In Wolof there is a saying that ‘reeroo amut ñakkaa wahtaan moo am’. Roughly, this means that there is no such thing as a misunderstanding; rather, there is a lack of communication. In the previous weeks, I’ve repeatedly called on government to engage the Gambian public in dialogue, particularly the section of society seen as opposing the New Regime. You see, Mr President, when a president is voted into office, he becomes the president of the whole nation regardless of who voted for him and who did not.

It becomes his responsibility to serve one and all. Serving one and all means not only providing goods and services equally to all citizens, but providing them (everyone) a sense of security. How to achieve that may be varied and complex but there are a few things that cannot be compromised. Every individual living in the country has a fundamental right to peacefully demonstrate. That is guaranteed by our laws and no one should be deprived of it. To gauge and measure how democratic a government is, look at how it treats its opponents. As I said in an earlier post, the duty of a lion is to protect its pride. Similarly, the first duty of a government is to protect its citizens, even if they are found to be wrong, politically.

So, if the people of the Fonis, and Kanilai in particular, are not happy with the arrangement of posting ECOMIG forces in their area they have every right to show their disagreement to that. It is their home and if they observe something that is somehow inimical to their day to day activities, or progress, then they have a right to point it out. How they do it though is the question we must address to them and the rest of the country. There are laws which have to be adhered to. There are measures of resort in case one is not satisfied with anything the government does. But it has to be understood that no government in the world should – or can afford to – condone subversive actions.

Having said all that, the government should also understand that they have a responsibility to provide security for its people. No matter what, the government or its agents cannot – should not – use lethal force. That would be betraying the trust vested in them. It is unfortunate that a life was lost in the altercation between the people of Kanilai and the ECOMIG forces. The soldiers are trained and brought there to ensure peace, if they resort to using lethal force on the people, then their purpose is defeated. Who are they protecting in that case?

They should have never used life bullets to quell a peaceful demonstration, if it were a peaceful demonstration. But even if there were unruly elements among the demonstrators, the fact that these are trained soldiers should have enabled them use their training to avoid the loss of life. We have lost enough lives to Yahya Jammeh and his thugs already. Why waste more?

It is said that the people of Kanilai – or some of them – are making threats that whoever wants to enforce the freeze of Yahya Jammeh assets will be dealt with. That is rather unfortunate. They cannot use illegal means to stop a legal injunction. There are courts in the country. Let them use legal means and see if anyone will say anything against that. If they think that an injustice has been committed when the assets were frozen, let Yahya Jammeh or those who think so, use the courts to overturn the ruling. Otherwise, let them hold their horses.

What is the way forward? In my humble opinion, dialogue is the key. Let the government engage them and bring to their notice that the State has nothing against them, that it is here for all and sundry, that they are Gambians just like Adama Barrow, Lawyer Darboe or Mai Ahmad Fatty. And that their rights will not be trampled upon. If they are reassured of these rights, they will have no cause to raise the ugly head of subversion.

Also, I think there should be a reshuffle of the distribution of the ECOMIG forces. Let them transfer the Senegalese soldiers to other parts of the country and take the Ghanaians to Foni and Kanilai. This will not be seen as giving in to pressure from the people if Foni; but a master stroke at problem solving. With this, the people if Kanilai will be pacified and yet, the government would achieve its aim. It will then be seen whether the cry of the people of Kanilai is genuine and not subversive. It will also alley fears that the Senegalese want to use the Gambia as a base to attack Casamance. In this way, the government would have killed two birds with one stone.

All said and done, let the government communicate and understand that the people of Foni and Kanilai are themselves victims of Yahya Jammeh. What they need is our support and reassurance.

Peace is sacrosanct. We cannot go anywhere if we don’t have peace.

May God bless the Gambia.

Tha Scribbler Bah

A Concerned Citizen

In a rebuttal to the essay of BB Sanneh, I told him that his essay was intellectually dishonest and lacked credibility because he attributed some statements to the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at without providing the references. I also asked him to produce the al Kitaab al Mubeen, a book which he claimed is the scripture of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at. According to him Ahmadi Muslims have a Book which is different from the Holy Qu’an. On 30 May 2017 he wrote a rejoinder to my essay with his references. He however did not show any indication that he is going to exhibit the book of Ahmadis which is different from the Qur’an. He tried to downplay the issue by referring to it as “the brother (referring to the present writer) is trying to put a spanner on the spoke of the wheel in order to deceive the gullible and uninformed readers.”

Before addressing the subject proper, I would like to address his self-righteous statement that I engaged in profanity and that Ahmadi Muslims always engage in profanity. If telling a liar that he is lying is indeed profanity by his definition, then I am very happy that he considered my essay a profanity. He quoted a verse of the Holy Qur’an, Chapter 16 verse 125 that instructs believers to do Da’wah with Hikmah (wisdom) and Mau’izah Hasanah (goodly exhortation) and that arguments should be done in the best manner. I am very happy that he quoted that verse. I love the Holy Qur’an. He probably thinks that Hikmah and Mau’izah hasanah means concocting falsehood because that is what he has been doing all along. Now, let us go to the subject proper.

THE DISHONESTY OF BB SANNEH

BB Sanneh, in my last essay, I humbly admonished you to show a little sense of honesty, integrity and truthfulness because these are basic universal moral principles. In fact, you should show these qualities at a very high standard because you are a Muslim. Why did you not tell your readers that you actually literally lifted your so-called references from an anti-Ahmadiyya website? In fact you copied it word for word. If you were as honest and truthful as you claimed to be, then have the courage to tell the readers that you lifted your points literally from a website devoted to opposing us. Why would you declare that you have gotten your points from the writings of Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad? Tell me sincerely from your heart whether I am profaning when I called you a fabricator of falsehood? Tell me a better word that I can use. This is the source of BB Sanneh’s fabrications for anyone interested in knowing that his source was not an Ahmadiyya source but he rather copied from an anti-Ahmadiyya website: http://www.janathimessage.co.uk/Literature/Beliefs_of_Ahle_Sunnah/BeliefsofQadianies.html

I expected you to take it from the Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s (as) own writings. Sincerity requires you to do that. Is this your perception of Hikmah and Mau’izah Hasanah? BB Sanneh, this is very shameful and then you have the audacity to write that you “deliberately left out sources because it honestly never occurred to me [meaning BB Sanneh] that someone would take me to a challenge for it.” So, this is your source? What a shame!

The second instance that shows his dishonesty is that he made statements that do not exist in the source he referenced; he quoted out of context; he deliberately twisted words to give them different meanings and quoted an anti-Ahmadiyya source in such a way that people would think it is actually an Ahmadiyya source. These acts are highest standards of dishonesty. I said he did these things because he has plagiarized and pretended that he actually read from the Ahmadiyya literature. He is not different from the one who first committed these crimes because he is helping in propagating the falsehood.

1. An example of a non-existent statement that he has made:

BB Sanneh alleges that the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at writes,

“He was the second advent of Holy Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and better and superior than the first coming” (Roohani Khazain vol 16 pp.272).

This statement is not found anywhere in the above reference, that is, Roohani Khazain vol 16 pp.272 and no where in the entire Roohani Khazain. Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as) never in any statement declared superiority over the Holy Prophet Muhammad Rasoolullaah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him).

1. An example of a statement that was deliberately twisted to give it a different meaning:

BB Sanneh alleges that the Founder of the Ahmadiyyaa Muslim Jama’at writes: “The basis for our claim is not Hadith but Quran and that WAHI which comes to us. Yes in support we also quote those Hadith which are according to Quran and DO NOT CONTRADICT MY WAHI. As for the REST OF THE HADITHs, I THROW THEM AWAY LIKE A WASTE PAPER.” (Roohani Khazain vol 19 p.140)

This is what is found in Roohani Khazain vol. 19, p. 140: The Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at writes:

“I swear by Allah and state that this claim of mine (of being the Promised Messiah) is founded not upon the Hadeeth, but rather upon the Qur’an and the Divine revelation that I have received. Indeed, as supporting evidence, we also present such Ahaadeeth that tally with the Qur’an and do not contravene the words of God that I have received. As for Traditions besides these, we cast them aside as valueless…”

BB Sanneh, are you saying that any Hadeeth that contravenes the Holy Qur’an should be accepted and the Qur’anic verse be rejected? You should know very well if you have basic knowledge of Ahaadeeth that even the compilers of Ahaadeeth have categorized many Ahaadeeth as unauthentic. Will you prefer such Ahaadeeth over the Qur’an? In fact, agreement with the Qur’an is the primary criterion for judging the authenticity of a Hadeeth and whether it should be rejected or not.

What is the context of the above statement by the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at? The Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at is refuting the claim of one Maulvi Sanaullah of Amratsari that the claim of the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at of being the Promised Messiah was not based on Divine Revelation but entirely on traditions (Ahaadeeth) attributed to the Holy Prophet (saw). The Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at states that contrary to Sanaullah’s allegation, his claim is founded primarily on the Word of Allah, which is the Holy Qur’an and secondarily on the Divine Revelation he himself received, again the word of Allah. And that the Ahaadeeth is also used as supporting evidence provided it does not contravene the Holy Qur’an primarily and the revelation he received secondarily.

• Another example of twisting the statements:

BB Sanneh alleges that the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at writes: “Quran is God’s Book and the words of my mouth.” (Advertisement dated 15th March 1897, Roohani Khazain vol 22 p. 87)

The Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at was quoting the words of Divine Revelation which he received from Allah. The words therefore are not his (that is the Founder of Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at), they are words God has revealed to him. Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was only stating the words he received from Allah. The word My is referring to Allah as the Speaker. Therefore what is found in Rohaani Khazain vol. 22, p. 87 is

“…Walk with grace, for your time draws near and the step of the followers of Muhammad (saw) would land firmly on the tallest minaret. God will put all your duties right and will grant you all your wishes. The Lord of all the hosts will turn this way. This sign will affirm that the Glorious Qur’an is indeed the Book of God and the utterances of My mouth…”

I most sincerely ask BB Sanneh, by virtue of his claim of defending Islam and exposing the heresy of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at, to further defend Islam and its honour by invoking the curse of Allah on the liar. In the words of the Holy Qur’an, invoke the following prayer: La’natullaahi ‘alal kaazibeen (The curse of Allah be on the liars) if indeed you believe that the quotations you made are right and meant exactly what you said. Please do it out of your respect and honour for Islam. I say La’natullaahi ‘alal kaazibeen.

