Sunday, August 3, 2025
Home Blog Page 88

Africa Cup of Nations: Guinea sack coach Paul Put, Gambia’s once-upon-a-time football sweetie

0

Guinea coach Paul Put was sacked on Tuesday following the team’s last 16 exit at the Africa Cup of Nations in Egypt.

Belgian Put, who was appointed in March 2018, saw Guinea beaten 3-0 by finalists Algeria in the first knockout round having scraped through as one of four third-place teams in the group stage.

“The coach is dismissed. We’re going to talk with him about the terms of his departure. Feguifoot has ended the partnership with Paul Put,” said Antonio Souare, the head of Guinea’s football federation.

Souare added a return of three wins, four draws and five defeats in 12 matches played under Put was “not satisfactory”.

Put, 63, led Burkina Faso to the Cup of Nations final in 2013 before losing 1-0 to Nigeria.

Paul Put was coach of the Gambian national team between 2008 and 2011.

 

On the Impending GTTI Fiasco: Letter the Minister of Higher Education

Honourable Minister and my dear respected kotor,

I salute you with great reverence and with good reasons for that respect: You have always been a great source of inspiration for us throughout the nineties and beyond, as one of the brightest stars in our academic firmament. Indeed I have never met a public official so eloquent and imbued with brilliance like you.

That respect remains to this day. And it is because of the high esteem in which I have always held you that this epistle, which should have been penned much earlier, got delayed. Indeed it is very difficult to criticise public officials on policy matters in our little town called Gambia. This is due to the fact that our people prefer to hush down issues and make gossip mills out of important matters rather than coming out boldly to challenge the relevant authorities.

We used Yahya Jammeh’s heavy hand as an excuse for this but the same attitude remains, by and large, post-Jammeh. And that is why I developed a new descriptor hashtag #HushHushNation as I still ride on my foundational one #CantCageMe.

It is sad to note that whenever I publish open letters to serving public officials, some people assume that I have personal problems with those officials despite the obvious fact that the matters I raise are issues of genuine public concern. Therefore I am very careful and I do not rush to issue critiques of public officials; I became extra cautious on this one because of the respect and admiration I have for you.

However, the matter at hand is so critical and so urgent that if I do not write this letter, I would not be able to sleep peacefully. The subject is education, a matter I deeply care about in this country.

When I first heard that The Gambia Technical Training Institute (GTTI) virtually our only vocational training institute worth its name was going to be transformed into a university alongside the Management Development Institute (MDI), I thought it was some kind of a joke or a case of newspapers misreporting a matter too complex. Alas, I was wrong and I knew that to be the case when I read yet another news report announcing Cabinet approval for what I have now labelled the worst decision in our educational history.

Honourable Minister, I believe that you may disagree outwardly but in the inner recess of your heart, you would firmly agree with me that our only public university, the UTG is not in good shape at all. The students of this university do not have adequate classroom and sanitary facilities. UTG still lacks the right numbers of professors and lecturers to be able to fully and effectively carry out its mandate.

Funding for the UTG is inadequate and the leadership at that university is certainly suboptimal, to be euphemistic about a very serious and critical situation. Most times I have said that the energy, and brilliance, exhibited by the students of the UTG far outpaces the leadership at that university and something should be done about that to help us duly harness the brimming potential of our dynamic young minds.

After two decades of operation our only public university does not have a proper library, talk less of modern laboratories. Recently one of the programmes in that university (UTG) in the area of science could not pass the test of accreditation from relevant authorities but desperate efforts had to be mounted to make sure that programme is given a pass.

Why then do you think that it is prudent to create a new university of science and technology and in the process rob us of the only vocational training institute we can boast of as a nation in dire need of skilled technicians in every field?

Honourable Minister, I am sure you have seen my comment on Facebook on this matter but it is important that I repeat it here for emphasis as I conclude part one of of this epistle: A country that doesn’t have a single solid high school level physics lab has no business trying to set up a so called university of science and technology…stop misleading our President!

‘Jeurejeuff kotor Badara’, you have served us well from the previous government as a very effective permanent secretary at the Ministry of Basic Education. You continue you serve us well as Minister of Higher Education and we appreciate your service. But this move on GTTI is not a wise one. Let the conversation continue in part 2, inshaa Allah.

Your Faithfully
Momodou Sabally
Former Secretary General and Head of the Civil Service, author.

In Defence of Ndey Tapha Sosseh: Mamadou Tangara must Resign and Apologise for Aiding and Abetting Tyranny in the Gambia

The rebuttal by Mamadou Tangara that he never sought the extradition of Ndey Tapha Sosseh from Mali is laden with loopholes for which Tangara cannot exonerate himself from such an immoral and unpatriotic act. After serving a dictator for so long in such a strategic capacity, Tangara cannot make me believe that he believes in and upholds any higher values and standards otherwise why would Tangara, a highly educated and marketable intellectual as he is and knowing the brutality and despotism of Jammeh, decided to stick with Yaya Jammeh until the end? No human being deserves trust and respect who aids and abets a tyrant and a tyranny that is notorious for rape, torture, murder and plunder of public wealth.

 

In his rebuttal Tangara acknowledged that indeed Tyrant Jammeh expressed concern about the presence of Kukoie and Ndey Tapha in Mali. Knowing Jammeh, does Tangara want to make us believe that Jammeh will only express such a concern and not go further to seek the extradition, abduction or murder of these individuals? By acknowledging that Jammeh raised that concern it is clear that indeed Jammeh would indeed send him to Mali to execute that concern. Tangara knows, like the rest of us, that Jammeh has no values, no morals, no patriotism and no fear of God to seek the destruction of the rights and life of a human being especially those he perceived to be his enemies.

 

Further, in his misleading rebuttal Tangara said he did warn one Jibi Bah to be careful of Jammeh but then he could not reach out to Ndey Tapha for “obvious reasons”! What are those “obvious reasons”? How could Tangara find it difficult to contact Ndey Tapha when it was Tangara himself who said that Ndey used to send him pictures and reports of her activities. Tangara went further to even claim that he had once “handpicked” Ndey for a training in Mali. The question therefore is how could someone be so close to you that you even recommended her for a training but then you cannot make a mere call or text to save her life? Who is Tangara trying to hoodwink?

