Monday, May 5, 2025
Home Blog Page 450

REALLY DOCTOR BABA GALLEH JALLOW?

0

“The Commission calls witnesses it considers useful to its investigations, and not necessarily witnesses who want to testify. If we feel the persons you mentioned ( Samsudeen Sarr & Captain Ebou Jallow) will be useful witnesses they will be called. Otherwise they will not be called. We are not obliged to call any witness unless we are convinced they add value to our investigation”. Really, Doctor Baba Galleh Jallow?

I was forwarded the above epistle, a response by Dr. Baba Galleh Jallow of the Gambia’s Truth, Reconciliation & Reparation Commission (TRRC) from a question asked by curious journalist(s) on why Samsudeen Sarr (my humble self and a witness to the 1994 military takeover) and Captain Ebou Jallow ( former AFPRC Spokesman) were never invited to testify.

I am yet to confirm the veracity and origin of the script; but I can still definitively say that when the TRRC just started with a premeditated choreograph of delineating my image as a recovering lunatic, thanks to psychoanalyst “Doctor” Essa Faal, a close friend of mine in the corridors of power informed me about how Dr. Baba Galleh Jallow reacted similarly after he had suggested to him the need to invite me to testify or defend myself. I was at the time in the country minding my own business but of course shocked by the rubbish disseminated against me during their opening sessions. According to my friend Dr. Jallow had trivialized my importance to their investigation of the truth aimed at reconciling the Gambian community while they encouraged and tolerated a host of witnesses to spew derogatory statements about my character. The least they could have done was to invite me to explain my side of that prison event.

For that reason I couldn’t but still regard everything as a conspiracy to assassinate my character by portraying me as someone deranged from a bad experience at Mile Two Central Prison, exacerbated by their intransigence to ever allow me on their perverted platform to invalidate the fallacy. Allowing me that opportunity would have certainly proven my faculties far stabler than Essa Faal had enthusiastically depicted before my traumatized family members and the whole world for that matter.

On the same tenor, if I had remained mute as they probably had expected, I am sure Dr. Baba Galleh Jallow would  have gleefully told the journalist (s) that Samsudeen Sarr cannot be invited because of his poor mental health.

That was their game plan which I punctiliously negated in series of publications online and on Gambian local newspapers. What I did at Mile Two Central Prison after the terrifying night of September 6, 1994 was a very funny but necessary joke I performed and throughout laughed over the drama that indeed saved our lives. Captain Alagie Kanteh, former spokesman of the AFPRC military junta upon his arrest and detention in August 1994 had hinted us about the persistent demand for approval by then defense minister Edward Singhateh to have all “security detainees” executed by firing squad. That Singhateh had gotten the villainous idea from the then head of state of Sierra Leone, Captain Valentine Strasser who had happened to be his idol and whom he had officially visited soon after the takeover.

That was before anyone was killed in the 1994 takeover; the November 11 counter coup, the death of Sadibou Hydara and the killing of Koro Ceesay had not happened yet. But when Edward appeared that night extremely intoxicated and acting recklessly with a fully loaded Ak-47 rifle, the warning by Mr. Kanteh became ever more real to me and I concluded that something radical must be done to avoid its repetition. None of the AFPRC members, Sana Sabally, Sadibou Hydra and Yankuba Touray that night exhibited  any notable grudges or deadly instincts other than Edward Singhateh.

In fact according to Spokesman Kanteh, Chairman Jammeh had to threaten Edward Singhateh with arrest and detention to finally stop him from pursuing the Strasser-recommended-mass execution. Thank you Mr. President for saving our lives. Notwithstanding, I still believe that Edward came that night of September 6, to fulfill his fiendish objective by playing with his loaded weapon to cause an “accident” that would have justified the need to shoot all of us.

In hindsight, I could imagine all of us being slaughtered that night and twenty-two years later lead counsel Essa Faal meets Edward in Nigeria where he practices law, assures him to just appear at the TRRC but to avoid acting like Yankuba Touray, coaches him on how to deny every allegation against him, then after a well rehearsed argument, the commission apologizes for being unnecessarily difficult on the former defense minister and finally allows him go home scot free. Then the whole crime of killing the security detainees and  Ousman Koro Ceesay rests squarely on the shoulders of poor Yankuba Touray, prolonging his incarcerate and dragging his trial indefinitely. I doubt as whether Captain Kanteh would have been allowed to testify had he candidly included such narrative in his story. Every officer detained at Mile Two Central Prisons was aware of that friction between Singhateh and Jammeh, innumerably recounted by Kanteh over the defense minister’s adamance to have us all executed, a subject totally dodged at the TRRC.

In the case of Captain Ebou Jallow, it is apparent that Dr. Baba Galleh was not at all honest to the fact-finding journalist(s); otherwise he would have explained why Captain Ebou Jallow was never invited. The captain was indeed asked to submit his preliminary statement in order to be scheduled on a date and time for his testimony which he did in October 2019. Yet they failed to invite him until he ran out of patience and published the entire statement online in April 2020.