1. An example of a statement quoted out of context:

BB Sanneh states that the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at writes: In one of my revelation (kashf) I saw myself as God and I believe in it. (Kitab Al-Brae P: 85. Roohani Khazain V: 3 P: 103).”

The statement that you quoted above has not been fully quoted therefore giving it a wrong meaning. As your source itself has admitted, it is a state of vision that Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as) was mentioning. By deliberately mutilating a part of the whole, your source has put the whole issue out of context and you being the type of person who does not go to the actual source fell for it. Now let us look at the whole quote, the verdict of the Holy Prophet (saw) on the issue and then the examples from Muslim literature.

This is what Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as) writes in Kitaabul Bariyya and it is in consonance with the Hadith in Bukhari (quoted below). It is a long quotation but I have to bring it here in full in order not to mutilate the meaning.

“In a vision I saw that I myself was God and believed myself to be such. I believed that I had no will or thought or action of my own left, and that I had become like something which was being completely overpowered by something else that had absorbed me wholly so that my whole being had completely disappeared. I saw the divine spirit envelop my soul and covering my body hide me completely in itself so that not a particle of me remained. I beheld myself as if all my limbs had become His, my eyes had become His eyes, my ears had become His ears, and my tongue had become His tongue. My Lord seized me with such great force that I disappeared in Him and I felt that His power was surging in me and that His Divinity was coursing through me. The Lord of honour then set His camp around my heart and the Lord of power ground down my soul so that there was no more of me nor any desire of mine left. My whole structure was demolished and only the structure of the Lord of the universe remained visible.

The Divine [Allaah] overcame me with such force that I was drawn to Him from the hair of my head to the nails of my toes. Then I became all spirit which had no body and became an oil which had no dregs. I was separated completely from my ego and I became like something which was not visible or like a drop which had become merged in the ocean so that the ocean comprehended it in its vastness. I no longer knew what I had been before nor what my being was. Divinity coursed through my veins and muscles. I was completely lost to myself and God Almighty employed my limbs for His purpose and took possession of me with such force that nothing exceeded it. By this seizure I became non-existent. I believed that my limbs had become God’s limbs and I imagined that I had discarded my own being and departed from my existence, and that no associate or claimant had remained as an obstruction. God Almighty entered wholly into my being and my anger and my gentleness and my bitterness and my sweetness and my movement and my inertness all became His. In this condition I said: I desire a new universe, a new heaven and a new earth.”

In this full text, which has been mutilated by the source of plagiarist Sanneh, the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at repeatedly mentioned God and did not even once claim Godhood/Divinity. He said that it was in a vision that he saw himself as God. Visions are subject to interpretations. They are spiritual experiences through which Allah Almighty gives glad tidings to His dear servants. Visions are not interpreted literally. In the quotation above, in the portion highlighted in block letters, the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at has in fact used the same words used by Muhammad Rasoolullaah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)

It is recorded in Sahih Bukhari, Kitaabur Riqaaqi, Baabut Tawaadu’i:

“Abu Hurairah narrates that the Holy Prophet (saw) said, ‘Allah the Almighty says that whoever is an enemy of my friend, I declare war on him. My servant can be close to me through things that I love and that I have made obligatory upon him. By offering Nawafil My servant gets so close to me that I start loving him. When I make him a friend of Mine, I become the ears with which he hears, the eyes with which he sees, the hands with which he holds, and the feet with which he walks. That is I fulfill all that he desires. If he begs of Me, I provide for him; if he seeks my protection, I grant him protection.”

Does this imply that Muhammad Rasoolullaah (saw) meant to say that the person literally becomes Allah? Or will you also accuse Rasoolullaah (saw) of blasphemy? Why would it be a claim of Divinity for Hadrat Mirza Ghulam (as) to use the same words used by his master Muhammad Rasoolullaah (saw)?

This kind of experience is a state called Fanaa fillaah, where a person loses his own existence and identity in favour of the existence and identity of God. His personal desires do not exist anymore; only the desires and wishes of God become his desires and wishes. Ask people even in the Gambia here who are Sufi-minded about Fanau. They will tell you what it means. Examples of these type of statements can be found in many Muslim literature.

The blind cannot talk about the brightness of the sun. The deaf cannot talk about the sound of thunder. The spiritually bereft and unacquainted cannot talk about spiritual matters; they must ask the people acquainted with such matters.

I once again most sincerely ask BB Sanneh, by virtue of his claim of defending Islam and exposing the heresy of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at, to further defend Islam and its honour by invoking the curse of Allah on the liar. In the words of the Holy Qur’an, invoke the following prayer: La’natullaahi ‘alal kaazibeen (The curse of Allah be on the liars) if indeed you believe that Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as) literally claimed being God. Please do it out of your respect and honour for Islam. I say La’natullaahi ‘alal kaazibeen.

BB Sanneh alleges that the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at writes, “I have said several times that according to the verse (of Holy Quran) ‘wa akhareena minhum lamma yalhaqoo behim’ as Burooz I am the same Prophet, the Khatamul Anbiyyah, and 20 years ago God named me Muhammad and Ahmad in Braheen-e-Qadianism and declared me His Being.” (Aik ghalti ka azala, Roohani Khazain vol. 18 p.212)

The first fabrication to note here is that the founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at has never written a book called Braheen-e-Qadianism. That is an absolute fabrication by BB Sanneh. I now tell BB Sanneh that the exact words in Eik Ghalati Kaa Izala are:

“… I have stated repeatedly that, in accordance with the verse wa aakhareena minhum lammaa yalhqoo bihim, as Buruz (reflection), I am the same Prophet Khatamun Nabiyyeen. It was twenty years ago, in Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, that God named me ‘Muhammad’ and ‘Ahmad’ and declared me to be the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). Thus the status of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) as Khatamun Nabiyyeen is by no means in peril due to my Prophethood, since the zill [shadow, reflection] is never independent of the original. Since I am Muhammad by way of zill, therefore, the Seal of Khatamun Nabiyyeen remains intact and Prophethood of Muhammad remains confined to Muhammad. This means that in all events it is Muhammad who remains the Prophet and no one else.”

BB Sanneh, where in these statements has the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at rejected the Prophethood of Muhammad Rasoolullaah (saw) and declared himself an independent and superior Prophet to Muhammad Rasoolullaah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)? He only stated that he was Muhammad Rasoolullaah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) by way of reflection which he further explained throughout the book that you have made referenced to. Without Muhammad Rasoolullah, there would not have been any Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as).

Statements like this are made by great saints of Islam. One example is Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jilani who said, “This [pointing to body] is not Abdul Qadir Jilani but of Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him),” (Guldastah Karamat). This is called fanaa firrasool (losing onself in the love of Rasoolullaah, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)

Writing about the Imam Mahdi, Hadrat Imam Baqr writes;

“The Imam Mahdi will say, “O people, if any of you wishes to behold Ibrahim and Ismael, let him note that I am Ibrahim and Ismael; if any of you wishes to behold Musa and Joshua, then let him note that I am Musa and Joshua; if any of you desires to behold Isa and Simon, then let him note that I am Isa and Simon; if any of you wishes to behold Hadrat Muhammad Mustafa, pace and blessings of Allah be upon him, or the Ameerul Mu’mineen, may Allah be pleased with him, let him note that I am Muhammad and Ali, may Allah be pleased with them all,” (Bahaarul Anwar)

BB Sanneh, you definitely have to go back and study the basics of Islam. I am surprised that you do not even understand the connotations of basic spiritual statements that are found all over in Islamic literature. May Allah Almighty guide you in understanding spiritual matters.

Before concluding, I would like to explain another statement that you have misinterpreted deliberately. You allege that Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad writes, “Whoever is not sure of our success is in fact, a bastard. He wouldn’t be a legitimate man. (Roohani Khazain; V: 18 p: 31)” and then “But only the sons of the prostitues didn’t confirm and accept me. (Roohani Khazain: V:5, P: 547-548).

Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as) never called anyone son of prostitute. This is what he writes in A’inae Kamalat-e-Islam, “Every Muslim will accept me and will confirm my claim except the Zurriyyatul Baghaaya whose hearts will have been sealed by God Almighty.”

A term must be understood in the context in which it is said. First, what does zurriyyatul baghaaya mean? According to Tajul Uroos, a famous Arabic lexicon, baghy which is the singular for baghaaya means “a female slave, irrespective of her conduct.” In that case that term would mean “the sons of slaves” and a slave is “A person under another’s influence and lacks the power to use his own faculty of free choice and determination.” Tajul Uroos further states that when someone is called the zurriyyatul baghaaya, it would mean “he is deprived of guidance.” Therefore the statement of the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at is this “Every Muslim will accept me and will confirm my claim except the THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN DEPRIVED OF GUIDANCE and whose hearts will have been sealed by God Almighty.” This exactly is the meaning of the term in the context in which it is used. In that sense and context, this term perfectly fits you. You are a son of a slave because you cannot utitlise your faculty of thinking, that is why instead of reading the books of the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at, you went to the website of his opponent. Your mind is being controlled by another to an extent that you cannot think. You are indeed mental slave.

I, as an Ahmadi Muslim, declare that we believe in Allah as presented by the Holy Qur’an and Muhammad Rasoolullaah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). We believe that Muhammad Rasoolullaah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) is the best of creation and Seal of the Prophets and we believe in whatever the Holy Qur’an says about him. We absolutely believe in the Holy Qur’an and believe that even a single dot of the Holy Qur’an cannot be falsified. If BB Sanneh thinks and believes that these are not the beliefs of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at, then:

I once again most sincerely ask BB Sanneh, by virtue of his claim of defending Islam and exposing the heresy of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at, to further defend Islam and its honour by invoking the curse of Allah on the liar. In the words of the Holy Qur’an, invoke the following prayer: La’natullaahi ‘alal kaazibeen (The curse of Allah be on the liars) if indeed you believe that Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as) and his followers do not believe in the God presented by the Holy Qur’an, do not believe in the Holy Qur’an and have their own book, do not believe in Muhammad Rasoolullaah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him). Please do it out of your respect and honour for Islam. I say La’natullaahi ‘alal kaazibeen.

