Monday, April 28, 2025
Home Blog Page 203

UDP wins majority in the National Assembly

The United Democratic Party (UDP) became victorious in Gambia’s Thursday Parliamentary elections, winning 31 seats out of the total 53 seats contested.

 

Alhaji Alieu Momarr Njai, the Chairman of the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) made the announcement Friday morning ending a night long results declaration at Election House along Bertil Harding Highway.

 

The Gambia went to the Polls on Thursday to vote for new Parliamentarians, four months after the defeat of long time ruler Yahya Jammeh whose APRC party has ever dominated the National Assembly in his 22 years tyrant rule.

 

According to Chairman Njai, from the results received from the seven (7) returning officers in the fifty-three (53) constituencies in the National Assembly elections of April 6 2017, the UDP won with 31 seats, gaining the majority in the new National assembly.

 

“UDP won 31 seats; APRC won 5 seats; NRP won 5 seats; GDC won 5 seats; PDOIS won 4 seats; PPP won 2 seats and Independent Candidate won 1 seats” he said.

 

The UDP won Lower Badibu; Jarra West; Jarra East; Kiang Central; Kiang East; Kiang West; Bakau; Central Badibu; Tallinding Kunjang; Lower Fulladu West; Upper Fulladu West; Niani; Janjangbureh; Sami; Upper Nuimi; Illiasa; Lower Nuimi; Serrekunda West; Bundungka Kunda; Jeshwang; Kantora; Tumana; Busumbala; Kombo East; Latrikunda Sabiji; Sanneh Mentereng; Sandu; Brikama South; Brikama North; Old Yundum and Kombo South.

 

Chairman Njai rates the voter turn-out at 42 per cent.

 

Meanwhile, a total 886,000 where registered to vote in the elections, according to the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC).

A total of 239 registered candidates representing 9 political parties and Independent candidates were contesting for the 53 seats in the country’s Parliament.

Democracy Has Now Started in the Gambia!

 

April 6 shall go down in our history as the beginning of democracy even with the sadness that only three women have been elected. For the first time we have 7 separate parties including an independent represented in our parliament. A diverse parliament is good for democracy and good governance. The base of a constitutional democracy is the parliament. This is because while the president represents the whole country as one constituency, at the same time the parliament is equally representative of the whole country and also representative of the various constituents of the country. Hence it is in the parliament that public interest can be best promoted and secured because of the debates, engagements, negotiations, agreements and disagreements of the various members of the parliament.

 
The role of the parliament is not merely to make laws. But more importantly when parliament makes the laws, it now comes to monitor the Executive to ensure that it is effectively implementing those laws. These laws are not just about provisions of our constitution or the criminal code, but these laws also include our budget and taxes. The role of the Executive is merely to enforce the law. Enforcing the law means only two things: to protect human rights and to satisfy needs of citizens. Hence the function of the Executive is merely to collect taxes, provide goods and services and protect our rights. This is what constitutes law enforcement.

 
But for the Executive to do any of these actions, it requires the approval of the parliament first. Hence the Executive is at the mercy of the Parliament. This is why therefore the parliament is the most important and most powerful national institution. The Gambia is a republic under a constitutional democracy, which means we are an independent people within a nation-state and governed by our own ideas codified into a body of laws. Politically we are not governed by the Holy Quran or the Holy Bible. We are not governing ourselves based on the culture of the Aku or Manjago, Fula or Serer, Mandinka or Wolof, Sarahuleh or Jola. We are governing ourselves on the basis of the Gambia Constitution and other laws that have been enacted by the parliament and assented to by the president.

 
The crux of our constitution sets up three arms of the state as the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary with separate functions within a system of checks and balances. These checks and balances are guided by the rule of law as spelt out in the constitution intended to make sure no one arm has too much power. This is to restrain public institutions and officials and ensure that they deliver effectively in protecting our rights and satisfying our needs. This means the Gambia is not run on the opinion of the President or Speaker or Chief Justice and indeed not on the opinion of any one citizen so long as that opinion is not in line with the constitution. It is only the Judiciary that has the power to determine if that opinion is in line with the constitution or not.

 
Now that we have a new parliament, the process of remaking the Gambia has begun. Mr. Adama Barrow came on the ticket of a Coalition of parties, which has a manifesto with a three-year mandate. The new dispensation also comes against the backdrop of a 22-year brutal regime that butchered the constitution severely just to entrench itself in power forever. The task therefore before our parliament is to enable the Gambia transition from dictatorship to democracy. How will they do this?

 
We therefore expect each and every parliamentarian to uphold the supreme interest of the Gambia. By this, we expect that parliamentarians, individually and collectively to realize that the life and death of the Gambia is in their hands. We expect each and every one of them to have a vision of a Gambia they wish to create. We expect the parliamentarians to work together in unison with the Executive in ensuring that they carve a solid statecraft that will usher in a new democratic dispensation in which the sovereignty of the Gambia shall prevail supreme at all times.

 
We will remind the parliament that heinous crimes and atrocities were committed in the Gambia over the past 22 years under the APRC Tyranny, which needs investigation to expose the truth and ensure justice. Those responsible for human rights violations must be identified and brought to book. In the same vein, our parliament must make a clean break from the APRC-dominated parliament of yesteryears. We do not need a rubberstamp parliament that aids and abets tyranny. The country faces major challenges in terms of development such as poverty, unemployment, high cost of living and inadequate provision of social services. We face major challenges in the public service, which is grossly weakened over the years. Above all, the country urgently needs major constitutional, legal and institutional reforms in order to usher in a modern statecraft. Thus the task before this parliament is already cut out for them.

 
The unprecedented presence of multiple parties in the parliament means we expect quality discussions over bills and policies. We expect an enhanced scrutiny of the Executive and all sectors of our society to ensure the full protection of human rights, efficient delivery of pubic goods and services and uncompromising adherence to the rule of law. The parties represented in the parliament have no excuse to fail the Gambia because they have lived the experiences of our people. They cannot claim to not know the urgency of our moment and the needs of our society.

 
The parliament is our defender. The parliament is our leader. The parliament is our guide. The parliament is our manager. The quality of development and democracy in the Gambia rests with our parliament. If there is a high incidence of corruption and poverty in the Gambia, none is responsible other than the parliament. It means the parliament would have failed in its monitoring and accountability role. If our public institutions and public officers fail to deliver to respond to our needs, the responsibility lies with our parliament. The constitution has given the parliament all necessary powers to ensure that good governance and the rule of law prevails in the Gambia at all times.

 
Democracy has now started. Democracy is a noisy game. Democracy is participatory. Democracy flourishes when citizens get interested in national issues and the way and manner the government and politicians address them. It requires that citizens are vigilant to speak out and to protest. Democracy flourishes when citizens form themselves into groups to campaign together to hold the government to account. The time has therefore come for the Gambian citizen to actively participate in the governance of the country.
Congratulations to Gambians! God Bless The Gambia.

GOOD MORNING PRESIDENT BARROW

 

Today is another historic day for Gambia as her resilient children voted to fortify her new found freedom and democracy. Firstly, I extend my profound congratulations to the United Democratic Party for its dazzling victory in the just concluded NAM election. It is pleasing to note Gambians have not only decided to safeguard her freedom but proven taking charge of one’s political destiny is the only way out of dictatorship. Albeit, the campaign has witnessed a charade to smear the respectable images of party leaders, the election is Gambia’s first free and fair election. We have learned and decided that recoiling into the irresponsible excuse “I am not interested in politics” only mutates dictators. As a consequence, keen interest in the political affairs of our governance has flourished charmingly as manifested in the results.

 
As the blinding dust of the campaign is settling amicably, we must put our differences aside and foster the fortification of our freedom and democracy. Gambians are forging social groups with the intent of guiding our leaders to desk our country on solid institutions to enhance sustainable socio-economic development. It is understandable our expectations are high due to nauseating 22 repressive years we just emerged from. Notwithstanding, we must be tolerant with our young government. The volcanic charade to smear and reach for one another’s throat with shinny profane daggers which erupted during the NAM political campaign won’t drive any society towards peace, stability and development. If for anything, the electorates have taught us all the final political decision isn’t party surrogates but theirs. The mind that is incapacitated to learn, adapt and incorporate and transform experiences into personal development is dangerous.

 
As families continue to mourn and seek justice for their love ones, government must ensure its swiftest dispensation. In the process, tears will be shed and tempers explode but just must be done. The security must equally endeavour to stem out the repeat of what was seen in the court when the NIA 9 were arraigned before a judge. Both parties must understand in a free world, rights and freedom have enjoyed without taking the law in one’s hands.