 

By alerting Jibi that he was in danger from Yaya Jammeh and by urging Malian authorities to provide security for Ndey if indeed true, how come therefore that Tangara could not reach out to the main person herself to alert her? Or else, how come Tangara could not also reached out to Mrs. Adelaide Sosseh, one of the most popular and accessible Gambians and the mother of Ndey to warn her? How come Tangara could not even find any trusted person under the sun to warn Ndey? If Tangara could play the kind of role he claimed to have played in the release of Amadou Scattered Jammeh, how come he could not play a similar role in the case of Ndey by reaching out to her?

 

I am sure Ndey Tapha Sosseh is not ignorant or an ingrate or plainly malicious against Mamadou Tangara. If Ndey could acknowledge the divine intervention provided by the late Kalifa Bajinka how come Ndey could forgot or misconstrue the role played by Tangara. We had seen other witnesses also mention the saviour role Kalifa played but no on ever mentioned Tangara. Why? As Tangara himself acknowledged indeed Ndey is a smart and intelligent woman and I add that she is also one of the most decent, honest and trustworthy human beings on earth. Therefore, I do not see why Ndey would face the world only to lie against one man called Mamadou Tangara or forget or misunderstand how Tangara helped her!

 

What I can deduct from Ndey’s testimony and from the misleading rebuttal of Tangara is that indeed Tangara is one of the most prodigal sons of this land who unleashed excruciating affliction on the body and soul of our nation. This is because Tangara is one of the most highly educated human beings in the world. Tangara knows that Yaya Jammeh was not only uneducated and ignorant, but he was also corrupt, vile, immoral and despicable who has no good for any society. Yet Tangara decided to share even one day with Jammeh to enable him to continue to unleash havoc on Gambians. By his education and experience, one would have imagined that Tangara would not even have hesitated for once to join the Jammeh Cabinet. Not only did he join that Gang of Imbeciles, but he also went further to bask in its glory and defending that regime with all of his might and soul! Shame.

 

Let Tangara resign now and offer an unconditional and unreserved apology to Gambians for his role to sustain a brutal regime whose only character was to kill and rape hundreds of Gambian men and women and boys and girls. Tangara cannot claim that he was not aware of murderous, corrupt and criminal nature of Yaya Jammeh and the APRC Regime! Yet he served them well!

 

Well before the TRRC all Gambians know that it was Yaya Jammeh and his Junta who killed Koro Ceesay. Tangara cannot claim he did not know that it was Yaya Jammeh who ordered the shooting to death of 14 Gambian students. Tangara cannot claim not to know that it was Yaya Jammeh who ordered the killing of Deyda Hydara, Chief Manneh or Mamut Ceesay and Ebou Jobe or Solo Sandeng. Tangara cannot claim that he did not know the existence of the Junglers, and the culture of tortures and extrajudicial killings perpetrated by them under the command of Yaya Jammeh.  Yet despite this knowledge, which all Gambians also know, Tangara silently and obediently continued to serve that tyrant. What kind of human being is Mamadou Tangara? Which God and what religion does Tangara believe? What values does Tangara uphold?

 

At the end of the day all that I can say is that it is in fact Pres Adama Barrow disrespecting Gambians. For it is so disappointing and insulting that indeed President Adama Barrow could think of nothing other than to appoint people like Mamadou Tangara into the highest office of the land. The decision to appoint Mamadou Tangara into the Cabinet of the Gambia is the most stupid, immoral, unpatriotic, ungodly, insulting and treacherous decision anyone can make. Whoever appointed Mamadou Tangara into our Cabinet can only be described as a traitor, betrayer and unworthy son or daughter of the Gambia. It is such a shame and insult of unparalleled proportions!

 

Ndey Tapha Sosseh is a patriot. She is among the best sons and daughters of the Gambia. She is not comparable by any standards to Mamadou Tangara and all those traitors and immoral sons and daughters who sold their soul to Yaya Jammeh to betray Mother Gambia! Ndey Tapha Sosseh could have equally prostituted herself to Yaya Jammeh and become an ambassador or director or governor or permanent secretary or minister. But no, she chose the Gambia instead while Tangara disowned the Gambia and chose Yaya Jammeh. If Tangara wants to cleanse himself let him take the courageous and honourable step by resigning and apologising to Gambians immediately but he cannot use Ndey Tapha Sosseh to cleanse himself. Ndey Tapha Sosseh is far more decent and patriotic than that! Shame on Traitors!

 

For the Gambia Our Homeland

Sabally Applauds Jammeh, Raps on Education as he Addresses Graduates

0

Former Secretary General and Presidential Affairs Minister, Momodou Sabally, has applauded Gambia’s erstwhile leader Yahya Jammeh for his courage and vision in establishing the country’s first ever university (UTG).

He made these remarks,  Friday, July 12, 2019 while addressing graduates at Sibanor Secondary School.

“This is indeed a day worth celebrating both for you and your parents. 25 years ago, no one parent could have imagined their children accomplishing Secondary school education under their own roof and under their own watchful eyes in this blessed and historic town of Sibanorr.

“So then we must give the devil his due and commend our former Head of State Sheikh Professor Dr. Alhagie Yahya AJJ Jammeh who had the vision, courage and tenacity to initiate the actual democratisation of education in this country. Yes that is the man who also gave us our first ever university.

“And those who tell you that Yahya Jammeh used our tax money to build a university, should be told to go and ask our first President Sir Dawda Jawara, what did he use our tax money for.

“Jammeh is gone, his legacy stays. We have a new President, let us give him our unflinching support because nation building is a continuous process. It is a relay. Jawara gave the baton to Jammeh, Jammeh to Barrow. Now let us move together in unity as a team. Team Gambia:

One Gambia

One People

One Nation”

He later advised the graduates to be persistent in pursuit of their educational goals and to never stop learning.

“Education is your multipurpose visa in this increasingly complex global village we live in today. And therefore our progress as individuals, communities and nations would only be commensurate with our level of education and training.

“Reading and learning are my most important tools and assets to this day and beyondinshaa Allah. So my advice to you on the topic of “Life after School” is ‘Go Back to Schooll!!! Keep reading, keep learning.’

Sabally concluded his speech by reiterating a message he gave to graduating students in another school barely a week ago:

“Stay away from politics and do not allow anyone to use you to create chaos or instability in your country in the pursuit of their selfish interests. Engagement in your civic duties is important but at this stage in your life, my advice is to stay away from party politics, perform your civic duties and responsibilities. Get your voters cards when you qualify for that (by age), go to the polls when the time comes and keep the peace!” He concluded.