WHY I MADE AN OFFER OF D25, 000 FOR YOU TO PRODUCE YOUR SO-CALLED AL KITAAB AL MUBEEN?

I have realized that you want to run away from the challenge by saying that why did I choose to offer D25, 000 just for this point out of all the so-called allegations and also referring to it as “…trying to put a spanner on the spoke of the wheels…” This is the simple reason: The Holy Qur’an is the essence of Islam; there would have been no Islam without the Holy Qur’an. The fundamental beliefs and practices of Islam are embedded in the Holy Qur’an. By attacking the Holy Qur’an, you have attacked the very foundations of the religion which is the acceptable religion in the sight of Allah, the religion called Islam. How did you attack it? You attacked it by saying that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was able to produce a book like the Qur’an called al Kitaab al Mubeen, contrary to the Qur’anic declaration that no one can produce even a chapter like any chapter of the Holy Qur’an. I am therefore obliged to defend the very foundation of Islam which you have vehemently attacked.

The 27^th Day of June 2017 is the deadline I have given you and the challenge still stands. Instead of making unnecessary statements in order to evade the challenge, please let the world see this book al Kitaab al Mubeen. By doing that you will save the entire Ummah from the deception of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at as you called it.

THE MUBAHALA OF 1997

You have been trying to hail your scholars as heroes and custodians of the Islam to an extent that you believe they have the mandate and authority to declare who is or is not a Muslim, among them you specifically mentioned Abdoulie Fatty, formerly of the State House mosque. Let me put it to you that those so-called scholars in the Gambia were challenged to a Mubahala (a duel of prayers wherein the curse of Allah is invoked on the wilful liars). Ask Abdoulie Fatty especially and his team of anti-Ahmadiyya scholars why they did not accept the challenge for a duel of prayers and invoke the curse of Allah on the wilful liars whoever those wilful liars may have been. For twenty years now, the challenge has not been accepted. I am now telling you, Bakary B Sanneh and whatever scholar you are referring to, that if you are so sure of your truthfulness and allegations that you have raised against the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at; if you are so sure of the falsehood of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as), then publicly announce what you think and believe about the Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at and then publicly declare that you pray for the curse of Allah to descend upon the wilful liar whoever it is. Our local newspapers will be, I believe, very willing to publish such announcement.

Please do not hesitate to do this if indeed you are defending Islam. It will definitely be a great service to Islam.

Written By: Tahir Ahmad Touray

The Constitution of the Gambia provides for presidential elections every five years. On 1 December 2016 we went to the fifth presidential elections of the Second Republic. Yaya Jammeh lost to Adama Barrow yet he refused to step down until the whole world had to get involved in our internal affairs. After much pressure and national trauma, he left yet his party leaders and their members in various parts of Kanifing and Foni especially refuse to accept the verdict of the people. They erroneously hold that the only legitimate child in the Gambia is Yaya Jammeh who must rule the Gambia forever, by force. For that matter they now want to disunite and dismantle our country by any means. This cannot be accepted.

Therefore the time has come to put it to APRC and some folks in Foni to stop insulting the dignity and sovereignty of Gambians. The continued agitation by these folks in Kanilai and APRC in general in support of Yaya Jammeh is unacceptable because it is utterly shameful and painful. Yaya Jammeh is not a person in the league of Edward Francis Small or any patriot. This man had the unique opportunity to rule the Gambia during which time our people gave him full support from Banjul to Basse. Yet he decided to flout our Constitution, dishonour our dignity, trample upon our sovereignty and disregard our religious and cultural norms and values to unleash a reign of terror on Gambians. He directly raped, tortured and murdered citizens as well as directly plundered national resources with impunity for 22 years. Therefore the least we expect from APRC is grief and remorse and not a rowdy bunch celebrating a killer.

To those poor youths and communities in Kanilai, let them realize that when Yaya Jammeh overthrew PPP in 1994 he was as poor as a church mouse. But within 22 years, he looted the Gambia to become one of the richest men in Africa. Therefore there is no property in Yaya’s name that is legitimate and legal including that palace he built in Kanilai. They are all stolen property. In those 22 years, he indiscriminately tortured and killed the people of Foni and took their lands with impunity. Hence Yaya Jammeh does not worth to die for, and no self-respecting citizen will defend a tyrant.

Let this clueless bunch realize that it is because of Yaya Jammeh and APRC’s irresponsible and unconstitutional action that brought foreign countries to get involved on our internal issues leading to the presence of foreign forces inside the Gambia. Hence when we reach this stage, the APRC and those folks in Foni must be told to reflect and remain calm. They must be told to submit themselves to the laws and institutions of the Gambian nation and protect the unity and peace of the Gambia. They must not act as if they have been unfairly treated or cheated by anyone. APRC folks must be told that there is no case for resistance or liberation war for any Gambian community or region.

The new government has shown that they are a law-abiding government and this is why APRC was not banned and no APRC person has been arbitrarily arrested. In 1994 Yaya Jammeh disgraced and maltreated other people’s parents and elders by dumping them in the back of a truck to parade them throughout Banjul. He then went further to ban the PPP and other parties, as he liked. He subjected national leaders to kangaroo commissions of enquiry, while he engaged in series of insults against Jawara and his ministers who could be his father. Yet no Gambian village or region demonstrated against him, but all gave him support that he came to betray. Today we did not see a similar thing happen since January when Barrow became president even though APRC committed far more atrocities and corruption than PPP.

Rather what we are witnessing is how the Barrow Government went to court to obtain legal authority and follow due process against the atrocities and looting of Yaya Jammeh in a calm and civilized manner. Hence APRC and their folks in Foni must advise themselves to humble down and realize that they do not have the monopoly of power and must not threaten the unity and security of the Gambia. Yaya Jammeh is not the president of the Gambia. When he had the chance to lead this country, he led it in the most terrible way never seen before in the Gambia. If any Gambian is not ashamed by Yaya Jammeh then your sense of morality must be completed damaged. Yaya Jammeh did not only kill Gambians and loot our resources, but he also ridiculed the Gambia in front of the whole world.

The agitation we see taking place in Foni are a minority of the people. The chiefs, alkalolu and the people of Foni must tell these agitators not to turn Foni into a scene of violence and disgrace. The Governor of West Coast Region must engage the authorities in Foni to impress on the people that their actions are unlawful and unnecessary. They must stop.

Above all, Pres. Barrow needs to engage the relevant stakeholders to take necessary action. We must not allow any citizens to take the law into their own hands. Hence the police must arrest and prosecute any person who breaches the law. Secondly the National Assembly must address the issue by sending a message to the APRC and their folks in Foni to let them know that they are acting outside of the law. I want to suggest that the National Assembly constitute a fact-finding mission to Foni to find out what really are the issues on the ground there. This must be followed by a set of recommendations and implemented.

The APRC leaders: Isatou Njie Saidy, Fatou Lamin Faye, Bala Garba Jahumpa, Fabakary Tombong Jatta, Abdoulie Bojang, Yankuba Kolley and Musa Amul Nyassi must be reminded that they bear responsibility for the actions of their supporters. But it appears that these APRC leaders are instigating their supporters to make the Gambia ungovernable. They are certainly receiving instructions from Yaya Jammeh in Equatorial Guinea. We know he is communicating with these folks but APRC must be told that they must abide by the law. APRC presided over the most gruesome and despicable episode of our history and if they cannot repent, they must not be seen acting as if they have been cheated of anything. If anything, it was APRC, which wanted to cheat the elections after misruling the country with blood and tears. Truth must be told.

To the masses of Foni and the rest of the Gambia, let us realize that those making these agitations are a tiny minority of people who have lost power, access to resources and privilege that they were used to under Yaya Jammeh, illegally. They cannot contain themselves now in their new reality hence they want to see the whole of the Gambia burn down. Let us refuse them by keeping the peace and stability of this country. Let us shower truth on their heads that they are misbehaving and acting in a manner unbecoming of a true citizen of this country. Yaya Jammeh can never become a leader of this country again and it is foolhardy to dream about that. Let the people of Foni isolate this rowdy APRC people and reject their false narratives aimed at generating fear and disunity.

No region, religion, tribe, family or party is under any threat from the Government or from the rest of Gambians. Hence let us not allow anyone who perpetuates the false narrative that there are sections of the population who are discriminated, threatened, maltreated, at risk or witch hunted. If that was the case, many folks are happily roaming the streets and enjoying the comfort of their homes today would have been in jail for the treason they caused. But even Abdoulie Bojang has been made an ambassador! Yankuba Kolley is still the Mayor of KMC even when he is not elected. Fabakary Tombong Jatta or Seedy Njie has never been attacked. Musa Amul Nyassi and four of his APRC parliamentarians enjoy their full rights and benefits in the National Assembly like any other. Hence where is the threat APRC has faced in this country?

Yet while this APRC folks enjoy their peace and freedom, they refuse to remember that the family of Koro Ceesay is in grief because Yaya Jammeh and his henchmen burned their loved one to ashes 20 years ago? Do they not realize that the family of Enor Kolley, Jasarja Kujabi, Ndongo Mboob and Marcie Jammeh are in grief over the murder of their loved ones by Yaya Jammeh? There are many families in deep grief right now because Yaya Jammeh and the APRC murdered their loved ones: Deyda Hydara. Chief Ebrima Manneh. Kanyiba Kanyi. Elo Jallow. Njagga Jagne. Landing Sanneh. Daba Marenah, April 10 and 11 Children. November 11 Soldiers. Private Modou Njie. Lt. Colonel Sarjo Jarju. Lt. Amadou Sowe. Lt. Buba Sanneh. Abdoulie Jobe. Solo Sandeng. Solo Koroma. Lang Marong. Ebrima Ceesay and many more! Are these APRC folks telling us they are not aware of the carnage of Yaya Jammeh? How could they be so callous to now trumpet such a killer in our midst?