 
Finally, we hope the president will use his constitutional mandate to nominate ladies since the gender proportion remains alarmingly unequal. Until Monday, have a blessed weekend.

 

By Sulayman Jeng

Birmingham, UK

Polls closed in Gambia’s Parliamentary elections, counting underway

Polls have closed in Gambia’s Parliamentary elections and counting is underway throughout the country.

 

Voting officially began as early as 07:00am GMT and closed at 17hrs GMT throughout the country.

 

This is the first elections without a dictator’s interference as long time ruler Yahya Jammeh was voted out in December 2016.

 

A total 886,000 where registered to vote in the Thursday’s elections, according to the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC).

A total of 239 registered candidates representing 9 different political parties and Independent were battling for the 48 National Assembly seats in the country’s Parliament. Five other nominated members will later be appointed by the President, totaling 53 seats of the National Assembly.

Former ruling APRC Party and now opposition slogged in 29 candidates, The Gambia Democratic Congress of Mama Kandeh had 52 candidates, United Democratic Party of Lawyer Ousainou Darboe had 44 candidates, Hamat Bah’s NRP had 24 candidates, Halifa Sallah’s PDOIS had 22 candidates, NCP 3, GMC 5, PPP 14, GPDP 4 and Independent 42 respectively.

The official results are expected early Friday, April 7th, 2017.

EU Chief Election Observer witnesses opening of Polls in Bakau

The European Union Chief election Observer to Gambia’s Parliamentary elections, Miroslav Poche on Thursday witnessed the opening of the polls at Bakau New Town Lower Basic School as early at 07:00 AM.

A total 886,000 registered voters will cast their votes in Thursday’s elections, the first post-Jammeh elections in the country.

Pochea member of the European Parliament from Czech Republic heads the EU Observer Mission to the Gambia following an invitation from the Independent Electoral Commission for the body to observer the polls.

“This morning I saw how voters expressed great interest and commitment to cast their votes in those highly contested elections” EU Chief Election Observer Poche said at the voting ground, adding data from the field will form the base of their assessment.

This is the first time the European Union deploys a fully-fledged election observation mission to The Gambia, reflecting the EU’s commitment to supporting The Gambia’s democratic transition and the level of international interest.

A total of 57 European Union Observers are deployed across the country to observer the Parliamentary elections.

Meanwhile, 239 registered candidates representing 9 different political parties and Independent are battling for the 48 National Assembly seats in the country’s Parliament. Five other nominated members will later be appointed by the President, totaling 53 seats of the National Assembly.

Polls open in Gambia’s first post-Jammeh Parliamentary elections

Voting is underway in Gambia’s Parliamentary elections, the first polls since long time ruler Yahya Jammeh was defeated in December 2016.

Polls opened as early as 07:00AM GMT and closes at 17hr GMT.

So far, voter turnout is reported low in the capital, Banjul and other stations in Greater Banjul area like in Buffer Zone, Tallanding, Serre Kunda Plaza Cinema, Latrikunda and Bakau.

According to the Independent Electoral Commission, 886,000 registered voters are expected to cast their votes in Thursday’s elections.

A total of 239 registered candidates representing 9 different political parties and Independent are battling for the 48 National Assembly seats in the country’s Parliament. Five other nominated members will later be nominated by the President, totaling 53 seats of the National Assembly.

Former President Jammeh’s APRC Party and now opposition has 29 candidates, The Gambia Democratic Congress of Mama Kandeh has 52 candidates, United Democratic Party of Lawyer Ousainou Darboe has 44 candidates, Hamat Bah’s NRP has 24 candidates, Halifa Sallah’s PDOIS has 22 candidates, NCP 3, GMC 5, PPP 14, GPDP 4 and Independent 42 respectively.

Expectations are high that the new lawmakers will overhaul a national assembly once derided as a mere rubberstamp under former President Yahya Jammeh’s 22 years rule as laws were often made by executive decree and buttressed by legislation later.

THE MOST IMPORTANT ELECTIONS?

 

On December 1st, 2016, Gambians went to the polls and democratically removed a 22 year autocratic, repressive and entrenched dictator through the ballot box. Despite months of denial by the incumbent, dictator Jammeh, and months of uncertainty for the population, the voice of the people eventually prevailed and our collective will was instituted when the elected Adama Barrow was sworn in and Jammeh sent into exile to Equatorial Guinea. Although we continue to stumble a bit here and there as we find our footing in this new-found democracy, hope was restored and many are optimistic in the prospects of “New Gambia” to finally get on the path to prosperity.

On April 6th, 2017, Gambians head back to the polls to elect the legislative branch of our government, The National Assembly. For the past half century, I believe this branch has been the most neglected of the three branches. This has partly been by design – the Executive deliberately refusing to give it the due attention because it helps them control and abuse power without the required checks and balances. A bigger reason, in my estimation, is the lack of understanding and appreciation for the importance of the National Assembly by the general population, and a lack of proper understanding by elected officials of their role AND POWER in the functioning of our democracy themselves. The national assembly does not carry the same prestige as cabinet ministers, it does not pay as well, the members are not issued government vehicles with personal security guards to drive them around and they don’t travel as much to meet foreign diplomats and collect lucrative per diems. Also, add that one normally has to go through the rigors of a campaign with the risk of humiliation should they lose. So it’s understandable that our “highly educated” are not usually attracted to serve. Consequently, it’s left to the “popular” community leaders or “elders”, or political party militants chosen by the party leaders. These folks may not be the most educated or most qualified, but are almost assured of winning the elections due to their political backing or their popularity. This lack of enough competent national assembly members is right up there with any systemic and structural failures that have led to the poor governance we have endured since independence, especially our great suffering under the AFPRC/APRC regime over that past 22 years.

I would have loved to believe that the past 22 years have taught us the importance of a competent national assembly. Sadly events and discussions after the removal of Jammeh have proven beyond any reasonable doubt that that appreciation is still lacking. Evidence? It does not get more glaring than the outrage many critics expressed when Coalition 2016 Spokesperson, Halifa Sallah, turned down a cabinet position because he wants to contest for a seat in the National Assembly. For me, this was one of the noblest sacrifices one could make at such a crucial time in our nation’s history. Instead of praises and accolades, Mr. Sallah was rebuked, even insulted, by many who accused him of being selfish. Seeing that many Gambians understand and follow football, I beg your indulgence to allow me to use a football analogy to explain the importance of the national assembly. The nation/government is the game of football. We all know the importance of the greats – Pele, Maradona, Ronaldinho, Drogba…all the way to Messi and Christiano Ronaldo. These are the stars that everyone knows as responsible for the exhilarating entertainment that keeps fans glued to their stadiums, that sells tickets and merchandise and draws advertisers to make the game the multimillion dollar business it is. Deservedly, these big stars enjoy the fame and fortune that comes the job. Occasionally, they also endure the criticism, paparazzi and other not-so-fun baggage. Their importance is undeniable. Before, we had Pele, then came Maradona and now we have Messi. They dominate, make an impact and disappear, leaving us with memories. The ingenuity of some forces some changes as teams try to adapt to new stars and their abilities. Sometimes they even leave us with some moves like the “Cruyff” or the “Maradona” that kids continue to learn and use decades after they’re gone. In our government, these “superstars” would be the President and Ministers. Their names are recognized and their contribution will forever be remembered. Historians will write about them and children will be asked trivia questions about them.

Now ask yourself, who made the rules that allowed the stars to shine and for the fans to enjoy football? Who decided that a football match will last 90 minutes so Messi does not get exhausted playing for 3 hours? Who decided that the game won’t end as soon as one team scores? Who decided the size of the football pitch and that there will be grass on it? Who decided that for certain fouls, one is issued a yellow card to be warned? Who decided that a violent foul results in a red card and an ejection so Christiano Ronaldo does not get his legs broken by Chiellini? See, many of us never even thought of the people who made these rules or their importance to the game. I certainly do not know any of their names. However, many of these rules that were made over a century ago still stand today and without them, we would never have been able to enjoy Messi, Ronaldo or Ibrahimovic. Despite not having enjoyed the fame or fortune of the stars, the impact of these rule makers will continue on to the end of time. The role of the National Assembly members is like these rule makers. It’s not as glamorous, prestigious or even recognized, but it’s noble and crucial, and its impact will put the country on either a safe path to prosperity or a perilous path back into the dark ages of tyranny and corruption. This is why I would have loved to see our “wise and patriotic” political leaders shun the limelight, stay behind the scenes and make the rules that will guide the nation we all claim to love. Our culture believes that with age comes wisdom. How I wish our “older and wiser” politicians would have been the one making the rules to guide the “young” technocrats, of which we have plenty, to be the “Messis and Ronlados”. Imagine a national assembly of Sedia Jatta, Ousainou Darboe, OJ Jallow, Fatoumatta Tambajang and Halifa Sallah, making rules that “The president will only serve a maximum of 2 five-year terms”, “The President shall name a vice president before being sworn in” and “Ministers shall declare their assets prior to being sworn in”.

