Disaster Relief….

In the Wolof Language they say, ‘xoddeeku balaa ngai laka le’, a crude translation of this will be ‘prevention is better than cure’. Every year, when the heavens open up, many Gambians are affected by floods or storms and their houses are destroyed. They lose a lot of their valuable belongings and are certainly traumatized. This is something that can be minimized, if not completely eradicated.

If we have the proper planning and get ready to preparation for the long term, we will ensure that the places that are prone to flooding would be identified and then measures taken to guarantee that we don’t just react; rather, we should plan ahead of the rains.

There is a Department for Physical Planning which is under the Ministry of Lands which needs to carry out a broad study of the land in the country and demarcate residential areas in a way that no houses will be constructed in sodden areas which will always cause houses to collapse. It is true that it is very difficult land for residential purposes and as such if someone acquires a land already, it will be very difficult to stop him/her from erecting his/her house there; especially those who have already struggled and put up buildings.

Of course such people may not want to leave their houses or stop constructing houses because they might have invested their lives’ savings in those lands or houses. But nothing compares to human life. We see in the developed world that when a disaster is about to happen governments evacuate residents, sometimes forcefully, just to ensure their safety. The first priority of a government is to protect its citizens, sometimes even from their own actions.

Our laws should therefore cater for such a contingency. For instance, where someone intends to build a house in a place that is known to be prone to flooding, government should have the power to stop such a person. If it does, then how, and how far can the government agencies go in enforcing this law? If this law is already present in our Constitution, then why is it not being implemented?

These are a few of the things we should start thinking about to reduce the number of disasters that are experienced by our people. I call on you to put in place measures which will reduce the damage caused by these disasters in our country.

Have a Good Day Mr President….

Tha Scribbler Bah

A concerned Citizen

Building The New Gambia

Open Letter to:

1. Chief Servant Adama Barrow
2. Speaker Mariam Denton
3. Chief Justice Hassan Jallow
4. Minister of Justice Aboubacarr Tambadou

Proposal for the Creation of a Special Tribunal for the Prosecution of Gross Human Rights Violations and Acts of Corruption Committed Between 22 July 1994 and 19 January 2017 in the Gambia.

At the end of the Second Imperialist War (aka WWII) in 1945, the Allied Powers created a special court, the International Military Tribunal through a charter to prosecute German war criminals at Nuremburg. A similar court was also created in Tokyo for Japanese war criminals. Many years later, at the end of the Yugoslavia War, the UN Security Council through a resolution created the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in 1993 to prosecute those who bear the greatest responsibility for the gross human rights violations in that war. A similar court was also created for Rwanda in 1994 after the genocide to try those who were responsibility for those crimes. The court was set up in Arusha in Tanzania where our current Chief Justice Hassan Jallow was the Chief Prosecutor, and our current Minister of Justice was an employee of that court. We also recall the Khmer Rouge tribunal in Cambodia for the prosecution of human rights violations under the oppressive Pol Pot regime. Yet again, we saw the same kind of special tribunal created in Sierra Leone following their civil war even though they also had a truth and reconciliation commission.

The Gambia did not experience the kind of conflict these countries encountered. However serious violation of human rights and severe acts of plunder of public resources did occur in our country over the past 22 years that require accountability. I submit that prosecuting these violations ad corruption through the normal court system would not serve the purpose of justice well enough because of many challenges.

In the first place, it was a good idea that the Minister of Justice appointed a Special Prosecutor to try the NIA 9. But given the whole scenario of the 22 years of dictatorship, I am of the view that the Government needs to go the full length to establish a more viable mechanism to bring those who bear the greatest responsibility for human rights violations and corruption to book. For this matter, the Gambia needs a special court to be able to ensure that justice is dispensed in the most thorough, cost effective and credible manner.

I made reference to the international and regional scene to show that such measures were once undertaken in various parts of the world hence it is possible to also carry them out at the national level. This could be done and it will be legal, fair and just. Apart from that there are other reasons for which the creation of such a tribunal is also necessary and justifiable.