Time has come to address these things through the law, Mr. President.

God Bless The Gambia.

Madi Jobarteh

The Gambia needs a new caliber of leadership at all levels. What the nation needs is competent and honest politicians, those who operate with integrity and who are not simply driven by vengeance, personal gain, or the desire to remain in office for life. These political leaders must be judged based on their capability, moral character, and genuine commitment to public service, as well as their ability to uplift the aspirations and demands of the Gambian citizens. It is a tremendous shame that just as it has been through the ages, greed and self-interest has destroyed the country.

Since independence, major corruptions and scandals have plagued the Gambia, with the perpetrators persistently evading punishment. This is despite the Special Criminal Bill that was passed in Parliament in 1979 by the former Attorney General, Momodou Lamin Saho, as well as the Evaluation of Assets and Prevention of Corrupt Practices Bill, shepherded in 1982 by the former Attorney General Fafa M’bai. To regain the public’s confidence in the government’s integrity, the laws on asset declaration in Gambia must be formulated without fear or favor. It is vital that conflicts of interest or illicit enrichment are detected.

The National Assembly has been urged to formulate new legislations, including the Anti-Corruption Commission Bill and the Declaration of Assets Bill, and to pass them into law to enforce transparent asset declaration among politicians holding public office and civil servants in high decision-making positions. The goal is to ensure that the public has confidence in those who hold political office.

The recent revelations that former president Yahya Jammeh amassed over $50 million, held 88 bank accounts in his name (or in those of his associates), was associated with 14 companies, and was accused of taking over successful businesses for his own gain in his 22-year rule have led to fresh calls for the passing of the Declaration of Assets bill and the Anti-Corruption bill before the National Assembly.

The Gambian people have been repeatedly failed, as over the fifty years since independence the country has been unable to combat corruption, making it a generational issue. Gambian political leaders born after independence should enact laws that best work for the next fifty years, building and improving upon the democratic process by combating the cankerworms of corruption in the Gambia by entrenching the law on Public Officers’ Declaration of Assets, Liabilities and Business Interests, and the Anti-Corruption Commission law. These laws are vital to accelerating the Gambia’s growth and competitiveness.

The legacy that most of our political leaders have left is one of greed, selfishness, and impunity, along with a lack of any desire to develop the country or help the people they profess to serve. This is despicable enough, as it hinders the economic growth and development of the Gambia, yet it is more dreadful in that, instead of fighting corruption, these leaders are often deeply engaged in dishonesty and exploitation, unscrupulously using their power to entrench and extend their own greed and continue to plunder the country.

It appears that institutions that are meant to safeguard the Gambia and be watchdogs against corruption (e.g., the judiciary, police, security services, and rule of law) are failing the country, and instead are selectively serving the interests of the elite classes. This is the legacy that the Gambia has inherited from its colonial past, when such institutions were more often subservient to the all-powerful colonial administrator or governor.

Instead of changing colonial era institutions, laws, and values for the better, Gambian ruling parties and leaders continue to entrench the deeply compromised governance systems that have held the country back and against which they fought so much, claiming and promising redemption from such chains. As such, over fifty years after its independence, the Gambia is at a standstill, with greed and self-enriching politics rampant. A centralized political culture highly reminiscent of the colonial administration remains, and it is this refusal to serve the people that is destroying the country from within.

The Gambian people’s social contract should not only be limited to the electoral process, but existing politicians should also be accountable and must transparently declare their assets and liabilities whenever they assume public office. The Gambian people are dying because money meant for healthcare, education, and agriculture is stolen, and hard-earned tax-payer money is misappropriated directly or indirectly by the custodians of our treasury. Rich or poor, male or female, all of us are affected by corruption, but it does not have to be this way. The Gambian people deserve to live in dignity and in progress. We walk forward, not backwards, and as such we are growing as a nation.

Despite the lack of legislation to combat corruption, the public’s perception is that corruption in the government has increased with impunity. Indeed, over the past few years, there has been no significant progress, and the latest report by Transparency International confirms that the Gambia has fallen in the ranking to 145 out of 176.

In many respects, after its Independence the Gambia moved quickly to confront the problem of corruption. However, the People’s Progressive Party (PPP) era was inseparable from widespread corruption that took such firm root in the country that ill-gotten gain was flaunted as the norm. When the Special Criminal Court Bill was tabled in Parliament in 1979, then Attorney General Saho stated: “It is not alarming to say that this country will be destroyed if this cancer [of corruption] is not arrested now.” He continued to state that he made “no apologies for this Bill,” adding that “No stone would be left unturned in the fight to protect the interest of the public from the rapacious mafia within our society.” In 1980, the view was expressed by one Member of Parliament that “more stringent measures such as hand amputation ought to be introduced” to stem the tide of runaway corruption. In an address to accounting personnel of the government in July 1980, a Parliamentary Secretary suggested, according to the Gambia News Bulletin, that embezzlers should be punished by firing squad (Justice Jallow,2012).

It was in this climate of mass disaffection with the PPP government that Kukoi emerged in 1981, and in which Fafa M’bai, Attorney General in 1982, shepherded the Evaluation of Assets and Prevention of Corrupt Practices Bill, which on 31st December 1982 became Act No. 17 of that year. We know what happened to Fafa and his Act when the “rapacious mafia” went to work on him.  It is not even persuasive to contend that the “society” perceived “the exercise as being manipulated and used as a political weapon targeted principally against the urban elite of a particular ethnic group.” (Justice Jallow,2012).

Corruption has scarred nearly all aspects of life in the Gambia, and all too frequently it is the middle-level officials who are caught and scapegoated, whilst the so-called “big fish” continue to go unpunished. Until the system forces these upper echelons to be accountable for their actions, the public will continue to perceive that things have not improved.

While the main aim of the Declaration of Assets is to prevent corruption, it is also designed to increase transparency and the trust of the public administration, to prevent conflicts of interest and illicit enrichment, to avoid false accusations of wealth, and to monitor the wealth of politicians and public servants. These are valid demands because such individuals hold great power over the allocation of national resources, and their salaries are paid through the public tax contribution.

The Declaration of Assets shall be regulated by the Constitution and, in accordance with international standards, it shall require the President and members of his/her cabinet to disclose fully all their assets, liabilities, and business interests and those of their spouses held by them or on their behalf. Such a disclosure should occur no later than three months from the date of the election or appointment. However, by changing the law to require the declaration to also be made at the end of the term of office will facilitate greater accountability.

The bill can be added by amending the Constitution to provide, in very general terms, for the verification of declarations and enacting new legislation to establish a detailed framework of rules and sanctions relating to non-declaration, verification of declarations, and the legal consequences of any breaches of constitutional and statutory obligations on the Declaration of Assets.

Strengthening the law, in and of itself, cannot guarantee that public funds will not be looted and spirited away by holders of political office and public servants. Gambians also need to take political action, in part by strengthening the powers of the National Assembly and its committees to summon and question the President and other public officials and servants about any suspicious acquisition or accumulation of wealth. We also need to strengthen the protection of investigative journalists, media houses, and whistleblowers because of their vital role in exposing and publicizing the theft of public resources.

Gambian citizens should have the right to view the financial disclosures of all public officials and employees, as well as their spouses and children who are minors or unmarried and living in their households. As such, the Anti-Corruption Commission will publish the financial disclosures of many of the highest ranking public officials in the government gazette.

The periodic public disclosure of personal assets would help to ensure that unexplained wealth, especially ill-gotten gains, do not go unnoticed. The government of President Adama Barrow has conducted a spate of probes into the corruption of Yahya Jammeh, and the string of corruption cases indicates a serious and alarmingly routine abuse of power and misconduct by public officials. This points to serious structural flaws in the system that have allowed these loopholes to be manipulated for massive fraud and the swindling of public funds. This issue has been plaguing the Gambia’s growth and competitiveness.

Declaring assets behind doors, which is what occurred in the Gambia under previous governments, no longer suffices, as it reeked of secrecy and opacity instead of promoting transparency and honesty. Asset declarations should be accessible to the public as part of their right to know and be informed, instead of being made only internally within the government.

Studies show that an asset declaration open to public scrutiny is a way for the public to ensure leaders do not abuse their power for personal gain. Published information on a person’s assets allows a civil society to hold its leaders to account. Making a public declaration of assets is an effective anti-corruption tool.

While the Declaration of Assets should be done periodically and kept on record by an effective independent body, it is also appropriate to have forensic accounting experts and investigators monitor the assets periodically. An asset profiling system should be introduced to determine what assets personnel are expected to have, based on their positions, years of service, and their present and past emoluments.

The Gambian society needs to bolster the campaign on enactment of the Declaration of Assets and the Anti-Corruption bills to build a public understanding of the debilitating effects of corruption in society. To ensure the well-being of the nation, such enactments must be undertaken in a courageous and impartial fashion. All too often, anti-corruption voices are themselves deemed to be tainted and lacking in impartiality.

Who Are We….?

Mr President, I sometimes wonder about our identity. It is hard to differentiate between us and the westerners on the one side, or the Arabs on the other. We have assimilated so much that sometimes we are even more European than the Europeans themselves. It seems that we despise what we are.

We do not value our culture and heritage and as such we have almost lost our sense of identity. One is hailed for looking like a European or an Arab. This is manifested in the way we speak, the way we dress, the way we associate with others and so on and so forth.

Every nation on Earth is trying to work on its indigenization of its culture, heritage and language. India and Turkey are good examples of this. They spend millions of Dollars to sell the image of their countries. We have seen Turkey inviting journalists from different parts of the world, paying their airfares just to sell their image. We on the other hand are trying to adopt; whatever it is that will make us look in vogue.

