed God must once in a while jump in to get things in order. He said “The six planets are revolv’d about the sun, in circles concentric with the sun, and with motions directed towards the same plane… But it is not to be conceived that mere mechanical causes could give birth to so many regular motions… This beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful being”. Then came the new breed of scientists who would not settle for Issac’s premise. A French astronomer and mathematician Perre-Simon Laplace came up with his “perturbation theory” that subsequently led to the discovery of the 7thplanet Neptune whose gravitation field compensated in stabilising our solar system and allaying Newton’s dilemma. Albert Einstein also came up with a theory of special relativity that changed Isaac’s description of gravity. It describes gravity as the curvature of the fabric of space and time. That matter dictates how space-time should curve, and in turn, space-times dictates how matter should move. This is the most remarkable feed of thinking about nature to come from a single mind. From this, Einstein generated the famous equation E=MC^2 (Where E means energy; M means mass; and C^2 mean speed of light). This consequently led to a change in the geopolitics, as it led to the development of atomic bombs. There is no reason why Gambia cannot produce the next Einstein.

 

Human being are endowed with five common-senses and these are limited in their range of sensitivity. Our eyes for example can only see with the wavelengths of the visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum. We’re completely blinded to other regions such as the gamma-rays, X-rays, ultraviolet, infrared, radio waves and micro waves. However, with our ingenuity we can create devices and technologies that can explore objects out of the reaches of our senses to generate date that our common senses can allow us to visualise, analyse and logically interpret in pursuit of understanding our interaction with this world. Scientist have created microscopes by bringing together a multitude of magnifying lenses in which one lenses magnifies the image of the other, and so-forth, thus allowing us to see microorganisms that cannot be seen by our naked eye, but can kill us in few hours. We have seen how medical advancements in the West facilitated by science resulted in prolonging the life expectancies of their citizens.

 

With our common senses and level of intelligence, human beings often arrogantly portray themselves as the most important creatures in the world. That everything revolves around us. This is also consistent with our intuitive observation of our environment. That our earth is flat and the sun, the moon, and other planets revolves around us. This perception held amongst many scientists in the past until the telescope were invented. It revealed to us billions of galaxies different from our milky-way galaxy that are in constant motion, spinning at 142 Kilometres per second, and comprising billions of stars that are being orbited by trillions of other planets. It showed a universe that is not only expanding, but in acceleration that is being driven by the mysterious dark energy. What’s also puzzling is the revelation that we’re in fact not in the centre of the universe. We’re not in the centre of our solar system, our solar system is not in centre of our galaxy, our galaxy is not in the centre of all galaxies. So would God create such vast universe with trillions of planets that are billions of light years apart for nothing? Are there intelligent lives existing elsewhere? If yes, how do they look like? If no, then why not? As in living people able to form governments and institutions. Will they invade us? Life as we know it is carbon based (made with carbon). Carbon is an element on the periodic table that is able to form multiple bonds with itself and other element to create large complex molecules. Another thing I found intriguing is the universality of our universe. That everything in this universe is made up of the same substances we see here on earth, that are made from the elements of our periodic table. Thus, if an intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe, it is conceivable that they may be also made of carbon and thus should. This should help narrow down on how they must look from the array of possibilities. There is currently an intense search for them. In addition to the approach of looking for bio-signatures that’d infer their existence, the radio wave of the electromagnetic spectrum is also being monitored as a mean of contact. The radio wave that we used to listen to radios, is the only component of the electromagnetic spectrum that transverse into space and travels across planets and if Aliens have a means of decoding the wave emanating from this planet, they ll be listening to our “mengbe-kering” shows. They probably have their opinion about us by now. If one has a rocket that travels through space with great speed with a radio, they will be able to follow and listen to the chronology of evens such as speeches starting from now to historical speeches such as the Martin Luther King speech in real time, as the rocket protrudes through the radio wave that escaped into space long time ago. There is currently an initiative monitoring 500 million radio signals in a pursuit to make or receive radio contact with exoplanetary species if they exits.

 

While scientific explanations such as the beginning of the universe “The Big Bag”, the beginning of life on earth remain speculations, a tremendous stride is made in understanding the nature of our universe using the physical laws of nature. Many benefits are already being enjoyed by the people in areas of communication, health, agriculture and economics; many more benefits to come some of which are in the prove of concept stage; the sequencing of the human genome that revealed, though the genetic code, the instructions of how we’re created and promises to provide cure for diseases that has plagued us for centuries such as cancer. We Africans should take part for our own benefit.

 

 

From 37 to 7 Souls Unlawfully Jailed. Why We Need to Check the Police and the Court!

0

In our Republic the power to enforce the law falls on the justice delivery system first and foremost which comprises the police and the courts primarily. It is the police that has the authority to arrest anyone provided there was a crime committed or about to be or suspected to have been committed.  The police have the same authority to therefore detain and then impose charges on suspects for prosecution before the courts. It is the courts that have the sole authority to therefore declare the innocence or guilt of suspects who stand before it. Therefore, the police and the Court are indeed very powerful institutions.

 

The decisions that the Police and the Court make can have lasting impact on the life and future of persons with whom they come into contact. By arresting, detaining and prosecuting a person means a heavy burden is put on the liberty and reputation of that person. Similarly, by sentencing a person to jail time does not only significantly limit one’s liberty and dampen dreams but could as well irreparably injure one’s reputation and potentially end the life of that person.

 

In light of the above the Police and the Court therefore cannot afford to make mistakes or abuse their power for doing so means irreparable damage to the life of a human being. We have seen, for example in places like the US where people are jailed for decades and even sentenced to death only to discover years later that in fact, such persons never committed the crime for which they were jailed in the first place. A very sad episode is where you find many people who were jailed when they were young only to be released in their old age because they were wrongly arrested and tried and then unjustly sentenced. It is for this reason that we must closely check the Police and the Court as they perform their functions.

 

Indeed, the Police and the Court are hugely important and necessary institutions without which we cannot call a society a civilized society. This is because in the absence of the Police and the Court to dispense justice justly it means therefore citizens would have no choice but to take the law into their own hands in order to solve their grievances. But with the Police and the Courts present we are all restrained knowing full well that these institutions will protect us or repair the damage we have suffered due to a violation of our rights or property in any form. Hence the Police and Courts are utterly important, necessary and they deserve our full respect and support.

 

That notwithstanding, the Police and the Courts are also known to have been one of the foremost instruments that have been used to harm citizens. For example, in the US the Police and the Courts have been used to criminalise Black People and then sentence them to jail time or death because of racism. In fact, in the US the police can literally shoot you to death if they fell like it and especially if you are Black and then claim self-defence! Similarly, we had seen during the Yaya Jammeh Tyranny how citizens were unlawfully arrested and then unjustly tried and sentenced to several years or death. This was why the terminology ‘Mercenary Judges’ emerged as Jammeh hired and paid foreign and local judges to do his bidding to silence anyone he did not like.

 

The current case of 37 citizens and non-citizens clearly manifests once again the impact of the decisions and actions of the Police and the Courts. The Gambia Police Force first arrested these people in questionable circumstances and then imposed life-impacting charges on them. Knowing full well that a Magistrates Court cannot decide charges that are considered capital offences still the Police went ahead to put them before the magistrate, unjustly and unlawfully. The Police already knew that a single decision of theirs could potentially deprive a human being of his liberty, reputation and wellbeing.

 

On its part the Magistrates Court also knew that the charge of arson is not an offense it has the mandate to address. Yet the Magistrate ignored the law but went ahead to decide the matter by sending 37 souls to prison on remand. For that matter it is now several weeks that these people are languishing in jail when there is no reason for them to be there other than a single, albeit unlawful decision by a magistrate.

 

Today the justice delivery system decided to withdraw the case against 30 of these detained young people because of the huge outcry against their arbitrary action. Why did they withdraw the case if indeed the Police were sure that indeed these young people committed the crimes of which they accused them? The Attorney General as the chief law enforcement officer in the Republic knows full well that indeed there is no case against these people. But by sheer abuse of power they deliberately arrested these people only to subject them to untold suffering. This is unacceptable.

 

Therefore, I wish to put it to law enforcement and judicial officers to always ensure that they are fully aware of the law and understand the law as their own name. They must ensure that in every decision or action they wish to take they must meticulously review all factors and sides just to ensure that their decision will be squarely lawful, right and just. They must bear in mind that any single mistake they make in their decision, advertently or inadvertently has the potential to destroy a life. Any law enforcement or judicial officer with conscience and committed to the cause of justice should completely avoid making another human being to suffer just because of your lack of due diligence or blatant abuse of power.

 

For that matter, ultimately the efficiency and accountability of our law enforcement and justice delivery officers and institutions rest with the citizens when they stand up to ensure adherence to the rule of law. We must check the Police and the Courts at all times with deep interest and concern just to ensure that they are acting within the law and the powers stipulated therein. This is for our own interest as well as the benefit of these police and court officers and society as a whole.

 

We cannot afford to have a justice delivery system in which the rights and dignity of citizens will be at the mercy of a single person just because he or she is a police officer or a magistrate or judge. We are a Republic in which the sovereignty of the Gambia resides in the people. Law enforcement and judicial offices like all other public servants derive their legitimacy and authority from the people and therefore perform their functions in our name and for our welfare.

 

For that matter we cannot and must not accept to have public servants such as police officers and magistrates and judges transform our authority given to them to harm us simply because of their failure to apply the rule of law or abuse their powers. That is a contradiction in terms that must not exist in a Republic. Therefore, let us insist that the Police and the Court apply the rule of law in full at all times knowing full well it is only when the rule of law is followed and adhered to will we have our rights fully respected and protected. Otherwise our rights hence our sovereignty don’t mean nada!

 

For the Gambia Our Homeland

Bloomberg’s world’s wealthiest families 2019

0
  1. The Walton family

Company: Walmart

Fortune: $190.5bn

The family own a 50 per cent stake in what is now the world’s largest retailer. Founded by Sam Walton when he bought his first store in Rogers, Arkansas, in 1945  (now a Walmart museum). Dividends paid to the family by the business last year were around $3 billion.

  1. The Mars family

Company: Mars

Fortune:  $126.5bn

Known for the world’s confectionery favourites including M&Ms, Snickers, Twix, Milky Way and Mars Bars the business began small with founder Frank Mars dipping chocolates by hand as a school-boy and remains owned by the Mars family to this day. The company acquired pet health-care company VCA in 2017 – which makes up around half of the company’s $35 billion revenue.

  1. The Koch family

Company: Koch Industries

Fortune: $124.5bn

Founded in 1940 by Fred Koch the company began after Koch developed a process to refine crude oil. It is the second largest privately owned company in the US after Cargill (number 10 on this list). The company is now a Conglomerate energy company and was run by brothers David and Charles Koch, sons of Fred Koch, until recently.

David Koch ran for US vice president alongside presidential candidate Ed Clark  in 1980 for the Libertarian Party, receiving 1.1% of the total nationwide vote.

  1. The Al Saud family

The ruling family of Saudi Arabia

Fortune: $100bn

A youthful monarchy of only 87 years the Al Saud family have accumulated wealth from payouts from the Royal Diwan – the King’s executive office. With approximately 15,000 extended family members the true wealth of the family is expected to be higher. Members of the family have made money by founding businesses which serve the state such as the official Saudi Arabian Oil Company, Saudi Aramco – said to be the most profitable company in the world  – whose chairman is Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

  1. The Wertheimer family

Company: Chanel

Fortune: $57.6b

Begun in the 1800s Ernest Wertheimer started make-up company Bourjois with his sons Pierre and Paul taking over by 1917 and partnering with Coco Chanel to create perfumes in 1924 – selling a 70 per cent stake to the brothers to take over production. Unhappy with the sale, Coco Chanel later tried to seize control of the company from the Jewish family with the help of the Nazi’s during WWII – but was unable as the family had fled to New York. The Wertheimer family bought out Coco’s share after her death in 1971.