The Gambia is at a crossroads. In our books, are many bad laws that need amendment. In our “culture” are even worse habits that need a reorientation. In our communities is a lot of hurt and pain that need healing. Jammeh stayed for 22 years because there are no term limits in our constitution. A woman was recently arrested and initially denied bail for “insulting the president” despite pleading to the judge that she had an infant child to take care of. Bodies of political victims are being exhumed from mass graves. We need solid people who have the character, conviction and wisdom to lay the solid foundation that will ensure that we will never return to the dark days we just got out of. With this I pray that Gambians with the right qualifications and qualities step up to the plate, forego the “glamour and glitter” and serve in this most crucial branch of our government. I pray that when casting that ballot, we remember to put aside fear, favor, affection or ill-will and elect people who understand what is required and possess the qualities that will serve the national interest. This is the most important elections in our history…of course second only to the one that removed the brutal dictatorship of Yahya Jammeh.

SANA SARR

AU Election Observation Mission arrives in Banjul

The African Union Election Observation Mission to The Gambia’s April 6th Parliamentary elections arrived in the country ahead of voting day.

At the invitation of the government of the Republic of The Gambia, the Chairperson of the African Union Commission (AUC), His Excellency Moussa Faki Mahamat deployed the African Union Election Observation Mission (AUEOM) to observe the parliamentary elections in The Gambia, a statement from the continental body said.

The short-term observers are drawn from members of the African Ambassadors to the AU in Addis Ababa, Pan African Parliament (PAP), Election Management Bodies and civil society organisations.

Supported by a technical team from the AUC, PAP and the Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa (EISA), the AUEOM are in the country since 27th March and will end its mission on the 12th of April 2017.

The Head of the AUEOM Mr. Terry Tselane, Vice Chairperson of Independent Electoral Commission South Africa arrived in the country on the 2nd April and will remain till the 8th of April 2017.

The objectives of the AUEOM are to make an independent, objective and impartial assessment of the 2017 National Assembly Elections; and to offer recommendations for improvement of future elections that will contribute to the consolidation of democratic governance, peace and stability in the country.

“To this end, AU observers will be deployed to the regions of the country to observe the final days of the campaigns, the voting process and the days immediately after polling. The AUEOM will meet with various state institutions, the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC), political parties, civil society, the media, security agencies and other stakeholders. The Mission will also interact with other election observation missions in the country and diplomatic missions present in the Republic of The Gambia” the AU noted in the statement.

The AUEOM has a mandate to observe the 6th April 2017 National Assembly Elections in conformity with the relevant provisions of the African Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance (ACDEG), which entered into force on 15 February 2012; the AU/OAU Declaration on the Principles Governing Democratic Elections in Africa (AHG/Decl.1 (XXXVIII)), adopted by the Assembly of the African Union in July 2002; the African Union Guidelines for Elections Observation and Monitoring Missions; relevant international instruments governing elections observation; and the Constitution as well as the laws of the Republic of The Gambia.

The observations and recommendations of the AUEOM will be based on the principles of credibility, transparency, fairness and professionalism in the conduct of the elections as enshrined in the aforementioned AU instruments.

After the elections, the AUEOM will release its preliminary assessment of the election at a press conference in Banjul. A more detailed final report on the elections, which will be shared with the appropriate Gambian authorities and institutions, will be produced within three months.

Gambians to vote in first post-Jammeh Parliamentary elections on Thursday

Gambians are heading to the polls on Thursday, April 6th, 2017, in first elections since the downfall of the long time ruler Yahya Jammeh in December 2016.

A total of 239 registered candidates representing 9 different political parties are battling for the 48 National Assembly seats in the country’s Parliament. Five other nominated members are later appointed by the President, totaling 53 spots in the National Assembly.

Former President Jammeh’s APRC Party and now opposition has 29 candidates, The Gambia Democratic Congress of Mama Kandeh has 52 candidates, United Democratic Party of Lawyer Ousainou Darboe has 44 candidates, Hamat Bah’s NRP has 24 candidates, Halifa Sallah’s PDOIS has 22 candidates, NCP 3, GMC 5, PPP 14, GPDP 4 and Independent 42 respectively.

According to the Independent Electoral Commission, 886,000 registered voters will cast their votes in Thursday’s elections.

Gambians vote with marbles dropped into coloured metal barrels representing the different candidates and despite rumours of reform after the Presidential elections, the system will be used again for the legislative elections, according to the electoral body chairman Alhaji Alieu Momar Njai.

Expectations are high that the new lawmakers will overhaul a national assembly once derided as a mere rubber-stamp under former President Yahya Jammeh’s 22 years rule as laws were often made by executive decree and buttressed by legislation later.

Gambia to host Int’l Seminar on Resilience and Waste Management

The Gambia is hosting an international seminar on rural resilience and community waste management from 25th – 30th April 2017.

Organised jointly by the Arkleton Trust and WasteAid UK, the event will involve communities from The Gambia, Senegal, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Uganda, Cameroon, Nigeria and India.

In addition, more than 30 local participants from the host community in Gunjur will be sharing their experience of innovative projects and good practice in community resilience.

WasteAid UK and other recycling specialists will be sharing recycling skills such as making charcoal from woody waste, fertiliser from food waste, and construction materials from plastic waste. WasteAid UK previously set up the Brikama Waste Reprocessing Centre in 2016 in partnership with Women’s Initiative The Gambia and is currently developing a Guide to Community Waste Management, which will be reviewed by seminar participants.

Kebba K. Barrow  Adviser, Gunjur Youth Development Program said they have benefitted from support from the Arkleton Trust over recent years and are pleased to be able to provide our expertise in return, sharing skills and knowledge with people from across Africa and beyond.

“This will be a very interesting event for everyone involved and we hope to achieve more positive outcomes for the people of Gunjur and rural communities further afield” he noted.

Focusing on community resilience, the first part of the seminar will encourage attendees to share their experiences and good practice in anticipating risk, limiting impact, and ways to survive, adapt and grow stronger.

Nicola Swan of the Arkleton Trust, an expert in rural development and knowledge exchange, said the seminar will provide a creative space for grassroots community practitioners, leaders and policy makers to come together and share experiences and knowledge, and to learn from each other.

“The ingenuity of communities to succeed is profound and many communities have addressed issues in innovative ways.  Lack of infrastructure and other systemic issues remain a challenge though, and for this reason, we will be inviting a few policy makers and academics to benefit from the opportunity to hear things ‘from the horse’s mouth”.

The second part of the seminar will cover waste management as a key tool for resilient communities. Waste that is not managed can become a hazard for people and wildlife. With simple recycling skills, however, people can keep their communities clean, create jobs and earn an income.

Mike Webster of WasteAid UK said: “Improving waste management is vital for communities to prosper and stay healthy. The event will allow skill sharing between community waste managers located in geographically diverse parts of sub-Saharan Africa, and will help WasteAid UK improve the techniques that turn waste into an economic opportunity”.

The Arkleton Trust has a tradition of holding seminars to bring together individuals involved in rural development to share ideas usually on a particular theme or current issue.  In the last few years Arkleton has been funding ‘exchanges of knowledge’ between different community organisations, many of which are based in Africa.

In the last year, through some of these exchanges of knowledge, a link was made with WasteAid UK and it was agreed to join together to create two back-to-back events involving rural practitioners, policymakers and academics.  Waste management is particularly relevant for remote communities as it is at the heart of sustainable living.

The hypocrisy of party politics

By Solomon Demba

Democracy can be seen as the only political system compatible with liberal democracies. In a proper functioning democracy, political parties tend to embrace both internal and external democracy in order to attain full political participation of all citizens.

In this sense, practice of democracy takes place at two levels, at one level; there is a fierce competition between political parties in pursuit of political power; at another level, party members partake in key decisions such as leadership selection and policy formulation. The leadership selection of the Gambia’s political parties seems to have eschewed rigorous public scrutiny, as there are hardly publicized leadership contests for party members to seek the high office.

This raises the question whether the Gambia political parties have effective internal democracy mechanisms necessary to promote the political participation of the citizenry. It is a striking fact the leaders of the main political parties have been in post for decades, without a prospect of leadership challenge. Judging by this fact, can it be said the Gambia political parties are more dictatorial than the dictatorship they claimed to have replaced?