They would’t call Captain Jallow because as a primary witness he candidly disclosed how former finance minister and his best friend the late Koro Ceesay was cold-bloodedly murdered by Edward Singhated his brother Peter Singhateh and Alagie Kanyi to the consternation of Yankuba Touray rather than his active participation in the plan or execution. The statement was an unwelcome story that failed the benchmark of the TRRC “definition of the truth” which according to Dr. Baba Galleh Jallow, couldn’t add any value to their investigation.

Just like Captain Jallow’s, I believe my preliminary writeup would have disqualified me. For I would not only have unbiasedly explained every incident according to my experience but would have denounced them for conspiring with some unconscionable officers to castigate my personality. They could have at least consulted the then army medical doctor Malick Njie incarcerated along with us for a more academic evidence whom I am sure would have truthfully  told them that “Samsudeen Sarr just pulled off a successful joke on everybody and later on explained to most of us how and why he did it”. It was amazing not to hear any of my colleagues familiar with the incident conscientiously debunking everything during or after the ugly depositions.

However, I want Dr. Baba Galleh Jallow to understand this: that nearly 99.9% of Gambians  including former Sir Dawda Jawara’s staunchest supporters that I later questioned about the government of former President Yaya Jammeh confessed their initial unadulterated endorsement of the military takeover and the AFPRC/APRC regime until……………And more often than not reasons for their change of heart had everything to do with their misfit in the system, betrayal of their selfish aspiration, that of their family members or associates while the vast majority had to join the bandwagon of antagonists after the APRC government was about to fall in 2016. This last group in particular was more visible among Jammeh’s ambassadors, ministers, military officers and top civil servants.

We were in fact warned as security detainees in 1994 that Essa Faal, a young and very vibrant lawyer at the justice ministry, committed to the aspirations of the junta was assigned to prosecute us for treason. Yes he was indeed fraternizing with the system and was also reported to have been very active in the “Algalie Commission” before being appointed in 2002 or around that time by President Jammeh as a Gambian diplomat at the UN in New York City.

In defense of the AFPRC government in August 1994 against the PDOIS rejection of ministerial positions offered to their leadership, pious Doctor Baba Galleh Jallow had nothing to say but to condemn the “socialist party” for even defiantly publishing their Foroyaa newspaper against the declaration of Decree 4 forbidding all national newspaper reporting, calling their action “too provocative in a country crying out for sanity”. In that same article, while our lives as security detainees were hanging on a frail thread at death-row he added these eerie remarks: ……those held  in custody must at all times consider the survival of our innocent population above their own survival. This may sound harsh considering the pain and anger of being detained, but if we are to ensure the survival of our nation, we must be prepared to endure frustrations. If keeping the peace means modifying our ideals and convictions we must do it. We must always remember that reconstructing a broken state is almost as difficult as reconstructing a broken egg.

What in god’s name was this guy smoking? No wonder Singhateh was convinced at the time that there were corrupt lawyers willing to defend such state atrocity and also nefarious journalists insulated to justify it.

There were thousands of such intellectual whores who were there for only their personal gains until some of them realized that their sycophancy was not paying off and they turned rebellious or counter-revolutionary.

Two decades ago is like yesterday and the evidence is still abundantly available in digital and analogous records. We could trace the activities of every player pretending to be holier than thou today.

But come to think about, where is the moral principle in somebody who vehemently expressed his opposition to coup d’tats, deeming it illegal but still wholeheartedly supported and worked for a government established by that very “outlawed” action? Where would one classify the character of the 99.9% Gambians in that demographic chart after their endorsement of the “illegal” power seizure?

It more or less translates to, for lack of better analogy, a self-proclaimed saint being supportive to a “crime” until the “criminal” targets his ungodliness domain and he starts crying foul and demanding necessary policing. That in my book is a devilish mindset.

I could already hear the novel misfits and losers laying plans to persecute and prosecute the  NPP leaders after 2021 through a “Janneh Commission” that would quiz President Barrow’s ministers and senior public officials to account for their dubiously acquired wealths especially on where they had the funds to construct mansions in Dakar Senegal within three years. Another Ugandan Constitution for plagiarism by a new Constitutional Review Commission is in waiting  and definitely an Essa Faal will be bracing up to grill Adama Barrow over why Senegalese forces illegally occupied the Gambia and ruthlessly butchered an unarmed father called Harona Jatta in Kaninlai, why his police forces murdered peaceful demonstrators at Farababanta and how they could torture, arrest and illegally detained  the 3 years jotna activists exercising their political rights.

How our doctors, lawyers and the rest of the herd will fit in the next episode would depend on the efficacy of chameleon DNAs.

Samsudeen Sarr

New York City

Motorists get their share of coronavirus relief as government reduces fuel price

0

The ministry of finance has announced the reduction of the price of fuel amid loud calls by motorists for the price of fuel to be reduced.

The ministry said in a statement on Thursday: “The Public is hereby informed that the Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs, in line with The Gambia government’s policy of mitigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on lives and livelihood, has made the biggest ever reduction of the domestic retail prices of fuel in The Gambia.