  1. The Hermes Family

Company: Hermes

Fortune: $53.1bn

In 1837 Thierry Hermes began making riding gear for noblemen, however Jean-Louis Dumas, who died in 2010, is praised for taking the company global as an international fashion brand. Family members Pierre-Alexis Dumas, artistic director, and Axel Dumas, chairman, continue to hold roles at the company.

  1. Belgian families: Van Damme, De Spoelberch, De Mevius

Who merged their breweries to form : Anheuser-Busch InBev

Fortune: $52.9bn

The world’s largest brewing company based in Leuven, Belgium which became a collective enterprise when three families merged their well established breweries, dating from the 1400s, to form a larger brewery. The group is responsible for the classic beer Stella Artois, originally brewed as a Christmas beer in 1926.

Artois took over Dommelsch Brewery in 1968 later merging with Piedboeuf breweries in 1987 forming Interbrew. InBev was formed in 2004 when Interbrew merged with Brazilian AmBev – it then acquired US Anheuser-Busch in 2008 and became Anheuser-Busch InBev.

  1. The Boehringer, Von Baumbach family

Company: Boehringer Ingelheim

Fortune: $51.9bn

A German pharmaceutical company founded in 1885 by Albert Boehringer and is still owned by the family over a century later. The company focuses on creating drugs to treat cardiovascular disease, respiratory diseases, diseases of the central nervous system, metabolic diseases, virological diseases and oncology – selling drugs internationally.

  1. The Ambani family

Company: Reliance Industries

Fortune: $50.4bn

An Indian conglomerate company which owns businesses across India engaged in energy, petrochemicals, textiles, natural resources, retail, and telecommunications. Founded in the 1960’s by Dhirubhai Ambani and Champaklal Damani the company, which owns the world’s largest crude oil refinery, is now run by Dhirubhai’s son Mukesh (said to live in the world’s most expensive private residence).

Dhirubhai Ambani is said to have moved to Mumbai with just a few rupees in his pocket, as the son of a Gujarati village school teacher according to the Times of India, his father went on to build a global-scale petroleum company in 40 years.

  1. The Cargill, MacMillan family

Company:  Cargill

Fortune: $42.9bn

Members of the family still hold majority ownership for the company which is one of the world’s largest producers and distributors of agricultural products including sugar, refined oil, cotton, chocolate, and salt. The company was founded in 1865 by William Cargill. (Bloomberg)

 

Urgent Action is Necessary to Sanitize Diplomatic Passport Saga

0

It is indeed disappointing and outrageous that such national documents as diplomatic passports could be given to family members of ministers. That does not tell well at all! As the name and purpose imply a diplomatic passport is only for diplomats and persons performing diplomatic functions or conducting services for The Gambia in the international scene.

Diplomatic passports therefore cannot be for persons running their personal or family or business affairs. Hence it is unjustified to give the national diplomatic passport to any human being who is not a diplomat or performing functions for The Gambia Government in the international stage.

The important point however is that, family or no family, our diplomatic passports were and continue to be indiscriminately handed over to all sorts of undeserving citizens and non-citizens alike during the Jammeh era as well as under the Barrow Government! This only tantamount to bastardizing our sovereignty and dignity as a nation.

There cannot be any justification for giving diplomatic passports to people who don’t deserve it no matter how well intentioned and humanitarian the justification. Therefore, I have considered the Minister of Justice’s request letter and I appreciate that the reasons therein are purely humanitarian. As a son myself I would also want the same comforts for my mom. But the Minister is the legal advisor of the Government hence he should be the one to give advice to colleagues and public servants about the legality of issues, decisions and actions.

Therefore, the idea that the Justice Minister would ask someone else’s opinion about such a legal issue is untenable. He should have known all by himself, by virtue of his position and function and knowledge of the law which kind of persons qualify for a diplomatic passport. If the Minister of Justice doesn’t know that then woe betide The Gambia! The Gambia has three kinds of passports – ordinary, service and diplomatic passports and who qualifies for what passport should be known to the Minister upfront!

If the justice Minister could therefore enjoy this privilege for his family what stops any other Minister from seeking the same? What about ambassadors or top government officials also seeking diplomatic passports for their families? What would all this mean for our country where some would even secure diplomatic passports for their local and foreign friends, not to mention boyfriends and girlfriends? Therefore, let us not rationalize this matter just because the Minister appeared to have followed due process! The idea should not have occurred to him in the first place.

What this episode exposes is that for years there have been several malpractices and unprofessional attitudes taking place in our public sector without accountability. We have come to normalize the abnormal to the point that no one understands the systems and procedures anymore. This has been the reason for lack of transparency and accountability hence the proliferation of corruption, injustice and inefficiency of public institutions!

But these malpractices have to stop otherwise there will be no system change. None more than the Minister of Justice should lead that system change at the Government level. He should be seen insisting on rule of law, transparency, accountability and probity. He cannot lower the bar!

The sanity or health of the public service lies entirely between the Minister of Justice and the Secretary General. They must not only ensure the prevalence and adherence to the rule of law but also ensure ethical conduct by all. Therefore, it was bad judgment on the part of the Minister of Justice and Secretary General to conceive of this idea much more to put it into writing and place it before the President.

I think the time is still not late to cleanse our public service system. This Government has woefully failed to do that necessary and urgent undertaking for three years now and this is why the issue of diplomatic passports is now a scandal. The Barrow Government just continued with the same approach as the previous regime and today our diplomatic passports are in the hands of imams, priests, NGO leaders, business leaders, private citizens, foreigners and criminals! This must stop and all diplomatic passports must now be recalled in order to account for them.

Therefore, let us demand that the foreign ministry publish all names of people who hold Gambian diplomatic passports from 1994 to 2019. All non-deserving holders must be revoked forthwith. Diplomatic passports are not a matter of confidentiality! They are public documents and anyone who has it must be deserving of it. Hence the Gambia Government should be in a position to disclose who holds our diplomatic passports and why!

Furthermore, this matter requires a national inquiry as it deals with national security and our international reputation directly. Where foreign criminals could obtain our national document, it means the reputation and image of our country is at risk. Who knows what these dubious individuals are engaged in hence putting the name of our country into disrepute!

But even family members could also undermine or threaten national security and national reputation for they could as well engage in criminal activity using diplomatic passports! This is why diplomatic passports must be very scare and difficult to obtain for anyone who holds it also carry the image and reputation of the Gambian nation in your hand!

A holder of our diplomatic passport, by his or her (mis)conduct, can potentially cause The Gambia to lose international standing and trust hence threaten national interests. This is why some governments do not recognize the diplomatic passports or even ordinary passports of other countries because of the dubious activities of holders of that passport.

The National Assembly must therefore institute an inquiry so that proper and hard sanctions are imposed on perpetrators. It is clear that The Gambia Government will not exercise accountable leadership by being transparent about this issue. They will rather misinform, mislead, distort and derail the matter as usual. So, let the National Assembly come to the salvation of the country. Now!

I hope our NAMs would not fail us this time around. This is because there have been numerous instances where the National Assembly could and should have stepped up to invoke their full constitutional powers to salvage the country yet failed to do so. By so doing they failed to hold the Government accountable and therefore allowed violations of the Constitution and abuse of rights and plunder of public resources to prevail unaddressed hence allow impunity to persist! I hope this time they will not hesitate and fail!

Time will tell.

For the Gambia Our Homeland

 

Mexican gang CASTRATE an alleged rapist by letting a pit bull maul his genitals

0

A furious gang caught a suspected rapist then tortured him by making a pit bull terrier eat his genitals.

The man in his 30s was set upon after reportedly sexually assaulting a woman in Mexico City, Mexico, last month.

Horrific footage shows how he was stripped naked, handcuffed and pinned to the ground as five men surrounded him.

Shockingly, a white pit bull terrier with brown markings then began mauling the man’s genitals – tearing off and eating his entire penis and testicles.

The victim is heard screaming ‘stop, leave me now, leave me’ while the group watch. One of the gang then covers his mouth with a rag to stifle his cries for help.

A second dog, a brown pit bull, appears but does not join in.

Footage taken by one of the attackers shows how the alleged rapist was castrated by the ravenous dog, leaving nothing but a gaping, raw wound.

Video of the savage torture emerged last month. It was reported in local media that a criminal gang had caught the man after he allegedly raped a woman.

The attackers are said to have made the video public as a warning to other would-be attackers in the crime-ridden city.

Local media reported that in recent years ‘methods of torture by Mexican criminal organisations have increased their level of cruelty.’

They claimed that such attacks were becoming ‘increasingly frequent’ and claimed dozens of women are raped every day.

‘One of those women, supposedly, was raped by the protagonist of the video,’ reported DonDiario.

It is not known if the man in the clip survived.

Mexico has the world’s highest murder rate with 17,000 killed in the first half of this year – the highest levels in its history.

Astonishingly, that figure does not include drive-by shootings, kidnappings, extortion and other serious crimes, many of them part of cartel and gang violence.

In 2015, the rape rate for Mexico was 12.6 cases per 100,000 population though the actual number is likely to be much higher as many go unreported. (DAILYMAIL)

Relatives fly to Singapore to bring Mugabe home

0

Close relatives and government officials flew out of Zimbabwe on Monday to collect the body of ex-president Robert Mugabe from Singapore where he died last week, his nephew said.

Mugabe, a guerrilla leader who swept to power after Zimbabwe’s independence from Britain and went on to rule for 37 years until he was ousted in 2017, died on Friday, aged 95.

A charter flight left Harare at nine am (0700 GMT) on Monday and was expected to return home on Wednesday at 1300 GMT, Leo Mugabe told AFP.

On arrival, the body will be taken straight to his rural village in Zvimba, about 90 kilometres (56 miles) west of the capital Harare, for an overnight wake.

On Thursday and Friday the body will lie in state at Rufaro Stadium in Mbare township in Harare for the public to pay their final respects, he said.

The 35,000-seater stadium is where Mugabe took his oath of office at a colourful ceremony when colonial Rhodesian prime minister Ian Smith handed over the country to Mugabe.

There Mugabe hoisted the new Zimbabwe flag and lit the independence flame on April 18, 1980 – bringing hope for a new era after a long guerrilla war.

The body will be kept at his Harare house known as the Blue Roof overnight Thursday and Friday. The official funeral will be on Saturday at the giant 60,000-seater National Sports Stadium in Harare.

“Then the (traditional) chiefs will bury him on Sunday, where I don’t know,” said Leo Mugabe.

The location of the burial remains unclear, with Mugabe’s family and President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s government apparently at odds over whether it would be at his homestead northwest of Harare or at a shrine for liberation heroes in the capital.

His nephew said that in line with native Shona customs, traditional chiefs from Zvimba will have a final say on where the former leader will be buried.

As a national president he did not exercise the role of a traditional ruler, but Mugabe held the respected title of traditional chief of Zvimba rural district.

Mugabe’s health deteriorated after he was toppled by the military in November 2017, ending his increasingly tyrannical rule.

He had been travelling to Singapore for treatment since April.

On the Demise of Robert Mugabe and Related Matters: Letter to DJ Fireman

0

I salute you, Fireman,

It has been a while since I last sent you that famous letter on Reggae music. And talking about Reggae music, and it’s revolutionary ethos, the one song that kept ringing in my mind since the recent demise of Zimbabwe’s founding President Robert Mugabe, is Bob Marley’s hit track, “Zimbabwe”. 