It is often the case, external democracy is overly publicised to provide the political master with at the least a chance of securing power, while the internal democracy is relegated in the background of internal power struggle within oligarchy circle. Nevertheless, we must not disregard the importance of internal democracy if we are serious about preserving a proper functioning democracy. As there can be no democracy without consensual agreements of citizens, the legitimacy of party leaders can only depend on the informed consent of party members. Of course, that seems undesirable from the view point of the ruling oligarchy, but it is necessary so to preserve the autonomy of the membership. Such proposition seems in line with John Locke’s political philosophy of liberalism. It follows that legitimacy derives its authority from the informed consent of citizens.

While external democracy has been instrumental in empowering citizens to hold their representative accountable through the ballot box, internal democracy is equally important as it balances power structure within political parties.  Political parties are vital institutions that allow full realization of democratic values such as political participation, representation competition. Their presumed permanence makes them the guarantors of political stability as they can build consensus on divergent views to protect national interest. Indeed, they are constituted as private entities, but given the vital role they play in our democracy, they are public utilities accountable to the citizenry.

Clearly, the Coalition ‘agreement on the term of the presidency does not have a strong legal base, because party rules that contradict the constitution may be declared void to preserve the supremacy of the constitution. The European Court of Human Rights has been decisive on this point by allowing dissolution of political parties on similar ground. While I accept the point that states are the ultimate guarantors of constitutional rights, and mostly held accountable for the breach of the fundamental rights.

From formalistic standpoint, it could be argued that is only government act that can violate the constitution. This seems plausible if one ignores the public duty imposed on political parties thought constitutional mean. Political parties are quasi agents of states given their interconnection with governments and constitutional relevance. From a realist standpoint, the law is not only a set of mechanical rules, law evolves with practice, it embodies various assumptions, ‘‘values and conceptual understandings.’’. Surely the relevant provisions of the constitution should be read to produce reasonable result. In my view, five year term seems reasonable and constitutional. So this a settled matter

The contemporary human rights jurisprudence suggests a shift towards a progressive interpretation of the law to give horizontal effect to certain core rights. This implies that private and public entities, including political parties whether in government or not may be liable if they breached individual constitutional rights. Law is not a static creature, but a living instrument; it must be enlarged to protect fundamental rights. Undoubtedly, in the West courts have been more receptive of purposive interpretation in order to accord better protection to individuals. That marks the decline of formalism and the rise of realism. Such stance is not only coherent in jurisprudential and political terms, but also coherent in legal terms.

While the external democracy is mostly codified in states’ constitution, the internal democracy is usually set out in parties’ constitutions. Indeed, there is a tendency for political parties to profess external democracy, at the same time function internally as a dictatorship by controlling the membership. Such approach is not only inimical to internal democracy but also to external democracy. As power becomes concentrated in the party leadership, there is a danger that leadership may adopt an oligarchic structure to bolster its grip on power, while denies membership of reasonable political participation.

This may well justify the need to impose obligation on political parties to adopt policies that preserve democratic values. For example, German, Finland and other democracies had enacted laws to improve internal democracy in political parties in order to improve minorities’ representation including women. What is also objectionable to the principle to transparency is limited access to parties’ constitutions. A seminal document with a character of social contract, there can hardly be a justifiable reason for its limited accessibility.

It seems imperative for all political parties to conduct an open election that allows the full participation of parties’ members. Notably, the leaders of the main political parties have been in office since the inception of their respective parties.  Their tenure in office seems relatively long if one consider the average term served by their counterparts in other established democracies. From another perspective, it could be argued the parties’ members were unwilling to take the risks and sacrifices associated with taking a divergent political position in a dictatorship. This is explicable in the light of sufferings and pain the party leaders had endured in the Second Republic. Their determination to cling to power seems to have paid off resulting in the rebirth of our new democracy.  Let’s all hope the government keeps the ball running toward the right direction!!

In conclusion, the Gambia political sphere has been through turbulent times, the political parties are yet to develop effective internal democracy mechanisms. It is also the case that, most political parties act as social groupings with varying membership models. As a consequence, the memberships seem to lack the ability and the capacity to act collectively, to bring out any meaningful change as to the direction of the political parties.

Going forward, the political parties must be compelled to employ measures necessary for effective internal democracy. Such measure will enable all Gambians, particularly the minorities and women to fully realize democratic values of a functioning democracy. Failing to do so, the political parties are likely to be more dictatorial than the dictatorship. We cannot be selective about democracy.

Forward with the Gambia!

GYIN Gambia to stage first ever Rural Youth Awards

The Gambia chapter of Global Youth Innovation Network (GYIN Gambia) is to stage its first ever award meant to recognise the efforts of enterprising youth in rural Gambia.

 

The overall aim of RYA2017 is to identify, promote and elevate successful young women and men who, despite all odds, are channeling their creativities, energies and passion to contribute in making a change their communities and societies, a statement from the Chapter says.

 

Scheduled to take place at the Agricultural Rural Farmers Training Centre in Jenoi, Lower River Region (LRR) on the 29th April 2017, the theme of the award is ‘WE NEED YOUNG PEOPLE IN RURAL AREAS: We need them to produce, process and market the food that will feed the world’.

 

The Award categories are: Young Farmer of the Year; Young Entrepreneur of the Year; Young Business Idea of the Year; Young Emerging Business of the Year; Young Information Technology Enterprise of the Year; Young Commercial Farmer of the Year; Young Agribusiness of the Year; Young Social Media Campaigner of the Year; Best Business Innovation of the Year and Young Business Partner of the Year.

 

The event is being organised with the financial and logistical support of the International Trade Centre (ITC) through the Youth Empowerment Project (YEP) The Gambia, European Union Trust Fund for Africa, the National Agricultural Land and Water Management Development Project (Nema), and National Youth Council (NYC).

 

The Rural Youth Award committee believes that rural youth have a key role to play in reversing the threats of agriculture, climate change, food security and related issues.

 

“The award would recognise and celebrate the efforts and successes of rural youth in entrepreneurship in the areas of agribusiness and information technology.

RYA2017 would also showcase talented rural youth on entrepreneurship, agribusiness and information technology and would also serve as a platform to promote gender equality and inclusiveness” the statement noted.

 

They key expected outcomes of RYA 2017 includes supporting rural youth business plans, providing 6 months mentorship for the awardees, supporting rural youth with enterprise development opportunities, and supporting increased agricultural production and productivity, access to markets and services.

 

Global Youth Innovation Network Gambia Chapter (GYIN Gambia) is a national youth network operating across the country and has been implementing a number of youth projects in the country.

The Gambia: Seven Decades of Economic Development Part 1 1950 – 1959

 

Sheriff Kora

Introduction
Timothy Snyder in his epic work On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons of the Twentieth Century
remarked that “If young people do not begin to make history, politicians of eternity and
inevitability will destroy it. And to make history, they need to know some.” It is as a
result of this knowledge that I have decided to share parts of my thesis focused on the
economic development history of The Gambia from 1950 to 2015. During my research,
one of the biggest challenges I faced was the paucity of data and economic development
literature on our country’s economic development history. This is a common theme
among many ex-colonies especially in the early decades leading to independence and
shortly after. As a result, it is befitting to give credit to pioneers such as Tijan Sallah,
Harry Gailey, President Jawara, Ambassador Dr. Ebraima Manneh, Burama L.J. Jammeh
etc. without whose research work I used extensively in achieving this work.

For the sake of brevity, this article is only a synopsis of my research work, and is by no
means exhaustive of the development history that took place in this decade. This article
aims to contextualize the pre-independence development history of The Gambia between
1950 and 1959. It will attempt to highlight the indigenous and external actors within the
context of the development theories and strategies, the international system, donor
policies and programs of the era that drove the economic development ethos of the
country.

Country Overview

The Gambia is the smallest Anglophone countries in West Africa. The country
stretches about two hundred miles, and is surrounded on three sides by Francophone
Senegal, and opens to the Atlantic Ocean on the fourth. Unlike other Colonies and
Protectorates of Britain, The Gambia was the least endowed in matters of mineral
resources. However, it has the most navigable waterways in West Africa, which made it a
convenient and lucrative gateway for the Atlantic Slave trade. It is her strategic location
and the desire of the British to deprive the French political control of the river that the
boundaries of the colony were carved without regard to ethnicity or geographic
considerations.

As a means of saving cost and enhancing administrative efficacy, The Gambia,
under the indirect rule system was partitioned into a colony and a protectorate. A
Governor who was appointed by the colonial office in London administered the colony;
the protectorate before the introduction of divisional commissioners was indirectly
administered through the traditional chiefs. With an area of sixy-nine square miles and a
population of about 30,000 inhabitants, the colony was the seat of the capital Barthurst

and covered the area of Kombo St. Mary; the protectorate on the other hand covered an
area of over four thousand square miles with an average population of about 237,000.

