Tuesday, April 29, 2025
Home Blog Page 488

Gambia’s economy suffers sliding growth as government blames delayed rain and Thomas Cooks’s collapse

0

By Lamin Njie

The Gambian economy is anticipated to grow by four percent in 2019 compared to an actual real growth of 6.5 percent in 2018, Finance Minister Mambury Njie has said.

The top government official today brought the 2020 budget before members of the national assembly for their approval. According to Mr Njie, government will spend 30 billion dalasis in 2020. Total government expenditure and net lending for 2019 was 28.8 billion dalasis.

The growth of the country’s economy has however dropped to 4% with the finance minister saying the “decline in growth is as a result of anticipated setbacks in both agriculture and services sectors.”

“Growth in these two sectors is project at -2.6 and -1.5 percent in 2019 compared to 0.9 percent and 9.9 percent in 2018, for agriculture and services respectively.

“The contraction is on account of the delayed rain and the impact of the collapse of Thomas Cook the major carrier of tourists to The Gambia,” he added.

The Jambur man who stopped supporting UDP after risking life for party

0

By Adama Makasuba

A Jambur man has accused the United Democratic Party of not showing any form of solidarity to him and his family during their detention by the APRC regime in 2001.

Ba Dembo Bojang who appeared before the TRRC today to testify on former President Yahya Jammeh’s 2009 so-called witch hunt quickly veered off to narrate his 2001 ordeal, accusing the UDP leaders of abandoning him.

“I don’t like UDP anymore unless if this government leaves and they choose another person but if they choose Ousainou I will not vote for him. But if they choose a new person I will vote for that person, maybe that one vote could be reason for a victory for someone,” Mr Bojang told TRRC officials at a session Jambur today.

“Therefore, I will not vote for Ousainou Darboe and if I should hear that he chose someone I will not cast my vote for that person, I am the one who liked him but he doesn’t like me, the one who is supporting you, if he happened to got into trouble shouldn’t you care about that person,” he added.

According to him, the reason for his dislike of UDP is because the Jammeh regime had sent seven people from his family including himself for opposing APRC and UDP leader neither visited them in detention nor sending a messenger adding “from that time I have expressed I don’t like Ousainou Darboe and UDP.”

They arrested myself and my brother Dodou Kah and his son Ousman and his younger brother Dodou Bojang and my niece call Binta Sillah and my grandson Kebba Mamaring Bojang and my son Ousman Bojang, he said.

On the Current Debacle at Nawec: System Failure

0

I have always had great respect and admiration for the man who is the new Managing Director of NAWEC because of his academic prowess. When we enlisted for the A’Level Science class at  Gambia High School In the mid-90’s the name Alpha Robinson resonated with excellence. 

However, the academic prowess of nerds does not necessarily translate into results at the helm of the corporate world. Perhaps that is why people like the apple legend Steve Wozniak, kept himself at the background applying his rich mind in the labs.

When news emerged that Alpha Robinson was appointed M.D. of NAWEC, I demurred despite the fanfare shown by some excitable social media enthusiasts and vested interests. I thought it was quite disingenuous to appoint a person who lived all his adult life in the West to come and manage the most critical and troubled institution in this country. I remained mute because the obvious response to any critique at that time would have been to accuse me of harbouring ulterior motives.

But now the results have started emerging and the outcome is unflattering. We can all feel the degeneration and inconsistency in service delivery under the new head. 

Clueless about the nitty-gritty of that complex behemoth, he is being cajoled and hoodwinked by vested private interests; a clique that has no motivation but Machiavellian personal gain.

The M.D. is allegedly making life unnecessarily difficult for the patriotic young men and women who have sacrificed for years trying their best for NAWEC while he was busy enjoying big pay and better life in the west. 

I know the need for strict leadership in state-owned enterprises and I have been a tough leader at one. But there is no justification for curtailing legitimate pecuniary gains of your subordinates when you are fully enjoying your share. Given our very low pay scale in this country, it is totally disingenuous to mess up with the incentive structure of any corporate body. Staff should be held accountable and pushed to deliver but curtailing remuneration is wrong. 3EA44F71-4FEA-4126-AE8D-8809E5ABCD69

One truly has to understand the full scope and nature of remuneration in our public service to be able to manage any institution in this country. It is complicated and the society itself is very complex to the extent of defying management theory based on the Western model; and that is why NAWEC cannot be properly run by anyone who is neither conversant with that institution nor quite au fait with our corporate-social nexus.

The New M.D’s recent statement that NAWEC has been damaged for the past 50 years is an insult to all the patriotic people who have been working at that institution under difficult circumstances for the past 50 years. It is sad that people like  (former M.D) Abdou Jobe who laboured and suffered to extent of being jailed for no just reason get the finger from Mr Robinson. This is totally unacceptable and the man at the helm of NAWEC should apologize for these false and malicious remarks.

I can feel the new M.D’s frustration because NAWEC is just about the most difficult institution to manage in this country. But if he is shocked at the enormity of the task at hand, he should simply resign rather than attack the honour and professional integrity of hundreds of Gambians who have toiled and moiled under the heavy oil and smoke of what used to be called GUC, MSG, and now NAWEC.