Gambia gov’t vs The Fatu Network: Joint statement from President & Vice President of The Fatu Network

As many are aware, on Monday, July 8th, 2019, Radio France International reporter Romain Chanson, and The Fatu Network cameraman Modou Saidy were attacked by APRC militants during coverage of a solidarity gathering organized for Yankuba Touray. Mr. Touray stands accused of causing the death of former Minister of Finance, Ousman Koro Ceesay in 1995. Responding to the assault of the TFN cameraman, many Gambians on social media, Senegalese media, Gambia Press Union and others have shared solidarity messages and publications with The Fatu Network. However, on July 9th, 2019, The Gambia Government spokesperson Mr. Ebrima Sankareh issued a statement standing in solidarity with the RFI journalist, not mentioning the attack on The Fatu Network cameraman in that written communique.

We are concerned that The Gambia Government sidelining Gambian journalists will give way to continued and dangerous confrontations while they are out to do their work to cover stories and inform the masses. Thus, we urge Mr. Sankareh to correct this situation to ensure such incidents do not happen to TFN staff or any other journalist covering a story in The Gambia.

The Fatu Network is a premier media outlet that was at the forefront of the Gambian struggle, and continues their exemplary work to this day.  Thus, we stand in solidarity with our staff, and would like to express gratitude to Fatu Camara, the CEO of The Fatu Network for showing true leadership by supporting Mr. Saidy during this ordeal. We would also like to offer our condolences to Mr. Saidy whose father passed away a day after he was attacked.

Sincerely,

Awa (Tukulorr) Sey, President, The Fatu Network Oumie Andrews, Vice President, The Fatu Network

Sabally faults the conversion of GTTI to university of engineering, science and technology

By Alhassan Darboe

Momodou Sabally,former secretary General and minister of presidential affairs has faulted the conversion of GTTI to a university of Engineering, Science and Technology. Writing on his Facebook page, Sabally said: “A country that doesn’t have a single solid high school level physics lab has no business trying to set up a so called university of science and technology…stop misleading our President…..I am really worried about this one … So disappointed with Higher Education Minister Badara Joof!”.

Also adding her voice to the chorus of voices speaking against the move by government to convert GTTI into a technological University, Kumba Daffeh, a Gambian social commentator and educator commonly known as Tresor closet- beyond said: “The story of putting the cart before the horse. All the high schools I have been too have no functioning Science labs. Really, who are they going to graduate to get to the school of Science. We just like to look good on the outside without taking care of the insides, the reason why most things fail. We just are allergic to following due process and doing the right thing for the sake of prosperity.”

Also commenting, Cherno kebbeh,a U.S based Gambian- American economist added: “I couldn’t agree more. It is a complete joke. How do you just elevate a polytechnic to a university overnight”?

According to a recent press release by Ebrima Sillah,Gambian minister of Communication, cabinet ministers have approved the planned transformation of the Gambia Technical Training Institute into a University of Engineering, Science, and Technology (UEST).
The release from the Communication minister further added: “The transformation of the GTTI into a University is expected to create opportunities to address the high-level skills gaps within the country’s workforce. The transformation will also accord the emerging University to retain its current responsibilities to augment and improve the quality and relevance of these programs. It will strengthen technical certificate and diploma levels and will respond to critical needs of students who will take up degree programs in Science, Engineering and Technology,’’

Gambian higher education is in shambles. Gambia University despite the best efforts of the administrators is currently struggling with poor learning facilities, outdated libraries and poor internet access for students. Marina International School, a private high school in Bakau is more equipped with learning facilities than University of The Gambia. Gambia college, MDI, GTTI and other private colleges produce graduates who if they ever wish to enroll at Gambia University mostly start from scratch because Gambia University does not give them credit for classes taken in other tertiary intuitions.

Gambia government’s most shameful behavior towards The Fatu Network

The Fatu Network would like to express full disappointment with regard to the Gambia government’s reaction towards the assault of two journalists at the high court in Banjul on Monday.

On Monday July 8, our cameraman Modou Saidy was assaulted by an angry APRC mob as he attempted to film a solidarity gathering organised for Yankuba Touray who stands accused of causing the death of former finance minister Ousman Koro Ceesay in 1995. The other journalist who was attacked by APRC militants is a reporter with Radio France International, Romain Chanson.

On Tuesday July 9, the Gambia government issued a statement but this statement made no mention of the attack our cameraman. The statement, signed by the Gambia government’s spokesperson Ebrima Sankareh, only stopped at addressing Mr Chanson’s case.

We view the government’s behavior as most shameful. It is also our view that this government is not serious about ensuring the safety and security of Gambian journalists.

The Fatu Network

Three years after the July 15th coup attempt in Turkey, the Fetullah terrorist organisation (FETO) is still a global threat

On the 15th of July we are marking the third anniversary of the hideous coup attempt by the Fethullah Terrorist Organisation (FETO), staged in Turkey three years ago on 15 July, 2016. As is known, this bloody attempt was thwarted by the bravery and sacrifice of the Turkish people. As the painful memories of the fateful night is still fresh on the minds of the Turkish people, the putschists mercilessly used lethal military hardware against innocent civilians, who took to the streets to defend their democratic institutions, claiming the lives of 251 innocent Turkish citizens and wounding more than 2,500 people.

As three years elapsed since this ominous event took place, the Turkish Government and the Turkish people made a long way in overcoming the trauma posed by this existential threat. In this context, the focus of the Turkish Government has rested basically on two things, namely, the diagnosing the reasons for the presence of FETO elements within the security and civilian structures of the state and rehabilitating the state apparatus from these terrorist elements.

Fortunately, Turkey, under the wise leadership of H.E. President Erdoğan, has managed to overcome the trauma created by FETO. Three years on, our fight against FETO-member coup plotters has not weakened our security forces and civilian bureaucracy, on the contrary, the Turkish Armed Forces, National Police and state apparatus in general have grown stronger as they have been cleared of FETO-member traitors.

The Turkish government in parallel with its fight with FETO as well as all sorts of terrorism at home is committed to further strengthen the bases of democracy in Turkey. We are determined to fight such enemies of democracy through democracy. Hence, the Turkish people and the government, having paid a dear price for the sublime values of democracy, now legitimately expect the cooperation of the international community and our allies with regard to the extradition of the FETO criminals.

During the last three years, criminal activities of FETO have been investigated in hundreds of different court cases, bringing to surface the darker undertakings of the organisation. Confronting such a dark, sinister and clandestine structure is not easy. The Turkish government rightfully took and continues to take necessary and proportionate measures to supress and eventually defeat this imminent threat.