Mr President… I think it’s time we also endeavor to entrench Gambianness in our youth, be proud of our culture and heritage. Let us teach and learn our culture, heritage and languages. Let us celebrate our heroes of yesterday and show the world what we are, where we are coming from and what is it that makes us unique as a people. Certainly, we also have a lot to be proud of, a lot to celebrate. We indeed have a lot to offer the world. But if we don’t let our young ones know what is our own; then they will not appreciate it.

Mr President, this in my opinion has to start with our school system. The previous government made efforts in starting the teaching and learning of our indigenous languages but it seemed rushed and as such left a lot to be deaired. Proper research should be conducted to come up with suggestions and recommendations which will take everything into account so that once it is started, will progress into phasing out the colonial language. This is important because the learning of a second language is surely a hindrance to understanding certain things.

I’ve written before that had we been learning maths and science in our languages, the massive failure would have been reduced. If we want to make a mark in the international stage, we must pay particular attention to maths and science – in our languages.

Mr President, my advice is that your government should engage the University of the Gambia to conduct the necessary research into this so that we find out all the pros and cons of this.

Already, there are NGOs who are doing great work on this front. We can tap into the great works they have already started. Let us learn, teach, promote, spread and entrench our culture, heritage, language and identity in the world.

Mr President, Gambian sons and daughters are excelling in every field and in every part of the world. We do not lack the expertise and knowhow to transform this land into a great nation in the world. Let us tap into our human resource base, this is our greatest asset.

Have a Good Day Mr President…

Tha Scribbler Bah

A Concerned Citizen

From 30 November to 11 December 2015, Paris chaired and hosted the 21st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP21). Since 1995, the COP has been held each year in a different country and attended by the 196 parties (195 states + the European Union) that have ratified the Convention to review implementation of the Convention and negotiate new commitments. It is for this reason that COP21, and Paris Agreement in particular has been heralded as a major and an unprecedented milestone in saving the planet, today and tomorrow following the Paris Accord. But Trump just announced today that the US is pulling out because he said the deal is bad for business for the US. Nothing can be further away from the truth. To expose his lies, let us look at what the Paris climate agreement is saying?

 
The Paris Agreement

 
In the agreement all the 195 countries pledged to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2025-2030. This pledge is contained in what is called Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC), a set of proposals from each country as to how it intends to reduce emissions. Therefore contrary to Trump’s misinformation the Paris Accord did not impose anything on any country.
In the run-up to COP21, every state party to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was invited to communicate its INDC, detailing the steps it is taking to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 or 2030. Accordingly, even a small country like the Gambia gave its proposal, which is to reduce overall emissions by about 44.4% in 2025 and 45.4% in 2030. In this plan, the Gambia Government included two unconditional mitigation options, i.e. to increase investment and use of renewable energy and also in the short-term, to make the country transition to low-emissions and climate resilient development pathway.

 
According to the UN, there is unanimous agreement from scientists, that the earth’s atmosphere is growing warmer due to greenhouse gas emissions generated by human activity. The aim of the Paris Conference was therefore to come up with a response to this problem, which is threatening to wipe out the human presence in certain parts of the world. The UN said the agreement marked a change in direction towards a new world, which confirmed the target of keeping the rise in temperature below 2°C. Scientists believe that a greater increase in temperature would be very dangerous. The agreement even establishes, for the first time, that the world should be aiming for 1.5°C, to protect island states, which are the most threatened by the rise in sea levels. The Paris Agreement therefore asks all countries to review these contributions every five years from 2020. The agreement acknowledges that $100 billion (in loans and donations) will need to be raised each year from 2020 to finance projects that enable countries to adapt to the impacts of climate change such as rise in sea level, droughts, among others, or reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The agreement specifies that this amount should increase otherwise called the Green Climate Fund.

 
COP21 recognized that not all countries are equally responsible for global warming. Thus one of the main principles of climate negotiations is that countries have common but differentiated responsibilities when it comes to climate change, depending on their wealth in particular. The agreement establishes an obligation for industrialized countries to fund climate finance for poor countries, while developing countries are invited to contribute on a voluntary basis. The ten largest CO2 emitters are, in the order of the size of the emission, China, the United States, Europe (a single contribution for the 28 Member States), India, Russia, Japan, South Korea, Canada, Iran and Saudi Arabia.
The other two key measures for tackling climate change are adaption and mitigation. In adaptation, it is expected that states will take measures to reduce the impact of climate change such as building dykes in coastal zones. Mitigation measures and policies are meant to encourage the development of renewable energies and supporting lower-emission modes of transport.

 
Politics of Climate Change

 
The issue of climate change has always been a contentious issue where states, especially more powerful and richer countries such as the US and EU have dragged their feet in responding to the demands and urgency of the matter. Since the first climate conference in 1979 in Geneva to the 2005 Kyoto Protocol which only the US and Australia refused to ratify among the 36 targeted developed countries, to COP15 at the 2009 Copenhagen conference which approved the shared target to limit global warming to 2°C, it has been found that poor leadership has been the major stumbling factor in addressing global warming. It is in light of this that the full agreement of the countries of the world in Paris was extremely commendable and significant. But this leadership does not rest only with advanced countries and the largest emitters of greenhouse gases, but poor and developing countries like the Gambia also bear equal responsibility to ensure the development and implementation of proposals to tackle global warming among other measures intended to support poor and farming communities to adapt to the situation.
It has been noted that when global warming is effectively tackled, not only does it save farm lands, ensure better rainfalls and prevent other vagaries of the weather, but also, these gains translate in more job creation. The UN has noted that better climate change policies could produce 6,000 green jobs in Macedonia by 2030, 58,000 in Tunisia, 40,000 in Senegal. Meanwhile, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), by 2020, 75 to 250 million people across sub-Saharan Africa could face water shortage, and rain-fed agriculture could contract by 50% in some African countries. The World Bank adds that rise in temperatures could cause permanent GDP loses of 4-5% for Africa.

 
Trump Disaster
Hence the announcement by Trump is nothing but a bunch of false alarms and irrelevant statistics intended to scare the people of the US and the world. None of what Trump said is true. The fact is that in the US alone, California, which is the sixth largest economy in the world, is one of the topmost places on earth with advanced climate change policies and programs that are paying off well. These policies and programs are the basis for the immense growth in that single state within the USA. If one state within the USA can succeed why cannot the US as a whole implement those same policies and programs and succeed? But Trump does not want t hear that because Trump is looking at his businesses and not jobs for the hardworking American people he always trumpet.

 
What the world has to realize is that Trump is in this for his own business empire. Right now in Scotland, Trump has been fighting the Scottish authorities against their attempt to build some wind turbines near his golf course in that country. Even when it is clear that those wind turbines are good for the Scottish and UK economy and will create jobs, yet Trump opposes it for years now just because he thinks that is not good for his business. Hence Trump is not pulling out of the Paris Accord for any nationalistic reason but only for selfish reasons. His claim that US is to give billions upon billions to India or redistribute its wealth to every country is not true. Certainly the American negotiators that went to Paris for this agreement are not stupid fools to just sell America to the world. Hence Trump is merely engaged in a hype in order to hoodwink the ordinary masses of the US who are absolutely unaware of the how the world works to make them feel that he is there fore them. But trump is there for no one. Trump is there for only Trump. Period.

 
Therefore, by pulling out and given that the US is the second largest emitter of greenhouse gases means the security and the future of the world is now severely threatened. Trump is the world’s biggest liability right now! All countries particularly developing countries must condemn this decision. The United Nations must propose sanctions against the US right now. All countries must take measures to impose taxes and stiff measures on US companies as well as American products such as cars, fridges, aeroplanes and similar technological items to make the US pay for the emissions that come as a result of the manufacture of these products.
Time to impose stiff sanctions against the US!

After 22 years of direct and severe harassment of the media by the APRC regime, it is utterly callous of any media house and journalist in the world to celebrate Yaya Jammeh in any manner or form. Yet the Daily Observer, without remorse decided to irresponsibly dedicate a front page birthday wish to a tyrant, majority of whose victims in the media community in fact come from that very newspaper. Even if Yaya Jammeh owns the Daily Observer, one would expect that the Editor-in-Chief and staffs of that newspaper would remember their former colleague Chief Ebrima Manneh who was kidnapped and killed on the orders of Yaya Jammeh. This is one single case among many other Daily Observer journalists who were subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention and torture with many more having to flee to save their lives at various times. Yet 22 years later, the Daily Observer had no good judgment but to celebrate such a predator of press freedom in the Gambia.

 
The Daily Observer of today is indeed a huge shame if one truly considers the very origin of that paper and the glorious history of its original proprietor Kenneth Best of Liberia. In 1990 this honourable man established the Daily Observer as the first daily newspaper in the Gambia. He believed in our country so much so that he made the credo of the newspaper, “Forward with The Gambia” which can be seen everyday in the front page of the newspaper. It was at this newspaper that some of Gambia’s finest veteran journalists either started their career or improved themselves to international repute.

 
I was myself a beneficiary of Daily Observer training in 1994. Some of our leading journalists that passed through the paper include Mathew K Jallow who was an editor, the current Information Minister Demba Jawo, GRTS chief Ebrima Sillah, former Information Minister Sheriff Bojang, sports journalist Lamin Cham, our UK-based expert Ebrima Ceesay, our US-based experts Baba Galleh Jallow and Yoro Jallow, and indeed Ndey Tapha Sosseh who became the first female Editor-in-Chief of the newspaper years later, and many others. The story of the Daily Observer and its contribution to the development of the media is glorious and deep. Hence it was utterly tragic that this noble paper had to land in the hands of Yaya Jammeh in the first place. Since then it has distinguished itself for gutter journalism, as it became the mouthpiece of the dictatorship using its pages to ridicule Gambian dignity and destroy Gambians lives with impunity.