First. The Gambia’s current Criminal Code does not explicitly contain such offences as torture, sexual violence, enforced disappearances and summary executions within the context of a tyrannical regime. Where such offences exist they are not as explicit as to carry the same or exact definitions and elements as in the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Even while the Sexual Offences Act addresses rape, yet it does not fully capture this crime in terms of a crime perpetrated from a standpoint of a political objective. Given that these are international crimes and which were committed in a widespread and systematic manner during the reign of terror of an oppressive regime, it is therefore necessary that special measures be taken to address them. Otherwise, the prosecution of perpetrators of these crimes will become difficult and cumbersome in the hands of our Justice ministry and the Judiciary leading to potential delays and derailment.

Second. Without a special tribunal to focus specifically on this period and the crimes committed therein, it would mean that both the Ministry of Justice and the Judiciary would be adding additional work onto their existing workload to handle these cases. Such capacity does not exist. In fact this is one of the reasons the Ministry of Justice exercised good sense to appoint a Special Prosecutor. But then this Special Prosecutor is only half the solution because his mandate is only focused on the NIA 9 case. What about crimes committed on 11 November 1994 and the many others that followed until 14 April 2016 when Solo Sandeng was killed, including the 3 million US dollars donated by Taiwan that disappeared between Yaya Jammeh and former AFPRC Spokesman Ebou Jallow. Thus this means the role of this Special Prosecutor itself needs to expand and better situated. Thus given this scenario it makes sense that the State restructures the justice delivery system to allow a new tribunal in which the role and position of the Special Prosecutor will also be reviewed accordingly.

Third. Since the arrest and beginning of the trial of the NIA 9 and the arrest of several henchmen of the ancien regime, there has been minimal progress for a number of reasons. One of them is the lack of cooperation by the defense in relation to the appointment of a Special Prosecutor. Even though such a position is quite disingenuous on their part as the appointment of the Special Prosecutor is legally justifiable, such obstacles could however be avoided if a special court were created instead.

For that matter I submit to all of you honourable trustees of the Gambia that the Government drafts a bill for the setting up of a Criminal Tribunal for the prosecution of those responsibility for the gross human rights violations and perpetration of the international crimes of torture, rape, enforced disappearance and summary executions as well as corruption during the period 22 July 1994 to 19 January 2017. The tribunal will have its own judges, prosecutor and defense lawyers. It will operate as an open and just court that bears all the hallmarks of a competent court with the necessary jurisdiction and to conduct fair trials and dispense justice. The Special Prosecutor will then be the Chief Prosecutor of the new tribunal. All accused persons will have their defense lawyers to defend them, as they should.

Failure to create this mechanism but to rely on the usual court system could create potential risks for the country. In the first place, it could cause long pre-trial detentions as well as delays and even derailment in the ongoing and future trials that would translate into justice being denied. For many weeks now, many ‘Junglers’ and NIA agents are under detention yet as human beings they have the same rights as anyone else. Therefore if they remain under detention up to a certain time, then their status may change from alleged perpetrators to victims. In that case human rights activists and organizations will have no choice but to defend their rights. This will further put pressure on the government, which can also lead to some agitation in the country.

But to ensure effective investigations and dispensation of justice, it is also urgent hat the NIA be closed immediately. The NIA is a crime scene. The premises and agents of the NIA were part of that system that unleashed heinous crimes on our people. Hence leaving the NIA open with the same old agents potentially interferes with evidence to the detriment of justice. For that matter, the NIA must be closed and all staffs put under suspension. The Government must then create a caretaker taskforce to conduct an audit of the agency in all respects. By leaving the NIA open as it is means we would be making the search for truth and delivery of justice extremely difficult, if not impossible.

Similarly other agencies such as the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, Operation Bulldozer and all official and unofficial detention centres that they have must be put under the purview of this caretaker audit taskforce just to make sure that evidence is not tampered and obstructions are removed in the way of the truth and justice. The fact is that the NIA and NDLEA are directly and deeply intertwined with the crimes of the Yaya Jammeh Dictatorship.