Within this framework, the fight against FETO both inside and outside Turkey has constituted one of the main priorities of the Turkish Government. Within Turkey, our efforts are being conducted under three pillars:

  1. a) Firstly, on the basis of the rule of law, the perpetrators of the 15th of July coup attempt have been brought to justice.
  2. b) FETO’s organizational structure within governmental institutions has been unveiled; administrative and judicial procedures have been initiated against its members and hence the “parallel state structure” has been brought down.
  3. c) Apart from those within the governmental institutions, FETO’s attempts to spread across all areas of the economy via its shell entities, particularly in the education, media and banking sectors, have been thwarted.

Despite facing extraordinary security challenges, we have been able to successfully conduct our fight at home in compliance with the principles of the rule of law and fundamental rights and freedoms. We have also expended efforts to avoid grievances and established new mechanisms to examine and settle alleged grievances.

As these developments took place, FETO has undergone a significant transformation. The organization, which lost its backbone in Turkey, is now trying to survive by making use of its structure abroad. Thus, fighting against the structures of FETO abroad has gained significance.

Most importantly, the international community is gradually understanding that FETO is not a social movement that engages with education and charity, contrary to the way it tries to portray itself, but rather a dark and insidious organization with political and economic ambitions. A clear awareness regarding the characteristics of the organization has developed among public opinions abroad.

Various countries and international organizations have declared FETO as a terrorist organization. In this context, FETO was declared as a terrorist organization in the 43rd session of the Council of Foreign Ministers of the OIC held on 19 October 2016; a similar resolution was written at the Asian Parliamentary Assembly on 1 December 2016 and ratified at the 12th Conference of the Parliamentary Union of the OIC on 27 January 2017. In addition to the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, the Supreme Court of Pakistan declared FETO a terrorist organization with the verdict rendered on 28 December 2018.

The awareness raised regarding FETO in third countries has also stimulated closer monitoring and investigation of the activities related to these elements by the officials of the aforementioned countries. Unlawful acts carried out by FETO-affiliated organizations have thus been revealed in various countries. The members of the organization have been deported accordingly. In addition to those deported to third countries, more than one hundred and ten FETO members from over twenty countries have been extradited to Turkey.

In most of the countries where the FETO schools had been operating, the schools were handed over to Maarif Foundation of Turkey. FETO’s presence in some other countries were diminished to a minimum level since the relevant Turkish authorities keep their close contacts with their counterparts to take over the remaining FETO schools. The Turkish Maarif Foundation (TMF) has taken over FETO affiliated schools in eighteen countries. The activities of FETO affiliated schools and language courses have been terminated in thirty-six countries.

In spite of the Turkish Government’s and the Turkish people’s all-out fight against FETO, it still avails itself of every opportunity to abuse the democracies to operate in many countries under the disguise of schools, businesses, NGOs and media houses throughout the world. Their modus operandi is the same all around the world. As they aim to infiltrate and enlarge their global economic and political influence, they constitute a direct security threat for any country where they operate.

Written by H.E. Ismail Sefa Yuceer, Turkish Ambassador in Banjul

 

Mane: I will stop taking penalties for Senegal

0

Senegalese superstar Sadio Mane has opted to stop taking penalties for the Teranga Lions after missing two at the Nations Cup.

Mane missed a penalty against Uganda but scored the winner as the West Africans progressed to the quarterfinals of the Africa Cup of Nations in Egypt.

Despite scoring three times at the tournament, the Liverpool attacker has taken a step back from taking penalties for his national team.

“I will not be selfish,” Mane said in a press statement after the meeting.

“I will stop paying penalty shootouts after being twice wasted so far in the tournament.”

“My team comes first, and I will give another colleague a chance to pay penalties if we get it in the future.”

Mane also missed a penalty at the competition two years ago in Gabon.

Senegal will next face Benin in the last eight with the winger expected to star once again.

Man rapes 89-year-old grandmother

Luck has run out of a 71-year-old man, Yap Chaiphak, after he was arrested by the police in Southern Thailand after confessing to have raped an 89-year-old neighbour.

However, before the police arrived, some measure of “justice” had already been given to Chaiphak.

A granddaughter of the victim, simply identified as Naphawan, affirmed that she whacked Yap four or five times with a broom handle for not being remorseful of his shameful act.

“I admit I lost my temper,” she said.

“Society is not safe anymore – for a neighbour to do this to my gran is just terrible”.

The victim, identified simply as Mia, was raped while out on a raised platform outside her house in the village of Ban Na, on Monday.

The suspect has been admitted and taken to hospital to treat a broken arm and damaged ribs which he got from the beating meted out to him. (Vanguard)

Sabally Advises Youths to Stay Away from Politics, Focus on Their Education

Former Presidential  Affairs Minister as well as Secretary General and Head of the Civil Service, Momodou Sabally, was the Guest Speaker at the graduation ceremony of Yunus English School in Busumbala on Saturday June 29, 2019.

Addressing more than 230 graduates on the topic “Education as a Tool for Personal Development and National Progress”, Sabally decried the level acrimony in our current political landscape. He therefore advised the youths to stay out of politics and focus on their education for personal development and to prepare themselves for active positive roles in our nation building process.

He admonished the youths to eschew any groups or movements trying to create instability in the country and encouraged them to respect the laws of the land as enshrined in the constitution of the republic. “Everyone has only one vote so there is no need to fight about politics. When the time comes for elections in 2021, just go to the polls and peacefully cast your vote!”

Dilating on the theme of his speech Sabally advised the graduates thus:

“With reference to the verses of the Quran that I opened this speech with, their meanings are quite clear on the surface but just like the deep, vast ocean that the Holy Quran is, these verses have multiple layers of meaning.

“But for the purposes of this speech, I draw from these first two verses of Surah Jumuah, the message that Prophet Muhammad’s mission is to TEACH us.

“And so if the one in whose hands is the keys to our redemption has the duty to TEACH us  and the first verse that was revealed to him was “Iqra”, then is their anything more important in our lives than to learn?

“Like any good thing, education comes at a cost. From school fees to uniforms and foregone income, we have to pay the price. But the results are more than worth the trouble!

“In the words of the Greek Philosopher Aristotle, “The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.”

“One of my favourite role models, American Founding Father Benjamin Franklin puts it this way “If a man empties his purse into his head, no man can take it away from him. An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest.”