By 1950, The Gambia was seriously underdeveloped, and agriculture was still the
basis of her economic life. Unlike the other colonies such as Senegal and others in the
sub-region that witnessed economic growth as a result of industrialization and
reallocation of labor from agriculture to the higher productivity non-agricultural sector,
the Gambia witnessed no significant economic growth or development from low scale
agriculture to the industrial sector. Without any other appreciable mineral resources, The
Gambia lagged behind in economic and social development. The colony was exposed to
the shocks of price fluctuations on the world market during this period. As a British
entity, the depth and breadth of The Gambia’s development between 1950 and 1959 was
driven largely by the colonial policies of that era. Most of the economic and social
development projects undertaken in The Gambia in this period derived from the policy
shift and attitude of the British Empire towards her overseas territories at the conclusion
of the Second World War. Trusteeship was constructively by the colonial office to
promote the welfare of the colonies.

Whether this was out of goodwill or imperial interest has been subject to debate.
However, the paradigm shift in colonial development policy has to be examined in the
context of events and the global actors at the onset and end of WWII. Development of the
colonies was not only a bid to impress public opinion in the wake of nationalism or to
counter Nazi argument of paternalistic neglect by Britain, but to guard against the
possibility of internationalization of the colonies at the end of the of the war. Colonial
economic development was also a strategy of the British government to improve colonial
infrastructure and institutions in order to retain and increase exports of commodities that
would have been hard to acquire from hard currency countries. Britain was determined to
alleviate the balance of payment deficit with the dollar area and to tackle the ‘dollar gap’
problem in the 1950s.

The birth of the United Nations in 1947 coupled with the Truman Doctrine that
espoused bettering the conditions of overseas possessions of all colonial masters as a
deterrent of communist encroachment were two other important incentives that set the
ball rolling for economic and social development in the British colonies. The Bretton
Woods system and the institutional underpinnings of the United Nations such as the Food
and Agricultural Organization (FAO) and the International Labor Organization (ILO)
gave technical assistance in the development of The Gambia in the 1950’s.

The combination of these politico-economic pressures and the expedience of the
British Colonial officials was the genesis of Colonial Development and Welfare Act of
1940 which mandated the Colonial Development and Welfare funds that were geared
towards creation or improvement of social services and public works and utilities in the
colonies. Colonies were seen as a viable source of dollar revenue through the triangular
trade model under the Marshall plan; consequently, the economic policy was drawn into
this strategy and the economic crisis of the post-war period shaped the way in which the
overseas development policies were implemented.

Two institutions were created to oversee the development goals of the colonial
office, namely: the Colonial Development Corporation and the Overseas Food
Corporation. As the names suggest, the former was charged with developing mineral
resources, improving communications, developing waterpower, electricity as well as
producing food and other agricultural products. The former had the sole powers of food
production for export to the United Kingdom. The colonial development policy in The
Gambia like elsewhere in the sterling group was yoked between two theories centered on
goodwill and imperial interest: modernization theory on the periphery, and the
dependency theory at the core.

Colonial Infrastructural Development

The financial plight and development trajectory of The Gambia in the 1950s is a
consequence of the colonial development policies leading to the 1940’s and how they
were applied. Despite the attractive outlook of the colonial development scheme, until the
end of the 1940’s, they were executed on a policy that each colony regardless of size
should be economically self-sufficient and not to be a charge on the Treasury of the
metropolitan country. Capital development projects were expected to be funded directly
out of the budget surpluses of the colonies from the export market boom of the war years
and later from the industry demands of the Korean War. However, the meager earnings of
monoculture countries such as The Gambia and the Seychelles Islands were unable to
carry out the physical improvement investments in school, bridges, hospitals etc. This
gave enough compulsion to the colonial office to pump in capital from the Colonial
Welfare and Development funds towards financing development projects.

Prior to the 1950’s development projects, the Colonial Development Corporation
undertook a large scale mechanized agricultural project in the 1940’s to cultivate and
harvest rice mechanically in Walikunda – in the hinterlands. The second project was the
Yundum Egg Scheme. After a hefty financial investment from the Colonial Development
and Welfare funds, both projects, which were thought to be profitable ventures, turned
out to be a disaster.The high sunk cost that followed the unsuccessful economic
experiments of the Colonial Development Corporation in the Walikunda rice project and
the Yundum Egg Scheme between 1947 and 1951 were glaring examples of projects that
failed due to corruption, mismanagement, and the lack of human capital necessary for
driving sustainable development of the Gambian colony. With the British public
perception that the economic situation in The Gambia was a drain on the colonial
Treasury the arrival of the Conservative Labor Party in 1951 prompted a risk aversion
stance when it came to development investment for overly dependent countries like The
Gambia.

These failures not only “convinced private and government investors that little
potential gain would accrue from development projects there”, they made the Governors
and other colonial officials reluctant at requesting funding for development projects to
improve agriculture, develop the harbor, airport of improve land and water
communication. Consequently, investment as witnessed in other colonies tended to

by-pass The Gambia. This will have far reaching consequences on The Gambia’s
post-war development history in the 1950’s and leading to its independence from Britain
in 1965. Between 1946 and 1958, The Gambia received a total of 1,240 million pounds
from the Colonial Development and Welfare funds . 1,058,800 was spent on colony
improvements of which 976,340 pounds was grants from the Colonial Development and
Welfare grants; the remainder was to be raised by the Government.

The major service departments of the colonial government were Agriculture,
Public Works, Marine, Education, and Public Health. The bulk of funds were allocated
for social development schemes in expanding education and health. Communication also
received a huge proportion in the 1950’s most of which went on road and bridge
construction, transportation etc. Economic development expenditure was primarily
centered on agriculture improvement and marketing. This was the period when a new
bridge and a high school were built in addition to water supply improvement and a street
drainage system for Barthurst. Despite the development bias that existed previously
between the colony and the protectorate, the protectorate areas received a sum of
£583,290 towards the construction of a rural asphalt road from the provincial
administrative seat of Brikama to Mansa Konko in this era.

In addition to construction of the asphalt road between Brikama and Mansa
Konko in 1955, the bridge at Pakali Ba was also constructed in the same period. The river
transport system was also revamped as a recommendation from the Blackburne Report,
which recommended development of building deep-water wharves in the capital
Barthurst and service wharves in up country river ports to link the protectorate with the
ocean. The capital was outfitted with two wharves and the groundnut ports of Kaur and
Kuntaur were also improved. A new river transport called Lady Wright, and a few old
hand operated ferries were procured to facilitate crossing along the banks of the river
Gambia. However, most of the equipment were old and ineffective, and unfortunately, the
ferry between the Barthurst – Barra crossing points capsized in 1957 claiming the lives of
over fifty people.

Health

Between 1950 and 1959, there were only two hospitals in The Gambia – The
Royal Victoria and Bansang Hospitals. Prior to 1938, there was no hospital in the
protectorate until the construction of a new hospital in Bansang, which served the entire
protectorate population of over a quarter million people. The medical services in the
colony were better than the ones in the protectorate. In 1953, the hospital in Barthurst
was replaced by the Colonial Welfare Development fund into a new facility called the
Royal Victoria Hospital. The biggest public health challenge of the period was mosquito
borne diseases such as Malaria and Yellow fever. This menace was relatively mild in the
Barthurst area where there were proper control measures in place. However, mosquito
borne diseases were prevalent in the protectorate where investigations have estimated the
infant mortality rate to exceed five hundred per thousand live births.

The caloric intake and diet of the average Gambian was very low with little or no

protein. The average Gambian ate less vegetables and the staple rice was of low
nutritional value. Sleeping sickness, yaws, intestinal worms and malnutrition were all
endemic in the 1950’s Gambia. The medical and public health facilities of The Gambia in
1950 were also met by challenges of new drug shortage and the inadequacy of staff with
the proper medical training to serve the population. There was also the traditional
constraint of locals who were often unwilling to consult with Western trained doctors.
The vast distance and inaccessibility of medical facilities meant critically ill or injured
patients in outlying villages often died before they reached the hospital.