Upon hearing news that Mugabe passed away, the sounds and lyrics of Bob Marley kept oozing into my consciousness:

Every man gotta right to decide his own destiny

And in this judgment there is no partiality

So arm in arms, with arms 

We’ll fight this little struggle

‘Cause that’s the only way 

We can overcome our little trouble

Brother you’re right, you’re right,

You’re right, you’re right, you’re so right…

Yes, Fireman, these were the words running down my mind as I recalled images of the old solider Mugabe. I met him on several occasions during summits of the African Union leadership while I served as Presidential Affairs Minister. 

Mugabe would be walking hand in hand with the late Zambian President Michael Sata, who was a specialist in humourous jibes. Sata would tell me that Mugabe had pneumonia and he would not spare our former President Yahya Jammeh, saying Jammeh is from a peaceful country but he was always walking around with a weapon, his famous sword.

My good friend, Robert Mugabe is an African hero. Not a perfect one but so is the much touted Barack Obama not a Saint. Winston Churchill is not a Saint and even the legendary Mahatma Gandhi, has his own dark side.

Fireman, the problem with us Africans is that the West still controls our narrative, more than half a century after the end of colonialism. They still succeed in demonising our own heroes and liberators and we accept it while they whitewash the biographies of their Western heroes. 

Indeed I am a fan of Thomas Jefferson, author of America’s famous declaration of Independence and so are many other African intellectuals, but seldom do you hear the fact that Thomas Jefferson owned slaves and there are other unpleasant aspects of his otherwise legendary life that remain muted to this day. Barack Obama is still a recipient of the Nobel peace prize even as the world knows quite well his record of civilian deaths by drone strikes and the wreck that Lydia is today partly because of his administration’s policies.

So sad that our own heroes get known only for their darker side. But I believe that people like you and I can change this trend by celebrating our liberators and heroes despite their shortcomings; for indeed there is no perfect human being or leader. There are many hilarious quotes attributed to the late Robert Mugabe but the latest that is trending is worth reading: “at least I left my people with land… Mandela left his people with poems, quotes and a statue.”

And speaking of Mandela, is it not horrendous that South Africans once again went on the rampage, wounding and killing our own African brothers and sisters and asking them to go home in their latest manifestation of what some call xenophobia? I don’t think this is xenophobia because of all the races in that country it is Africans who are being attacked; the very nationalities that supported the ending of apartheid in South Africa. What a world my friend! Didn’t they ever hear the words of Bob Marley from the song I referred to above?

To divide and rule could only tear us apart

In everyman chest, there beats a heart

So soon we’ll find out who is the real revolutionary…

When shall we learn to unite and be one another‘s keeper as black people? 

Fireman, let me quit that and come back home where our own leadership needs some inspiration from the timeless wisdom of Bob Marley. The following couplet could really be of help to the members of our now clearly fragmented coalition:

No more internal power struggle 

We come together to overcome the little trouble!

Fireman, we certainly need a little bit more of doses of Reggae wisdom for our leaders to sober up a bit. The problem is that your Reggae shows are always broadcast late night by the time our bourgeoise leadership had dined and wined and dozed off to sleep. Perhaps you should change your time to daylight when they are still awake.

Truly I was worried when I recently read a media release from the Office of the president stating that former UK Prime Minister, Tony Blair was at the office of our President and he did not only meet our President but also held a closed-door meeting with key staff of our Presidency discussing ways and means of implementing our national development plan. This happened less than one week  after we performed the funeral rites of our founding President, and our liberator from colonialism, Sir Dawda Jawara. Is this not worrisome my brother? Are we truly independent? 

Is the Presidential adviser, who is supposedly one of the former members of the revolutionary Movement for Justice in Africa (MOJA), a real African with patriotic spirit? Have they heard the words of Bob Marley who actually sang this song we are taking about here at the official independence ceremony of Zimbabwe in 1980?

Perhaps they have not listened to Bob Marley for too long but you and I can send them a reminder from the enchanting voice of Robert Nesta Marley; and on that note, I bid you farewell my good friend, DJ Fireman:

So soon we’ll find out who is the real revolutionary

And I don’t want my people to be tricked by mercenaries

Brother you’re right, you’re right,

You’re right, you’re right, you’re so right

Momodou Sabally

Former Presidential Affairs Minister, Economist, Author and International Speaker.

Samuel Eto : All you need to know about one of Africa’s great as he announces retirement

0

Cameroon’s four-time African Player of the Year Samuel Eto announced his retirement on Saturday at the age of 38, declaring “I need a rest”.

“The end, towards a new challenge,” the former Barcelona, Inter Milan and Chelsea striker posted on Instagram.

“Thank you all, big love, adrenalin.”

“In a few months you’ll see me doing something new,” Eto’o, who has campaigned relentlessly against racism during his playing days, later said on the margins of an economic forum in DR Congo.

“I need a rest, I’ve been running for 19-years,” he added light-heartedly in Kinshasa.

He stands alongside Liberia’s current president George Weah and Ivory Coast’s Didier Drogba as a great of African sport, and cuts a mythical figure in his homeland where he is close to national president Paul Biya.

He is slated for a major role in the Confederation of African Football where he has vowed to fight corruption to ensure funds go into infrastructure.

The most memorable period of his club career includes five hugely successful seasons with Barcelona from 2004 to 2009.

Despite an unfortunate knack for ruffling feathers, a return of 108 league goals from just 145 matches in five stunning seasons with Barcelona pays testament to his talent.

At his peak he enjoyed electric pace, impeccable touch and instinctive shooting to make him one of the most feared centre-forwards in the world.

He won a pair of Champions League titles and three La Liga crowns before departing under a cloud for Inter Milan after rowing with Ronaldinho leading to Pep Guardiola showing him the dressing room door.

He then spearheaded Jose Mourinho’s charge to a never to be forgotten treble with Inter of Champions League, Serie A and Coppa Italia titles in his first season in Italy.

He led Cameroon to an impressive four World Cups in 1998, 2002, 2010 and 2014 and enjoyed huge success at the Africa Cup of Nations as the Indomitable Lions won in 2000 and 2002.

He was part of a golden generation that featured Rigobert Song, the late Marc-Vivien Foe and Geremi as Cameroon also won the gold medal at the Sydney Olympics in 2000, with the emerging Eto’o both scoring and converting a penalty in the shoot-out win over Spain in front of a blockbuster 114,000 crowd.

His pace left him as his career slowed down with low stints at Russia’s Anzhi Makhachkala, Chelsea and Everton in the Premier League.

Last year, after a short spell with Turkish side Konyaspor, he joined Qatar league side, Qatar Sports Club, his last club. (Vanguard)

 

Over to you Zimbabwe! Country is thrown into mourning as Mugabe dies at 95, age Jawara died at

0

Former president of Zimbabwe Robert Mugabe has died at the age of 95.

Described as the bush war guerrilla leader who led Zimbabwe to independence in 1980, Mugabe died on Friday in Singapore where he was receiving treatment.

“It is with the utmost sadness that I announce the passing on of Zimbabwe’s founding father and former President, Cde (Comrade) Robert Mugabe,” a post on President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s official Twitter account said.

Mr Mugabe had been receiving treatment in a hospital in Singapore since April. He was ousted in a military coup in 2017 after 37 years in power.

Mugabe’s death comes 11 days after former Gambian president Sir Dawda Dawda Kairaba Jawara died at the same age.

Jawara is to The Gambia what Mugabe is to Zimbabwe as both men are credited for taking their countries to independence and later becoming their first presidents.

 

World Record: 74-year old woman to deliver twins

0

A 74-year old woman will deliver twin babies on Thursday in India after being married for 54 years without a child.

70-year-old Indian woman who gave birth to twins in 2015

Yerramatti Raja Rao is set to be delivered of her babies in a private hospital in Guntur city, India as doctors have made all arrangements for the procedure.

The birth of the twin babies will topple a record set by another Indian woman who gave birth to twin babies in 2015 at the age of 70.

The oldest woman ever reported to have a baby was in Italy at the age of 101.

According to doctors Yerramatti Raja Rao who hailed from Nelapartipadu in East Godavari district married Mangayamma on March 22, 1962.

After few years of their marriage, they expected children, but dreams were not fulfilled.

Though the couple became old, their dream was not fulfilled.

Recently, a woman residing near their house became pregnant at the age of 55-years through IVF.

Mangayamma drew inspiration from her.

She along with her husband approached Ahalya Nursing Home in Guntur city.

They met IVF experts Dr.Sanakkayala Umashankar.

The doctors collected Mangayamma’s husband sperm and tried in the IVF system.

Doctors efforts were fruitful.

Since then, Mangayamma was under the supervision of doctors in the nursing home.

Dr.Umashankar decided to perform cesarean to her today at 10.30 am. The doctors noticed twins in her womb. .

They have made arrangements to perform delivery to the old age woman.

Mangayamma is eagerly waiting for children.

Dr. Umashankar said ” If Mangayamma will give birth to children, it will become world record” (NAN)

Sir Dawda’s widow Chilel Jawara and family thank Gambians

0

I wish to convey my sincere thanks and appreciation to all Gambians for sharing the pain and sorrow that I and my family are going through this trying time.

Since the death of my irreplaceable life-time partner – His Excellency Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara – was announced, Gambians all over the world have been sending their condolences to us. Those who could make it to our house came and those who couldn’t, sent in messages of condolences and prayers. This act of greatness from the Gambians is overwhelming and deeply touches our life as a family.

A special applause goes to all the media houses in The Gambia. I did see and recognize your great work and tireless efforts from the day my husband passed on to the day of the State funeral. I also noticed the outstanding coverage you did throughout the occasion and have continued to do.

On behalf of the Jawara family I thank you all for your efforts and show of solidarity, nationalism and professionalism towards us. The amount of support and love we have been receiving shows that we are not alone in this trying time.

I would like to thank the current President of the Republic of The Gambia, H.E. Adama Barrow, as well as the First Lady, for honoring my late husband and giving him a historic and befitting burial; this act of greatness will forever be remembered by us, as it will continue to serve as an indelible mark in our hearts and minds. Thank you all. May God bless and continue to keep us all as a family and nation of love, oneness and progress!

Chilel Jawara

Former First Lady of The Gambia

Source: Elegance Magazine

Stand Against Abuse of Power and Disregard of the Rule of Law!

0

It is less than three years when we ended a Dictatorship notorious for violations without accountability hence impunity. For 22 years we had a regime in which the law enforcement and justice delivery institutions were used to abusing the rule of law by dumping Gambians in prison unjustly and illegally for which many came out scathed for life.

 

Three years on, today, we have 37 Gambians and non-Gambians similarly forced into prison by yet again the same law enforcement and justice delivery institutions as if we are still under Dictatorship. The Gambian Judiciary knows full well that its various courts have legal limitations as to what they can decide or not. Yet Kanifing Magistrates Court deliberately decided to send 37 youths to prison when that court knows it has no such powers to do so.

 

Similarly, the Gambia Police Force knows which court can decided which case. Knowing that magistrates’ court cannot decide cases that carry life imprisonment or death penalty still the Inspector General of Police decided to take such a case before that court in total disregard of the rule of law. This clearly shows that the police and the courts have decided to connive to kill the fundamental rights of Gambians as usual. Yet the Gambian Nation stands still, silent and calm!

 

Furthermore, the Gambia Prisons Services know that boys and men placed in remand cannot and must not be automatically shaven. Section 66 of the Prisons Act states that,

 

“All male prisoners on remand or awaiting trial who usually shave and are received shaven shall be shaved both while under detention and on the day of their appearance in court.”