Sabally then buttressed his message to the graduates by narrating his own story on how education empowered him to become a useful global citizen, serving not only his country but people from all over the world.

He paid tribute to the founder and proprietor of the School Mr. Yunus Sillah and congratulated the graduating students and their parents.

Baby named ‘Google’ gets gifts from Google

United States technology giant, Google, has sent gifts to a baby boy named Google by their parents in Indonesia, local media reported on Wednesday.

Google was born in November but his birth certificate went viral recently after his mother posted it on social media.

Some online commentators quipped that he would find it hard to search his name on Google.

“They sent several items as a token of appreciation, including a jumper,” the baby’s mother, Ella Karina, was quoted as saying by Tribunnews online newspaper.

Ella said that Google congratulated them and expressed hope that baby Google would help many people in future.

Google’s mother said she was initially opposed to her husband’s idea to name their second child Google, but now she has no regrets.

“We thank `technology giant Google’ for their attention. We are more confident now,” Ella said.

Sabally Addresses WASS Graduates on Discipline

0

Former Secretary General and international speaker Momodou Sabally has called for a return to the basic tenets of our cultural and religious ethos in inculcating discipline in young people.

He made this remarks at the graduation ceremony of the West African Senior Secondary School (WASS), on Friday June 28, 2019, as Chief Guest of Honour and Keynote Speaker.

Speaking on the theme “Combatting the High Increase of Indiscipline Among Teenagers in School” Sabally asserted:

“The topic is indeed of relevance without any shadow of a doubt.

Yet the question must be asked: ‘What went wrong? Where were we; what used to obtain in the past? And how did we find ourselves in this mess.’

“My first diagnostic premise is that we went for western education whole scale without making sure our cultural value system was fully integrated into the stuff we were feeding into the minds of our young people.

“The abandonment of initiation rites both for male and female has played a major role in the deterioration of the attitude of our young ones.  Add to that the proliferation of the global media input into the minds of our youths, and then the now widespread use of social media with its obvious and unmistakable influence on the young fertile minds of our youths and you will clearly see the path we took to arrive at our current situation.

“We must correct these errata or face the consequences. What we  are seeing is just the tip of the iceberg. We need to solve this problem, NOW!”

“How can a high court judge stoop so low as to interfere in a simple disciplinary matter at school level? Where are we heading as a country?

“And one more thing: Where are the fathers of the teenagers? Where are we? We cannot abdicate our responsibilities and leave all the burden of raising our children to our wives. This is totally unconscionable.”

He then called for close collaboration between all stakeholders in a bid to solve the problem of indiscipline.

“The problem of indiscipline can only be solved when parents, school authorities and government officials come together to work in partnership.

“We must look back at our past and try to correct ourselves by bringing back to the fore everything that is good and relevant and teach our young ones our authentic culture and religious ethos.

This is the way forward!”

Sabally then shared his experience and how education helped transform his life for the better. He advised the graduates to espouse the culture of lifelong learning and to play positive active roles in their communities and the country.

The Ramadan Rapist

By Momodou Ndow

We’ve heard the whispers, and the wind has carried them everywhere. The weekend parties at Kanilai and endless functions populated by young Gambian women and other married women who left their husbands behind. Goloh thought he had a free rein on women – young or old, single or married. This is what being a psychopath and heavily intoxicated with power can create. In his twisted head, Goloh was convinced neh mor morm daykabi and everything in it was at his disposal, including all the young women.

Toufah’s case is your classic victim grooming scenario. Victim grooming is when someone builds an emotional connection with a child to gain their trust for the purposes of sexual abuse or sexual exploitation. The installation of plumbing in her family’s home, the buying of furniture, driving her sick relative to doctors, showing particular interest in her project, and the employment offer (protocol officer). These are the emotional tools Goloh used to groom Toufah.

Imagine a president using a Ramadan beauty pageant event as a pretext to lure an 18-year-old lady for sex. Better yet, imagine a president raping an 18-year-old lady at the State House while nyungey wachey kaamil right outside. Just imagine that! And it was all facilitated by Jimbee The Pimp, the number one accomplice in this alleged rape case. This was all about power, not sexual desire. According to Toufah, Goloh told her that a woman has never rejected him and he could have any woman he wants. So sex was not the issues here! Goloh wanted to use the power of rape to punish Toufah for rejecting him, which he claims never happened. The motivation here was the need for dominance and control.

As the saying goes, “what goes up must come down”, and Goloh is on his way down and will crash and burn. He was drunken with power and thought he was flying, but his Chaya is now caught on an electric light pole, and that electric light pole is Fatou Toufah Jallow. In Toufah I see strength, in Toufah I see courage, and in Toufah I see a fighter! I hope more young women will come out and share their stories regarding any horrific encounter they had with Goloh, The Ramadan Rapist! Apparently, there was an elaborate system in place. 

PRESS RELEASE: U.S. Department of State Releases International Religious Freedom Report

0

On June 21, 2019, Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo released the 2018 version of the annual Report to Congress on International Religious Freedom – the International Religious Freedom Report – that describes the status of religious freedom in every country. The report covers government policies violating religious belief and practices of groups, religious denominations and individuals, and U.S. policies to promote religious freedom around the world. The U.S. Department of State submits the reports in accordance with the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998.

This year’s report on The Gambia details a climate of broad religious tolerance and acceptance.  The report includes U.S. Embassy efforts to decentralize and expand outreach to religious communities. In remarks at an Iftar hosted during the Holy Month of Ramadan this year, Ambassador Paschall noted that just as The Gambia is a leader in religious tolerance and acceptance, it can be a leader on many other significant human rights issues.

 

The full report, including The Gambia country narrative, can be found online at: https://www.state.gov/reports/2018-report-on-international-religious-freedom/the-gambia/.

Understanding the constitutional immunity for AFPRC members: Lessons for TRRC

While it is indeed painful to witness a key perpetrator like Yankuba Touray easily walk out of the TRRC it is necessary to point out that indeed the Constitution, from sections 13 to 17of the Second Schedule have protected members and other persons acting in the name of the notorious AFPRC from accountability. In their criminal minds the junta seemed to have considered that a day of reckoning would one day arrive and therefore they crafted these entrenched clauses to protect themselves. However, it must be noted that these AFPRC members shall not escape justice for long hence Yankuba was ill-advised to invoke those provisions.

What did those sections say?