Education

In the area of education, the Government at the turn of the century did very little
investment. The policy of the colonial administration was to disassociate itself from
educating the people and to delegate the responsibility of education entirely in the hands
of missionaries. Educational development in this period was guided by the
recommendation a Government appointed commission in 1950 spearheaded by T.H.
Baldwin. By 1950, there was only a handful of primary school largely concentrated in the
colony. There were only four secondary schools in the entire country: St. Augustine’s and
St. Joseph’s run by the Catholic mission, and Armitage High and Gambia High schools
were government operated schools. There was very little investment in vocational or
agricultural training. The school curriculum was designed to teach the basic arithmetic,
reading and writing skills needed for carrying the clerical duties of the colonial
administration. There was no advanced education beyond the secondary school level. The
few Gambians with the means often travelled overseas to further their studies, and never
returned. This was the beginning of the Gambian brain drain and the problem of human
capacity development to improve the educational system.

However, the colonial administration undertook development of post-secondary
education when it purchased the abandoned buildings at the Yundum egg scheme, and
transformed it into the Yundum Teachers Training College in 1952. Although expenditure
in education has increased from less than £30,000 in 1948 to £124,000 in 1958,
enrollment in schools were generally low and primarily restricted to only boys. Schools
were disproportionately centered in the colony partly due to the stiff opposition from
many of the traditional rulers in the protectorate.

Following the low development of education in the 1950’s was the problem of
low human capital and the shortage of adequately trained Gambians to fill the important
administrative positions. By the end of 1948, there were seventeen Gambians in the civil
service compared to seventy-nine expatriates. However, due to the revolution of
education in the 1950’s, by 1959, there were fifty-three Gambians in all cadres of the
civil service compared to sixty-seven expatriates. It is important to note that the
Gambianization of the civil service did not gain steam until in 1963 when Gambians were
clamoring vigorously for a change in the administrative system.

Trade, Agricultural Exports and Economic Growth

Trade in the 1950’s was characterized by large development of cash crops –
groundnuts in the case of The Gambia that was exported or exchanged for imported
European goods. Thus the economic development investment of the colonial government
in the 1950’s was geared towards improving agriculture and the extractive industry in
The Gambia. Economic development had largely been associated with expansion and
promotion of minor export crops such as peanuts, sesame, cotton, and palm kernel seeds.
Fertilizer consumption, improved irrigation and agricultural machinery under the
‘oxenization’ project were also increased during this era. Gambia’s output of ground-nuts
(in shell) between 1950 and 1958 stand at the following: the country produced 61,000
tons in 1950, 69,000 in 1951, 58,000 in 1952, 63,000 in 1953, 59,000 in 1954, 58,000
tons in 1955, 80, 000 tons in 1956 and 90,000 in 1957. The country also produced 2 tons
of palm Kernels each year except in 1958 when output dropped to a thousand tons.

It is estimated that 98% of all exports from The Gambia were destined for Britain.
The surge in agricultural output and trade was facilitated by the demand and attractive
prices of commodities as a result of post-war reconstruction and the Korean War boom in
1951. Increased in exports in this period rose faster than imports and created a trade
surplus in The Gambia. This was facilitated by the introduction of the Gambia Oilseeds
Marketing Board (GOMB), which sold the groundnut cash crop. Trade licenses were
granted to natives or representatives of transnational firms such as the United Africa
Company and Maurel and Prom to purchase groundnuts from the farmers. Despite the
initial boom in the export trade, The Gambia could not cope with the fluctuations in
market prices, bad harvest and poor quality of nuts. The government ran a deficit of
£150,000 in 1953 that warranted investigation from the Colonial office, which resulted
into the incompletion of many projects. The dwindling of world prices between 1954 and
1955 forced most of the loss to be absorbed by the farmers’ fund, ultimately resulting into
loss earnings to the farmers.

There was very limited foreign direct investment into The Gambian economy, and
with the exception of development aid that came principally from the Colonial Office and
Treasury, the country witnessed a considerable outflow of capital from the few foreign
firms that made up the private sector. The prominent financial institutions in the country
in the 1950’s were the Standard Bank of West Africa and the Banque Centrale du
Commerce et L’industrie. Whilst most of the development initiatives came from the
Government itself, there has been assistance from the FAO which assisted the in the
eradication of the rinderpest disease that was ravaging cattle in the 1950’s. The ILO
visited The Gambia in 1952 in a regional visit to offer technical assistance and to ensure
fair labor practices in the both informal and formal labor sector. The development
literature of the country shows the only notable donors of the era as the Red Cross, which
trained Gambian medical orderlies to staff the health centers. The Anglican, Wesleyan,
Methodist and Catholic missions have had a long-standing presence in the country and
were actively involved in evangelism and education.

Political Development

Politically, the country was still under the colonial domination of the British

Empire with very little to no Gambian representation in policy matters. The protectorate
and the colony were deliberately divided with the former being excluded politically, and
bearing the brunt of taxes and agricultural production for exports. Development was
mostly centered in the colony whilst the protectorate was marginalized. There was a
serious case of inequity and distributive injustice in the 1950’s. In 1950 out of a budget of
over £1,000,000, a paltry sum of £37,000 was disbursed to the protectorate
administration. More money was expended to administer 30,000 in the colony. However,
following the decolonization efforts in 1946, the elections of 1951 was the real beginning
of active political parties and organized nationalism in the country. The democracy envy
that spread across the continent, empowered Gambians to demand more representation in
the colonial legislative council. The constitution was amended in 1953 and 1954. The
first political party the Democratic Party emerged in 1951, and in 1952 the Muslim
Congress Party was created, the United Party followed suit and finally following the
extension of the franchise to the protectorate, the Protectorate People’s Party was formed
in 1959 to represent the interests of the protectorate. A significant economic and political
development of the 1950’s was the emergence of The Gambian Workers Union in 1959.
These were the political forces to lead the country to self-attainment and independence in
the 1960’s.

The development performance of The Gambia in this period was defined by the
very nature of colonialism, its motives and development policies. Economic development
under the distortionary policies of colonialism was geared towards developing the natural
resources of the colonies for extraction and market profit. As a result, being a
monoculture, The Gambia did not provide adequate incentives for any significant
investments into its institutional and infrastructure development. Although there were
slight improvements in the agriculture sector and the public works sectors such as roads
and water communication that served as the lifeblood of the economy, these
improvements were not without their own shortcomings.

Agriculture was labor intensive and distorted gender roles. Women and children
entered into the heavy labor pool with the children deprived of any form of education.
The promotion of the groundnuts, sesame and cotton cash crops created a shift in
agricultural production from horticulture which led to inadequacy of food reserves and
subsequently chronic malnutrition and famine. The development challenges of the 1950
decade will later play a compounding role in the challenges and successes that will be
witnessed in the future development history of the Gambia.

Over 886 thousand voters go to the polls IEC chairman reassures spot counting as he calls on the media to transmit results as it unfolds

 

By Sarjo Camara-Singateh, Foroya Newspaper

 

Mr. Alieu Momarr Njai has assured the election observer community that the counting of the results would be on the spot and the media has a role to play by transmitting the process as it unfolds.

The Independent Electoral Chairman made this statement at the briefing of observers on Monday 3rd April 2017 at Paradise Suites Hotel ahead of the 6th April parliamentary elections, which was well attended by both local and international elections observers, (ECOWAS, AU, EU ) to name a few. He indicated that his institution’s motto is Fair-play, Integrity, and Transparency; that polls will open at 8am and close at 5pm, but if voters are in the queue at 5pm they should be allowed to vote. “Our electoral system is second to none in terms of its transparency, credibility, fairness and accuracy. NO ONE CAN RIG IT!!!” He noted that spot counting will be witnessed by IEC officials, party agents, polling agents, donors and observers.

“During this session, our able officers here will demonstrate to you the whole voting process, from A – Z. You will then see for your very-self come Thursday 6th April during your visits to the various polling stations country-wide that our voting system is fool-proof; tamper-proof and rig­ proof! COUNTING IS DONE RIGHT THERE AND THEN ON THE SPOT! The Media therefore have a pivotal role to play in this very crucial exercise by transmitting the process as it unfolds”.

He said during the four days in which the nominations were held, 239 candidates were nominated and one has since withdrawn. There are 886,578 registered voters and 1,422 polling stations in the country and the breakdown is as follows: Banjul Administrative Area, 35 polling stations, 22,731 voters; Kanifing Administrative Area 287 polling stations, 199,957 voters; Brikama Administrative Area 427 polling stations, 281,115 voters; Kerewan Administrative Area 183 polling stations, 101,717 voters; Mansakonko Administrative Area 90 polling stations, 49,198 voters; Janjanbureh Administrative Area 207 polling stations 116,675 voters and Basse Administrative Area 193 polling stations, 115,185 voters.

Njie remarked, “One Hundred and twenty-two Assistant Returning Officers have been hired to work in the 53 constituencies countrywide. Counting will be done at the polling stations at the close of polls. There are seven collation centres. Five thousand four hundred and sixty-two polling staff will be contracted to man the polling stations”.