 

Based on this provision, we now ask why did Mile 2 prison authorities shave Killa Ace by cutting his dreadlocks? It is clear that Killa Ace does not ‘usually shave’ his hair and he was not ‘received shaven’ yet the authorities at Mile 2 blatantly went ahead to shave the man. Why? This is nothing other than sheer abuse of power and direct violation of the fundamental rights and dignity of Killa Ace.

 

By violating the rights and dignity of one citizen it means the Police, Courts and Prison institutions of the Gambia have violated the dignity and sovereignty of all Gambians.  How long shall Gambians accept elected and appointed public officials to continue to behave like Masters and Lords over the very citizens who gave these officials their authority and legitimacy to serve in public institutions?

 

It is such a shame that a supposedly democratic government like this Government of Adama Barrow that succeeds a tyrannical regime like that of Yaya Jammeh would leave intact tyrannical practices to remain in a supposedly democratic society. This case reflects that indeed the Barrow Government is neither interested nor committed to transforming the Gambia from Dictatorship to Democracy. Rather the Barrow Government poses a clear and present danger to Gambian Citizens and the Gambian Republic.

 

This is attested to by the fact that since this case erupted there is no one single official or institution within the entire State that attempted, even slightly to correct the anomalies and malpractices that have been unfolding so far. From the President to the Chief Justice to the Minster of Justice to the IGP and the Director General of Prisons each and every one of these elected and appointed public officials blatantly washed their hands off as they sit by to watch violations and impunity take root in our country yet again.

 

Nothing is more dangerous than to have a Government led by elected and appointed officials who refuse to take responsibility and initiative to make things right but to sit by and allow abuse to flourish. By their failure to ensure that the rule of law is followed by the Police, the Courts and the Prisons this Government therefore poses a direct threat to the lives and rights of Gambians. Will our citizens allow this misconduct at the highest level to continue?

 

Let Gambians know that today 37 human beings are lying in horrible conditions at Mile 2 for no reason other than our complacency, indifference and silence. No one is saying that the police and the courts must not apprehend and prosecute criminals of any kind. Indeed, the police and the courts must ensure that the law is enforced. But in enforcing the law we must insist that the police and the courts also uphold and follow the rule of law.

 

If we allow the police and the courts to disregard the rule of law for one citizen rest assured all other citizens are also at risk sooner or later. We had seen this during the Jammeh Tyranny how even Ministers, Secretary Generals, police and military generals were all sent to prison without any due process simply because we allowed the culture of disregard of the rule of law to prevail. Are we repeating the same today? Time will tell.

 

For the Gambia Our Homeland

……………………………………………..

Guinea-Bissau police say 1.8 tonnes of cocaine seized in biggest ever haul

0

Police in Guinea-Bissau have seized more than 1.8 tonnes of cocaine hidden in flour bags in the biggest seizure in the country’s history, authorities said on Tuesday.

Police said the drugs had arrived by sea in the country’s northwest. After a two-week intelligence operation, police arrested eight people: four Bissau-Guineans, three Colombians and a Malian, the force said.

It was the second large drug shipment to be caught this year in the former Portuguese colony on the Atlantic Coast, long a major crossing point for Latin American cocaine headed to Europe. An 800 kg haul was seized in March.

Guinea-Bissau is home to just 1.8 million people and covers just 10,800 square miles, but its plethora of remote islands and unpoliced mangrove creeks makes it ideal territory for smugglers.

Police said the latest shipment was on its way to Islamist militants: “The drugs belong to the terrorist network Al Qaeda. The cocaine comes from Colombia. But the destination is the Arab Maghreb,” said Domingos Monteiro, deputy director of the judicial police.

Al-Qaeda’s affiliate in north and West Africa is based primarily in northern and central Mali but has a presence across the region. Authorities in the region have long suggested it is involved in drug trafficking in the lawless Sahara desert.

For years, the United Nations described Guinea-Bissau as a “narco state” in which drug traffickers had become so powerful they controlled parts of the government. But after the arrest of some politicians implicated in the trade by the United States’ Drug Enforcement Administration in 2012, Bissau’s cocaine traffic seemed to decline or go underground. (Reuters)

 

Sabally Urges Government to Diversify Sports Development

0

Former S.G and International Speaker Momodou Sabally has lamented government’s over-concentration on football to the detriment of other sports. “At this rate, we might just as well rename our Ministry of Youth and Sports to ‘Ministry of Football’.”

Sabally made these remarks, Sunday August 25th as he addressed students and guests at the graduation ceremony of the Sci Kungfu Contact martial arts academy at Buffer Zone, Talinding. “We must redirect our resources towards other sports including athletics, basketball, wrestling and martial arts.” Sabally asserted.

He took the opportunity to commend the instructors and patrons of the martial arts schools in the country for their dedication and patriotism in supporting what he called “one of the most noble sports that anyone could be engaged in.”

He then advised the graduates at the ceremony: “martial arts is supposed to instil in you that discipline and focus that is indispensable to outstanding achievement in any field. So you should take your training as a tool to channel your energy into positive productive endeavours in the greater arena of life.”

Sabally concluded by encouraging parents to enrol their female children into the study of martial arts given the spate of violence against women, saying “Martial arts is not about promoting violence, instead it is a way to instil discipline and a very effective tool for self-defence. If only we could enrol more of our youths into this discipline, we would be dealing with less violence and unnecessary agitation in our streets.”

On the Recent Cabinet Reshuffle: the President’s Report Card (Part 2)

But Yankuba is yet to be indicted for any direct involvement in human right abuses. And if the law of the land is anything to go by, then people are supposed to be deemed innocent until they are proven guilty. We must also realise that this is the fourth appointment to this post in less than 3 years. With our current security challenges, one can assume that President Barrow made this appointment out of frustration and his desperate desire to restore security in this country. That still doesn’t obviate the concerns of the critics.

But what I know is that Yankuba Sonko spent his life in the police. During my tenure as Secretary General, I had the opportunity to work closely with him and I bear witness that when certain directives came from the President that were going to land people in jail, he collaborated with me to thwart such matters thereby saving dozens of people. One particular case that I remember was the incarceration of several men in a land-related matter where the victims were sent to Mile 2 Prison without trial. When a lawyer brought this to my attention, I asked Yankuba what had happened and when he explained that it was a directive from the President I asked him to release them, which he did. I still don’t know how Yankuba and I survived this one but I acted on instinct and he took the risk to free these people.

When journalist Sanna Camara (currently part of the Presidential media and PR Team) was arrested and detained by police, allegedly due to directives from the top, I was out of the country on an official mission. Upon return, Sanna’s boss at the time, called me to report the matter and seek my intervention. I called then IGP Sonko and asked him to release the journalist immediately, which he did without hesitation. 

A certain medical doctor from one of the most prominent families in this country would have been languishing in jail by the time Jammeh left office but I was able to save this guy with the help of Yankuba Sonko, again at great risk to Yankuba’s job. But the problem is that all these people that Yankuba and others helped during the former regime would rather remain silent or even join the mob in castigating him while these very people and their families were the ones that supported and financed Jammeh’s multiple re-elections as President. Things are too complicated in this country so while we go ahead in trying to hold one another accountable, let us proceed with honesty fairness and caution.

A people who appointed former Speaker Abdoulie Bojang to the glorious position of Ambasador, and this is the same Abdoulie Bojang who helped proclaim a state of emergence; at the time, potentially the most lethal tool in Yahya Jammeh’s attempt to subvert the will of the Gambian electorate, should be quite cautious in condemning the appointment of Yankuba Sonko.

A country that stayed mum when someone who was a prominent member of the former regime was appointed as counsel in one of the most critical commissions in this transition period should think twice before condemning any other appointment. And this counsel was adversely mentioned in some of the transactions that came out of this same commission but the so called activists and devotees of rule of law and due process remained mute.  Even where a key figure in that commission came out with a damning petition on alleged malpractices that included selective questioning of witnesses not even a mini-enquiry was set up. And yet we call for the lynching of someone who has not been indicted directly in any particular case?

We have a ex-con currently serving as Director of Investigation at just about the most critical transitional institution in this country but that man is deemed fit and proper by the loudest voices in this country, even when they knew that the same man would have to head investigations about the very people he took up guns against.

When the TRRC was being launched, ICC prosecutor Fatou Bom Bensouda was an invited gust of honour and the whole country glossed over this. Now please read the excerpt (below) as carefully and succinctly observed by journalists Mustapha K. Darboe and Thierry Cruvellier on the website www.justiceinfo.net:

ESSA FAAL’S CONVICTIONS AND PRUDENCE

When on January 28 this year Batch Samba Jallow testified publicly before the TRRC and implicated Fatou Bensouda, the Commission’s lead counsel, Essa Faal, seemed caught off guard and embarrassed. Essa Faal is the incisive, impeccably prepared and willingly implacable conductor of the TRRC public hearings that have, since January, made the Truth Commission in The Gambia a national event to which the public is riveted. He is a key contributor to the success of this justice process and the credibility of its investigations. He is also a former ephemeral member of the State Prosecutor’s Office of The Gambia in 1994. And more importantly he is a former colleague of Fatou Bensouda at the International Criminal Court. At the hearing, the dialogue between the victim and the lead counsel seemed to end in disagreement about the conclusions to be drawn from Jallow’s experience.

– “Who was the prosecutor in this case? asked Essa Faal.

– Fatou Bensouda. She was the mastermind, replied Jallow.

– Ah, she was the prosecutor.

– Yes, she was the mastermind of everything we went through.

– Ah… You would agree that Mrs Fatou Bensouda, if she was the prosecutor at all, would have come at the tail end of things, at the prosecution stage of things and therefore would not have participated in anything that happened before your prosecution. Correct?

– No, I don’t agree.”

It did not take much longer for the suspicions to arise that preferential treatment or protection may be given to the former personal legal adviser and minister of Justice of Yahya Jammeh…

So our fiery lead counsel of TRRC has been doing an amazing job and no one could fault him in the execution of his duties. But that track record is suspended when his former colleague/boss comes into the scheme of things. Was I wrong when I used the term “Animal Farm” when I once criticised the way we are proceeding in our so called New Gambia?

How can you embrace and celebrate Yahya Jammeh’s gun-toting interior Minister during the Transition period, and then come to condemn the cool and meek Yankuba Sonko? A former parliamentarian and long-serving APRC big wig together with the former ruling party’s chief fundraiser are  now executive members of one of the biggest opposition parties. This parliamentarian was in the National Assembly when Jammeh brought up a bill to indemnify those who perpetrated the murder of innocent students on April 10/11. So this man is fit and proper to serve your party and hopefully become a cabinet Minister should you win the election, but Yankuba Sonko should be sent to the gallows?

Let us be fair, what is good for the goose should certainly be good for the gander as well. 

My concern with Yankuba Sonko’s appointment is the views and sentiments of the victims whose cases happened during the time Sonko was IGP. President Barrow should do more in terms of helping the victims across the board. Those who sustained injuries and still in need of medical treatment should be supported as a matter of priority. It is unconscionable that certain victims with a few bruises have gone home with millions of Dalasis from the state treasury thanks to the total lack of scruple and prudence of our current attorney whose only motivation for action seems to be the number of decibels on social media rather than justice and due process. This, in the face of lack of medical treatment and support for those with severe injuries and even those who lost family members. 

But this is quite normal in this dispensation that is becoming quite emblematic of selective justice and selective behind-the-scenes reparations. It still beats my imagination how convicted security personnel can go home with millions (without following due process) in compensation while Solo Sandeng’s family continues to struggle for basic stuff and the April 10/11 victims continue to cry for medical support.