As it stands now, the institution will continue to degenerate and services will become poorer and more unreliable. What obtains at this critical national institution is the outcome of a clash of egos at the highest level of our political drama. Like vultures at an abattoir, some private business concerns have fully capitalised on this situation. And the fact is that the combatants in this clash have adequate backups for utility services. The price of this battle is being paid by the ordinary consumer – when two elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers.

The only way out for the MD is to disentangle himself from the cages of the vested interests that got him tied up at the get go. He should change his ways and open his doors for consultation and cooperation with those who know that institution. NAWEC cannot be micromanaged. That’s simply impossible due to the nature and scope of their operation.

To the patriotic professionals working at NAWEC, my advice to you is to remain persistent and dedicated to your duties. Please do not allow any transient authority to frustrate you. The country is bigger than any individual or political dispensation hellbent on settling scores at the expense of national progress. Do not resign, please. These unhealthy clouds hovering over NAWEC shall all be dispelled some day, inshaa Allah; and patience and persistence under trying circumstances are the keys to greatness for those who understand the inner wisdom below the yokes of oppression.

As Nelson Mandela sang during his trying times, repeat the worlds of the poet, William Ernest Henley:

Out of the night that covers me 

Black as the pit from pole to pole,

I thank whatever gods may be

For my unconquerable soul.

In the fell clutch of circumstance,

I have not winced nor cried aloud.

Under the bludgeonings of chance

My head is bloody, but unbow’d

And to Conclude I hand over to you my personal hashtag #KanaSong; I recommend the inspiring lyrics of the late Robert Nesta Marley. Under the yoke of institutional bullying and undue oppression under such leaders like the man who was Minister of Finance when I served as Budget Director; my song of resistance has always been the words of Bob Marley “and we know we shall win; as we are confident, in the victory. Good over evil!”

-Momodou Sabally

Former S.G and Head of the Civil Service 

Remove the Entire Draft Section 107 Altogether in the Criminal Offences Bill

0

It is not enough for the Ministry of Justice to remove the second part of the draft section 107 regarding parental insult and then leave the first part in there. While the second part of this provision is indeed draconian, discriminatory and a direct threat to democracy and human rights, it must be noted that the more severe part of section 107 is the first part. Here is what the first part says,

 

“Any person who insults, or does any act to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the person of the President, or the Government of The Gambia as by law established, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not less than fifty thousand dalasi or a term of imprisonment of not less than one year or to both the fine and imprisonment.”

 

This particular provision is the very provision that directly threatens and limits the ability of the citizen to criticize the President and the Government in order to hold them accountable. It is this part which raises the President and the Government above public scrutiny. Effectively this first part of section 107 makes the President and the Government lords over and above the people of the Gambia.

 

With this provision citizens cannot in anyway therefore question, challenge, condemn, criticize or express divergent or dissenting opinion against the President or the Government. Hence this part of section 107 undermines democracy and good governance in the Gambia with the potential to indeed make this country an authoritarian and closed society. This is the very part of the provision that needs to go first. It undermines transparency, accountability and efficiency of the Government.

 

Yes, no one should insult anyone including the President or public officers much more insult their parents. But as I noted earlier insult laws are not necessarily intended to curtail insult in political discourse. This is because even the President insults. We had seen Yaya Jammeh insult citizens just as we have seen Barrow also insult citizens in his various utterances. Hence the purpose of insult laws is merely to protect the President and the Government from public scrutiny thereby allowing abuse of office and violations of human rights to prevail with impunity. Focusing on parental insult is merely an attempt to divert public attention from the real issue.

 

But when you compare the first part (i.e. express an opinion) of section 107 with the second part (i.e. parental insult), one will realize that the second part, which is about parental insult is the easier part to handle. This is because ordinarily most people will not insult the parents of the President or public officers. And anyone who makes such insult publicly would usually also face a negative reaction from the general public. For example, if I insult Pres. Barrow’s mother or if I insult the father of the Justice Minister or the uncle of the IGP or the grandmother of the Speaker, it is clear that many people will also condemn me severely.

 

Hence one can truly avoid insulting the parent of a public officer. However, what a citizen cannot avoid is to express an opinion that criticizes public officers and public institutions with very severe and unpleasant expressions. The first part of the provision states that if you say something about the President or the Government that brings “hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection” against them then you have committed a crime. In essence this provision is meant to criminalize opinion hence deny you to think. OMG!

 

For example, if I say Pres. Barrow is stupid or that his Government is useless it strictly means that I am making some people to also hold the same view which is that I am making people to dislike the President or the Government as I do. Indeed, this is the whole idea of politics and democracy, i.e. political parties and citizens seek to influence each other’s position by making one to either like or dislike a President and Government by our utterances.

 

But whatever position I hold, this is my opinion about the President and the Government, and this opinion is just my opinion and not the gospel truth. Some will believe and agree with me and others will not. In fact there will also be some other citizens who will hold a different opinion that Pres. Barrow is indeed intelligent and honest, and the Government is effective. Neither they nor I is right or wrong. We just happen to hold divergent or dissenting opinion. Hence no one should be arrested for speaking his or her opinion.

 

But with this provision it now means therefore the Government does not want any citizen to have a negative opinion about it. How can we have a society where no one is allowed to have and express a negative or contrary opinion to the Government? That is what is called dictatorship such as we had under Yaya Jammeh.