 
But the folks that work in the Daily Observer are Gambian citizens. Thus one does not expect that when Gambians shed blood and tears to remove that tyranny, this paper will still fail to recognize their own sovereignty and dignity and align themselves with the new aspirations of the country. But it appears the editors and staffs of the Daily Observer do not understand the trials and tribulations of the media in this country hence they could insult their own fallen colleagues in their face by celebrating a journalist killer.
In fact the first victim of Yaya Jammeh was Kenneth Best himself when he was illegally and forcefully deported from the Gambia on 30 October 1994. Without any charge or court appearance, security agents bundled this man out of his house to drive him straight to the airport for deportation to his war-torn Liberia from where he fled the tyranny of Samuel Doe to the Gambia. Yaya Jammeh never cared if the man was going to face any risks when he returned! How callous!

 
Is the Editor-in-Chief of the Daily Observer telling us that he does not know that there was a man called Deyda Hydara who was shot to death by agents of Yaya Jammeh called the Junglers? Does the Editor-in-Chief of the Daily Observer wish to tell us that he did not know the Junglers burnt down the former Independent Newspaper printing machine as well as Radio 1FM? Does the Editor-in-Chief wish to tell us that he does not know about the illegal closing down of Citizen FM, The Independent Newspaper, Taranga FM, Daily News Newspaper and Standard Newspaper over the years?

 
Is the Daily Observer not aware of the jailing of GPU Executive members and editors of Foroyaa and The Point newspapers in 2009 for sedition? Is the Editor-in-Chief of the Daily Observer telling us that he is not aware of the torture of numerous Gambian journalists such as the current parliamentarian Madi Ceesay or Musa Saidykhan and many others? Is the Daily Observer telling us that they are not aware of the terrible bad laws against the media in the Gambia and the insults that Yaya Jammeh had consistently heaped on the media? Yet this Editor-in-Chief and his editorial and management teams have no scruples but to trumpet the very tyrant who is behind all these atrocities and bad anti-media laws in the Gambia.

 
Let me remind the Daily Observer that in 1994, Yaya Jammeh said

 
“Journalists are the illegitimate sons of Africa. Citizens should not buy newspapers so that journalists can starve to death.”

 
The time has therefore come for Gambians to totally and completely boycott the Daily Observer because this newspaper has demonstrated that it does not feel and sympathize with the misery of its own fallen colleagues. By this Yaya Jammeh birthday advertisement they have insulted Deyda Hydara and Chief Manneh and the entire media fraternity and their families. They have insulted the entire Gambian nation in total disregard of the blood and tears that our people had to shed in the hands of the tyrant they now cherish.

 
I call on all companies, NGOs, individuals and public institutions not to buy or advertise with the Daily Observer ever again until the Daily Observer withdraw that Yaya Jammeh celebration and apologize to the people of the Gambia and never to do it again. The time has come for us to take our destiny in our own hands. We must therefore never ever allow any government, any president, any NGO, any imam, any company and indeed any media house to ever again ridicule our dignity and destroy our rights and our lives. Daily Observer has confirmed that they are a direct accomplice in the murder of Gambians and this must be addressed. Never ever patronize the Daily Observer!

 
In that same vein, I call on the President of the Gambia Press Union Emil Touray to summon the Editor-in-Chief of the Daily Observer to demand a retraction and apology to the media fraternity. The Daily Observer has endangered and weakened the GPU and the entire media community by their despicable action. At this very moment the GPU is before the Supreme Court to deal with some of the bad laws of Yaya Jammeh hence we cannot have a media practitioner who could at the same time celebrate Yaya Jammeh. That is a painful paradox and insult!

 
There is freedom of expression and freedom of the media but these do not include the freedom to aid and abet a dictator. That is propaganda, sycophancy and direct threat to the rights and lives of citizens hence criminal. Yaya Jammeh represents the destruction of the media and no amount of free press allows a journalist to celebrate a predator of the press. If such a journalist should celebrate a violator of media freedom then all journalists must disassociate themselves from that journalist.

 
Finally I call on all those Daily Observer journalists who have conscience and uphold the freedom of the media to protest against their newspaper and demand a retraction and an apology. Stay away from work or issue a petition for the resignation of your Editor-in-Chief or resign altogether from this mercenary newspaper. Do not let your career be stained by this gutter journalism. Stand with your fallen colleagues and remember that you could have been Chief Manneh or Deyda Hydara or any of those victims. How do you think Deyda or Chief Manneh is feeling today? How would you have felt if you were shot or tortured to death by Yaya Jammeh only to realize that today your own newspaper was celebrating that very Yaya Jammeh? Have conscience and stand up to defend press freedom and national sovereignty.

God Bless The Gambia.

Madi Jobarteh

Porridge is a warm breakfast cereal akin to Gambian cuisine. Health experts unanimously agreed that eating porridge has a lot of health and nutritional benefits. British nutritionist Kevin Rail once wrote that eating porridge helps people to regulate their appetite because whole grains and whole-grain derivatives have a high amount of dietary fiber. This substance helps fill you up, which prevents you from overeating.

If you do not overeat, you will maintain or even lose weight. Fiber also helps keep blood-sugar levels on an even keel and reduces the risk for high cholesterol. Porridge also gives energy; helps recover tired muscles, develop strong bones and boost your immunity.

Porridge is a staple food in Gambia and one village in particular, Jaali, is known to be great porridge eaters. Though the origin of porridge continues to be clogged in mystery, most people credited the village of Jaali in the Kiang West District of the Lower River Region for the beginning of the dish. Today, the name porridge in The Gambia is synonymous to Jaali. Legend has it that in Jaali, the three square meals of the day used to be porridge and a result it has earned the local parlance “Jaali Mono” (meaning Jaali Porridge).

“Even if “Mono” doesn’t originate from Jali, its tradition can be traced to the village because we are known for it and moreover throughout my wide research about the history of Jaali, I have never come across a claim that “Mono” originated from anywhere else aside from here,” Lamin Metanding Drammeh, a religious leader and native of Jaali told me.

Jaali is some 155 kilometres away from Banjul, The Gambia’s capital, and a three-hour drive via the South Bank. The community of Jaali is said to be some 800 years old. The name of the community, JALI, sources say was derived from a Mandinka phrase ‘Kuli-Jah-Leh’, meaning a lake where people hang leather. The community acquired this name from foundation owing to the activities of the founders. According to sources, the founder of the community of Jaali was a hunter and near his hunting site was a lake; it was near this lake that he always spread his hunting garments which included leather from animal skin. Little did he know at the time that this isolated hunting site would become his home. People at the time began referring to the lake in their Mandinka parlance as ‘Kuli-Jah-Leh’ (a lake which is used to spread leather) and when the site became a habitation for the hunter and people began enjoying the treasures of the new home, they began calling it Jaali, a short form of ‘Jah-Leh’.

The routes of the founding of the community can be traced as far as Sunna Karantaba in the Cassamance region of Senegal. It was from this village that a hunter named Massi Samateh set out on a lone journey in the search for the treasures of life; a journey that brought him to the Kiang valley of The Gambia. Upon entrance into the Kiang Valley, Massi Samateh acquired sanctuary at Jamari from where he continued his hunting expedition. It did not take long before the hunter fell in love with his new hunting site, a site known by the indigenes as Masi Sita. He then made a request to his Jamari hosts to grant him the land that hosts hunting site for settlement; a request that without any reservation received the stamp of approval. Massi Samateh then began erecting the pillars for his new settlement and stayed on it alone until his brother, Janneh Drammeh whom he left behind in Sunna Karantaba also followed his routes to locate him, a move that lead to the establishment of the settlement of Jaali. The two brothers together triggered the expansion and development of the community.

Sources advanced that this Janneh was an Islamic scholar and when he locate his brother Massi who by then was a Soninke both settled not far from each other. Massi’s children sources went on, enjoy when Janneh’s children are reciting the Holy Quran and at one point asked their father if they can also learn the songs their brothers sing. Their father did not reject the request Janneh made sure that all the children were able to learn the Quran. Soon Massi abandoned his isolated settlement of Massi Sita to join his younger brother at Jaali. By this time, Janneh already built a Mosque where he used to pray with his family. And since Massi’s children can now recite the Quran, they were converted to Islam and the first son was made imam whilst Janneh himself maintained the alkaloship.

The children of Massi and Janneh intermarried, leading to the growth of the village’s population. The main occupation of Jalikans was hunting and farming and these will be critical in the beginning of the “Jali Mono”. The story of Demba the missing hunter is still narrated in Jali several centuries after the actual event took place. He was said to have gone hunting and didn’t return after a day’s work on his farm and as a result, a search party was dispatched after the village talking drum announced his disappearance. Youths of the village were mobilised to locate him and they armed themselves with sacred charms, axes and spears to defend themselves from unexpected attacks and wild animals. When Demba was found, he was already packing his booty he looted from the bees and set on going home. He had to wait until dark to use a fire to plunder the bees while at the same time escape the deadly sting of the killer bees.

Animal husbandry is also very akin to Jaali and as the village continues to expand exponentially with the arrival of more people, sources said at one point in time, almost every household has a herd to its name. In the mornings, the herdsmen will go to the herds to milk the cows and because of the large quantity of herds at the time, fresh cow milk became abundant in the village to an extent that in the evening, villagers threw the milk away because they had enough of it. “So because there was milk in abundance with the supply far exceeding the demand, the people decided against throwing food away and asked each other to come up with an alternative use of the milk. They unanimously agreed that they will prepare a dish that can be eaten with the milk and that was how they started to cook “Mono”, Lamin Metanding Drammeh further intimated.

“However, at the time, there was no sugar available to sweeten the “Mono” but any generation one lives in, its people must have a way to go about it. So because honey is another tradition of Jaali, they decided to use that to sweeten the “Mono” by allowing both the honey and porridge to boil and prepared slowly until a thick consistency is reached. When it is done, the cooking pot will be withdrawn from the fire by allowing the porridge to cool a little before they can pour milk on it and serve for breakfast.”

When preparing the porridge, you combine the grains and water. Bring to a boil over high heat, reduce heat to a simmer and cook covered; you cook until all the grains are tender. The people of Jaali decided that they should give a new name to their latest dish and because it takes lesser time to prepare, they gave it the name “Mono”, a short name for the word “Akamono” (meaning it can ripe easily.)