Section 13(1) clearly protects members of the AFPRC or their ministers or appointees from answering before any ‘court or authority or under the Constitution or any other law’ for anything they did or failed to do in the ‘performance of their official duties’ in the name of the junta. While torture and murder are indeed not an official duty, however the drafters of the Constitution smartly covered up this matter with subsection 4 which states that even if such action was taken not in ‘accordance with any procedure prescribed by law’ it cannot be questioned.

These actions have been listed in subsection 2 as actions leading to or subsequent upon the July 22 military coup which includes the overthrow of the PPP Government, suspension of the 1970 Constitution or the establishment of the AFPRC. Section 13 went further to state in paragraph 3 that no person acting on behalf of the AFPRC shall be questioned for any act in any proceedings and therefore no court or tribunal shall have the power to make any decision on account of these acts. Furthermore, under paragraph 5 it stated that no court or tribunal shall ‘entertain an action’ against any person acting on the instructions or authority of AFPRC even if such action violates any law during the tenure of the AFPRC.

To further concretise their protection from accountability the Constitution went ahead in Section 17 to state that even the National Assembly ‘shall have no power’ to amend or repeal Section 13 and other sections which seek to prevent any court to challenge the decisions of the commissions of inquiry set up by AFPRC (Section 11) or Section 12 relating to the succession of AFPRC to the properties of the former government or Section 14 which also relates to preventing anyone challenging the confiscation of properties or penalties imposed by AFPRC. Only a referendum can amend or repeal these provision!

In light of the above one can see that Yankuba has a firm ground to refuse to testify as that would mean an ‘authority’ or a ‘proceeding’ is questioning his actions and inactions as a member of the AFPRC. While the TRRC is essentially a fact-finding exercise, and not a court or tribunal, as set out in its objectives in Section 13 of its Act, it must be noted that such inquiry focuses on the actions and inactions of individuals who might be members of AFPRC or their ministers or appointed persons. The recommendations of the TRRC are indeed decisions that would may lead to other decisions being subsequently taken by any authority on the actions or persons connected with AFPRC.

Section 14 of the TRRC Act states one of its functions as investigation of human rights violations that took place between 1994 and 2017. These violations indeed would definitely be actions or inactions committed by AFPRC persons who are already protected by Section 13 of the Constitution from being questioned by anyone. The powers of the TRRC under Section 15 of its Act further emphasise the extent to which it can go to investigate including forcing a person to testify as they did with Yankuba Touray by subpoenaing him.

Section 19 of the TRRC Act gives the power to the Commission to recommend amnesty for perpetrators who apply for such. This means where the TRRC does not give amnesty to a perpetrator then such a person stands the risk of prosecution. Therefore, in view of Section 13 (2) of the Constitution this means the actions or inactions of an AFPRC member or minister are potentially subject to question or decision by some authority contrary to the Constitution.

The question now is what is to be done?

We must bear in mind that a review of Section 13 of the Constitution focuses only on acts and omissions ‘relating to, or subsequent upon’ four events. These are the overthrow of the PPP Government before the formation and after the establishment of the AFPRC and the suspension of the 1970 Constitution as well as the establishment of the 1997 Constitution. This means therefore actions beyond 1996 are not covered by the Constitution for which AFPRC members, ministers and appointed persons do not enjoy any constitutional immunity.

In my view therefore TRRC should focus on the period after 1996 for those AFPRC members who refuse to cooperate by invoking Section 13 of the Constitution. This is one option for TRRC to consider. Otherwise arresting these individuals would be unconstitutional and certainly difficult to prosecute. It will serve to derail the Commission and potentially lose its cool. We must avoid that.

The other option would be to challenge the constitutionality of the immunity clauses in Section 13. I do not think this is also a wise option as Section 13 is indeed part of the Constitution as an entrenched clause. Consequently, it would be strange to question the constitutionality of a provision of the Constitution. Constitutional experts may wish to interrogate the idea of how the Supreme Court could question a provision of the Constitution against the Constitution. What I know is that the Constitution is the basic law and therefore it is other laws and actions or omissions by natural and legal persons that are interpreted in their relation to the constitution. But to question the constitution against the constitution would be a contradiction in terms in my view.

Having said that it is important to highlight that after all AFPRC persons cannot escape justice. This is because sooner than later the 1997 Constitution will be repealed as we usher in a new constitution for the third republic. That dispensation therefore opens the floodgates to now prosecute AFPRC persons without any hurdles. This is where Yankuba would now come to realise, albeit too late though that his actions before the TRRC were ill-advised.

I wish to therefore urge the TRRC to order the release of Yankuba Touray and rather subpoena him to testify on other issues beyond 1996. Failure to testify for those issues would directly violate the TRRC Act as he would have no constitutional immunities. Therefore, the Commission would have a legitimate ground to seek his arrest and prosecution of he refuses to testify.

As citizens there is no need to despair or act unlawfully because of the unfortunate actions of Yankuba. Anywhere Yankuba goes in this world he cannot escape justice because he has indeed committed crimes that are against humanity hence international crimes. That Yankuba Touray would act in such a way must not be found surprising. Such actions by perpetrators are a normal occurrence in truth commissions around the world.

For that matter no one would have any reason to question or doubt the power, competence, integrity or relevance of the TRRC. This unfortunate action cannot in any way prevent other witnesses from testifying. I am sure many such persons would rather advise themselves properly to realise that it is in their own personal interest to come forward to testify as we saw how Sanna Sabally, Alagie Kanyi, Alagie Martin and others did.

For the Gambia Our Homeland

The writer, Madi Jobarteh, is a renowned Gambian political commentator

Understanding the Constitutional Immunity for AFPRC Members: Lessons for TRRC

While it is indeed painful to witness a key perpetrator like Yankuba Touray easily walk out of the TRRC it is necessary to point out that indeed the Constitution, from sections 13 to 17of the Second Schedule have protected members and other persons acting in the name of the notorious AFPRC from accountability. In their criminal minds the junta seemed to have considered that a day of reckoning would one day arrive and therefore they crafted these entrenched clauses to protect themselves. However, it must be noted that these AFPRC members shall not escape justice for long hence Yankuba was ill-advised to invoke those provisions.

What did those sections say?

Section 13(1) clearly protects members of the AFPRC or their ministers or appointees from answering before any ‘court or authority or under the Constitution or any other law’ for anything they did or failed to do in the ‘performance of their official duties’ in the name of the junta. While torture and murder are indeed not an official duty, however the drafters of the Constitution smartly covered up this matter with subsection 4 which states that even if such action was taken not in ‘accordance with any procedure prescribed by law’ it cannot be questioned.