In view of all the foregoing premises and many others too sensitive to be discussed in the public glare I could give President Barrow a 65% mark for his appointment of Yankuba Sonko and the marks deducted are merely out of due sympathy for the views and sentiments of the #real victims (as opposed to those who are experts in using the victims as ways and means to score political and financial gains).

The Gambia is that country where one of the real estate moguls forcefully grabbed land from its rightful owners using Yahya Jammeh’s heavy hand with attendant serious human rights abuses; only for that same real estate mogul to be given a chunk of prime land by the current administration under murky circumstances and yet his name is not mentioned at private meetings of so called activists talk less of public forums. And this mogul is now regarded as an icon who wines and a dines with this government and he has a very insidious (yet covert) role in the decision making process of this government but no one is making noise about this.

Our beloved country is at a dangerous crossroad and all qualified hands are needed for the nation building process. The fact is that a lot of our fine hands and minds are out of the country working for international organisations at pay rates untenable back home. A lot of our experts and professionals living in this country have shifted to local- based international organisations because the pay scale of government is not competitive enough. The few new hands tried by this administration have not given us much to cheer for. Therefore we need all hands on deck.

The (jaundiced) pundits claim that the whole country is a crime scene and therefore no one should make noise about the appointment of conflicted individuals like Dr. Baba Galleh Jallow, Executive Secretary of the TRRC, and his friend, Alhagie Saidy Barrow; it would be Impossible to have anyone with a clean bill of health. So where do they expect Barrow to source  his appointees from, heaven? God is not about to open the gates of that sublime abode anytime soon because He knows that if he should send back to us his saints, we just might corrupt them.

Let us be sincere in our efforts to hold one another accountable; and let us be reasonable in our expectations given the realities that we all know about. Jesus Christ is indeed right, but do we listen to his words? “He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone…”

This is my report card for the President with the required remarks on the sideline. Overall, he gets a pass in this Cabinet reshuffle but a credit is more desirable.  We hope he will work harder next term.

May Allah guide and protect our President.

God Bless The Gambia

Momodou Sabally

The Gambia’s Pen

Gina Bass wins gold at All-Africa Games, defeating woman regarded as fastest in Africa

0

Gambian female sprinter Gina Bass has breezed past Ivorian favourite Marie Josee Tallou to win 200 m gold at the All-Africa Games in Rabat, Morocco.

Bass who lost to Tallou in the 100m race days ago recovered to beat the Ivorian who is regarded as the fastest woman on the continent.

With her triumph the 24-year old Gambian has incidentally set a new national best of 22m 58secs. (APA)

Baaba Sillah talks to Sir Dawda Jawara at his home in Haywards Heath in Sussex

0

Greetings,

As The Gambia is mourning the demise of Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara, the country’s first president, I invite you to read the marathon interview the great Baaba Sillah had with Kairaba some years ago in the United Kingdom, precisely in Sussex. This was a couple of days before he moved from his house with plans to return to Banjul. Unfortunately, they could not meet again as Sir Dawada was always busy with visitors or attending to one ceremony or another. In the end, Baaba gave up trying for another conversation. Not having met him in person, he could not help noticing for the first time that, he was sanguine and composed. He was an excellent listener and his responses to questions were always measured. Like him or loathe him, for Baaba “Jawara epitomised tolerance and respect for the other”. Baaba’s foresight in seizing the moment and the quality of the discussion with Sir Dawda will undoubtedly help many young Gambians to know their history. We came a long way….The socio-political trajectory of The Gambia in the early 60s is now presented before you to assess Kairaba’s rule and legacy and draw lessons from them, for the future of our country. May his soul rest in perfect peace. Adieu Kairaba !

 

Pierre Gomez, PhD

Professor of Comparative Literature

Dean, School of Arts and Sciences

The University of The Gambia

Brikama Campus, P.O. BOX: 3530

The Gambia, West Africa

“Baaba: What would you say were your major influences when you grew up in The Gambia?

Sir Dawda: I was in Banjul in the 40’s. I was born in Barajali in the Maccarthy Island Division and I came over to Banjul and stayed with the late Ibraima Jallow. He adopted me while he was a trader in Waali Kunda. Both Jallow and my father were friends and they were both traders working for different Firms. At the end of one trade season, he asked my father if he could take me to Banjul so that I could go to school. At the time, there were no Schools in that part of The Gambia. My father agreed but my mother tearfully agreed so that I could leave and go to Banjul. I was about eight, which would be around, Well! I was born in 1924 1932 or thereabouts. I would therefore say that my main childhood influences were my guardian Mr jallow and his family, in Banjul and of course some others in the neighbourhood. When I got to 37 Wellington Street, which was my address in Banjul, I went to Daara there. The teacher at the daara was then Serinj Mataar Jonn. Interestingly enough, when I got there and joined the Daara, Serinj Mataar Jonn had already aged. He was ill and bed-ridden. He had had a stroke. As a new arrival, I got on extremely well with him and in the end; I took total charge of him. I was probably the one who could decipher his sounds, his signs and monosyllabic language now looking back, that experience left a big impact on me for the rest of my life. I also discovered my tenderness for the sick.

Our maggi-Daara was Momadu Gey and I carried on with the training at the Daara. I went to elementary School at Mohammedan School. The headmaster was J D O Wilson. Some of the staff members were brought over from Sierra Leone to establish and run the Mohammedan school. The Muslim community of Banjul with the help of the Colonial Administration established this School. So the Daara, of Serinj Mataar Jonn, Mohammedan school, and the Jallow Family could be said to have been my big influences from when I arrived in Banjul.

Baaba: Presumably the Mohammedan School was not just and Elementary School?

Sir Dawda: Yes it was just an Elementary School! This is to say that from sub-standard to Standard seven (7)! However, when I finished that Elementary school, I had done so well as to win the ‘Photo’ at standard seven.

Baaba: was this some kind of award for achievement?

Sir Dawda: Well! In those days, at the end of every year, there was an examination for all the pupils of standard 7 from all the Schools in the Colony, Banjul and her surroundings. The pupil that did the best at that examination, in that year was awarded the ‘Photo’.

Baaba: Whose Photo might this have been?

Sir Dawda: the Photo actually was the photograph presented by Bathurst of the Gambia and Bathurst of Australia. In other words, the winner was given a scholarship to secondary School. The choices of Secondary school were to the Saint Augustine’s Secondary, the Methodist Girls High School and the Methodist Boys high school I chose the latter. Well of course one could have chosen, Armitage School possibly, in Georgetown but these were the choices within the Colony.

Baaba: Let me take you back a bit Sir Dawda, can I take it literally that the ‘Photo’ to mean a photograph with somebody’s image or was it a trophy of some sort like a shield or a cup?

Sir Dawda: Well it was a photograph and I reckon that it could have been the photograph of Earl Bathurst who was a Colonial Secretary, after whom Bathurst The Gambia and Bathurst of Australia got their names. That was the trophy of the winner of the Standard 7 examination. I remember the person that came second to me that year was Mustafaa Faye. He was the son of the late Sheh Umar Faye!

Baaba: After this Sir Dawda you went to the Methodist Boys High School? What course of study did you follow and how long were you at the MBHS?

Sir Dawda: The course led me up to the Cambridge School Certificate and after a couple of years I took the London Matriculation. Well! I followed the normal path and took the regular years at High School.

Baaba: So you proceeded from there to?

Sir D.: After the London Matriculation, I wanted to study medicine but there were no opportunities at the time. The Scholarship I won ended after the Secondary School education. While waiting for an opportunity to further my education, I entered the Victoria Hospital as a nurse.

Baaba: So your skills at Nursing Serinj Jonn started to pay dividends already?

Sir Dawda: Oh yes …laugh…Indeed!

At the Hospital, I started my Nursing training and some of my colleagues were keebaa Konte, who stayed on as a Nurse and continued as a Pharmacist. In 1947, i was awarded an ‘Open Scholarship ‘, which enabled me to go to Achimota in Ghana to do Science. By then I had decided to do Veterinary medicine. I proceeded to Achimota to do Science for duration of 2 years. However, after a year, I gained entry to Glasgow University to continue my studies.

Baaba: Sir Dawda, the years preceding your year at Achimota and indeed your time at Glasgow were very significant turning points for the history of Africa and other countries in their relationships with the ‘ Mother-Countries’. It was also the time when President Roosevelt and Winston Churchill declared the famous ‘ Atlantic Charter. War had ended and peace had returned. The Nazi tyranny was suppressed. There was therefore, hope for the countries under Colonial subjugation. Two years prior to your departure to Achimota, some leading African and Pan-African thinkers and activists such as Kwame Nkrumah, George Padmore, Wallace Johnson, Edward Blyden, Nmandi Azikwe and the Gambian contingent at this fifth Pan African Congress included E F Small, I. M. Garba Jahumpa and C. W. Downs Thomas. These Pan Africanists got together in Manchester and their resolutions heralded the real agitation for African Independence. In The Gambia, more specifically, Governor Andrew Bagworth Wright launched the 1947 constitution. As you can see there were a lot of ideological pulses beating simultaneously and it would be difficult to imagine that ideas that were being banded about would not have impacted on you and the African masses? Would you say that any of the ideas had made an impression on you or could you say that the concerns they raised generally veered in one political direction? Did these ideas steer you towards one direction or another and what was your situation at the time?

Sir Dawda: My situation was that my views were not veering towards politics! Like most people at that stage, my main concerns were my studies – aiming at my chosen profession. But while I was at Achimota, Kwame Nkrumah had returned to Ghana. I had some political feelings, though not really developed. But I was very keen and enthusiastic especially when the Students at Achimota, invited Nkrumah to come and give a lecture. He came over; I was very, very excited by that. Like most and infact all the students. Nkrumah came with some huge political figures at the time such as Lamptey, Akwage Komlo Gbeduma and so on. The whole atmosphere was very stimulating. I was still at Achimota when the Ex-Servicemen took to the streets on a demonstration in Accra. There was a lot of commotion and the Colonial authorities reacted. It found me in Accra and we had to hurry back to Achimota as there was some looting and I had to come away from the mayhem! So both of those events found me in Ghana, i.e. Nkrumah’s return and the Ex–Servicemen’s agitation.

Baaba: These two events though seemingly innocuous at the time, blazed the trail for the rise of the independence movements in Africa. Would you agree with this and what transpired after you went to Glasgow?

Sir Dawda: When I was at Glasgow, we founded an African Union at the University and for a few years, I was the President. It was not a large Union and there were not too many Anglophone-African Students. By and large, my involvement showed my political inclinations because it was a political Association. There was another Association, which was set up by the Labour Party of which I was also a member and at the time of elections, the British elections I mean, that body campaigned for the Labour Party candidates.

Baaba: So you suddenly find yourself being sucked into the fray?

Sir Dawda; Yes! Certainly! I was hardly aware of it myself but i certainly was interested practically in Politics.

Baaba: There was also around this time that the former British Prime Minister, Harold Macmillan who was giving a speech in South Africa in which he spoke of his famous ‘ wind of change’. It was soon after that; you left Glasgow as a qualified veterinarian. Surely these nascent (for want of a better word) political feelings, impulses brewing inside of you and the desire to deliver and offer your services to the people were on top of your agenda. Would it be right to presume that was exactly what happened?

Sir Dawda: Yes! I qualified in 1953 and became a member of the Royal College, which qualified me as a professional Veterinarian. So after the qualification, I went back home because at the time, the spread of Rinderpest around tropical Africa was causing havoc to the livestock and cattle. The Veterinary staffs of The Department were in a hurry for me to get back and help in the campaign against Rinderpest, otherwise known as cattle plague. I went back to The Gambia in 1953 as a Veterinary Officer and went to the field with the Staff.