Finally, I want to emphasize that the Gambia is at a very critical moment and it requires bold and decisive leadership to recover, redirect and rebuild this country. There is no better starting point than to ensure accountability for the gross human rights violations and acts of corruption of the past. That is what will heal and stabilize this country so we can better focus on rebuilding our institutions and economy to give relief to our society. I wish to kindly submit this urgent suggestions and I hope you will consider them in the supreme interest of the Gambia.
In The Service of the Gambia
……………………………
Signed: Madi Jobarteh

Alagi Yorro Jallow

Election victory is not a test of exemplary leadership, it is simply a process of democracy. Effective governance and transformational leadership are about positive influences. Any leader who deliberately makes your life miserable is not a true leader – at best, he is your dictator. Good governance and exemplary leadership is premised on vision, mission, passion, resilience, empathy and compassion. These elements are the basis for program conceptualization, alignment and implementation.

A progressive agenda is a well-thought out and encapsulated in processes that provide national integrity in line with existing framework, as described by Professor Anthony and Professor Robert Rothberg.
Having seen what democracy is all about including the principle of liberty, one would be tempted to once more ask – what good governance and exemplary leadership is all about?

In answering this question, it is necessary to note that governance and leadership in its generic sense means different things to different people especially when you morphed from dictatorship to democracy.
However, in real life and practice, good governance implies a high level of organizational effectiveness in relation to policy-formulation and the policies pursued, especially in the conduct of economic policy; and its contribution to growth, stability and overall well-being of the citizens. Good governance also implies accountability, transparency, participation, openness and the rule of law – a pre-requisite for political legitimacy.

Good governance as we must all know is not a systemic issue. It lies at the heart of behavior of the leadership and the public office holders, their behavior and attitudes to power, their empathy and concern for the poor.

The implication of this is that only the best people should hold public office. They should be the most righteous and wisest persons of character and distinction, of honor and integrity; they should be dependable and example setters. Exemplary Leadership principles and methods requires change or transformational management process. Leadership requires integration of best practices and effectively applied for the common good.

Transformational Leadership is principles-based in which ‘Team’ is critical factor – a great marriage between the Transformational Leader and the Led based on reciprocal bonding. There is a shared vision inspired by a collective bargaining for the public good, where experiential wisdom is pooled and lessons learned are funneled for continual improvement. Naturally, the success of the Transformational Leader is based on alignment and synergy in work process implemented by subordinates across all tiers of governance. These are the kind of people we need in power more especially in New Gambia.

A nation where all it presently prides is nothing but core traits of bad governance amplified. A nation where the government in power makes arbitrary policies, unaccountable bureaucracies, unenforced or unjust legal systems, abuse of executive power, a civil society unengaged in public life and widespread corruption. Yet some people will come to the open and shower praises on the same government. This is shameful. And bad governance epitomizes a system of governance that has done perfectly well to constantly showcase its ineptitude and lack of vision.

It is a known fact that in New Gambia people are yet to really feel the impact of substantive democracy and good governance. The living conditions of the people is at its lowest, hopes have been shattered due to low salaries and low standard of living, unemployment, lack of infrastructures, unmotivated youths, increase in the poverty level, hunger and starvation.

Conclusively, it is conceivable that supporting the Barrow administration is not just an inevitable option but also a civic duty to make The Gambia a beacon of hope. The Gambian people need the change process to begin with the political leadership. What the Gambia needs are Leaders and followers who are humble enough to accept deficiencies and accept appropriate assistance and guidance. Gambians need listening leaders. The Gambian people need collaborative political leaders who would not compromise the interest of The Gambian people

Economic Security….

I have received several reports of people being caught with fake notes, particularly the two dalasi note. This is not a good thing and should be investigated immediately.

Fake currency has the ability to destroy our economy or harm it in a profound way – and that is the last thing we want at this point in our development, or the lack thereof. I think the Central Bank/Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs in collaboration with the Ministry of Interior should work swiftly to nip this problem in the bud.

In so doing, they should investigate the root of this menace and snuff it once and for all; and not focus on the individuals who may be caught with the fake currency here and there. The problem with them is that most people may not be in a position to differentiate between a genuine note and a fake one. So, arresting and prosecuting them may not do much good in the long run.

I think that the Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs, or perhaps through the Central Bank, should come up with a way to educate the public on how to identify fake currency notes. For instance, if I were given a fake two hundred dalasi bill, I may not be able to know what to look for in order to ascertain whether it is genuine or fake.

So, Mr President, I’m calling on you to instruct the Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs to come out and educate the general public on this very crucial issue. There are bad elements who will capitalize on any form of leniency to make a quick buck, or dalasi in our case.