 

Therefore, the greatest threat in the draft criminal code to the fundamental rights and freedoms of Gambians is this first part of section 107. This is the part that threatens our democracy more than anything in our laws. It is the most venomous and most far reaching provision against democracy and good governance because it merely says no one should think and express an opinion that is negative about the President and the Government. This means no one is allowed to criticize, condemn, disagree or challenge the President and the Government. Is the President God or an Emperor?

 

Therefore, I hereby demand that the Ministry of Justice go further to completely and totally remove the entire section 107 out of this draft criminal code forthwith. I call on all Gambians to continue to raise our voices against this most draconian provision that has no purpose other than to turn the Gambia into a tyranny. I call on the NAMs to completely reject this bill so long as section 107 remains in the bill.

 

Anyone who imagines, drafts, makes, approves and supports this provision may the Hottest Hell Fire burn you!

 

For the Gambia Our Homeland

 

……………………………………………..

Madi Jobarteh

Skype: madi.jobarteh

Twitter: @jobartehmadi

LinkedIn: Madi Jobarteh

Phone: +220 9995093

 

Tallinding UDP launches fierce attack on Fatoumatta Jawara branding her ‘rotten’ potato that deserved to be removed from bag

0

By Lamin Njie

The UDP leadership in Tallinding constituency on Sunday branded the constituency’s national assembly member a rotten potato that needed to be removed from the bag.

Fatoumatta Jawara is among eight UDP members of the national assembly who have been expelled by the party after they were adjudged to have ‘conducted themselves in a way that was not in conformity with party principles.’

The expulsion of Fatoumatta Jawara, Billay Tunkara, Saikouba Jarju, Saikou Marong, Baba Galleh Jallow, Omar Darboe, Abdoulie Ceesay and Alagie Jawara is as a result of their alleged overt support for President Adama Barrow.

The UDP leadership in Tallinding on Sunday held a press conference where it hailed the decision of the party’s national leadership in sacking the eight officials.

“Fatoumatta leaving the party will not affect us in any way, it will only strenghten us.
“She’s given her back on the party, on Tallinding, and she even went to the point of saying she supports Barrow Youth Movement.

“We also have evidence she is one of those people who take bribes from the president to support his agenda,” a top Tallinding UDP official Bubacarr Jabbie while reading a statement said.

Another official blasted: “If you have one rotten potato in a bag, and you know it could harm the bag, what would you do? That’s what Fatoumatta is in the bag.”

The Fatu Network contacted Fatoumatta Jawara but she is yet to respond to a request for comment.

New draft constitution: 30 years is how old one should be to be able to run for president

0

A person must attain the age of thirty years on the date of nomination for election of president, the new draft constitution has said.

The Constitutional Review Commission on Friday released the new draft constitution as The Gambia moved ever closer to getting a new constitution.

If approved, The Gambia’s political and socio-economic future will witness a major transformation, as among the many propositions are term limit and absolute majority.

On the issue of president, the new draft constitution says a person must be a citizen of The Gambia and has ‘on the date of nomination for election of president attained the age of thirty years’.

The new draft constitution also espouses a candidate either hold an undergraduate degree with five years work experience or a high school certificate with twelve years work experience.

New draft constitution: This is how old one needs to be to be able to be appointed minister

0

The new draft constitution of The Gambia has laid down the law regarding who qualifies for the job of minister.

The Constitutional Review Commission on Friday released the new draft constitution as The Gambia moved ever closer to getting a new constitution.

If approved, The Gambia’s political and socio-economic future will witness a major transformation, as among the many propositions are term limit and absolute majority.

On the issue of ministers, the new draft constitution says a person is qualified to be appointed a minister if the person is a Gambian and has ‘attained’ the age of 21 or more. It also says the person must a qualification at tertiary education level and can speak and write the English Language well.

Gov’t drops ‘saaga’ insult law plan after vicious bashing from Gambians

0

The Gambia government has ditched its plan to introduce a law that could see people going to jail if they are found guilty of insulting the parents of public officials.

The Barrow administration in the past few days has been under fire over an alleged plan by to introduce a law that would ban people from insulting government officials.

Justice Minister Abubacarr Tambadou clarified Friday saying the proposed new law is strictly on ‘parental insults’ when it comes to public officials, but now the ministry of justice has issued a statement announcing it will no longer present the proposed law that seeks to introduce the offence of parental insults in the criminal Offences bill.

“This withdrawal decision is as a result of concerns expressed from several quarters regarding the objectives and the possible effects of the said provision,” a statement purportedly by the ministry said.

It said further: “The Ministry wishes to inform the general public that the introduction of the said proposed law was simply intended to stem the rise of unwarranted abuse and/or intimidation of public officers who serve the public everyday and these include civil servants, police officers, judicial officers, National Assembly members etc.

“Contrary to some claims, the proposed law was neither intended to stifle freedom of expression nor to shield public officers from public scrutiny. Far from it.