I plunged into the field with the Staff of the Veterinary Department at Abuko and we carried out a campaign of vaccination throughout the country. I was therefore in the field most of the time and fortunately, at the time, we used what was called the ‘ rapinised vaccine’. It was a vaccine, which was developed by using rabbits so that we had a vial out of the vaccine. One could use it to multiply that vaccine. You could actually take your vial out into the field with your rabbits and produce vaccine and protect cattle with the vaccine.

Baaba: This was an interesting as well as a rewarding exercise?

Sir Dawda: Yes it was interesting!

Baaba: How did the cattle owners take to you?

Sir Dawda: Oh! They saw me as a saviour. Well! Not only me but credit also went to the dedicated staff around me. It was hard work but it was very rewarding. One had to be prepared to sleep anyhow, anywhere.

Baaba: Was this a countrywide campaign?

Sir Dawda: Yes it was countrywide.

Baaba: The two years preceding your return to The Gambia, witnessed the formation of Political parties in The Gambia! Reverend J. C. Faye blazed the trail in 1951, with the Democratic Party. This party splintered in 1952, the offshoots of which were the Muslim Congress of I. M. Garba Jahumpa and in the same year Pierre Saar Njaay, formed the United Party. Party politics were relatively new and people needed time to digest this new phenomenon. In addition, Sir Percy wynharris had concocted a new constitution, which he tried to peddle to The Gambian populous. What were your initial reactions to the Wynharris constitution and your impressions of all these three political figures, first from an outsider coming in?

Sir Dawda: Well! As an outsider and partially in! As I said, I was busy working as a Veterinary Officer. Yet around this time another disease that was prevalent among livestock but not as devastating in it’s effects as Rinderpest was, like many other diseases, needed attending to. We had our hands really full with our professional work but occasionally, I took trips to Banjul. Infact, I remember attending one of the one or two meetings mainly that of Garba Jahumpa Muslim congress Party. So I had a look into how things were being done at the time. I also went to what later became something of great significance to me and that was attending the Protectorate Peoples society’s meetings. It was not a Political Party. They had meetings and an organisation. There were also less well-organised societies mainly dealing with self-help. There was Sanjaali Bojang as the head of one of these Societies, the Committee of Gentlemen. Infact I became a member of the Protectorate’s Peoples society, the (PPS). Well back to your question, you want to know how I saw these new parties and their leading figures. I attended their meetings occasionally since I was busy in the field so I could only come to Banjul occasionally. It was the PPS, which later developed into a Political Party known as the Protectorate Peoples Party. In actual fact, they wrote me in when the Party was actually formed, ready to go into elections in 1959 or thereabouts. I was infact invited to come and lead this party. As I said, my field duties did not allow me to come too often as I said.

Baaba: It is often argued by some Gambian Scholars of history that politics at the time was not based on ideological premises. They argue that it was based on issues. Is this a view that you would subscribe to?

Sir Dawda: well! Yes, there weren’t any coherent argument on ideology. I do not think that ideology featured much in the sense of socialism, capitalism Communism. I do not think that they featured much at all in the politics looking in from the outside. Even when we the (PPS) became a Political Party, the main objective of the organisation, like almost all the others I suppose was; How to advance thee Self-determination of The Gambia agenda. Which as you say was whipped-up by this’ wind of change’ moving around Africa and Ghana was moving rapidly and soon became independent. Guinea, Senegal and a lot of other comparable countries and so on. So really the driving force at the time was not so much ideology as the attainment of independence from Colonisation and for self-determination. I think these were the driving forces.

Baaba: Surely some of the issues that the new Political Parties picked up were of specific sectional or ethnic interests. Would you agree that the ethnic card, or sectional interests did play a part, however little?

Sir Dawda: Well in any society, particularly in any African Society, I think Ethnicity is bound to play some part to colour things a little bit. In The Gambia in particular, I think that what was the main dichotomy was colony and Protectorate. This was enshrined in the Colonial set-up and constitution. The Colony comprised the Capital City and her suburbs and you have the rest of the country- the Protectorate. The Colony, by that time had full-franchise. They can vote. Any person who attained a certain age could vote on an issue. They could choose representatives to the Legislative Council and so on.

Whereas the Protectorate had nothing, no such franchise. So really, it was this that created the division, which really had to be addressed. It had to be addressed because it meant that the Politicians were all elected within the small circle within the Capital and it’s surroundings. Therefore, they did concentrate their attention to the conditions, naturally to their constituencies. And since the Protectorate had no franchise and since they were neglected in many, many respects, so the main target of the P PS was to correct this imbalance, to a large extent. Not only did they aim at self-determination, throughout the country but also to address this very serious anomaly in the Colonial set-up. One of the things that did happen was the extension of the franchise to the rest of the country.

Baaba: Let us still stick with 1959. The Protectorate Peoples Society was now a fully-fledged political party. It was also around this time that there was a concerted, orchestrated political agitation that became manifest in mass mobilisation in political rallies, Party Broadcasts, etc. Throughout the country. All of these were aimed at constitutional change as you have yourself confirmed. I remember vaguely as a boy, when Sir Alex Leonard Boyd came, people marched up to Government house to press for these constitutional changes. For Gambians, there was a fundamental flaw in the proposals for a new constitution. It was felt that the Windley proposals did not go far enough. In sum, it excluded a selfhood-clause. I gather that you yourself had some issues with this very same Windley, constitution. What were your specific gripes about the constitution and how did your intervention act as a catalyst for bringing to the fore the question of nationhood and to what extent was the Windley proposals an impediment to the acquisition of selfhood?

Sir Dawda: The demonstration that you referred to when Alex Leonard boyd was here, the main placards said that ‘ Bread and Butter’. Is this the one you are referring to?

Baaba: Yes it is precisely the Bread and butter strike.

Sir Dawda: Yes I think the main underlying issue was more’ Gambianisation’. Civil Servants mainly influenced this. During this period, Gambianisation had not advanced enough. We did not have apartheid in The Gambia but we did have petty apartheid you know! Many people did not realise this because even up to that time, we still had an exclusive European Hospital in which no African would be admitted. Even the African Doctors. Even if an African Doctor was sick, he could not be admitted in that Hospital. Whereas, the poorest European could. As a Hospital Nurse, I witnessed this! So the main reason for that demonstration was for Gambianisation of positions in the Civil Service. My issues with the proposed Windley constitution was- the point is that whatever happened then without a drastic change in the constitution in which the whole of the country can exercise their franchise, would be meaningless and defective. It would be a defective constitution indeed and that had not yet been addressed.

Baaba: Apart from these two issues you cited, there were some other things that emanated from this so-called defective constitution. Was it not the case that the constitution had something within its clauses to do with ‘how much say’ elected Chiefs had? Did this not by itself create the backdrop for dissent?

Sir Dawda: This must be the incident following the 1960 General election. Is that what you mean?

Baaba: yes, it was during the aftermath of the 1960 elections.

Sir Dawda: By now the franchise had been extended to the whole country. As a result of that election, the newly formed Peoples Progressive Party had a larger number of elected members and seats than the other Parties. The elections did not precipitate a crisis. However, after the elections, the Governor at the time then, chose his council. The Legislative Council from among the elected members. I was chosen as the Minister of Education. Sheriff Siise was a Minister without portfolio. Omar Mbakke was elected by the Chiefs as their representative, altogether, about half a dozen or so of us were in the LC. Things went on and we all assumed our Portfolios and responsibilities as members of the Legislative Council. It was not until late 60 that Windley decided to appoint a Chief Minister. By the way, at that time, PS Njaay was not a member of the Legislative Council. But one of his elected members was.

In October 1960, when Nigeria had her independence, on the 1st of October, and i was chosen by Windley to represent The Gambia in the celebrations in Lagos. Prior to my departure, we got wind of Windley appointing PS Njaay as Chief Minister. My colleagues and I in the PPP got together and decided that and came to the conclusion that the Party will opt for total independence. There were various ideas floating at the time. The ‘ Malta solution’ was suggested. To us it was a halfway solution to political emancipation advocated by Garba Jahumpa. In reality, a couple of members of the British Colony will be sent to the British Parliament. This meant that they did not have their own Parliament! We decided at that meeting that we had to go all the way to independence-no halfway solutions. Whatever we decided as a free nation after discussions with Senegal, or whoever, will be a decision we had to live with.

Based on this, we decided to draw-up a manifesto, stating that The Gambia had to have full independence, as soon as possible. Before I came back from Nigeria, there had been certain intrigues because the Colonial Authorities had become aware somehow of this Independence

Manifesto. They were very concerned about it. Maybe that was not their plan at the time for The Gambia. They must have had other plans at the time. Before I returned, there was a plot! There was a meeting at the Banjul Town Council Offices by the various Political factions including Sanjaali Bojang. Who was a pillar of the Peoples Progressive Party. This meeting, suggested the formation of a ‘ Solidarity. A solidarity Party to take in all the existing Parties. All the parties did join to form this Solidarity party. The PPP was just a year old but they wanted us to dissolve it and join the Solidarity Party. All of this was done during the few days I was away in Nigeria.

By the way, I had the draft independence manifesto with me to Nigeria and I managed to print it there. When I came back I found this idea of a Solidarity Party so, we had to take some drastic action within the PPP. We called-up an emergency congress at Brikama. This resulted in the expulsion of Sanjaali Bojang from the PPP. Well of course to think of expelling Sanjaali Bojang from the party, people thought it unthinkable. The Solidarity Party idea was suggested right after I got to Nigeria.

Infact it turned out that it was J C Faye, Garba Jahumpa and others. P S Njaay did not join them. Faye and Jahumpa were the ones who presided over the formation of this party. So we thought and I knew that the whole idea was that they have seen this new party coming up, gathering momentum quickly and they simply wanted to nip it in the bud…laugh! The day after we expelled Sanjaali, he, J C Faye, Garba Jahumpa got into a vehicle and paraded the streets of Banjul. Sanjaali, said among other things, that the PPP was an egg in his hand and he will crush it. You know they went round…laugh! A few days later, the Governor came up with the idea of appointing a Chief Minister. Yes he carried that through. But before he did so, at an Executive meeting of the Executive Council, he announced it. By then I had good intelligence at the time. Infact my intelligence was that at this specific meeting of the Executive Council, on such and such a day, Governor Windley is going to appoint P S Njaay as Chief Minister.

Well considering the strengths of the parties, following the 1960 elections and many other factors, I considered it that this would be most undemocratic and wrong in the circumstances. I had actually written my resignation letter and took it with me to that Executive Council meeting…laugh! So when windily came out with this announcement, I pulled out my letter of resignation and tendered it to him…laugh! A day later, Sheriff Siise too handed in his resignation, a few days later, A. B. Njaay too followed suit. So we really caused a real constitutional crisis. Around this time too, M E Jallow of the Gambia Workers union had caused some industrial disturbances. So you can see several factors led to this situation. In sum, P S Njaay was not a member of the Executive Council and his party did not command a majority in the Council. Windley’s argument was that the majority of the Chiefs supported P S Njaay. Yes that gave Njaay numerically a majority of elected members there were eight Chiefs. However if you look at it, it was the PPP Political Party that had more seats than even the Chiefs put together.

We had the support of maybe 65% to 70% of the votes cast for the PPP. The Provincial constituencies were relatively much larger. So taking all these into consideration, Windley as an, Englishman and knowing how well they revere constitutional values and principles of democracy in the United Kingdom, should never have appointed P S Njaay.