Mr President, the other issue is sensitizing the citizenry to display patriotism and be good servants of the nation. All the reports I have received so far, are of people who saw someone with fake currency notes and allowed the person to go away only to keep talking about it when the person concerned is already gone.

Gambians should show love of country by stopping evil wherever they see it. On this and many other examples, Gambians will only talk about it later when it is alreary too late. For instance, a good citizen sees another person litter our streets, he has the moral duty to insist that the individual picks up his or her litter. If he or she refuses, then the case should be reported to the nearest police station.

Similarly, if a person sees another one with fake currency notes, he/should stop the person and report the case to the nearest police station or any security outpost.

Together we can build a better Gambia.

Have a Good Day Mr President….

Tha Scribbler Bah

A Concerned Citizen

Mr Jallow, you have raised very interesting points in your reply to my rejoinder. It appears to
me that we have both agreed on the point that tax avoidance is legal but tax evasion is
illegal. The point I was trying to make in my previous article was that the two are used
interchangeably although one is legal and the other is not, and causes a lot of confusion for
many people.

You concur with me that morality is subjective and went further to state that, that is why we
have laws surrounding taxation and pretty much everything else. I could not agree more
with you. I do not think that people avoiding tax is the problem, the problem is short
comings in the promulgation of laws and poor design of tax regimes.

I mentioned in my previous article that in the Gambian context, there is a need to review
our tax systems ranging from dividend, withholding, payroll CGT etc to make them fairer.
This will ensure that the tax system is not open to abuse and vengeful towards the poor and
the powerless. We are where we are Mr Jallow because of governments’ inability to keep
their promises and look after those at the bottom of the income ladder. Mr Clinton, when he
was president in 1998 caused a storm when he said, “Save our Social Security”. This was well
received across America because he knew that was what people wanted to hear. This
however triggered a reaction from senator Ernest Holdings when he said, “Obviously, the
first way to save Social Security is to stop looting it”, (Rich Dad’s Cashflow Quadrant, P 65).

It is quite obvious from the above that the federal government has been responsible for
borrowing the retirement money for expenditures. I think Mr Jallow what we need to
understand is that the reason why the rich do not pay a lot of tax is because they do not
earn their money as employees. I demonstrated this in my previous article where my friend
could save £10,600 if he pays himself an annual dividend of £45,000 rather than earning it
as a salary.

I agree with you again when you stated in your response to my rejoinder that “To avoid tax
is to not pay tax law-makers intended you to pay”. Again, tax avoidance is still legal within
the framework as the law-makers have not done their work well enough to close those
loopholes. Stopping at intent alone will not make the practice illegal. They need to put in
place stringent measure to make it difficult or even impossible for people to take advantage
of those gaps in the tax codes.

As an accountant, I am employed by a company that needs me to highlight any potential
lawful money saving opportunity within my remit and to ensure that those opportunities
are exploited. Some people may say that is immoral but I am doing a job and something
being moral or immoral is debatable. However, what we need is a concerted effort to
influence policy and work with legislators to bring in laws that will ensure that everyone is
paying their fair share of taxes.

I am with you when you said and I quote, “Tax avoidance – particularly in an era of cuts and
austerity – is indefensible”. This to me is true as I fall in the category of the poor and I moan
about it because I am not privileged to earn my income in any other way other than a salary.
However, nobody will go to prison because they minimised their tax liability which was the
gist of my previous article. Robert Kiyosaki, the author of Rich Dad Poor Dad once
responded to a question about how much he earned in a particular year. He said to the
newspaper reporter that he earned $1m dollars but paid no tax. This income was earned
from capital gains and he used what is called Rollover Relieve to not pay tax and indefinitely
defer it.

To those who cannot use the system to avoid tax, this is immoral but to the benefactor, this
is called being smart. This is the reason why I say that we as citizens need to put more
pressure on our governments to bring about tax reforms that will curtail the use of
questionable schemes and put a stop to system abuse.

I will end the debate now because I believe you and I are on the same page but just that we
see the same issue from different angles.

It is indeed a pleasure that I am able to engage you on this topic and get your reaction in a
very professional manner. I think others will learn lessons from this discourse and engage
each other maturely, if the stories I heard about what goes on in Facebook are anything to
go by. I am not on Facebook but I heard a lot of unpleasant things about it.