“Effective 30th April 2020, the retail prices of fuel throughout The Gambia is as follows: petrol – D40 per liter from 49.36 per liter ( a reduction of D9.36); diesel – D43 per liter from D50.04 per liter ( a reduction of D7.04); [and] kerosene – D30 per liter from D41.35 per liter ( a reduction of D11.35)

“The goodwill gesture is aimed at ameliorating the cost of fuel on transport operators in light of the presidential directive to limit the passenger capacity of commercial vehicles. Since February 2020, the government has made a cumulative reduction of D12.62 (25%), D11.94 (23%), and D19.23 (44%) on the price of petrol, diesel, and kerosene, respectively.

“Similarly, the Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs, in collaboration with the Ministry of Higher Education, Research, Science, and Technology, is pleased to announce a D29.1 Million Student Relief Package for Gambian students abroad. D12, 915, 880 has been allocated to benefit 836 non-government funded students while D16.2 million will go to the government-funded scholarship package.

“The relief package is designed to support the feeding and sustenance of both government-funded and non-government funded Gambian students around the world. The Ministry of Higher Education, Research, Science, and Technology will administer the package on behalf of the government.”

Hunt for soldier who came desperately close to being arrested by drug agency officers continues

0

Officers of the Drug Law Enforcement Agency are on the tail of a soldier who allegedly opened fire moments before a bucket he was travelling with was searched for drugs.

A yet-to-be-identified soldier dramatically opened fire in the air on Tuesday at Kalagi Police Station as drug officers attempted to search his bag and a bucket he was travelling with.

DLEAG through its spokesman Ousman SaidyBah said in a statement: “On Tuesday 28 April 2020 around 20:00 HRS GMT onwards, operatives of DLEAG and GPF stopped a commercial vehicle (BJL 1890 S) for routine check at the Kalagi check point. During the process, they discovered a container (paint like bucket) in the said vehicle. The officer enquired about the owner of the said container and declared their intention to search it. A male subject who identified himself as a soldier claimed to be the owner of the container but refused that it will not be searched.

“With support from colleague police officers on duty, he was taken together with the said suspected container to the charge office. Upon arrival at the charge office, the said individual took out a pistol, fired a shot up in the air to pave a way for his escape. Later, a search was conducted but he could not be traced.

“The suspected container was searched and three (3) big bundles of suspected cannabis was found in it. Similarly, officers found one (1) big bundle of suspected cannabis in his green traveling bag.

“The driver also revealed that the said individual identified himself to him as a military officer when he boarded the vehicle in Brikama heading to the province.

“Investigators are probing into the matter and will work with the military command to establish the facts surrounding this matter.”

Vice President tells GRTS ‘they are taking it out of context’ after labourer job debacle

0

By Lamin Njie

Vice President Dr Isatou Touray has said she is being taken out of context following her ‘bitter experience’ comments.

Dr Touray last Saturday complained after no Gambian youth took part in offloading foodstuff bought by the government. She said Gambian youth would always complain about lack of jobs when this is a ‘great job’, referring to manual work. Her comments were quickly met with anger and a tide of criticism, as a section of the public called for her to apologise.

The vice president offered no apology in an interview with GRTS; instead she said her comments were taken out of context.

Dr Touray said: “We want to thank also the security forces. They have been very very useful in this process because you can see the observation I made the last time with regards to the lack of labour and how people are taking it out of context.

“You will find that they are taking it out of context [but] as a government it is our duty to focus, it is our duty to work and to give and to respond to the circumstances as they are because this is an emergency.”

Equality or exceptionalism: embedding preferential treatment in the Draft Constitution

As we continue to interrogate the proposed Draft Constitution (the Draft) in the tradition of public conversation, issues central to equality and the fundamental precept of the separation of powers are being partially considered in this instalment.

Although not a part of the justiciable constitutional text, the preamble would ordinarily constitute a true reflection of the letter and spirit of the document. In the extravagant claim of the incongruent first and second paragraphs of the Draft preamble, the people of Gambia “… having had the opportunity to express our views and aspirations on how we wish to be governed, affirm that this Constitution is the embodiment of our will and resolve for democracy … separation of powers … equitable distribution and use of resources, the rule of law, equality and observance of the principles of fundamental human rights and freedoms”.

In light of the above, I propose to examine separation, equality, and equitability.

The concept, now a firmly established constitutional principle across the democratic world is rooted in the simple if sublime proposition that governmental powers must be located within the legislative, executive, and judicial domains of a polity in a manner that keeps them “separate from, and independent of, each other as the nature of a free government will admit; or as is consistent with that chain of connection that binds the whole fabric of the constitution in one indissoluble bond of unity and amity” (Federalist 47)

That separation also entails the branches acting as checks on each other.

On the physical layout of the Draft, separation is arguably adhered to.

But the spirit and actuality of separation are smothered by an ‘animal farm’ tendency that accords differential treatment to the doctrine among the branches of government.
For example, in the Draft, the President is removed via an elaborate impeachment mechanism involving the National Assembly (NA) and the Judiciary. The role of the Judiciary may be regarded as a safeguard against legislative vandalism but considering that an impeachment process is exclusively a public function, it is improper to allocate decision making functions to participants outside the three branches government.