Baaba: After the mass resignation, Windley realised the extent of his error! Did he reverse that decision? As far as I know, Njaay carried on as Chief Minister.

Sir Dawda: Oh yes! Njaay carried on as Chief Minister until we had a Constitutional conference in London in late 1960 or early 61. Ian Maclowd was the Colonial Secretary at the time. We came to London and had the conference. As a result of that, the elections were scheduled for 1962 and it was also agreed that the Gambia’s constitution was advanced to that of ” Full Internal Self-government”. So instead of a Chief Minister, we will have a Premier.

I cannot remember whether elections were held before or after or whether we went straight into Internal Self-Government. I was chosen as Premier. Now I remember Baaba, before, I was appointed Premier, there were elections in 1962, and the PPP increased it’s majority so much so that a foreign commentator said that ” with the results of the 62 elections demonstrated that Governor Windley was wrong in choosing Njaay as the Chief Minister. Njaay did not have the support of The Gambian people.”

Baaba; could this have been the reason for bad judgment by Windley why he was replaced by Sir John Paul?

Sir Dawda: Well! That issue too came up. We learnt that he was disbarred owing to certain misdemeanour but whether this had any bearing on his decision, I do not know!

Baaba: When you became Premier, did you see yourself leading The Gambia into independence, given that at the time, you had a huge mass base? There were lots of sentiments that were akin to nationhood, selfhood, what were your feelings, can you describe the mood?

Sir Dawda: chuckle! Silence!

Baaba: Let me rephrase this! Two things here Sir Dawda! You must have felt that you were well on your way to taking the Gambia to independence. Secondly, your base was widened even further and as I understand it, you took it upon yourself to advocate for a non-ethnically based Party that was going to incorporate all constituencies including even the constituents of your political rivals? Did you smell victory and was this why you made such a shrewd move?

Sir Dawda: Yes that decision was taken long before the elections. When the Party was formed, you see in 1959, it was under the name of the Protectorate Peoples Party. Clandestine campaigning had already started. As you know, Civil Servants could not campaign openly though this carried on. I had resigned my position as a Civil Servant when I was invited to lead the Party. Many others too resigned. We went out campaigning fully as a party and held an open meeting in Banjul as a start, and then we ploughed the provinces and came back to Banjul. We were at Albion Place where we used to have our meetings and at that meeting, we declared that: we had to tackle one very important issue before we went into the elections. We declared that the PPP is a nationwide Party and the name should therefore be more suitable. If we had kept the name the Protectorate Peoples Party, we would not have legitimacy in the Colony. We therefore declared that we wanted a national Party that will deal with national issues and not a parochial or regional Party. This was why at that Rally; we changed the name to the Peoples Progressive Party. Since everybody knew us as the PPP we simply substituted the Protectorate with the word Progressive and significantly, this name change was done in Banjul.

In addition, our new Party constitution, written before we went into the elections said clearly that we had no room for an ethnic or tribal or regional sentiment.

Baaba: So Sir Dawda you led the country into independence imbued with the wisdom of presenting a non-sectarian platform! At the time Sir Dawda, there were lots of agitation and strive for political emancipation in several other African colonial possessions. Much like The Gambia, these Colonies were attaining ” constitutional independence”. There were of course  differing views on the direction in which Africa should be steered. One such view held that there ought to be a unitary, continental coalition to independence, another view maintained that independence was a gradual process of change. Some even held that we ought to stick with our former masters and maintain the Anglophone/franco-phone/Luso-phone linkeages and so on. You were in the thick of all this and I am sure that you were conversant with the arguments. Can you tell me who the main advocates of these different political/ideological notions were and where did you stand in the discourse?

Sir Dawda: Well! The most prominent was Kwame Nkrumah who was advocating a continental union. Infact there were groupings like the Casablanca group, the Monrovia group, one more radical than the other. Some advocated for not only for federal unitarism but also how far the link was to socialism or capitalism. There were all these things, all these variations. This is quite natural! Some leaned more closely towards socialism of the Soviet bloc and others even adopted communism. And yet some leaned more towards the capitalism of the western countries. So these views and debates persisted throughout independent Africa I felt that Nkrumah’s view was not practical and feasible! And the move towards unity should be gradual and so on. And of course, we had the creation of the Organisation of African unity. The OAU was aiming at trying to define what Africa should be after the continent becomes independent. Within that OAU we still had different viewpoints.

Baaba: Is it correct to assume that apart from Nkrumah, the rest of the Anglophone West Africa had their leanings towards a gradualist process?

Sir Dawda: Yes! Abubakarr Tafawabalewa, who was the first Prime Minister of Nigeria, for example was in favour of the gradualist approach. In this regard, there was Tub man of Liberia who was part of the Monrovia group as opposed to the Casablanca group.

Baaba: A sizeable body of opinion of African scholars now argue that the Organisation of African Unity was in fact a compromise! Would you agree that this is a reasonable assertion?

Sir Dawda: With such an organisation, to some extent yes, especially in the context of African countries efforts to liberate the peoples of Africa colonised by different European powers. The Portuguese, British, French, you know each viewing their colonisations in different lights. You see …chuckle, it was so complex that you could not have unanimity of approach when it came to what will happen to Africa after the liberation of various countries. For example Kwame Nkrumah’s continental unity. It is not something one could implement really. One of the criticisms of that it was not practical. It was not objective. It is all very well to advocate for this position but how are you going to implement that? After countries had attained their independence and after a big struggle. It would require for fifty or so countries to, each of them to abandon their independence and join some unity with one head of State, …and so on…it is not practical! It was a beautiful idea but one that was not feasible. It may take possibly a century or so. But as I said, the various nuances, the various differences were real. And don’t forget, the main objective of the OAU was to accelerate attainment of independence of all the other African countries that still remained under colonial rule. I think they did a good job in helping the independence movements.

Baaba: Up until 1945, the independence movements in Africa had very strong ties with the African Diaspora. George Padmore, Marcus Garvey, Alfred Sam, W.E.B. Du Bois etc, all of whom had been a source of inspiration and indeed support for Pan African liberation! After 1945, the bonds weakened somewhat save Nkrumah and other individual Africans in the  continent and in the Diaspora who tried to maintain this link. What in your opinion might have been the reason for the weakening of the ties and decelerated the momentum for Pan African liberation?

Sir Dawda: What do you mean and in what sense?

Baaba: Prior to 1945, the whole drive and impetus for Pan African liberation originated from the Africans in the West Indies, in Britain and in America not only in terms of political thinking but also in direct political action. Their view was to bring Africans together in order to share experiences and to map out strategies for political struggle. W.E.B. Du Bois and George Padmore for example were instrumental in organising Pan African congresses in the United Kingdom, in Paris, and even in Lisbon over a period of two decades and more except during the war years. At these congresses, the liberation of the African continent was top on their agenda because they believed that unless Africa was free, the African Diaspora would not be free.

Sir Dawda: naturally at the time, they were not under colonialism or were they not?

Baaba: yes, those that lived in the West Indies were also under Colonial rule!

Sir Dawda: yes of course, the racial situation in the United States was quite evident. Martin

Luther King and others were stirring things up there to liberate the Africans there even though they were not a Colony. The blacks especially in the Southern States of America were suffering terribly from the lack of freedom, racial discrimination and segregation etc. But I suppose that the relationship would be different once liberation was achieved. Once the freedom of several African countries was achieved, their mission was accomplished. And of course people like Garvey and Du-Bois passed away and so the connection will naturally be weakened. !

Baaba: Let me take you back to The Gambia Sir Dawda. Two people are interesting historical figures in The Gambia though their significance is hardly given the credit that they are due. One of them is Edward Francis Small and the other is M E Jallow. Let us begin with Small! Small is said to have played a key role in enlightening Gambians about the evils of colonialism. He is credited with the founding of Trade Unions and the organisation of workers into Workers Cooperatives, he had single-handedly taken the Colonial administration to task by taking up human rights issues especially the right to withhold one’s labour- he organised the first and longest workers strike, published newspapers. Small is also credited with a whole gamut of other things. What were your impressions of Small and what did you make of him?

Sir Dawda; Well! Small was before my time as a Politician! Yes he played a very pioneering role in industrial relations not only in The Gambia but also throughout West Africa. His approach was centred on Trade unionism I should say. He pioneered the Trade union movement in The Gambia, which was aimed at improving the lot of Workers. In doing that he enlightened people to get up and strive for one’s condition, liberation, either constitutionally or in terms of wages and conditions of service. Yes, he played a very meaningful role in the early stages of the Gambia’s move towards constitutional improvement.

Baaba: And Mr Jallow?

Sir Dawda: M E Jallow too as a Trade Unionist, played a very prominent role in the field. He was a very active, dynamic Trade Unionist. He always said that he was not involved in Politics but he was always accused of using the Trade union platform for political ends. All in all, trade union activities that he was involved in played a part in the life of a nation and it’s advancement, not only in constitutional terms but also in the condition of the people in relation to employment and their standards of living. Of course he, at one point, stirred up some confrontation with the establishment, which was why, Governor Windley, had to invite the Police from Sierra Leone to come and reinforce the Gambian Police in the maintenance of law and order.

Baaba: Sir Dawda, you led The Gambia to independence and later to a republican status. You are said to have made a big impact on the Gambian body politic. What would you say were your key moments during these two achievements and in what direction were you steering The Gambia towards?

Sir Dawda: From what we have said so far, I think that we as a government thought that in the context of the stirrings in the continent, and at that time in our history as a nation, the important thing was to steer the country to independence and base our independence on policies that would enable the country and the people to advance themselves. This was simply the main aim and objective. But of course it is very complex it meant that Political parties had to be formed. You cannot achieve this without the people. We needed to mobilise the people, advance policies and strategies, use the energy of the people to achieve these. This was what we, as a party tried to do and I am glad that looking back, we made certain points very clear which were also reflected in our parties constitution and that is: Once we achieved independence, we will establish a democratic system which; respects human rights; respect law and order; recognise the independence of the judiciary and so on. Again when we approached independence and when people looked at The Gambia, despite her geographical situation, it’s size, it’s resources or (it’s lack of resources), and so on, they tend to write us off. As Berkley rice had it ” the birth of an improbable nation”. My view then and I had said it many times is really; it is not the size and the geographical situation of a country. The Size of a country may play some part but it is not all. Importantly, how we conduct ourselves as a nation, as a people is what really matters. When we attained independence, we pursued the ideals of democracy and human rights to such an extent that in spite of our size, we took a prominent role, infact a leading role in the advancement of the ideals of for example human rights. In Monrovia, a draft resolution was passed to have a Human rights Charter for our continent, that was to protect the basic human rights of our peoples in Africa, Gambia was instrumental in its drafting. When it came to its implementation, a member state had to host meetings for the elaboration of the Charter. Not many member states came forward to do that. Again it was little Gambia with limited resources that took up the challenge and invited the African nations to come to The Gambia and work on the Charter. We bore all the costs and as a result, we had a Charter for Africa. As you know, it was not called a human rights charter; it was the Charter of human and people’s rights. There is a story behind that too. There was a lively debate and discussion. The left leaning countries, the socialist countries, did not like the simple human rights label alone.

They argued that the individual had responsibility towards the state and vice versa. We must emphasise the responsibility of the state to protect the right of the individual. The socialist led by Guinea, Sekou Touray’s Guinea, they wanted to emphasise the fact that the people had an obligation to support the State. So they insisted that we included the Peoples right. In the end, we conceded. The Charter was passed, infact it was in 1981 that the Charter was adopted at the OAU summit in Nairobi, Kenya. I remember that I was asked to move the adoption of the charter. The fact that we pioneered the move towards the human rights charter created for us many enemies especially countries like Libya. And it was that very year that that they supported the attempted coup. Later on in Addis, we had another summit that we had to establish a commission that will actually implement the provisions of the charter. Again a member state had to host the commission and everyone said that there was no match for The Gambia. This was how the headquarters of the commission came to The Gambia.