“There are five different types of “Mono”. You have what you call “Tiyakerr Churo”, where you mix rice grain with peanuts; “Yerenke Mono” by pounding coos grain and later make it into small particles; “Chura Koyo”, by allowing rice grain to boil until it form porridge particles in the pot; “Jisuma Mono” (it is originally called “Duma Mono” because you boil water and pour it on coos grain) and “Bero” where you boil water and pour it on rice grain. The family name is what is called “Mono”, Drammeh added.

According to Ousman Barrow, another native of Jaali, the reason why Jaali was added to the beginning of the word “Mono” had to do with its display of cultural diversity during a traditional competition held in the administrative capital of the region, Mansa Kokno. At that competition, the various villages of the region were asked to prepare their traditional dishes and Jaali as customary prepared a delicious “Mono”.

“At the same time, they slaughtered a goat which was cooked and stored in a safe place and then waited for everyone to gather. So when everyone gathered, they just pulled the head of the goat and dip it into the porridge and were straight away given the winners’ prize, then everyone shouted “Jaali Mono ye forse ta”, meaning “Jaali Mono” has taken first,” Barrow added.

Before Barrow even completed his final line, Drammeh intervened to rebuke the claims, and jokingly said that it was their cousins from the opposite side of the river (Tankular) that decided to make a traditional joke of it. Whether that is or not the case, Jaali has deservedly earned itself the credit of the beginning of porridge in the region and their invention is today consumed by most households in the country.

By Baboucarr Camara

Where Are My Taxes….?

This week I spent fifty dalasis on waste disposal. I used to pay D10 for a bag of waste to be transported by donkey cart. Now though, each bag is fifty dalasi. This expenditure is rising on a regular basis and considering the skyrocketing prices of basic commodities in this country, one can imagine how one would loathe to spend such amount on something as basic as waste disposal.

I wondered therefore where my taxes go? We pay taxes to the government through various ways so as to ensure that the state has the resources it requires to serve the citizenry. If any citizen refuses to pay tax, or somehow manages to evade the tax collectors, such a person is not a goof citizen and could be prosecuted if caught. Similarly therefore it becomes the duty of the government to provide certain services to the people who pay taxes to put something in our national coffers.

I live in Bundung Borehole and for the past two years, I have not seen a single waste collecting vehicle from the Kanifing Municipal Council. Mr President, among the duties of a government is the utilisation of the taxes paid by the citizens to provide them services that improves their lives and uplifts them.

Granted, the government cannot do everything for the citizens of the country but at least the basic needs should be fulfilled. The provision of services like water, electricity, basic healthcare, collection and disposal of waste, cleaning the environment are some ofmost basic services citizens expect from a government to whom they pay tax. For the ease of providing these services, we, the Gambian people, have empowered you to set up various ministries, departments, agencies and so on. If therefore, one of these is not function as it should, the blame goes back to your government.

The failure of the KMC to quickly solve the problem of the Bakoteh Dumping Site remains an epic example of lack of knowhow, expertise or honesty on the part of its leadership. So when there I still have to pay for a donkey cart collect and dispose of spite of paying taxes, I wonder again:

Where are my taxes?

Have a Good Day Mr President….

Tha Scribbler Bah

A Concerned Citizen

Further to my correspondence of last week, please allow me to add new dimension to the story for public debate & discourse given the dilemma facing the interior ministry in Banjul. In the write-up, I’d critiqued the Belgian firm, SEMLEX, and the overall flawed procurement process therein acquiring such a lucrative contract for the country’s identification and border security scheme. What upsets most was the optics of the deal with millions of dollars destined for the pockets of foreign investors through capital-flight.

The premise of this article concerns Pristine Consulting (Gambia). My understanding is that back in 2010, the company was contracted for the short-lived Gambia Biometric Identity System (GAMBIS) project intended as an integrated system in which Government aims to capture bio-metric details for all citizens and aliens in the country. The project includes National Identity Card, residential Permit and driving Licenses; to expand into passports, birth, death and marriage certificates respectively. Here was a domestic reputable entity providing employment to local talent yet pushed aside for foreign firms. Information gathered showed that the dictatorship at the time failed to fulfill its side of the bargain, souring relations.

Based on that corruption-induced deal as intimated last week, I strongly implore government to terminate all ties with Semlex, and to contractualize Pristine Consulting to produce all facets of The Gambia’s national identification. Folks, forty years of nationhood – how useless are we as a country if we have to rely on foreigners for a mere I.D card, orange juice, mango juice, tomato paste, and so on – This has got to stop thru import-industrial-substitution, thus promote & consume‘Gambia Made’.

The rationale behind this idea is two-fold. First, the Gambian people demand domestic industry be given chance in government procurement, cutting red tape, plus the money stays home. The Africa progress panel headed by, Kofi Annan, has lamented capital-flight as a major hindrance to African growth denying local banks of much needed liquidity to lend local farmers and businesses. Secondly, information has it that there are countless fake dalasi notes in circulation due to years of mismanagement & counterfeiting. The Finance ministry, liaising with Central Bank should make it a priority issue to change the ‘Dalasi’ bank notes for newer designs made of polymer technology. That is the style as found in European cash notes, strong, durable, and counterfeit-proof. The image of Yahya Jammeh needs removing from the ‘dalasi’ notes too. And well done to the government in doing-away with all symbols bearing that misrule away from public space. A smart move for psychological and ‘healing’ purposes.

Talking to an official from the reputable banknotes printer, DeLARUE, (classified) a renegotiated contract with Central Bank of the Gambia has the potential for knowledge and skills transfer, training, and partnerships with Pristine. So the plan is for a Gambian entity to be strengthened for potential partnership with DeLARUE as terms per deal. I am a little concerned watching Ministers going round Europe signing on deals without proper checks or institution-wide consultation. The lesson Africa should learn from China is ’empower you domestic industry’ to be job and wealth creators; and to stand tall dignified. My take is any deal with a foreign firm pertaining to a Gambian nexus should involve skills training and knowledge transfer, so that we don’t have to pay for that same service ever again. As such, a five (5) year deal with a reputable banknotes merchant as DeLaRue shall help upgrade and upscale Pristine Consultancy to reputable status in terms of technology transfer – as a future Bank notes printer serving Gambia and countries in the region. These are the sort of thinking negotiators should be aiming towards in securing jobs & good deals for the taxpayer.

As for the passports fiasco in DR Congo, the opposition has appealed to the Justice Ministry to investigate corruption scandal involving Kabila’s government and Semlex. A lot is at stake here as to how the Gambia government handle this dilemma. I am further worried by the out-of-court settlements being lined up with foreign companies per Jammeh era paying out millions without giving out details for public scrutiny. To the President’s credit, the country is on a right footing barely four months in office – but as citizens, and analysts, and educators, we shall continue to demand more, and the very best from our government.

Written by Gibril Saine, London.

Recently I wrote an article about the fundamental beliefs of the Ahmaddiyyah/Qadianiyyah which was
meted with a swift rebuttal. This rebuttal has actually painted to me a vivid picture of the average
Ahmadi’s mindset. I honestly, did not think for once that any genuine follower of this group would go
out of his way to belie facts that are well established from the writings of their founding father. It
makes me conclude that either they are deceptive or blindfolded; Surah Baqarah verses 6 – 10
addresses both scenarios. From the gentleman’s rebuttal, it’s evident he couldn’t stay on substance
but rather resorted to profanity and digression which has been their recourse to dissenting views. In
fact this same uncouth and vulgar attacks were launched on Imam Fatty too when he made his stance
unequivocally clear on Standard Newspaper just after the Talinding Cemetery incident. This is what
the Quran they to claim to staunchly believe in say about arguing with opponents: “Invite to the way
of your Lord with wisdom and good instruction, and argue with them in a way that is best. Indeed,
your Lord is most knowing of who has strayed from His way, and He is most knowing of who is [rightly]
guided”. (Quran 16:125).

 
The general impression among the non muslims and our secular minded muslim brethren is that our
opposition to Ahmadiyyat stems from religious intolerance. They fail to appreciate that our difference
is fundamental doctrinal. Thus for the benefit of those with such perception and perhaps confused by
the young man’s quotations and so called refutations, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad – the founder of the
Ahmadiyyah movement had at least two distinct phases in his life which I have alluded to in my earlier
article. One extended from his childhood into his early adult life. Being born in a Muslim family,
during this period he was a devout Sunni Muslim. It was during this period that we saw such writings
where he declared time and again his Muslim Sunni faith. Without any formal public education, he
helped himself freely with various religious materials available to him forming his own opinions and
conclusions. If there was any deviation from the established mainstream Islam doctrine, it was hardly
noticeable.

 
During the later part of his life, his thoughts and beliefs exhibited a noticeable change and initially at
least he made attempts to backtrack from his statements or writings to dampen the backlash of
Muslims. However with the passage of time he became more and more defiant and audacious in his
heretical views. It is this other aspect, this transformation, of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s personality
which is hidden from the public eye and which is hardly ever mentioned and quoted in the
propaganda literature of Qadianism Movement (Ahmadiyyah). The question is why are they hiding
this part? If they believe in the fundamentals of Islam as we do, why don’t they denounce this
blasphemy and kuffur of their founder and join mainstream Islam?

 
In my previous piece I deliberately left out sources because it honestly never occurred to me that
someone would take me to a challenge for it. With the subsequent turn of events, I will try to
systematically address the Qadiani’s refutations as best as I can. Praise be to Allah that most of these
have been scholarly dealt with and answered by our venerable scholars in the past so I don’t take
credit for anything as a very little student of knowledge.