In that regard the delineated process may be faulty but at least all three branches are involved.

If the process of presidential removal in the Draft is given a qualified pass, how should a Superior Court Judge (a Judge) be removed from the bench given the democratic principle of separating power and its concomitant philosophy of checks and balances?

In the Draft, the removal of a Judge is a wholly internal process. What role is accorded the President is merely ceremonial, as in merely suspending or dismissing a Judge after a decision was reached by the Judiciary’s internal and largely collegial deliberations.

By section 194 (1) of the Draft, “a Judge may be removed for – (a) inability to perform the functions of his or her office arising from infirmity of body or mind; (b) gross misconduct or misbehaviour; (c) serious breach of a code of conduct applicable to judges; or (d) bankruptcy or entering into an arrangement with creditors”.

The removal process is triggered by either the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) on its own motion, or a petition to it by a member of the public. If the JSC is persuaded it petitions the President for the removal of the Judge who then issues a suspension within seven days.

Inside fourteen days of suspension, the President, acting on the advice of the JSC, “… shall – (a) in the case of the Chief Justice, appoint a tribunal comprising – (i) a judge of a Supreme Court or its equivalent in a country with a common law tradition and jurisdiction, as chairperson; (ii) two other superior court judges from separate countries with a common law tradition and jurisdiction; (iii) a legal practitioner of not less than twenty years’ experience with high moral character and proven integrity; and (iv) one person, not being a legal practitioner, with not less than twenty years’ experience in public service affairs and of high moral character and proven integrity.

On the other hand, if the target of removal is “… a judge of the Supreme Court, other than the Chief Justice, appoint a tribunal comprising – (i) the President of the Court of Appeal, as chairperson; (ii) two other persons who hold or have held office as superior court judges; (iii) one legal practitioner of not less than fifteen years’ experience with high moral character and proven integrity; and (iv) one person, not being a legal practitioner, with not less than twenty years’ experience in public service affairs and of high moral character and proven integrity”.

In all other cases “… appoint a tribunal comprising – (i) a judge of the Supreme Court, as chairperson; (ii) two other persons who hold or have held office as superior court judges; (iii) one legal practitioner of not less than fifteen years’ experience with high moral character and proven integrity; and (iv) one person, not being a legal practitioner, with not less than fifteen years’ experience in public service affairs and of high moral character and proven integrity”.

As delineated in the Draft, removing a Judge raises troubling concerns, not least because it must be held in camera.

In CAMERA!

The process turns the separation principle on its head. As a sovereign country, Gambia must not look outwards for direct players in removing its Chief Justice.

Why must Judges decide the fate of other judges in a process that excludes any participation by the NA? In Kenya at lease a role is played by the Speaker of its National Assembly as Chair of the Tribunal constituted to investigate allegations against a Judge.

Even this is unsatisfactory given the separation principle and its handmaiden of checks and balances.

The Judiciary must subject itself to peer-scrutiny involving the NA in removing a Judge. It is a more transparent process and concentrates the mind of a Judge who may be more inclined to prolong matters given the nicer environment of close door removal hearings.
Far more troubling than the internal adjudication of a Judge’s fitness for office is the issue of retirement benefits as stipulated in the Draft.

According to 195 (1), “a judge of a superior court shall, on retiring, be entitled to any gratuity payable to him or her and shall, in addition, be paid a pension equal to the salary from which he or she retired, if on the date of retirement he or she has served as a judge of the superior court for an aggregate period of not less than ten years”.

At 195 (2) of the Draft, “where a judge of a superior court retires with less than ten but more than five years’ service as a judge of the superior court, he or she shall, in addition to being entitled to any gratuity payable to him or her, be paid a pension equal to three-quarters of the salary from which he or she retired”.

In the event the above provisions are unmet, (195 (3) of the Draft states that “a judge of a superior court who has not satisfied any of the conditions prescribed in subsection (1) or (2) shall, on retiring, be paid such gratuity and pension as may be approved by the Judicial Service Commission”

“Aggregate period”!

In effect, a Judge can work a few years, go international, utilised the revolving door to return with a view to accumulating the requisite period for a gold-plated pension package nicely carved in the Draft for a Judge by a CRC headed by a Justice of the Supreme Court. It is akin to what is called the military industrial complex in US political parlance.

Is this not the very definition of conflict of interest?

If earlier assertions of conflict regarding the appointment of a serving Judge as Chair appear esoteric and remote, is this unjustified “aggregate” policy written into the Draft not a crystal clear provision that will directly benefit a member of the CRC?

As if the CRC was afraid of retired Judges begging at Tippa Garage or the Traffic Light on Kairaba Avenue, 195 (5) of the Draft stipulates that “a pension paid to a judge of a superior court in accordance with this section shall be subject to increases as the salary of a serving judge of the superior court of the equivalent level”.

What the separation principle envisages is the operational independence of judicial officers and hence the protection of tenure in its fullest sense.