Mr. Njai stated that the Gambia’s Independent Electoral Commission is established under Chapter 5, Section 42 of the Constitution of the Republic of the Gambia, and it is mandated under the Constitution and Electoral Laws with: the registration of political parties; the conduct and supervision of the registration of voters for all public elections and referenda; the conduct of the Election of a Speaker and a Deputy Speaker; ensuring that the dates, times and places of public elections and referenda are determined in accordance with law and that they are publicized and elections held accordingly; and the Commission shall announce the results of all elections and referenda for which it is responsible. He noted, “The results of each of the 53 Constituencies must be collated at each of the 7 Administrative Areas before being announced by the Returning Officer and transmitted to me for announcement over GRTS. I cannot therefore announce any other result different from the actuality”.

The IEC Chairman, Njai noted that the IEC since its inception in 1997 has conducted four Presidential elections, three National Assembly elections and three Local Government elections and several by-elections for the National Assembly and Local Government. The fourth National Assembly Elections under the IEC’s purview is slated for Thursday 6th April 2017.

The IEC chairman said presently, there are nine registered Political Parties with the Commission and they are: Alliance for Patriotic Re-Orientation and Construction (APRC), United Democratic Party (UDP); National Convention Party (NCP), National Reconciliation Party (NRP), People’s Democratic Organisation for Independence and Socialism (PDOlS), People’s Progressive Party (PPP), Gambia Party for Democracy and Development (GPDP), Gambia Moral Congress (GMC) and Gambia Democratic Congress (GDC).

He also acknowledges the support made by ECOWAS, UNDP and the European Union as it has come at a time when help is really needed.

“Gambia can return to dictatorship if Gov’t is not properly directed” Halifa Sallah

 

By Kebba Jeffang, Foroya Newspaper

 

The PDOIS Secretary General and its Serekunda constituency National Assembly candidate Halifa Sallah says the Gambia could find itself back into dictatorship if the government is not properly directed by competent National Assembly members.

Sallah, who concluded his nation-wide tour meeting the electorate stressed the importance of the national assembly and carried the same message throughout the tour. The tour began on the 29th March in the Upper Nuimi in the North Bank Region and ended on the 2nd April, in Lamin, West Coast Region.

“It is a tradition in politics for politicians to seek for the mandate from their electorate when elections are approaching. This is what we are doing,” he said.

He informed his supporters across the country that the government has 3 branches in which the executive is charged with responsibility of handling state resources in order to create development for the people through different ministries.

He added that: “Members of the National Assembly are mandated to make laws and to guide the President along the right way whenever he or she should go. So it is very important to fill the assembly with experienced and knowledgeable people who will not be controlled by the executive but can question the government’s policies and programmes in the best interest of the Gambian people.”

Sallah said he could have been a Minister which has more privileges and requires no campaign for election as a portfolio, but he decided to seek for National Assembly mandate to ensure that The Gambia doesn’t get itself back into what it was. “If the government is not well directed it can return to dictatorship or what is even worse than that.”

He explained that PDOIS has a programme that it intends to deliver to the Gambian people and they have been putting forward such aims to the electorate for a long time. According to him, the concern of the electorate has always been the call for unity among the parties in order to remove President Yahya Jammeh from power.

“This is the call we looked into and decided to put our party interest behind and then invited other political parties for talks in order to join our forces together and remove the then incumbent. PDOIS paid Kairaba Beach Hotel and called all the Presidential candidates for talks at Kairaba Beach Hotel in September last year. We agreed on the method of electing one person among the political parties involved and we agreed that the person will resign from his party and stand as an Independent candidate and he or she will serve for 3 years in office,” he narrated.

The former minority leader in the National Assembly added that he was shocked to hear from certain people that he is the enemy of President Adama Barrow. He said this cannot be true as the allegation is baseless. He maintained that no one can pass judgment on him except President Adama Barrow whom according to him never claimed or justified that.

“We declined the ministerial posts because we believed that we can better serve in the National Assembly. All of us cannot be ministers because if the National Assembly is filled with incompetent members we will either return to dictatorship or even more than how we were,” Sallah asserted.

On what led to the split of the coalition in the National Assembly elections, Sallah explained that there were two positions on how to contest one of which requires the resignation of candidates from their parties and stand as independent candidates for coalition while the other was tactical alliance which was initially only supported by the UDP and NRP on the ground that they do not want their parties to die. He said they ended up agreeing on tactical alliance which requires candidates to stand in the name of their parties. He said in tactical alliance, candidates will not go against one another and each will be allowed to contest in the respective strong holds.

“However, during the talks, United Democratic Party (UDP) insisted that it cannot contest below 36 seats of the total 53 constituencies across the country. All other parties have their intentions too, some 20, 25 etc. We always adjourned the meetings on numerous occasions yet parties are not reducing their intentions. We then decided to go and get nominations under our various political parties since there could not be agreement and nomination was due,” he said.

According to him, it is confusing to see that certain parties are using coalition symbol and a photo of President Adama Barrow as if they are standing for the coalition. He clarified that no party is standing in the name of coalition as they failed to agree on that. He advised the constituencies to disregard such claims as it only represents falsehood. He said such parties are not sure of their popularity which makes them to do so.

Secretary General, Sallah, held meetings at the following constituencies to campaign for PDOIS candidates: Upper Nuimi, Lower Nuimi, Jokadu, Sabach Sanjal, Nianija, Niani, Sami, Upper Fulladu West, Niamina East, Bundungka kunda and Lamin.

More Calls To Revive Jahally-Pacharr Rice Project

 

Gambia’s import of rice has grown significantly in recent years compared to the past, the demand for the country’s staple food has increased. The more rice is imported, the more the price escalades in the local markets.

According to the Gambia Bureau of Statistics, an average of Nine Hundred Millions Dalasi was spent on the importation of rice from 2005 to 2014. The highest quantity was 143, 768,000 tons while the lowest was 35,553 000 tons in 2011 and 2006. This includes both commercial and food aid to the government.

The major importers of rice in the country are commercial owners who are mostly foreign business tycoons as the greater population of Gambians consumed rice daily as a staple food with rising demand in the market. The former President Yahya Jammeh who was also involved in business at the time has predicted more than 100 percent increment on the prices of rice in the country which has come to past. Since then a bag of rice has increased to the amount not affordable to many Gambians especially the poorly paid civil servants.

Experts who spoke to this medium about the lack of sustainability on the import of rice to the country at the expense of the growing population called on the government to revitalize the Jahally-Pacharr rice project. This project was first established as rice farm scheme for the large-scale irrigated and mechanised rice production. It is said no country can developed without food self sufficiency.

After several efforts of persuasions, Mr. Sambou Kinteh, former Principal Agricultural Officer responsible for the Central River Region (CRR) and Upper River Region (URR) has finally agreed to talk about the Jahally/Pacharr project, saying he is not selling himself or looking for a job in the new government.

Kinteh explained that the first attempt of Rice Farm Scheme RFS, suffered from poor engineering works with the result that attempts to irrigate failed and production had to depend on rain. He said the Taiwanese Technical Mission, World Bank and People’s Republic of China initiatives suffered from common weaknesses of omission of internal drainage systems, poor access, lack of flood protection work and high canal seepage losses. He added that Rice Development Project also failed without adequate financial provisions.

The former Principal Agricultural Officer and Permanent Secretary has highlighted valuable lessons accumulated from the past initiatives. He talked about the beneficiary involvement in the design and formulation of rice development project especially in site selection and choice of components. He also talked about the scale and level of sophistication of irrigation and mechanical technologies as well as the socioeconomic conditions of the farmers including sustainability of outputs like spare parts, local maintenance and repair services skills.

“Availability of support services: production inputs such as seed, fertilizer and chemicals; institutional support services such as extension, credit and markets; and mechanisation services such as land development, land preparation, irrigation and drainage, harvesting and post-harvest processing is critical for profitable production,” Sambou Kinteh said.

He further talked about a balanced division of management’s attention and emphasis between timely organization of production inputs and services on one hand and ensuring timely crop husbandry practices. He called for focus on development of rain fed swamps, tidal irrigated swamps, rehabilitation of small perimeter schemes and establishment of new perimeter schemes in descending order of priority.

Meanwhile, the recent visit to the camp at Sapo in the Central River Region was like walking in a ghost camp. There was barely a handful of people in the camp. Many of the buildings were old and abandoned.

“This place used to be lively with 24 hours electricity or generator like in the city. We have NARI, DOA, Water Resources, Mechanisation Team and Project Staffs. They were all working in high gear and was very instrumental,” NARI Farm Manager, Modou Sambou said.