These actions have been listed in subsection 2 as actions leading to or subsequent upon the July 22 military coup which includes the overthrow of the PPP Government, suspension of the 1970 Constitution or the establishment of the AFPRC. Section 13 went further to state in paragraph 3 that no person acting on behalf of the AFPRC shall be questioned for any act in any proceedings and therefore no court or tribunal shall have the power to make any decision on account of these acts. Furthermore, under paragraph 5 it stated that no court or tribunal shall ‘entertain an action’ against any person acting on the instructions or authority of AFPRC even if such action violates any law during the tenure of the AFPRC.

To further concretise their protection from accountability the Constitution went ahead in Section 17 to state that even the National Assembly ‘shall have no power’ to amend or repeal Section 13 and other sections which seek to prevent any court to challenge the decisions of the commissions of inquiry set up by AFPRC (Section 11) or Section 12 relating to the succession of AFPRC to the properties of the former government or Section 14 which also relates to preventing anyone challenging the confiscation of properties or penalties imposed by AFPRC. Only a referendum can amend or repeal these provision!

In light of the above one can see that Yankuba has a firm ground to refuse to testify as that would mean an ‘authority’ or a ‘proceeding’ is questioning his actions and inactions as a member of the AFPRC. While the TRRC is essentially a fact-finding exercise, and not a court or tribunal, as set out in its objectives in Section 13 of its Act, it must be noted that such inquiry focuses on the actions and inactions of individuals who might be members of AFPRC or their ministers or appointed persons. The recommendations of the TRRC are indeed decisions that would may lead to other decisions being subsequently taken by any authority on the actions or persons connected with AFPRC.

Section 14 of the TRRC Act states one of its functions as investigation of human rights violations that took place between 1994 and 2017. These violations indeed would definitely be actions or inactions committed by AFPRC persons who are already protected by Section 13 of the Constitution from being questioned by anyone. The powers of the TRRC under Section 15 of its Act further emphasise the extent to which it can go to investigate including forcing a person to testify as they did with Yankuba Touray by subpoenaing him.

Section 19 of the TRRC Act gives the power to the Commission to recommend amnesty for perpetrators who apply for such. This means where the TRRC does not give amnesty to a perpetrator then such a person stands the risk of prosecution. Therefore, in view of Section 13 (2) of the Constitution this means the actions or inactions of an AFPRC member or minister are potentially subject to question or decision by some authority contrary to the Constitution.

The question now is what is to be done?

We must bear in mind that a review of Section 13 of the Constitution focuses only on acts and omissions ‘relating to, or subsequent upon’ four events. These are the overthrow of the PPP Government before the formation and after the establishment of the AFPRC and the suspension of the 1970 Constitution as well as the establishment of the 1997 Constitution. This means therefore actions beyond 1996 are not covered by the Constitution for which AFPRC members, ministers and appointed persons do not enjoy any constitutional immunity.

In my view therefore TRRC should focus on the period after 1996 for those AFPRC members who refuse to cooperate by invoking Section 13 of the Constitution. This is one option for TRRC to consider. Otherwise arresting these individuals would be unconstitutional and certainly difficult to prosecute. It will serve to derail the Commission and potentially lose its cool. We must avoid that.

The other option would be to challenge the constitutionality of the immunity clauses in Section 13. I do not think this is also a wise option as Section 13 is indeed part of the Constitution as an entrenched clause. Consequently, it would be strange to question the constitutionality of a provision of the Constitution. Constitutional experts may wish to interrogate the idea of how the Supreme Court could question a provision of the Constitution against the Constitution. What I know is that the Constitution is the basic law and therefore it is other laws and actions or omissions by natural and legal persons that are interpreted in their relation to the constitution. But to question the constitution against the constitution would be a contradiction in terms in my view.

Having said that it is important to highlight that after all AFPRC persons cannot escape justice. This is because sooner than later the 1997 Constitution will be repealed as we usher in a new constitution for the third republic. That dispensation therefore opens the floodgates to now prosecute AFPRC persons without any hurdles. This is where Yankuba would now come to realise, albeit too late though that his actions before the TRRC were ill-advised.

I wish to therefore urge the TRRC to order the release of Yankuba Touray and rather subpoena him to testify on other issues beyond 1996. Failure to testify for those issues would directly violate the TRRC Act as he would have no constitutional immunities. Therefore, the Commission would have a legitimate ground to seek his arrest and prosecution of he refuses to testify.

As citizens there is no need to despair or act unlawfully because of the unfortunate actions of Yankuba. Anywhere Yankuba goes in this world he cannot escape justice because he has indeed committed crimes that are against humanity hence international crimes. That Yankuba Touray would act in such a way must not be found surprising. Such actions by perpetrators are a normal occurrence in truth commissions around the world.

For that matter no one would have any reason to question or doubt the power, competence, integrity or relevance of the TRRC. This unfortunate action cannot in any way prevent other witnesses from testifying. I am sure many such persons would rather advise themselves properly to realise that it is in their own personal interest to come forward to testify as we saw how Sanna Sabally, Alagie Kanyi, Alagie Martin and others did.

For the Gambia Our Homeland

Trump taps his wife’s spokeswoman as next White House press secretary

0

Melania Trump’s spokeswoman Stephanie Grisham will get a major new role as both White House press secretary and communications director, the first lady tweeted Tuesday.

“I am pleased to announce @StephGrisham45 will be the next @PressSec & Comms Director! She has been with us since 2015 – @POTUS & I can think of no better person to serve the Administration & our country. Excited to have Stephanie working for both sides of the @WhiteHouse. #BeBest” Melania Trump tweeted.

President Donald Trump didn’t look far for his next press secretary in Grisham, who for the past two years has been the communications director for the first lady. Grisham will keep her current job too.

However, Trump has tweaked the job duties before handing the reins to Grisham, whose purview will include a larger scope of responsibility than that of her predecessor Sarah Sanders, and one as yet unprecedented in this administration. Trump has appointed Grisham both White House director of communications as well as press secretary, a senior White House official tells CNN. Grisham will be assuming the roles formerly held by Bill Shine, who departed as White House communications director in March, and Sanders, who has said her last day will be this Friday.

Additionally, Grisham will remain in charge of communications for the East Wing in addition to her new West Wing responsibilities, staying on as the spokeswoman for the first lady, says the official.