If this kind of pension is available to a Judge, how about a National Assembly Member and all other public servants who served decades and contributed immensely to the economic development of The Gambia.

What country pays a segment of the public workforce gold plated pensions whilst a vast segment of pensioners in the same public sector is mired in penury.

And don’t tell me about challenging the obvious discrimination in Court as the Draft state that its “validity or legality … is not subject to challenge by or before any court or other organ of the State” (see 7(3) of Draft).

The pension issue belong in separate legislation and not a national Constitution.

We urge the Judiciary to work collaboratively on a fairer pension scheme for everyone.
What is presented in the Draft for Judges is not “equitable distribution and use of resources”

Why amend if the Draft ought to be rejected for outraging the conscience of a conscionable people through blatant preferential treatment arguably informed by conflict of interest.

An equal not preferential and exceptional Gambia!

Lamin J. Darbo

What is the rationale for this massive so-called Deployments?

0

A close study of the nature of the movements within the civil and public services clearly indicates that this is not a decision meant to promote and protect national interest. Rather this is yet again another misdirection and misstep by Pres. Adama Barrow to weaken the Government machinery thereby injure national interest for his own personal political objectives. All Gambians and especially our political parties must come out to demand that these deployments be stopped and reversed forthwith.

Look at the case of Muhammed Manjang at Social Security. When the man came to that institution he was able to raise profits, reduce waste, increase pensioners’ benefits and transforming the institution for the better. Why would anyone therefore move Manjang only to take him outside of the entire civil and public services to a tiny marginal commission over there? What is the rationale and value of this deployment?

If the reports out there are anything to go by Abdoulie Tambedou was also said to be doing a good job at GPPA. Why then take him out of that place to Social Security where there was another man already doing a good job there? Why? By taking Manjang to the Senegalo-Gambia Secretariat means this Government is throwing the man out of the orbit of the entire socio-economic development of this country. At Social Security, Manjang was in the heart of the social and economic development process of this country as he was protecting workers’ money and giving them back better pension. Therefore, what Barrow did is to deny and injure Gambian workers who have been working like donkeys all their lives!

The Government Spokesman said these deployments were intended to bring about efficiency in the civil and public services. Is he telling us then that both Manjang or Tambedou were inefficient in their former institutions? If that is the case, then the best decision was to sack them and not to take them to another institution with their inefficiency. Or is it that Tambedou is expected to do better at SSHFC and Manjang will also do better at Senegalo-Gambia Secretariat? Mr. Ebrima Sankareh please answer these direct questions!

One can also look at the Ministry of Trade whose Permanent Secretary Lamin Dampha knows nowhere other than that ministry. From the lowest level he rose through the ranks to become the PS over the past 20 years. He is reported to be effective and efficient. He has the institutional memory and is indeed a human library on trade, employment and industry in this country. Was he inefficient? Was he ineffective? Was he underperforming or corrupt such that one would move him? Ebrima Sankareh tell us!

Similarly, Salimatou Touray need not become any Deputy SG since she is also a veteran in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Such people should be left in their positions so that their institutions continue to benefit from their experience, expertise and wisdom, while they become mentors for young professionals. If indeed they were inefficient then there is another solution to that than moving them to another institution.

Therefore, this decision by the Government is baseless and a direct threat to the building of efficient and effective state institutions. While Pres. Barrow has the authority to make some of these appointments but let him know that such decisions should be well informed and geared towards serving national interest only. He cannot just use his own whims and caprices to take decisions that weaken the State as a whole.

At this time, it is necessary that all political parties and CSOs rise up to take a definitive stand against this bad decision. Our political parties and civil society must not sit by watching the President make terrible decisions that will injure the stability, continuity and performance of the State. A weak State is a direct threat to our human rights and human development. For 50 years this country could not prosper simply because of such interferences with the State machinery. It has to stop.

It was this kind of disingenuous, baseless and politically motivated interferences with the civil and public services by Yaya Jammeh that he succeeded in weakening and corrupting the entire governance and development system of this country. The price was too costly. If you don’t know look at the Janneh Commission Report.

Therefore, Gambians must not sit by to have yet another President to just get up at anytime to interfere with the civil and public services indiscriminately. That’s instability and an unstable and weak government is a recipe for continued poverty, stinking corruption and perpetual underdevelopment. Any country that does not have an efficient, effective, highly competent and well performing civil and public services cannot serve its people well. Unfortunately, this is the direction that Pres. Adama Barrow has taken with our civil and public services. Stop him.

What we expect Pres. Barrow to do is to create and maintain a highly professional, merit-based, transparent, accountable and responsive civil and public services in order to better serve Gambians. Anything less must not be accepted by Gambians. Stand up against this decision.

For The Gambia Our Homeland

…………………………………………….

Madi Jobarteh

Skype: madi.jobarteh

Twitter: @jobartehmadi

LinkedIn: Madi Jobarteh

Phone: +220 9995093

 

‘Executive advisory’ causes government to make major changes which affect 12 top officials

0

The Gambia government said on Wednesday it has acted on ‘executive advisory’ by effecting major changes within the civil service.