We as Gambians should learn to respect each other and understand that people will always
have differing viewpoints with you but that does not give you the licence chin them.

Thanks for a very constructive and fruitful debate Mr Jallow. I have learnt a lot from your
writings and I will encourage you to continue sharing your knowledge as you are an
inspiration in my view.

Nuha Ceesay
Leeds
United Kingdom

In a globalized world of uncertainty marred by various complex challenges, I have endeavoured an historical look at Gambia’s Foreign Policy through stages examining the various shapes & stripes thereof. Without a shadow of doubt, the arrival of European ‘explorers’ on the shores of Africa has left an indelible mark which The Gambia may struggle to escape from. Fast-forward several hundredth years later, it is still hard to ponder & chew on those early exchanges between people of such far-flung places of the earth, otherwise untouched. Until 1970 ushering in republican status, the country’s sovereignty had been mortgaged to the British Monarchy with major policy decisions strictly reserved for London. And except for a telegram from the colonial office in Westminster carrying direct orders, the Governor-General dictates day-to-day state matters unchecked. Given those constraining circumstances, the Gambia was denied empirical & juridical sovereignty, nor were conditions ripe for the pursuance of bilateral interest.

Although 18^th February was earmarked for annual independence-day celebrations, 24^th April would suffice for the fact that decolonisation was quick with no thorough planning. As with elsewhere on the continent, newly independent Gambia soon came to be gripped with daunting political & economic challenges, and technical skill shortages to tap into fill in gaps across government. That, ultimately, stifled effective governance – thus neo-colonialism was born.

Simply put, Foreign Policy is designed to achieve national interest goals abroad; and diplomacy is an adage of that structured along the lines of reciprocity, trust, credibility, compromise, signals, and such normative bilateral exchanges. It is worth remembering that foreign policy can also lead to a shooting war between nations if interests overlap or when coercive diplomatic demands aren’t met. The ‘oil’ wars in Iraq and Libya stood as prime examples of a hawkish foreign policy the United States has practiced for decades bullying nations into submission.

Profoundly, dedicated to the memories of our greats in the pro-independence movement in ‘’Bathurst’’ – PS Njie, EF Small, Sir Farimang Singhateh, SM Dibba, Rev. JC Faye, IM Garba Jahumpa, and countless others culminating in President Jawara’s ascension to power. A small but confident Gambia leading a measured foreign policy observing mutually accepted norms perhaps came to define how the PPP conducted external affairs.

It is worth remembering that the Gambia is a signatory to the United Nations founding Charter gathering juridical & empirical sovereignty respectively. As such the country is at liberty to defend it national boundaries, and to pursue national interest wherever that lays.

In his autobiography ‘’Kairaba’’, President Jawara reflected on ‘’… the Gambia’s reputation as a democratic, peaceful and stable state which led the then OAU to locate the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR, 1987) in Banjul. He went on to describe how his government further acted on Article (25) of that charter enjoining countries to educate their citizens on their rights, privileges and obligations by creating a national human rights institution – The African Centre for Democracy and Human Rights Studies, which later came to be the continental civil society flagship. A champion for peace & diplomacy, he ensured separation of powers, with an independent civil service to match. Over tea at a West London café, a retired Ghanaian diplomat spoke lovingly of President Jawara and his essence to democracy and human rights in Africa. Sir Dawda built cordial ties with many world leaders of his generation; a friend to the monarchy and arguably the only African head of state knighted by the Queen. And I would like to think if ever his legacy was in doubt, look no further.

Revisiting the Jammeh years – He had reduced the country isolated with an introverted selfish agenda, irrational at best. The APRC was but for an undisciplined foreign policy lacking guidebook, nor ethics designed on adversarial & cheque-book terms. For instance, Taiwan was ready to sign out cheques so long the Gambia continues to promote its case for independence from mainland China. Senegal was maligned and side-lined. Thus Dakar and Abuja mobilised to frustrate Jammeh’s every attempt to head the regional bloc, ECOWAS. The dictator had failed to measure signals & regional trends as states within the periphery fast transform to democracy. The level of disconnect was deep & daunting too. Angry and isolated, Jammeh then cozied up to Chavez’s Venezuela who also need friends, and to ‘Ahmadinejad’s’ Iran looking to boost credibility. Cuba was prepared to send in doctors so long as the Gambia continues to denounce imposed US embargo at the UN. An unjust blockade of course, but for a megalomaniac dictator, the Cuban doctors are tools of propaganda in shoring up his support base. On Cassamance, Jammeh’s role exacerbating that conflict in an attempt to settle ancestral & tribal grudge was obvious.