“The Ministry has therefore considered that this single legal provision on parental insults, which is only one among over four hundred other provisions in the revised Criminal Offences Bill that we will be seeking to enact before the National Assembly, threatens to overshadow all the hard work invested in this process, and the more fundamental and far reaching reforms of our governance architecture in general and the criminal justice landscape of our country in particular. These include enacting an anti-corruption commission bill, an access to information bill, a media services bill, a women’s anti- discrimination bill and above all, a new draft constitution to usher in renewed hope going into a 3rd republic. These are exciting times in our country and the sense of optimism imbued by these progressive constitutional and legislative reforms must not be allowed to be overshadowed by our disagreements over one single legal provision.

“The Ministry further reassures the public that it is firmly committed to its governance reform agenda and that it will always take on-board the concerns of citizens as it shapes this agenda in the best interest of all in our country.”

Peace group announces tour and it comes at the same time as Barrow’s tour

0

By Adama Makasuba

A peace organisation is planning a tour of the nation next week to engage people especially young Gambians on the promotion of peace in the country.

The group is expected to start its tour on a day President Adama Barrow would start gracing 44 in-country meetings.

The group’s tour of nation is targeting youth groups especially students who it describe as the people who are used during crisis situations.

Pro-Gambia a group formed after the political impasse in 2017 with its principal goal to promoting peace and unity in the country through dialogue among political leaders, youth and community, and pressure groups.

It has recently held engagement with various political leaders and interior minister on the coalition’s controversial gentleman pact which is calling for Barrow to step down in December.

Vice President of the group Fatou Fatty, who spoke at a news conference on Sinchu Baliya said: “We wish to informed and educate the public on how we can all come together and promote peace and give peace a chance to ensuring stability and security.”

Mrs. Fatty called for encouragement of dialogue in the country saying ‘because of dialogue they have resolved many unwanted problems in the country and we are calling on stakeholders to give support to this initiative and not to wait until the country is in flames and act.’

Ensa ‘Jeusus’ Jatta group secretary general said they expect to hold a national day for dialogue after the tour where ‘we will have all the political leaders, security forces, pressure groups- 3- and 5-years, religious leaders civil society organisations for us to come and dialogue and see how best we can safeguard the peace and security of the country.’

Two top imams take time off pulpit for face off as leadership row continues

0

By Lamin Njie

Two top Gambian imams last week went head to head as the fight for leadership of the country’s apex Islamic body continued.

Supreme Islamic Council second vice president Ibrahim Jarjue clashed with Rawdatul Majalis’s Abubacarr Jabbi on Perspective, a weekly GRTS show, in a session peppered by accusations and counter-accusations.

The debate first started to get heated when Supreme Islamic Council’s Jarjue claimed Rawdatul Majalis was a one-tribe Islamic group.

“Because we are interested in peace is why I am sharing a stage with Rawdatul Majalis. I will not have been here. We have nothing against them but all we hear from them is insults.

“If you go to any Majalis, you will find a Fula, a Jola, a Mandinka, a Serahule, a Serere but for Rawdatul Majalis, all the scholars are Mandinkas and Gambia is not a country of just Mandinkas,” Jarjue said.

He continued: “So if these people go out on a tour of the country and go as far as naming a new president, it’s impossible for us to work with those people.

“Also, if we (SIC) announce the sighting of the moon, they (Rawdatual Majalis) will announce that the moon is not sighted. They use the media to discredit us and to confuse people.”

Rawdatul Majalis’s Abubacarr Jabbi fired back saying the current Supreme Islamic Council is a ‘club of friends’.

Jabbi said: “These are all accusations. For him to say Rawdatul Majalis is made up of people from just one tribe is an allegation.

“We all know what Supreme Islamic Council did to Gambians; imams were beaten, imams were imprisoned and imams were stopped from observing Eid.”

Rawdatul Majalis, a group established in 2017 to bring all Islamic sects in the country together, is soaked in a bitter leadership row with the current leaders of Supreme Islamic Council. The group says the term of office of the current leadership has expired.

Justice minister clarifies ‘saaga ndey’ or ‘saaga bai’ insult law

0

By Lamin Njie

Justice Minister Abubacarr Tambadou has said the objective of the draft Criminal Code Bill is not to ‘stifle’ freedom of expression.

Gambians online have been railing against an alleged plan by the government to introduce a law that would ban people from insulting government officials. Screenshots were shared online with users suggesting people would be handed jail terms of up to one year if they are found guilty of insulting the president or a public official.

Justice Minister Abubacarr Tambadou clarified Friday saying the proposed new law is strictly on ‘parental insults’ when it comes to public officials.

Mr Tambadou said: “First, this is only one provision among hundreds others that are being proposed for amendment. Second, the Government is introducing two new pieces of legislation on freedom of expression: Access to Information Bill and Media Services Bill. These two bills were drafted in close consultation with Article 19 and the GPU and subjected to stakeholder validations.

“Third, as part of the government’s consultation process, we shared the draft Criminal Code Bill, which contains the Parental insults provision, with some civil society organizations in confidence because it has not yet been finalized and it is still subject to validation. It is unfortunate that this incomplete Bill was shared with the public before finalization.

“In any event, the Government proposes to proceed with the Parental insults provision for two principal reasons: first, the Supreme Court had sometime in 2018 upheld that the criminal provisions relating to sedition against the President were lawful and constitutional. This by the way is the provision relating to insulting the President or bringing into contempt or hatred against the person of the President etc. We thought that this particular provision is susceptible to abuse and decided to delete the provision notwithstanding the Supreme Court decision on it; but we also want to ensure that when the provision on sedition is removed, the exercise of the right to freedom of expression is done in a responsible manner and that Parental insults should have no place in political discourse especially with respect to those holding public office.