A statement signed by government spokesperson Ebrima Sankareh said: “Consistent with its philosophy of fostering growth and promoting rapid and efficient delivery of resources within all sectors of governance, The Gambia Government acting on Executive advisory, has effected major changes within the Civil Service.

“This involves the appointment of a Deputy Secretary General, the redeployment of nine (9) Permanent Secretaries and the reassignment of four (4) Directors, two of whom are redeployed to the Foreign Service.

“Accordingly, Mrs. Salimatta E.T. Touray, Permanent Secretary at The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has been elevated to the position of Deputy Secretary General, Office of The President. A career diplomat, with extensive diplomatic experience spanning two decades, Mrs. Touray began her Foreign Service career as Cadet Administrative Officer in 1993 and rose through the ranks, becoming Acting Deputy Head of Mission & Chancery at the Gambian Embassy in Brussels. She would later return to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as Deputy Permanent Secretary, before being appointed Permanent Secretary.

“Between 2010 and 2012, Mrs. Touray worked for the UNDP Gambia Country Office as National Project Coordinator for The Gambia Priority Employment Project (Gamjobs). A former translator and schoolteacher, Salimatta Touray attended Saint Joseph’s and Saint Augustine’s High Schools and holds, B.A. and Master’s degrees in French with specialties in Languages and Literature from the Université de Franche Comté, Besançon, France

The rest of the redeployments are: Mr. Lamin Dampha, Permanent Secretary at The Trade & Employment Ministry moves to the Ministry of Health as PS No. 2.

“Momodou Mbye Jabang, Permanent Secretary Ministry of Agriculture, moves to the Office of The President.

“Assan Jallow, Permanent Secretary at Youth & Sports moves to The Trade and Employment Ministry.

“Ebrima Sisawo, Permanent Secretary Ministry of Basic & Secondary Education moves to the Agriculture Ministry.

“Saikou Sanyang, Permanent Secretary at Environment & Forestry moves to the Youth & Sports Ministry.

“Muntaga Sallah, Permanent Secretary Office of The President moves to the Environment Ministry.

“Louis Moses Mendy, Deputy Permanent Secretary at the Interior Ministry, has been elevated to Permanent Secretary Ministry of Basic and Secondary Education.

“Saffie Sankareh, Permanent Secretary at Health, moves to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as PS.

“In a related development, Mr. Alhagi Nyangado, Director General of Strategic Policy & Delivery at the President’s Office is designated as Gambia’s new Ambassador to Russia.

“Muhammed Manjang, Director General of the Social Security & Housing Finance Corporation (SSHFC) moves to the Senegalo-Gambian Permanent Secretariat as its Executive Secretary.

“Meanwhile, Mr Saloum Malang, a long-serving Deputy Director General of The Gambia International Aviation has been elevated to the position of Director General of The Gambia Public Procurement Authority (GPPA).

“He replaces Mr Abdoulie Tambadou who is the new Managing Director of SSHFC.

“With these redeployments and new assignments, Government envisages a more productive and efficient Civil Service administration which is the bedrock of our development aspirations anchored in the National Development Plan.

“The Gambia Government therefore, urges all public and civil servants to support this initiative for the achievement of our development aspirations.”

Senegalese tests positive for coronavirus as Gambia cases of deadly disease rise to 11

0

By Lamin Njie

The ministry of health said on Wednesday a Senegalese national has tested positive for coronavirus bringing the country’s number of coronavirus cases to 11.

“The newly confirmed case who is a Senegalese national was in quarantine on account of recent travel history to Senegal,” the health ministry’s Dr Abdoulie Bittaye told reporters in Banjul.

It comes five days after health minister Dr Ahmadou Lamin Samateh warned Gambians against complacency amid news the country has one active COVID-19 case. It has now risen to two.

‘Over 170’ American citizens and LPRs depart Gambia as US remains steeped in efforts aimed at bringing citizens back home

0

Over 170 American citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents have left The Gambia for the United States, the US Embassy Banjul has revealed.

“The Department of State has no higher priority than the protection of U.S. citizens overseas! This afternoon, U.S. Embassy Banjul successfully evacuated over 170 American citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents back to the United States,” the embassy said on its official Facebook page Wednesday afternoon.

It is the second time US citizens in the country are being helped to return back to US.

Wednesday’s move means the US Department of State has now repatriated nearly 400 from The Gambia.

TRRC in report brands Jammeh a ‘dictator’ then concludes ex-leader used his greed and ambition to wicked ends

0

Former President Yahya Jammeh used his greed and ambition to wicked ends, the TRRC has said in a report.

In the report released on Wednesday, the investigation used testimonies it received to back its claim.

The report titled ‘TRRC Interim Report 2018-2019’ said: “The gross violations and abuses of human rights during the dictatorship and authoritarian rule of the former President Yahya Jammeh ( July 1994 to January 2017) shocked the conscience of Gambians in particular and humanity at large. The violations and abuses committed were massive, horrifying and varied.