By the time President Barrow assumed office, the country’s relationship with the world had suffered at its lowest ebb. The coalition inherited a broken foreign agenda lacking vision. The President deserve credit managing to rescue the country from the cold into international respectability. From ECOWAS, the AU, ICC, to the United Nations, the Gambia takes its rightful place among sovereign states at regional and multilateral gatherings in reshaping world order. The administration was spot on prioritising relations with the sister-republic, Senegal. And unlike elsewhere, Banjul-Dakar ties transcends cross-border neighbourliness. Indeed, a special relationship & ought to be nurtured as such – based on collaborative & strategic partnership for a common destiny. The recent Gambia crisis has come to define President Macky Sall’s legacy showcasing the power of diplomacy when peace is given a chance.

On the issuance of diplomatic passports, there need to be clarification on policy governing who should get them. The Vienna convention on diplomatic relations should internalise within (Foreign Service guidelines) in observance of standardised normative protocol. Experts within the ministry need to come up with fresh policy guidelines & safeguards in the application of Gambia’s foreign policy around the world. It should be known that Banjul will never again support murderous & corrupt regimes, nor states that oppress their citizens. On questions as to what criterion should future ambassadorial picks be based on – The Foreign Relations Committee should be empowered to vet, ascertain credentials and to approve nominated envoys as a check on nepotism. Nevertheless, the President should always reserve the right to pick the country’s ambassadors abroad, even though such appointments shall be subjected to confirmation hearings before the said committee in Parliament. Foreign diplomats posted to Banjul are to be accorded high status & protection, and no person shall ever set foot on Embassy premises without prior notice. These are globally accepted rules & norms governing bilateral relations which all states signed up to. A classic scenario manifest as an emotionally-charged global audience watch President Barrow took the oath of office at the Gambian embassy in Dakar. From DC, London, and worldwide, Gambian diplomats & embassy infrastructure shall be accorded similar high status – reciprocity, norms, ethics, trust & Protocol. I would further encourage an annual meeting between Banjul and its diplomats around the world when they are home for independence celebrations so as to – gauge, analyse, redirect national interest abroad!

For the sake of academic teaching, for institutionalism, and for all that razzmatazz democracy attracts – The administration should come up with a clear foreign policy explain its external agenda & position on certain issues. Six months in, it still has not done so leaving those of us in the foreign policy community seeking answers. It would be helpful for Foreign Minister Darboe to address a session of parliament in a major foreign policy speech outlining the government’s approach to external affairs. Such an address could also be occasioned at the University of the Gambia attended by Ministers, Governors, District Chiefs, the Diplomatic Corp, High Society, students, among others – live on Prime-Time television.

What could be in such a speech

The Foreign Minister will dilate on relations with Senegal over time. He will say that the two countries are joint by shared history enduring deep ties. In other words, our situation can only be described as one people trapped in two countries due to circumstances. Foreign Minister Darboe and his Senegalese counterpart, Mankeur Njie, are to hold annual bilateral summit (to alternate between Banjul & Dakar – groundwork to be laid out by the SeneGambia Secretariat). In view of the crucial role ECOWAS continues to play in the country, and ultimately, African Union, our foreign policy shall prioritise regional & continental issues moving forward.

In the Middle East, the government should make its position known on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict & settlement activities on occupied territories. And as Israel make moves on the bilateral front, the foreign minister should make it clear that Banjul believes in the sovereignty and equality of all nations the world over, and that the situation for the Palestinians is intolerable. Through ECOWAS and the African Union, the Gambia must call for Israeli to lift blockade on Gaza whilst urging dialogue over the status Jerusalem.