“By virtue of their employment, decisions by public officials affect the public on a daily basis and this exposes and makes them the most vulnerable to public reactions. So in order to prevent unwarranted abuse and intimidation of public officials, and consistent with the constitutional provision to place reasonable restrictions in the interests of public decency or morality, we proposed the offence of parental insults which in our culture is extremely offensive and may perhaps be the most extreme form of provocation. This is the genesis and context in which this law is being proposed.

“The objective is not to stifle freedom of expression, otherwise the government would not be introducing the bills mentioned above among others such as amending the Information and Communications Act to remove what I call the laws on “garuwalleh”.

“But in our local culture, it is simply wrong to insult the parents of another and it is the responsibility of all to discourage this practice especially against those holding public office for the reasons stated earlier. What has anyone’s parents got to do with their employment? Why not just stop at insulting public officials if you so choose and not their parents? The only reason one would do such a thing is to be hurtful to others because that is the natural consequence of saga ndey in our culture.

“And by the way, the proposed new law does not seek to prohibit insults against public officials, only their parents, ie, saga ndey!!! Or bai.”

New constitution okays term limit and absolute majority in massive shift

0

By Lamin Njie

The Gambia’s political future is about to witness a major transformation after the country’s new draft constitution revealed a massive shift to the country’s electoral law.

The new draft constitution of The Gambia which was released today says a candidate for election to the office of president can only be elected if the candidate has received more than half of all the votes ‘validly’ cast in the election. The pronouncement translates to 51% and it a sharp departure from the simply majority system The Gambia has known since independence.

The new draft constitution is also saying the president cannot hold office for more than two terms of “five years each, whether or not the terms are consecutive.”

The Barrow administration in 2018 tasked a commission to work on a new constitution for The Gambia, and after over one and a half years of work the commission has published the first draft of the document.

Cherno Jallow the chairman of the Constitutional Review Commission speaking at a news conference in Kotu today said the draft constitution comprises 20 Chapters with a total of 315 clauses. The current constitution of The Gambia has 17 chapters.

The CRC top official said: “We took note of their wishes and carried out research into comparable jurisdictions.

“We have come to the conclusion that while a leaner Constitution may be desirable, it ought not to be the yard stick by which we measure the strength and effectiveness of the Constitution.

“We have taken into account the fact that we have a young democracy with not so strong institutions – one of the things we have attempted to rectify in the draft Constitution – and the need to ensure clarity.”

Draft constitution demands Grade 12 certificate for presidency

0

By Adama Makasuba

The draft new constitution is demanding candidates for president to at least obtain a minimum of senior secondary school leaving certificate with twelve years work experience.

But if the clause is approved, it will affect many aspirant candidates for the country’s top job especially young people who are without undergraduate degree and haven’t got twelve years work experience.

Qualification for president was an emotive issue during CRC’s in and out-country consultation with many people saying a candidate for president of The Gambia should at least hold an undergraduate degree.

But the new draft constitution which is published today is saying a “candidate must hold a minimum of an undergraduate degree plus five years’ work experience after the date of attaining that degree, or hold a minimum of a senior secondary certificate or its equivalent plus twelve years’ work experience.”

Presidents in The Gambia are known to be poorly educated, with the exception of former president Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara who had attained university education.

Breaking: CRC releases first draft constitution, after months of compiling and drafting

0

By Adama Makasuba

The Constitutional Review Commission has published the much-awaited draft constitution following months of compilation and drafting.

It comes a week after the eleven-commission members announced a tour of nation for another in-country public consultation.

The draft constitution which contained 22 chapters and 315 clauses will be available to Gambians both in hard copies and on electronic for one-month.

Constitutional Review Commission was established in 2017 to draft a new constitution for The Gambia. The commission had a 18 months timeline.

Chairman Cherno Sulayman Jallow who spoke during the publication event on Friday said as tears roll on his cheeks: “I am pleased to announce that CRC draft constitution is finally published both online and hard copies. Throughout the execution of our assignment, the CRC Act has been our guide, ensuring at all times that we adhere as closely as possible to the terms of the Act. We have come to the conclusion while a learner constitution may be desirable, it ought not to be the yard stick by which we measure the strength and effectiveness of the Constitution.

“The 22-page of draft constitution having 315 will accord another opportunity for the public to review and give their opinions before it goes to the president for approval sometimes in early next year.

“It is expected in few weeks the Constitutional Review Commission would embark on another in-country public consultation that seeks to collate people opinions on the draft constitution.”

Islamic group brands Hijab fashion event ‘evil activity’ but agency reacts saying…

0

By Momodou Justice Darboe

It is the count-down to Hijab Fashion Week and all roads will on Friday lead to Semaj Garden in Senegambia where a scintillating array of young Hijab-wearing girls will do the cat-walk but Movement for Islamic Research and Dawah(MIRD) has condemned the event, describing it as contrary to the teachings of Islam.

Hijab Modelling Agency, established with the overriding aim of projecting young Hijabis in positive light, is poised to host a fun-filled night of events that is expected to attract notable figures in the fashion industry and the larger public.