“They ranged, inter alia, from torture, unlawful killings, gender-based violence, including rape, enforced disappearances, arbitrary arrests and detention to blatant denial of fundamental freedoms enshrined in the Laws of The Gambia and in international law and international humanitarian law. The violations and abuses constituted the gravest crimes which the TRRC is mandated to create an impartial record of during the period under review.

“The revelations by both victims and perpetrators of these crimes before the Commission shocked and even traumatized Gambians as they never imagined such atrocities could be committed in their country and culture whose people are known for their gentility and tolerance. It is hard not to conclude from the testimonies so far heard from witnesses that the dictator and authoritarian ruler during twenty-two years instilled in the people tremendous fear and insecurity and used his greed and ambition to wicked ends.”

President Barrow declares Friday public holiday in Gambia

0

President Adama Barrow has declared Friday a public holiday in The Gambia in observance of International Workers’ Day.

State House said in a terse statement Wednesday: “”President Barrow is aware of the economic impact of COVID 19 on workers and has launched the Government Food Support response to COVID-19 amongst other measures.

“Workers are encouraged to stay home and continue to abide by the preventive health measures to stay safe against the Coronavirus. COVID-19 is real and together we can prevent its spread. “

‘They know themselves’: Musa Batchilly says Barrow’s officials bought houses in Dakar as he vows to produce evidence if the officials do not sell the houses and bring money back

0

By Lamin Njie

Musa Yali Batchilly has said some senior officials working in the Barrow government bought houses in Dakar, vowing to give evidence to journalists when the ‘right time comes’.

The Gambia Action Party secretary general stated this in an exclusive interview with The Fatu Network.

He said: “I have high regard for the youths of this country. Look at the vegetables they are eating, it is produced by our women. Are they empowering these women? They are not.

“And you go buy houses in Dakar [for] millions of dollars, millions of dalasis? The car they drive, when you sell it [it’s] 600[000] to one million dalasis.

“They cannot even buy proper chairs in the classroom. They know what I’m talking about. I’m urging Mr President… I’m not accusing, I have evidence and if they push me I will bring it on.

“I will give it to journalists when the right time comes. I’m telling them to sell the properties and bring the money back. I’m giving them time.

“I’m telling you whoever bought… They know themselves, those who bought houses in Dakar. We have evidence on the table and if they challenge me, we will bring it on. Sell those houses back and bring the money to the country. It doesn’t belong to you.”

Tijani leader urges perseverance as he reveals this year’s Ramadan comes under difficult circumstances

0

The head caliph of the Tijaniyya order at Bansang, Sheikh Alhaji Hassan Bubacar Zaidi Jallow has urged Muslims in The Gambia to remain firm, united and perseverant in this period of coronavirus pandemic which is posing challenges to communion for the faithful, especially in the current Ramadan.

A Ramadan message issued by the caliph who also happens to be the pre-eminent jurist in the country stated: “We thank the Almighty Allah for making us witness the commencement of the holy month of Ramadan. May Allah, Subhanahu Wa Ta’Ala, (The Most Glorified, The Most High), grant us the favour of completing it in good health and according to His wish. May Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta’Ala accept our fast and our devotions and dua (prayers), forgive us our sins and give us the chance again next year.

“This year Ramadan comes under difficult circumstances of the corona pandemic which is a grave threat to the health of our communities and a grave challenge to our religious practices and to our social system, with physical distancing. But our hearts remain together despite physical separation.

“We pray that Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta’Ala in this holy month protects us and ours and our communities from this scourge of corona. May Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta’Ala lift this scourge from our communities and the rest of the world and grant us the chance to be together in peace good health and in full devotion to Him. I counsel all persons to turn to Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta’Ala in this difficult situation with prayer for His divine intervention for He has power over all things.

“I counsel all to be patient and comply with measures taken or advised by government no matter how inconvenient for they are for the public benefit. I counsel lastly but equally important for each and everyone of us to take necessary measures of protection for ourselves, our families, our neighbours and all those with whom we come into contact so that together we can defeat this scourge. Aaameen yaa Rahman, yaa Raheem, yaa Rabbul Aalameen.”

Trade PS Dampha moved days after official led efforts for procurement of foodstuff by government

0

By Lamin Njie

The permanent secretary of the ministry of trade Lamin Dampha has been moved to the ministry of health.

Dampha’s transfer came less than a week after he alongside permanent secretaries at the ministries of finance and agriculture led efforts that saw government purchase rice, sugar and oil to be distributed to Gambians.

The official is believed to be a man who has a firm knowledge of the ministry of trade having worked there for over two decades. He officially became the ministry’s permanent secretary in September 2019.

The Fatu Network has gathered the government is engaged in a number of removals and redeployment of officials.

Another official that has been affected is Social Security chief Muhammed Manjang who has been removed and redeployed to foreign affairs.

Alhagie Nyangado the head of the Department of Strategic Policy and Delivery at the Office of the President is another official reportedly moved to a new role in faraway Russia.

The government is yet to make any official statement regarding the developments.

Muhammed Manjang who survived vast staff campaign is TOLD his time as social security boss is over

0

By Lamin Njie

Muhammed Manjang has been reportedly informed that he has been removed as managing director of Social Security and Housing Finance Corporation and redeployed.