Baaba: Among other things, you will be remembered for playing a lead role as peacemaker in Africa. And in other parts of the world. I can cite the Iran/Iraq peace talks in 1981 and the Guinea/Senegal, Sengor and Seeku Toure and the list is long. I remember the war of words over radio Senegal with Useinu secka and his opposite number in the Voice of the Revolution in Conakry. You have championed these causes. However, you like most other African heads of state, have been dismissed by contemporary historians as having done everything but championed the cause for the economic liberation of Africa. Once Africa attained constitutional independence, a flag and a national anthem, you all blindly accepted neo-colonialism as a model for development. In other words our independence never had an economic agenda. Issues like monoculture, diversification of the economy, investment on our human resource potentials and such like were totally wanting. Do you have any reactions to these?

Sir Dawda: Well of course economic development cannot happen by magic! It is something, which depends on a lot of things, which to start with, The Gambia lacked. We are small in population. In area, in the shape of the country, these are not conducive to development. We are living in the belly of another country with a different constitution. In spite of these, we had managed to maintain a Civil Service that was very efficient I think as compared to other countries. Again under the circumstances, we did the best we could and i think we had some results. There was definitely an improvement in the living standards of the people, particularly in the provinces. They were lagging behind in many areas. You mentioned the monoculture. Well this was what we inherited and you cannot inherit a monoculture and turn it immediately into something. But we worked on this and in agriculture and we saw some improvements.

We organised the cooperatives, which they lacked before. We helped them to actually understand how to conduct their own economic activities and so on. Whereas in the past they depended on monies loaned to them by lenders with extortionate rates of interest in the rainy season. A lot of things were done for them, which really helped, throughout the country. Wages and salaries were increased and they took account of inflation and so on. The Government being the main employer helped the Civil Servants and they benefitted. We conducted exploration to see whether we had OIL and which became very promising. At some stage we even had Chevron that brought a ship to drill offshore, I do not know whether you were aware of this? Shell carried out exploration on-shore at Brikama and somewhere around Sere Kunda. The signs were that there could be something. Exploration is such that you may have to do it many times. So we did everything that we could including our economic development programme earlier on to see how we can advance our economy on a few fronts to back-up the mono-culture. So we did what we could under the circumstances and achieved some results. At some time, our currency was very strong and stable. It almost became a hard currency. When the coup took place in 1994, we had had a very good track record within the IMF and the World Bank.

In our dealings with them, we had conceived the “Gateway Project” and the IMF and others were just about to inject more resources for us to actually embark on this Gateway Project. At that vital moment, the 94 coups struck. Infact at the time that the coup took place, our delegation was in Washington. The Secretary General and others were with the World Bank and the IMF.

Baaba: I would like to take this subject on the economy-the EDP, our relationship with the world bank and the Bretton woods institutions and how to some thinkers, they continually, immiserate and perpetuate neo-colonial rule and how they continue to plunder Africa’s resources? I would like to take up with you, the emergence of dissidents both from within and from without your party; the rise of ethnic feelings and corruption with you, but we will have to leave it there for another opportuned moment, when we meet in Banjul. The next time we meet, I would like to follow up more specifically from 1965 to the present.

Allow me to take this opportunity to extend my sincere gratitude to you for giving up your precious time. I realise that under the circumstances, it had meant sacrificing some of the time you could have spent otherwise with family and on other matters. All the best to you!

Sir Dawda: Thank you Baaba, in fact, I see a lot of movements in and out of the house by family members. I suspect they are planning to jump a surprise of sorts on me for something… I do not quite, know what?…chortle.. I will see you in Banjul so that we can continue our conversation.”

Barrow and His Poor Performance at the Kairaba Memorial Service

Honestly I doubt the President did a good speech yesterday!

Of course he didn’t say anything untoward or despicable about Jawara or anyone. But the speech lacked the relevance and fire that the occasion deserved. This is particularly important given the intensely polarized and unhealthy nature of the politics and governance situation in the country for which he is in fact a leading protagonist.

Hence I had thought that his speech would use the legacy, ideals and vision of Kairaba to redirect the country. He could have used that speech to reach out to opponents and offer compromises and make appeals as well to the other side.

In that house yesterday all of the political parties were present but he didn’t mention any party or party leader. He didn’t speak to any of the issues prevailing in the country. He didn’t recognize the founding fathers as OJ did. So for me he was speaking in a vacuum.

Smart presidents in democracies always use such occasions to address prevailing issues and concerns by drawing from the life and ideals of the deceased. They use the life of the deceased to send messages of assurances and reconciliation and appeals. In celebrating the life and work of DK Jawara the President has plenty of examples about Kairaba to use as basis to further heal and unify his country! Barrow failed to do that yesterday.

Everyone who spoke about Jawara recognized and highlighted the democratic credentials of the man. They spoke of his strong and unflinching respect for human rights and unshakable adherence to the rule of law. They spoke about his deep sense of tolerance and peace and above all they celebrated his leadership and his vision for The Gambia.

These are the issues that are causing serious concerns and vibrations in the country. These are the issues that are agitating the country as it moves towards December with the fear of 3 Years Jotna protests.

Therefore was yesterday not the occasion for Barrow to turn things around by reaching out to political parties to come around a national building discussion table? He could have asked the 3 Years Jotna folks to come around a discussion table to address fundamental issues? He could have spoken to public institutions to deliver efficient and quality goods and services as a means to enhance living conditions. He could have spoken to security issues given the public perception of ECOMIG, etc.

We had protests in Brikama and Serre Kunda in which violence erupted. Some people have been arrested and sent to Mile 2. In Brikama scores of people were beaten and injured and arrested and now reporting to police.

Barrow could have spoken to that and ask that the police release people and drop charges in favour of tolerance and peace. He could have given assurance that there will be investigations in police brutality. He could have even announced that Gorgui Mboob would be compensated to rebuild his house. He could appeal to Gambians to respect human rights and abide by the rule of law.

This is what leadership requires in such moments. But Barrow failed unfortunately to take advantage of the moment and use Kairaba to remake and redirect the country. Sad.

I was really wondering how this speech came to be written in the first place. Who wrote it? Was there any consultation in the process of writing this speech? Did the speech writers ask Barrow what message he wanted to send? Did Barrow himself ever thought of this occasion and considered what he wanted to get out of it?

I hope in future occasions like this the President and his advisers will seriously consult and critically ponder over what message to send out. Yesterday was a hugely missed opportunity and indeed Kairaba deserved a better demonstration of leadership than what Barrow provided. The country could have gained immensely but Barrow failed us, once again!

With thousands of Gambians pouring out and mourning such a remarkable leader the only drawback yesterday was the substandard performance by Pres. Adama Barrow! We hope such poor leadership will not be repeated ever again!

Thank you OJ and Sidia for saving the day!

For The Gambia Our Homeland

On the Late Sir Dawda Jawara : Tribute to an Emblem of Peace

I never had a close personal acquaintance with the first President of The Republic of The Gambia but I was close enough to have had the great fortune of enjoying the fragrance of Peace and love that his  persona gracefully manifested throughout his historic life.

I was friends with the children of his staff who lived in the residence adjoining State House. Together with Karlmen (now a catholic priest) and the other kids, we would go to pick his dog, Haiko, for a stroll on the beachside. When we had the occasional parties, we would borrow furniture from State House. That is how affable Sir Dawda and his household was. 

Growing up I became familiar with his peerless charming voice especially when he spoke the English Language to address the nation on official functions. And that is why in response to a request from a local journalist on how I would remember the former President, I said this:

 “The name Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara is synonymous with peace, that is what I will remember him for most. But of no less importance is Sir Dawda’s very charming, inspiring voice; that too, I shall never forget Inshaa Allah.”

When I became Presidential Affairs Minister, certain matters concerning him fell on my desk. With the help of businessman, Amadou Samba, the tough assignments were smoothened out with joy to be of service to a most worthy son of our soil.

The demise of the father of our nation is indeed a most heartfelt loss for all peace-loving, patriotic Gambians. To write a fitting eulogy for a distinguished statesman like Sir Dawda is a Herculean task for any mortal being. I make no pretence to be up to the task; but when a request came from a major international media outlet, I obliged with a few thoughts:

The passing of Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara, first President of the Republic of The Gambia, and co-founding father of (what is now) the African Union, represents the end of an era. 

Sir Dawda, carried with him the spirit and hope of his independence colleagues like Kwame Nkrumah. His demise is an important moment of reflection as we move forward as a continent, Independent, by flag, but with lots of work still outstanding to stand on our own [feet], united.

Known for his humility and respect for democracy and human rights that earned The Gambia the position of Headquarters of the African Commission for Human and People’s Rights, Sir Dawda inherited a colonial legacy of a small country whose viability as a nation was questioned by no less an authority than the Lords British Empire.

Within a quarter of a century, President Jawara proved to the world that The Gambia, though small and devoid of much natural resources, could thrive in peace and freedom and play an important role in the comity of nations. It was under his leadership as Chairman, that ECOWAS took the bold and unprecedented step of coming up with a multinational force (ECOMOG) to stop the carnage and re-establish peace in Liberia.

Sir Dawda passes on with a respectable legacy and joins his brothers, the Nkrumah’s on the other side. The question is: will my generation rise up to the occasion to complete the African Independence project with the cardinal principle of democracy and respect for the views of the opposing camps in peace and tranquility.

Let history be the ultimate judge. But the preliminary score on the Independence generation’s card, is quite promising.

Adieu, man of peace.

Having written the above piece, my mind still searched into my heart for more words  to honour Sir Dawda, and so my muse spoke:

Adieu Sir Dawda

I was not your biggest fan

Through youthful years of angst

Espousing a revolutionary stand

With age I came to understand

The warp and woof of this land

Appreciating the Kairaba stand

Peace and love, sun and sand

A voice for all in our homeland

Carrying a rose and olive branch

Peace in Liberia was your stance 

Not wavering for a single instance 

Spreading peace and forbearance

Adieu Sir Dawda Gambia’s father

God bless you further in Al-Jannah 

I was privileged to be an honoured guest in Gunjur, just a few days before Sir Dawda’s demise, where the young people of that great town and their partners embarked on a major tree planting exercise. During this programme, environmental activist, Kemo Fatty, of the Greenup Gambia movement, brought copies of Sir Dawda’s famous Banjul Declaration and asked all participants and guests to stand up and read it aloud; which we did in unison with a solemn disposition, thereby relaunching Sir Dawda’s sacred proclamation.

Speaking to journalists on the sidelines of that occasion in Gunjur I told journalists that the best way for Gambian youths to honour Sir Dawda would be to make sure we implement his vision as proclaimed in the Banjul Declaration.

Indeed the old man, Sir Dawda, has lived a great, fulfilled life and he has left us with remarkable lessons. The tree he has planted shall grow and his mission lives in the veins and minds of the next generation as clearly demonstrated in Gunjur.

May Allah forgive our former President for his shortcomings and admit him in Jannah. And for now and ever we shall be repeating the glorious words of Gambian artiste Jali Madi Kanuteh who took inspiration from his own late father to chant “Dawda Jawara abaraka!

Momodou Sabally

Former Presidential Affairs Minister

Founder-President, Sabally Leadership Academy (SLA)

Reset password

Enter your email address and we will send you a link to change your password.

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

Sign up with email

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

By clicking the «SIGN UP» button you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Powered by Estatik