According to organizer Hijab Modelling Agency, the events are intended to provide a platform for Hijab-wearing young women to have a taste of fashion and the feeling of being a model while being modest.

“In addition, to train them the way of life in the fashion world in positive ways and to become professional models who will represent their motherland [The Gambia] on international runway events involving modest fashion,’’ stated a press release issued to the media ahead of the Friday Hijab Fashion Week.

However, MIRD has come out strongly to denounce the Hijab Fashion Week.

In a press release issued to this medium on Thursday, MIRD states: ‘’We condemn in the strongest possible terms the evil activity organized by some people who call themselves Hijab Modeling Agency. In Islam, everything is cleared for us. There are no editions, concoctions, deletions, additions or innovations in Islam.’’

The release adds, quoting the Quran: ‘’This day, I (Allah) have perfected your religion for you, I have completed my favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your religion.

“The verse above serves as a seal to any invention that anyone may introduce to Islam. The prophet (peace be upon him) said, ‘whoever does any deed (in Islam) that is not based upon our commandment it is rejected.'”

According to the release, Hijab Fashion Week is prohibited in Islam in that women are prohibited in Islam to display their adornments to other than their husbands or close male relatives who are prohibited to marry them.

“And stay in your houses, and do not display yourselves like that of the times of Ignorance. (The Glorious Qur’an).

“The above stated event will undoubtedly include display of beauty and adornment by adult Muslim sisters for marketing purposes which will certainly attract the opposite gender to lust for illegal sexual desires which will defeat the entire purpose of Hijaab as Hijaab literally means a barrier, a shield, a protection meant to preserve the Muslim woman against the oppression of illegal sexual relations,’’ the release said.

“We know very well that this ‘Hijaab Week’ is an eye-catching event that is intended to market your products, display your adornment to open spectators/attendance. There is no justification for this in Islam,’’ stated the release.

“It never was practiced during the time of the prophet(PBUH) nor was it ever practiced by any of the predecessors amongst the times of the truthful scholars, including female Islamic scholars,” said the dispatch.

But Rohey Jeng president of Hijab Modelling Agency told The Fatu Network the argument MIRD is peddling is faulty as the event is only meant to promote modesty ‘through hijab.’

“We are just trying to promote modesty, we are all hijabs and we are just trying to promote hijab fashion designers. And we are really not trying to make a mockery of Islam,” Rohey said.

Concerns Over the Draft Criminal Offences Bill 2019

0

On Tuesday December 2nd the Minister of Justice will lay before the National Assembly a bill to amend the current Criminal Code. I wish to call on National Assembly Members not to approve this bill because it contains provisions that limit citizens political rights and places the President and the entire Government above public scrutiny. They are using ‘insult’ as a strategy to achieve that diabolical objective.

 

Look at the provisions below where the government is proposing criminalising ‘insult’ against the president and public officers and their parents under Section 107,

 

  1. Any person who insults, or does any act to bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the person of the President, or the Government of The Gambia as by law established, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not less than fifty thousand dalasi or a term of imprisonment of not less than one year or to both the fine and imprisonment;

 

  1. Any person who directs parental insults to the President, Vice President, Cabinet Ministers, Judicial officers, Members of the National Assembly or any public officer holding a public office or in the exercise of his or her official functions, shall be held liable on summary conviction to a fine of not less than ten thousand dalasi and not more than fifty thousand dalasi or a term of imprisonment of not less than one month and not more than six months or to both the fine and imprisonment.

 

This is not the kind of provision one wold have in a democracy! The Criminal Code is a very important law as it deals with how citizens act and relate with each other on a daily basis. The Criminal Code is the law that determines that everything we do is either lawful or unlawful. Unlawful acts are called offences or crimes for which one is arrested, tried and jailed if you are found to commit them.

 

Therefore, what is in the Criminal Code must be of utmost interest to citizens. States especially authoritarian leaders and governments have always used criminal laws to criminalise lot of actions just to ensure that they deny or limit or stop citizens from actively taking part in national affairs or holding public servants and public institutions accountable or combating corruption or ensuring transparency and efficient delivery of public services.

 

During the colonial times the British made it an offence in the Criminal Code for any citizen to protest or criticize the Queen or the Governor or the colonial government. They called it sedition or insult. They did that simply because they do not wish to have Gambians challenge the colonial government or defend their rights or seek independence.

 

Unfortunately, this Obnoxious Criminal Code was maintained by the Jawara Government. In 1988 his Government arrested and tried a journalist Sanna Tiks Manneh for reporting in his newspaper ‘The Torch’ that some ministers were corrupt. Even though the courts eventually freed the journalists, but we could see how the Criminal Code was used with the intention to silence the man and his newspaper just to protect corruption.

 

Under the Jammeh Regime not only did he maintain sedition but there were other provisions such as ‘giving false information to a public officer’ which was used to silence and intimidate citizens who wished to expose corruption, maladministration, inefficiency and misconduct in public institutions and society as a whole.

 

Many times, citizens who wrote to the Office of the President to express their grievances ended up being arrested and charged for giving false information to a public officer. With this particular provision it means citizens were afraid to therefore write petitions to the Executive hence this provision was used to close accountability and transparency thereby allowing abuse and corruption to perpetuate.