On Iran, the Gambia joins other states in the United Nations family for the successful implementation of the Iranian nuclear deal (2015). The country is opposed to any new wars in the Middle East, and that differences should be sorted thru diplomatic means. On Lebanon, Banjul stands with Beirut on its quest for peace among all its citizens, given that Gambia is home to many Lebanese. On the civil war in Syria, the Gambia is horrified at the sufferings of the Syrian people calling for immediate cessation of hostilities. On recent disagreements between Saudis and Qatar, Foreign Minister Darboe will reflect on both allies, and that government has called for restraint in working out differences. In my view, it is very unwise of King Salman to pin hopes on Donald Trump given his incoherence. A White House where truth and falsehood interplay at an alarming rate in its everyday dealings.

On the occasion unveiling ‘Belt & Road’ megaproject, President Xi Jinping has stressed that China will not compromise its one-china policy with regards to Taiwan and Hong Kong islands. The Gambia welcomes resumption of diplomatic ties with Beijing, and it is one of our stronger partnerships. On the Korean peninsula, the Gambia will look to both China and Japan, and ultimately, UN channels ensuring sustained peace in the region. The country’s embassy in Malaysia could perhaps be restacked to cater for Singapore, Indonesia, and many of the emerging economies within the periphery.

The Foreign Minister will also say that The Gambia need-not practise an ideologically driven, but a pragmatic foreign policy. He will inform the gathering that President Barrow has had telephone exchanges with the leaders of Australia, Canada, and President Castro of Cuba. Although we would like to establish a diplomatic post in all countries, resources are low and had to be prioritised. However, the country is working through ECOWAS and AU channels to further advance ties across Latin America and friends in the Caribbean.

Raindrops are signs of hope welcoming downpours across the land. And as our diaspora colleagues take stand on River Thames #CharityGiving at the London Marathon – Fun reflections of Banjul-of-old came to sight as the yardstick upon whom all others are to be measured #Governance #Agriculture #Healthcare #Education #Infrastructure #Jobs #Tourism, in a progressive albeit sustainable path towards development.

Gibril Saine, LONDON

By Alagi Yorro Jallow

Tax avoidance is legal. Tax evasion is not. By morally conflating the two we’re making the problem worse. Morality is subjective, which is why we have laws surrounding taxation and other pretty much everything else to regulate individual interactions with others and the state. Mr Ceesay your rejoinder to my article is very constructive and informative but we need to consider the what is legally right and what is morally right.

Everybody does it, because everyone is well within their rights to do it. It’s legal. I can’t imagine we are decrying a strike or similar action which also skates close to the law. That would-be hypocrisy, wouldn’t it?

At a time of massive wealth and income inequality, we need a progressive tax system everywhere that is based on the ability to pay. It is unacceptable that major corporations have paid nothing in federal income taxes, and that corporate CEOs in other countries often enjoy an effective tax rate that is lower than their secretaries. For example, business man Warren Buffet second wealthiest person in America admitted paying less tax than his secretary. Thanks to the loopholes of tax avoidance! Special breaks and loopholes in the tax code favor wealthy real estate investors like Trump and do nothing to boost the economy. These breaks likely made it easier for him to claim losses of $916 million in the 1990s and avoid paying income taxes in subsequent years.

Today, America lose over $100 billion a year in revenue because large corporations stash their cash in offshore tax havens around the world. That is unacceptable (Wall Street Journal,2016) Special tax breaks and loopholes in a corrupt tax code enable billionaires and powerful corporations to avoid paying their fair share of taxes while sticking the burden on the middle class, Sanders said. It’s time to create a tax system which is fair and which asks the wealthy and powerful to start paying their fair share of taxes.”
If we are serious about reforming the tax code and rebuilding the middle class, we have got to demand that the wealthiest and largest corporations pay their fair share in taxes.

For Example, Sen. Sanders’ tax reform plans that goal by closing loopholes that benefit the wealthy and well connected, making the tax code more progressive, and establishing a tax on Wall Street speculators whose greed, recklessness and illegal behavior nearly destroyed the economy seven years ago.
Life is cheaper for the rich. That holds for many reasons – not being saddled with personal debt, for example – but being able to use devious means to avoid paying tax is one privilege of the rich.