Modou Sambou said their mandate was to make adaptive research on basic commodities like rice in low and upland including mangrove ecology. He explained the screening of different varieties of rice before selecting the best suitable for cultivation in the country. He also highlighted the lack of conducive working environment such as during flood, poor electricity and bad salaries among other things.

“Land is not a problem,” he pointed out.

The NARI Farm Manager called for the revival of the mechanisation team which he said would help to revive the rice project. He further called on the government to bring back Tractors and Power Tillers under one team with competent staff or mechanics. He added that the unit should have initial operating capital as a start for lubricants and spare parts.

“We need to have good salaries with hardship allowances. That will keep the workers to stay. It’s not like in the greater Banjul area where other avenues like treks are available,” he explained.

Mr. Modou Sambou said the Mechanisation Team can be providing services that will be responsible for ploughing the farmers fields which he said within one or two season will be able to stand on its own, saying it could cover all rice fields including the one in Kuntaur.

“When this is done there will be no need to import rice in this country,” he emphasised.

Meanwhile, Mr. Ousman Colley, Director of Agriculture covering both Central River Region and Upper River Region could not be reached for comments.

GBA sues AG, JSC over re-appointment of four judges

 

The Gambia Bar Association (GBA) has filed an action against the Attorney General and Minister of Justice, and the Judicial Service Commission over the re-appointment of four Nigerian High Court judges.

The judges are Justice Edward E.Ogar, Justice Martias O. Agboola, Justice Simeon A.Abi and Justice Martins U.Okoi.

The Gambia Bar Association claimed that the appointments of the Judges are not in line with the constitution of the Republic of The Gambia 1997.

Our sources revealed that the suit seeks to challenge the appointments and an order quashing their appointments.

It could be recalled that these four Nigerian High Court judges – Justice Edward E. Ogar, Justice Martias O. Agboola, Justice Simeon A. Abi and Justice Martins U. Okoi – were among several other judges that had their contract renewed late last year for January to December 2017 but as a result of the political impasse that gripped the country, some of the judges travelled out of the country.

But after the political impasse, some of the judges returned to resume work but were informed to hold on pending the swearing in of the new Chief Justice as the erstwhile Chief Justice who facilitated the renewal of the judges had resigned few days before former President Jammeh left the country.

After the new Chief Justice was sworn in and assumed office, the judges did not resume work as there were reports that some members of the Gambia Bar Association (GBA) would not appear before any foreign judge if they were re-appointed.

Meanwhile, sources disclosed that the appointments of judges are done in consultation with the Judicial Service Commission and not with the Gambia Bar Association, citing sections 138 and 145 of the 1997 constitution of The Gambia.

Source: Point Newspaper

Darboe urges APRC supporters to join UDP

 

The leader of the United Democratic Party, Ousainou Darboe, has called on opposition APRC supporters and others to join the UDP and work for the development of the country.
Speaking on the campaign trail Darboe also urged the UDP supporters to open their arms to all those who are willing to come to the party and forget about past differences.

He pointed out that UDP has no grievances against any individual and called for unity among Gambians.
Darboe further added that UDP is a peaceful party that is open to all regardless of tribes. “We must continue to maintain our relationship at all times and reject any temptation to harm our long standing unity and one family existence,” he said.

Darboe saluted Abdoulie Suku Singhateh, the former APRC NAM for Lower Baddibou and his colleagues who cross-carpeted to the UDP, describing them as patriotic citizens and true believers in national interest.
For his part Abdoulie Suku Singhateh urged the electorate to vote for UDP candidates because they are the right candidates who can bring development for them. The tour party has now returned to the Kombos.

Source: Standard Newspaper

KORO CEESAY’S FAMILY ASKS GOV’T TO INVESTIGATE DEATH

 

The family of the late Ousman Koro Ceesay, a former Finance Minister under the former regime of Yahya Jammeh, has called on the new government to launch an inquiry into his mysterious death and brought the culprits to justice, The Standard has learned.

Mr Ceesay died on June 23, 1995 as the Finance Minister under AFPRC regime in mysterious circumstances when his incinerated body was found inside his burnt official vehicle near Jambur village.
The family claimed that despite the fact that Koro was a serving cabinet minister at the time, no member of his family was spoken to by any member of the security forces nor were they informed about any police investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death.

The petition, which is signed by fourteen members of the family and sent to the Ministry of Interior, demands the new government to immediately launch an inquiry into Koro Ceesay’s death so as to know the truth and bring the perpetrators to justice.

In the petition, the family said it is their view that such monumental abdication of state responsibility can only lead to strong suspicion of foul play and consequently the family members demand that the new coalition government initiate an urgent investigation into his death so as to know the truth, hold any guilty party to account and bring about a long awaited closure for the whole family.

 

Source: Standard Newspaper

GOOD MORNING PRESIDENT BARROW

 

Lately, a lot of chit chat aimed to malign you and your rainbow government has gone under the bridge. Many have and will continue to be tough on you not to disparage but entreat you to deliver the best for new Gambia. Information is power. It liberates. But it also enslaves. Unfortunately, new Gambia is caught in a treacherous information cross-fire which threatens to lacerate its social web, undermines its stability, security, new found democracy and development. Regrettably, blame has been unduly apportioned on the diaspora as being bossy, unpatriotic and misrepresenting national interest.

 

When all hope was lost and the fight was fierce, the diaspora was the darling of the nation. It not only led and took the fight to the doorsteps of the dictator and relevant stakeholders who exerted pressure on monster Jammeh but provided finance and moral support for you and your MOU colleagues. Similarly, there are some who gave up their lives for us to be free today. They knew and believed despite one’s tribe, religion and political affiliation, no Gambian was exempted from Jammeh’s death squad. Others in the background who opted not to be seen of men equally gave their all for our freedom. They are here in the diaspora and did not expect any return for their deeds, time and resources. Therefore to box all diaspora Gambian activists under a single tag is dishonest, ungrateful and appalling.

 
Albeit, you have erred in the past and has gone back to right them manifest your admirable leadership quality. Your Banjul rally also gave me a lot of solace that with time we notice and appreciate the much expected delivery from you. You emerged authoritative, focus and ready to right not only the wrongs of a 22 years repressive government but desk the Gambia where every Gambian will be proud of.

 

Furthermore, you have vividly demonstrated that sceptics will not derail you and above all you have a thick skin for criticisms. This you manifested by encouraging your cabinet to allow the media do its job unpoliced. I am not a journalist and had no formal or informal training in the industry but I know there is a thin margin between informing a people and being sensitive to their feelings. Some are in it for money, others for fame and a few to inform, educate and entertain. Occasionally, one is caught in the heat of the moment and tends to lose their moral and ethical barometers in the process. But to deliberately tune the drums of instability and violence is callous and selfishly immoral.

 
New Gambia is in mourning and grieving period as a result of chilling unearthing of Jammeh’s unsettling atrocious. Yes, it not an excuse to issue a blanket leeway to you and your government but efforts should be directed in helping the nation heal, reconcile and brace the gnawing revelations yet unborn. We need to responsibly guide the government to succeed in transforming what we all fought for into visual reality. Holding a government responsible does not punctuate blinding its citizens with hate.

 

Identify the errors and provide alternation means to right the wrongs. Focus on the issues and not the personality of leaders. They are humans just like us with fears, dreams and shortfalls. Therefore to expect them to act godly is unrealistic and malicious. Mr President, Einstein postulated “peace is not merely the absence of war but the presence of justice, of law, of order-in short, of government”. In other words, it is prudent and helpful if your government avoids been seen as radiating rays of constitutional disregard and abuse of office. Many still find the continued vacancy of the Vice President’s office unjustifiable.

 

The minister of Interior, Mai Ahmad Fatty admitted, “We in the leadership remain aware of the difficulties in the land. We urge all Gambians to bear with us. Ideas shall be sourced from all quarters on how to put our nation on a path of integrity and prosperity”. Another caressing reassurance from a minister. However, there is already a fountain of ideas readily available for resourcing.

 
We should stop perceiving one another as strange bedfellows. Every day, both Gambians at home and in the diaspora freely give productive ideas and suggestions as to hoe to steer our fragile nation to safe shores but no evidence of them being taken on-board. We have allowed partisan politics to drive a wedge between us at the detriment of nation peace, stability, unity and development. Our political leaders and governments will come and go but Gambia will remain.

 

Sulayman Jeng
Birmingham, UK

Reset password

Enter your email address and we will send you a link to change your password.

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

Sign up with email

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

By clicking the «SIGN UP» button you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Powered by Estatik