●Regarding their theology about Allah, albeit the writer claims that they believe in Allah just as
we do, let him explain to us these snippets from the writings of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad or is he
going to resort to their usual default response of branding it anti Ahmadiyyah propaganda or lies
and fabrications? Not a surprise because Mirza Ghulam Ahmad has called Ummah worst than
that; “whoever is not sure of our success is in fact, a bastard. He wouldn’t be a legitimate man.
(Roohani Khazain: V: 18, P: 31)”
I (Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) dreamt that I myself am God and I believe in this that I am (God). (Roohani
Khazain v.5 P.564)
In one of my revelation (Kashf) I saw myself as God and I believe in it. (Kitab Al- Brae P: 85. Roohani
Khazain V: 3 P: 103)
True God is He Who sent down His messenger in Qadiyan. (Dafe Balaa P: 11 Roohani Khazain V: 18 P:
231)
Once the Messiah (Christ) stated his condition that (In a state of revelation) he felt himself as if he
were a woman and God expressed His desire of virility (God had intercourse with him). For the while a
hint is sufficient. (Islamic Qurbani Tract No: 34 by Qazi Yar Muhammad)

 
Is this not sufficient for you folks to internalized your involvement with this movement and begin the
search for true Islam? By the way, how come there is no single major renowned scholar of The
Gambia starting with Bun Jeng up to the contemporary ones who considers your jamaat as part of
Islam? Oops I forgot the only scholars in your eye view are those that are Qadianis, all others are
illegitimate sons of prostitutes. (Auzhubillah). But only the sons of the prostitutes didn’t confirm &
accept me. (Roohani Khazain: V: 5, P: 547-548).

 
●Their belief about the Quran
The brother is trying to put a spanner on the spoke of the wheels in order to deceive the gullible and
uninformed readers. Why is he offering D25,000 just for this point out all the so called allegations? In
any case I will list down here some of their verses and writings of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and you the
readers can judge if their Quran is different or not:

 
“I say with swearing upon God that I believe in these inspirations in the same way as I believe in Quran
and other books of God. And just as I consider Quran undoubtedly and surely the book of God,
similarly I believe that wahi (revelation) which descends upon me is the word of God.” (Haqeetqatul
Wahi, Roohani Khazain vol.22 p.220)

 
Holy Prophet’s revelation also turned out to be false. (Roohani Khazain vol.3 p.472) – meaning the
Quran is false.

 
He declared that Quran is also full of filthy words and enumerated several words in Quran as being
filthy according to current standards. (Roohani Khazain vol.3 p.115-117)
Mirza’s WAHI told him: Verse 33:40″‘Muhammadur Rasoolullah wallazeena ma’ahoo ashiddaohoo’ ala
alkuffar rohamao bainahum’ in this Wahi God has named me Muhammad and Rasoolullah.” (Roohani

Khazain vol 18 pp.207)
“I have said several times that according to the verse (of Holy Quran) ‘wa akhareena minhum lamma
yalhaqoo behim’ as Burooz I am the same Prophet, the Khatamul Anbiyyah, and 20 years ago God
named me Mohammed and Ahmad in Braheen-e-Qadianism and declared me His Being.” ​
(Aik ghalti ka azala, Roohani Khazain vol. 18 p.212)

 
“Quran is God’s Book and the words of my mouth.” (Advertisement dated 15th March 1897, Roohani
Khazain vol 22 p. 87)

 
“I believe in my WAHI (revelation) as I believe in Quran and Torah.” (Roohani Khazain vol.17 p.454)
“The basis for our claim is not Hadith but Quran and that WAHI which comes to us. Yes in support we
also quote those Hadith which are according to Quran and DO NOT CONTRADICT MY WAHI. As for the

 
REST OF THE HADITHs, I THROW THEM AWAY LIKE A WASTE PAPER.” (Roohani Khazain vol 19 p.140)
Verse [17:1] of Holy Quran: ‘Praise be to Allah, who took His Servant on the Night Journey from Masjid
Haram to Masjid Aqsa’, its real and literal application is the Mosque built by father of Mirza Ghulam.
(Collection of Advertisement vol.3 p.286)

 
Unless you belie the founder of your creed on these blasphemous claims, I don’t know how the
statement “MY WAHI” would be construed as the Quran that was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad
(pbuh). Now you tell us if Mirza Ghulam’s WAHI is the same as The Quran. May Allah remove the seal
from your hearts, ears and eyes for you to see the truth and follow it. Therefore it is clear from the
above that your kitab is definitely not our Quran. If you however, believe Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is a
prophet after Muhammad (pbuh) then how do you explain Ahzab (33.40) “O believers, know that
Muhammad (pbuh) is not the father of any man among you, but he is the Messenger of God and the
seal of prophets”? If you have faith like you claim, then it should not be daunting for you to reject and
denounce these conspicuous kuffur instead of adopting a denial approach. The one million dollar
question still remains, what and why are you hiding?

 
●Their belief about the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)
The Qadianis had a pamphlet in circulation in various parts of the world, ‘Ahmad in praise of
Muhammad’ which contains such quotations from the books of their founder, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad,
trying to prove that he was intoxicated with the love of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), full of
praises for Allah, Holy Quran and Islam. These quotations portray a very beautiful character.
However, the flip side of the coin from the writings of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is as follows;
He was the second advent of Holy Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and better and superior than the first
coming (Roohani Khazain vol 16 pp.272)

 
“When I am the Holy Prophet incarnate and when all the accomplishments of Muhammad including
the prophethood are reflected in my mirror of my shadiness, then who is the man who has claimed
prophethood in a separate being?” (Ek Ghalti Ka Izala, Roohani Khazain, vol.18, p.212)
Holy Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) has come again in this world as Mirza Ghulam to propagate Islam.
(Roohani Khazain vol.17 p.249)

 
Ahmadi should not differentiate between Mirza Ghulam and Hazrat Muhammad (pbuh) because
“Anyone who differentiates between me and Mustafa (pbuh) has not seen me and not recognized
me.” (Roohani Khazain vol 16 pp. 171).
Those who join Mirza’s Jama’at become a SAHABI of Rasoolullah. (Roohani Khazain vol 16 pp.258-259)
“I am Adam, I am Noah, I am Abraham, I am Isaac, I am Jacob, I am Ishmael, I am Moses, I am Jesus
son of Mary, I am Mohammad (S.A.W).” (Roohani Khazain vol 22, p.521)

Again unless, I am dumb but these statements are very conspicuous and self explanatory. If you
believe otherwise, why don’t you once again denounce and reject your so called prophet and hold on
to the mainstream Islamic version?

 
With regard to declaring this group disbeliever, the writer’s total disregard for the scholarship of
mainstream Islam is indeed too clear to comment on. In fact in addition to the World Muslim League
fatawa and Fiqh council of Cape Town, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan also issued a fatawa in 1974
pronouncing this group as disbeliever and beyond the pale of Islam. In fact Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
declared those who do not believe in him as disbelievers; – (Anwaar e Khilafat P. 99) it is our duty, not
to take non-Ahmadi as Muslims, nor should we say prayers with them, because they deny one of the
God’s Apostles. While the non-Ahmadi are infidels, so are their six-month old children also. And as
infidels they cannot be buried in the graveyard of the Ahmadi. (Akbhar Paigham-e-Sulah: 16th of Aug
1936).

 
Umar ibn Al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, said, “Verily, in the time of the Messenger of
Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, the people would be judged by revelation, but the
revelation has ended. Now we judge you according to your outward deeds. You cannot have double
standards, one foot in Islam and another in kuffurr and expect us to believe you and count you as one
of us. Even if we say hypothetically, these are not part of your creed like you claim, why do you still
believe, follow and hold in high esteem a heretic founder whose kuffur is so obvious?

 
On a final note, I can promise you that sooner or later we will banish you from our graveyards unless
you denounce this new religion of yours. We have lived with Christians far too long yet we never had
these issues because the line has been clearly drawn. Similarly, you have your religion and we have
ours so stop forcing yourselves on us when our creed and theology are fundamentally different. May
Allah show the light of Islam to all those who have been led astray by this fraudulent propaganda in
the name of Islam. May Allah protect the faith of all Muslims from such deceptions. Ameen

BB SANNEH

The Gods Are Not to Blame….

There is a lot of inefficiency in both our private and civil services. We take almost everything for granted and in the process compromise our work and business ethics. This in turn breeds inefficiency, laziness and huge losses to our society. All this is because of the ‘Maslaha’. You often hear people say ‘Gambians are civil’, ‘Gambians are friendly’ and so on and so forth. We overlook very critical details because of this so-called and unsolicited civility.

Mr President, the world is moving at a very rapid rate and we cannot allow ourselves to lag behind because we want to ‘Maslaha’ with some people. Isn’t that what was wrong with Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara’s government, too much Maslaha? The man was soft and kind to a fault. Unscrupulous civil servants saw this in him and they capitalized on it. Some embezzled funds, others destroyed whole projects and many other forms of evil practices were committed because ‘Baba Jawara dinama baalal’. This promoted corruption, nepotism, malfeasance and all sorts of backward behaviour. It was not even unheard of for Jawara to simply transfer someone accused of some wrong to another department. That is obviously not punishment.

Another non-progressive attitude of Gambians is the misguided belief in what they call ‘Ndogali Yallah’. Many people do not have an idea what it means when it is said that something is predestined by God and as such, even if someone is culpable, no action will be taken. But Mr President, if someone breaks the law, then it should be such that some form of justice takes place. Otherwise we would be promoting impunity. Take for instance, the case of the young lady who was involved in an accident and taken to the hospital yesterday. But because there was no police report and that the police were not present, the doctors and/or nurses refused to attend to her until police arrive. Unfortunately for her, she gave up the ghost before a police officer could arrive. What a tragedy!

One can understand the need for the police and the hospitals to work together in cases like this because it is at least one way to help in curbing the growing trend of crime escalation. But can’t there be a way to do that while still saving lives in the process?

There were suggestions that the people responsible should be taken to court to face justice. Then there came counter suggestions that the family of the victim does not want the matter to be a police case because ‘the driver who hit the girl is actually a relative’. But it is said that the young man was drunk. So you see, their belief that ‘lanyinoo lemu’ is compelling them to drop everything and move on. Commendable on their part if only it does not contribute to promoting impunity in the young man and others in the country!

Mr President, it is time that Gambians start owning up to their actions. Take responsibility and do not blame it on God. After all, Gambia is a secular state and people should stop blaming God for their failures. God is not to blame!

Have a Good Day Mr President….

Tha Scribbler Bah

A Concerned Citizen