 

Today we are under the leadership of Adama Barrow. We brought in this new leadership because we all agreed that the Jammeh Regime was a dictatorship that seized our rights such as freedom of expression, freedom of assembly and association and the right to petition the Executive. The regime criminalized these rights in the Criminal Code.

 

Therefore, it is indeed concerning that this new government would also continue to use the same Criminal Code as left to us by the colonialists and Jawara and Jammeh. What is even more concerning is the fact that this new Government has gone further to put in new provisions that directly infringe on citizens’ sovereign rights.

 

Let us be clear: no culture and no decent human being will entertain, condone or practice insults in any form anytime. Insults of any kind are indecent, uncivilised and toxic. But this is not a reason to therefore create this kind of a provision. Insults in the context of democracy and politics are addressed by political means and not through law and prosecution. If we wish to use the law to prevent insult in politics, then we will end up threatening our rights and creating more ‘criminals’ and therefore undermine national security.

 

What we need to consider is that these ‘insults’ are unpleasant expressions that come in the course of political discourse and disagreements between citizens on pertinent national issues. While no one should be encouraged to insult anyone on account of national issues however how do we determine what is ‘insult’. Not every unpleasant word or expression is an insult. But when there is a law that criminalizes insult but did not define and identify those insults beforehand it means therefore what constitutes insults will be left to the discretion of the police and courts.

 

When we leave such issues at the discretion of the police and courts, aka the State it means therefore such public officers could clampdown on any citizen to accuse her of insulting just to silence her. We saw how citizens were arrested under Jammeh and even today for insulting the president. We recall some years ago when a Foroyaa worker, Mass was tried for telling an APRC supporter to paste the picture of Yaya Jammeh on the sky. Similarly, one Fatou Badji was also arrested and tried briefly in 2018 for saying Barrow was not a good Muslim. How on earth could these two expressions constitute insult if not to merely harass citizens?

 

Insult laws anywhere are used to silence citizens, to stop citizens from scrutinizing their leaders and government and thereby to prevent citizens from exposing and combating corruption as well as from defending their rights. Above all insult laws are used to prevent citizens from actively participating in the affairs of their society hence create the ground for dictatorship to emerge.

 

All Gambians must stand against this Criminal Code Bill that is going before the National Assembly. Engage your National Assembly Member not to vote for this bill so long as it contains this provision among many other obnoxious provisions. We want democracy and good governance in which Gambians have the right and the space to freely exercise our sovereign citizens.

 

No to this Criminal Offences Bill. For the Gambia Our Homeland

 

……………………………………………..

Madi Jobarteh

Skype: madi.jobarteh

Twitter: @jobartehmadi

LinkedIn: Madi Jobarteh

Phone: +220 9995093

Baa Is Doing Too Much Now

0

Since becoming the Attorney General, we have seen Baa Tambadou gradually become more and more abrasive. It is in his attitude and in his speech! Just go back and look at his earlier press conferences/interview and compare them to the most recent ones rek. Authority does not equal authoritarian, and Baa is getting increasingly authoritarian by the day!

Of late, Baa has been acting as if he owns the Justice System and is the only one who knows what’s best for The Gambia, with a heightened arrogance nak! We have seen the way Baa acted and how defiant he was after his almost unilateral decision to release the Junglers. His reaction to the public outcry was pathetic and insensitive to the core. Do I need to mention how angry, obnoxious and rude Baa Tambadou was in his press conference when people challenged his acquisition of Diplomatic Passports for his extended family? He cried that people were insulting his mother after he managed to bring her into the national discourse. If your family does need Diplomatic Passports to travel around the world, then why get them one? A Diplomatic Passport is public property and people have the right to ask questions, period!

So I guess because Baa felt devastated that his mother was insulted, he’s now lashing out with a draconian bill to punish anyone who insults him, Adu Boy ak ngin andal. So those working for the government and being paid by public funds are the only ones with mothers? How about if someone insults my mother? They get to go to Mile2 as well? What have these government officials done to deserve such legal protection? Oh, and now Baa also wants to cross the boundaries of the his jurisdiction make the law applicable to those living overseas. Authoritarian daygain tan!

In this context, jurisdiction has to do with geography and the legal authority under that particular geographical location. The Gambia’s judicial system does not have legal authority over someone living overseas, and any law that seeks to give Baa Tambadou legal authority over people living abroad is an unjust law. Now, if the come to Gambia budil len ndey fofu, then your draconian law applies! Clearly, Baa is exhibiting that he is an unjust person. As the Minister of Justice, Baa should be seeking justice for all, not try to mete injustice by drafting draconian laws! We were promised reforms, and now we are getting reinforcements of the same dictatorial laws that almost sank the country. Like Fafa Mbye did for Goloh, Baa too is ready to show Adu the way! Well done Baa! Congratulation!

 But before I go you, let me leave you with this quote from President Obama. “As president of our country, and commander-in-chief of our military, I accept that people are going to call me awful things every day, and I will always defend their right to do so.” I guess justice will not guide Baa’s actions!

 PS: The Gambia Bar Association needs to start challenging these types of laws in the courts and not stand by and watch like they did during Goloh! It’s not all about practicing law and making money.  