Grisham will be accompanying the President in her new capacity on his trip to Japan and Korea this week.

Grisham has been with team Trump longer than anyone currently in the White House, with the exception of Dan Scavino, both of whom started on the Trump campaign in 2015. Prior to that, Grisham worked as a spokeswoman and communications operative, mostly in Republican politics, in her home state of Arizona; in 2012, she briefly worked on Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign. Before joining Trump’s campaign, she was operating her own public relations and communications company in Arizona, but decided to commit to the role of traveling press director after assisting with a July 2015 rally in Phoenix by then-candidate Trump. (CNN)

Barrow sacks Nawec boss Baba Fatajo, gives no reason

0

By Lamin Njie

President Adama Barrow has sacked the managing director of National Water and Electricity Company, Nawec.

Baba Fatajo was handed a termination letter in a surprise move on Tuesday.

Mr Fatajo confirmed his sacking telling The Fatu Network: “We got the correspondence this morning, [and it’s] the usual text that my services have been terminated. There was no reason advanced.

“[But] anything I tell you will be a matter of speculation. Perhaps you can get to the authorities, the office of the president since that’s where the letter is coming from. They should be in a better position to through light on this.”

The Fatu Network contacted the director of press and public relations at the office of the president Amie Bojang Sissoho for comment but she said she was not aware of Fatajo’s sacking. She however promised to find out and get back to The Fatu Network.

Mr Fatajo was the managing director of Nawec since 2017.

Open Letter to Prexy Barrow on Protest: Convene Meeting of Minds to Convey National Unity

Mr President,

As Driver-in-chief of Bus Gambia – to use your transport metaphor – the twist and turn you make, at crucial stages of the journey to destination prosperity, will determine the fate of our country. Faced with a potential protest in December by the bandwagon of ‘3 Years Jotna’, your government has reached a critical cross-road: you either have to make up, or risk driving the bus towards a crash. That is the stark choice in front of you.

In politics, as in life, you mark yourself out on where you stand in moments of conflict and crisis, not during times of comfort and calm – to paraphrase Martin Luther King Jr. These are not ordinary times in Gambia. The air is thick with a sense of a looming crisis, following the cast-iron determination of the ‘3 Years Jotna’ movement to take to the street to protest against your refusal to hand over power.

I have argued in these pages before that it is constitutionally wrong, verging on dishonesty, to force you to step down in three years. Such a move should be sanctioned by our law-making body, the National Assembly, to change our statue book, which mandates an elected president to serve for five years, if the protesters were to stand on legitimate rocket boosters to terminate your contract with Gambians. That you all agreed on three years, but refused to enact it into law, let alone your own MoU, is a collective failure of all involved.

Our NAMs didn’t do the deed. But that doesn’t render their case to be without merit. That is why now, more than ever, is the time to sit back, take a pause, and make moves to outmaneuver and outflank your political opponents by standing up for the national interest. Not escalate already fraught tensions, as some of your cabinet ministers are hell-bent on doing.

When the political journey is strewn with rough-edges, your ability as the lead-driver to navigate your way to smooth terrain would distinguish your mettle as a leader, your skills as a stress-tested operator and your foresight as a team captain. Because under pressure, the virtues and vices of a man manifest itself. It is how your deploy them, at the right time for the right cause that makes a crisis solved, bestow honor and endear you to people. Harold Macmillan, former British Prime Minister, was famously asked what he feared most. He droned on: “ Events, dear boy, events.” And “events” are about to sweep your government, shoving your bus to a juddering halt. You need to act far and fast before being at the mercy of “events”. “What to do?” What on earth can I do to defuse this crisis”, I hear you ask.

First, and most importantly, call for a meeting, inviting all the protest leaders, political party leaders, civil society representatives and religious leaders for a dialogue on national unity at state house.

Secondly, no less important, enlist the optic public service of GRTS to broadcast the event live prime-time – preferable immediately after the evening news. During the meeting, be more of a listener than an active speaker. Stick to your opening remarks, and your closing statements. Let the religious leaders lecture in chapter and verses the importance of unity to all present, as interlocutor of the meeting. Make sure leaders of all religious shades and colors are invited.

Thirdly, give a fair hearing to the points protest leaders and political party leaders are going to put forward. They deserve to be heard, and respected. Some personal comments may hurt. But suck it up. You call the meeting to serve as a human shield against a far worse catastrophe. In political terms, it is called the sadomasochism strategy, which means as a leader, when people are angry with you all what you have to do is appear in front of them. They can empty the anguish they had against you. That will make them both satisfied and relaxed that you have the guts to engage them.

In your closing statement, make a point of striking a message of unity, that you recognize and respect the contribution each and every member made from dictatorship to democracy, that in you they have a servant who listens and leads, that as a democrat you will respect the constitution and serve for five years, that beyond that anyone with ambition to be president can stand for president to be decided by the sovereign people of The Gambia. Lock them in a binding commitment there and then to pledge, as democrats, that they will respect the constitution and desist from the politics of protest.

That is the way to hem the crisis back into its sealed box. You must be able to communicate in clear terms, and show some gumption whiles delivery you message in a way that the public will not misunderstand, and the media and those present will not misrepresent. This is not the time for weak and wobbly leadership. It is time to stand up and be counted. You are attempting to ward off a criss, and deny your opponents a propaganda gift. Remember that who controls the streets controls power. The protest, if not head off, could mutate into a deep crisis. You have to do something practical. Merely counting on the blessings of Allah to wish away the protest from happening is phantasm. Politics is an art. Not a science. Nothing is chiseled in stone. As Machiavelli shrewdly observed: power could be attained by principles, but it is retained by pragmatism.

It is time to jaw-jaw with Gambians to bring the stand-off to an end. Follow the wisdom of one of the founding fathers of US Benjamin Franklin on the need to extend an olive branch to friends and foes alike during times of tension when he sarcastically quipped : “We must, indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately”? Hang out with them at state house.

It is in your gift, Mr president. Hit a different gear in a new direction of conciliation and camaraderie. And, whiles you are at it, swerve the bus from the looming criss to landscape of sunny uplands of tranquility, not tiff!

The writer Amadou Camara studied political science at University of The Gambia and is currently based in the US

 

 

 

Reset password

Enter your email address and we will send you a link to change your password.

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

Sign up with email

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

By clicking the «SIGN UP» button you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Powered by Estatik