Tax avoidance is bending the rules of the tax system to gain a tax advantage that law makers never intended. To avoid tax is to not pay tax law-makers intended you to pay; it is to go against the spirit of the law without going against the letter of the law; it is to exploit loopholes that were
It is entirely intentional; it exists by design. You are not going against the spirit of any legislation by having an audacity; you are behaving as the law expected you to. Tax avoidance really underlines how different life is for the rich and for everybody else. Wealthy individuals can afford accountants to zealously hunt down loopholes and exploit legislation.

To avoid tax is to scrounge off the state. Rich individuals and major companies depend on the state: whether it be a financial system that was bailed out by the state; state-funded infrastructure; tax credits to subsidize the wages of their low-paid workers; a law-and-order system to protect them and their property; an education system to train up their workforce and those of other institutions they depend on; and so on.

Tax avoidance – particularly in an era of cuts and austerity – is indefensible. But it is a symptom of a wider problem. American or British societies favors a mean and greedy elite. The financial disaster brought this injustice into acute relief, but there has been a concerted attempt to redirect popular anger to those at the bottom of society. Maybe, just maybe, that anger is beginning to shift upwards instead.

Everybody does it, because everyone is well within their rights to do it. It’s legal. I can’t imagine we are decrying a strike or similar action which also skates close to the law. That would-be hypocrisy, wouldn’t it?

The action by the youths of KMC to dump waste collected from Serre Kunda Market in front of the Mayor’s office is in the right direction that must be applauded. As a city council KMC has a responsibility by law to establish an efficient and effective system of waste collection and management. Businesses and vendors in the market pay duty while residents pay compound rates and taxes. These monies are supposed to be utilized by the Council to provide efficient services to the people. Yet for the past years, KMC has failed to provide the necessary tools while abandoning its obligations in the Local Government Act to ensure a clean and decent municipality.

Therefore the actions of the youth are in place that is very legal, nonviolent, peaceful and appropriate. It is an act of civil disobedience that sends a clear message to not only KMC but also to all other Area Councils that the people have enough of it. This is a message to not just the Area Councils, but also to the entire Government and public servants that the time has come when Gambians have taken charge of their country and their destiny. This is a message that tells all public institutions and public officers that they must deliver according to the law otherwise the people will make them deliver. This is what makes democracy work.

The youth of KMC must now organize their communities to stand together in unity and purpose to address the pressing concerns of the municipality. At this moment both the Government and KMC will try to negotiate, give excuses and empty promises just to calm the people. But the people of KMC must refuse these schemes and games. The people must stand firm that Bakoteh dumpsite must close today and it is the duty of the Government and KMC to find an alternative place.

The people of KMC must stand firm and unified to demand that the Kololi land sold by KMC is returned to the people because it is an illegal act. The people of KMC must stand together to prevent any tricks to divide and conquer them.

Both the Government and KMC will be seeking ways and means of finding the weak points of the people in order to neutralize them. This is what governments do all over the world. When they fail in their responsibility and the people are agitated, they will try to weaken the people with false promises, flimsy excuses and creating divisions and antagonism among them. The people of KMC must be aware of that to prevent such schemes being used against them.

KMC youths have given Gambians a lesson and a way forward and this must be consolidated throughout the country. For far too long our governments and Area Councils since Independence have been taking our money and failing in their responsibilities with impunity. The time has come to make them address their failure on their own. All that the people must do is to tell them and we stand our ground. Do not listen to any excuses, tricks, promises or false claims from the Government or KMC. These are nothing other than empty rhetoric that you hear all over the world whenever the Government or Area Councils are under pressure from the people. They are merely creating a diversion.

Democracy is where people take charge of their country to ensure that public institutions and public servants produce the necessary goods and services as stipulated by the law. It is such actions that tell a government that the people mean business and they will not take anymore any nonsense, inefficiency, corruption and mismanagement. It is such actions that awaken the government at both central and local levels to realize that they must deliver otherwise they will face the wrath of the people. It is such actions that therefore make the government afraid of the people and not the people afraid of the government. When the people are afraid of the government that is dictatorship. But when government is afraid of the people then you have democracy. it is such democracy that will produce sustainable development in fulfillment of the rights and needs of the people. Stand for democracy.

Stand firm and United.

God Bless The Gambia.

Madi Jobarteh