Written by Momodou Ndow

How Saikouba Jarju and SEVEN others dug their UDP grave

0

By Momodou Justice Darboe

Eight UDP members who are currently serving as members of the national assembly have been expelled by the party in a move political analysts say has always been coming.

Billay Tunkara, Saikouba Jarju, Fatoumatta Jawara, Saikou Marong, Baba Galleh Jallow, Omar Darboe, Abdoulie Ceesay and Alagie Jawara were axed as members of UDP on Thursday for allegedly conducting themselves in a way that was not in conformity with party principles.

According to sources, the expulsion of the eight legislators from the party was the outcome of broad party consultations.

“They have been expelled from the party because they were behaving in a way which is not in conformity with party rules and regulations,’’ Mr Almamy Taal, spokesman of the UDP told The Fatu Network while confirming the reports.

According to the UDP chief propagandist, the expelled legislators were apathetic to the party and their lukewarm attitude towards it was the reason why the UDP sent them packing.

“UDP is a membership party and whenever the party organized meetings and consultations, they[expelled NAMs] were not participating. The party decided to expel them because we were informed about their performance by their constituents,” Taal said.

Asked as to whether the party’s decision to sack the eight members of the legislature is not harsh and may affect its support base, Mr. Taal said: “ We are playing along the spirit of the party. UDP is a united party. We have instances where people have been expelled from the party. Ounda Nyang, former UDP Kanifing municipality, has been removed and replaced. We will continue to consolidate.’’

Sabally inspires graduating students but also issues general peace plea to Gambian youths

0

Former Presidential Affairs Minister and International Speaker, Momodou Sabally, has advised young people to take their education seriously and build up themselves to become productive citizens in a prosperous society thriving in peace and harmony.

Sabally made these remarks Tuesday November 12, while addressing graduating students at ABC Schools in Jeshwang.

He harped on the importance of education, advising the graduates “Do not ever be complacent with your attainments on this path of education. There is always something important to learn and there will always exist the need to improve and update your stock of knowledge in this Information Age. The key to sustainable progress for individuals as well as nations is continuous education; lifelong learning is a must for those who wish to go beyond the shallow waters of mediocrity and subsistence levels of existence into the banks of abundance and prosperity.”

Sabally further emphasised the need for young people to be patient in their pursuit of success and to avoid dangerous paths like the hazardous illegal migration phenomenon called the backway.

“My advice to you is to shun the bait of instant gratification and to get ready to give it your all and to make the necessary sacrifices so that you can enjoy the juicy fruits of delayed gratification. This is the path that was taken by all the great achievers of the world: This is the path taken by Sir Winston Churchill, the late Sir Dawda Jawara, Steve Jobs of Apple, Bill Gates of Microsoft; and Gina Bass, our new sprint heroine!” he said.

In his concluding remarks, he implored the students, and youths in general, to live the spirit of patriotism, unity, and allegiance to our common good, as inscribed in our national anthem.

“I have always averred that the peace and stability of this country can only be maintained if you the youths of this country decide to choose peace and harmony over division and anarchy. We may have our petty disagreements and suffer some annoyances but nothing is worth the destruction of our long-cherished peace and stability in this gem called the smiling coast of Africa!” Sabally asserted.

Marong asks Barrow to visit country’s troops …and he also believes Gambians CAN protect the president

0

By Lamin Njie

A top defense analyst is calling on President Adama Barrow to expedite the security sector reform in order for Gambians to regain control of national security.

President Barrow in June this year launched a national security roadmap as part of an ambitious reform programme but analysts say the process has been slow. A political impasse in 2016 resulted in Ecowas nations agreeing to send troops to The Gambia to ensure then-president-elect Adama Barrow is enthroned. Some of the foreign security personnel were later tapped to serve as the president’s bodyguards.

Sariang Marong who served in the US navy for 19 years in which time he has gone on deployment three time to countries where US has interest in, believes the reform process should be broadened to include Gambians protecting the president.

He told The Fatu Network in an exclusive interview: “At this point, there should be a parallel force on the presidential side; the bodyguards and physical security.

“For almost three years, I think that’s enough time to recruit and send someone in terms of VIP protection training, [and] anti-terrorism training.

“There’s four bodyguards I have seen him anytime he’s going who wear plain clothes. What I think is that the president, if he’s going with four or six foreign troops in total, I think 3-3 [three foreigners and three Gambians].

“That way they can start the transition process. I think we have capable Gambians, men and women who will swear and this will require a very robust vetting process.

“To be fair, ECOMIG did a very good job but initially when I saw the men who were guarding him, these were very young men that were guarding him.”

Gambia Armed Forces was one of the country’s security institutions that was pushed to the fringes in the aftermath of Jammeh’s political demise but Mr Marong argues it was high time President Barrow visited the country’s troops.

He said: “It’s a relationship building, it’s assurance that, ‘I care about you’. I watched one of the interviews where the president said, ‘I have someone who briefs me every time.’ You are the commander-in-chief. You got someone working for you but you’re the commander-in-chief and you got to get out there, get in front of the troops and talk to them.”

Reset password

Enter your email address and we will send you a link to change your password.

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

Sign up with email

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

By clicking the «SIGN UP» button you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Powered by Estatik