Mr Manjang in 2018 faced stiff opposition to his leadership when staff at social security launched a vast campaign against his leadership. He was accused of abuse of office and corruption.

In August 2018, he was put on a three-month administrative leave after President Barrow set up a panel to investigate claims that were being made against him by his staff.

In November 2018, Mr Manjang bounced back; his suspension was lifted and was restored as Social Security boss. The leader of the staff at the corporation was sacked.

Now nearly one and a half years since the events, Manjang has been removed as the managing director of Social Security.

Manjang’s removal has not been made official yet and a source told The Fatu Network he was informed of his removal over the phone. A successor has also not been officially named.

It has also emerged he is redeployed to foreign affairs.

General Drammeh continues to scoop admiration as he is again spotted in traffic with just ONE vehicle

0

By Lamin Njie

Army chief General Yakuba Drammeh has again been spotted in traffic without the traditional escort afforded those that came before him.

General Drammeh became the head of the army last month following the sudden removal of Masanneh Kinteh.

Mr Kinteh’s time as army chief was dotted by blaring sirens and road sweeping, with the car carrying him usually escorted by two vehicles filled with heavily armed soldiers.

It has now emerged his successor has scrapped the act in a sharp departure.

Saidina Alieu Jarjo sharing a photo of the new army chief in traffic dubbed him as the ‘people’s CDS [chief of defence staff]’.

Army sends troops to McCarthy Square to load back COVID-19 foodstuff ahead of distribution exercise

0

By Lamin Njie

The army has sent troops to McCarthy Square to help load back thousands of bags of rice and sugar, two days after the launching of the government’s food relief program.

President Adama Barrow on Sunday launched a grand food aid package which will see at least 230,000 families get rice, sugar and oil.

On Saturday however, the vice president complained that labour was a challenge as non-Gambian labourers struggled to pack McCarthy Square with procured rice and sugar. The Dr Isatou Touray regretted the fact that no Gambian youth was part of the labourers.

The army has now swept in to help in the loading and distribution of the foodstuff to Gambians.

Army spokesman Major Lamin Sanyang confirmed that soldiers have indeed been sent to the square to load back the foodstuff. The military will also help in the distribution of the foodstuff, he added.

Genesis of Gambia’s current predicaments

By Abdullah Samateh

The coming to power of Mr. Adama Barrow as president of The Gambia marked the end of the darkest chapter in our history and revived hopes that a bright future was in sight. It meant a return to the ideals and values we hold as a people, but which remained elusive during the 22-year reign of Yahya Jammeh. While on the campaign trail, the then coalition candidate promised commitment to the restoration of those ideals and attainment of the nation’s long-pursued aspirations. No one at the time cast the slightest doubt on his determination to deliver on his promises. After all, Mr. Barrow was widely perceived as a comrade in the fight against oppression who experienced firsthand our tragic plight under the dictatorship. In short, Barrow was the living embodiment of the future the people envisioned post-dictatorship.

However, the dramatic events that followed his rise to power, culminating in the growing discontent the country is witnessing today, is a testament that this was a misplaced trust and a serious misjudgment of the man the people entrusted with their future. Today, the president that was once hailed as the people’s hero during the heydays of the coalition government is now widely viewed as the villain-in-chief. He stands accused of plunging the country into a quagmire of chaos and uncertainty, as a result of his incompetence and lack of political sagacity.

Indeed, Barrow is central to any gains made or loses incurred under his watch. Yet neither the gains nor the losses wouldn’t come to pass without the actions or inactions of other stakeholders. Logically, accusing fingers will be pointed at him as the Commander-in-Chief while political turmoil sweeps the country. However, other stakeholders should not be left off scot-free without being held accountable. In fact, one could argue that the missteps made by the coalition members and other influential players in Gambia’s political landscape have inadvertently invited the current predicaments. Their actions allowed Barrow a convenient space to work quietly towards the realization of his hidden agenda. These include the coalition’s failure to abrogate the Jammeh-era constitution sooner by expediting the drafting of a new one, the coalition’s disunity and subsequent disintegration, and the rise of partisan journalism in the new dispensation.

It’s indisputable that the coalition succeeded a regime that had left behind a legacy of bad governance, dysfunctional institutions, and a staggering economy. Thus, it came in with onerous burdens on its shoulder. In well-functioning democracies, the succeeding administration assumes office to build on the successes of its predecessor and move the country forward. In the case of The Gambia, the coalition had to clean up the mess it inherited and begin de novo. Under such undesirable circumstances, priorities should be determined by the urgency of the moment. Given that the Jammeh era constitution — the document that decides our fates — is fraught with loopholes, draconian and self-serving clauses, the coalition should have prioritized the drafting of a new constitution that reflects the true aspirations of the people and ensures swift justice for the victims of the previous government.

Whether the failure to do so was a deliberate move on the part of the coalition is debatable, but what is crystal clear is that President Barrow had a vested interest in delaying a new constitution.

During his 2017 meet-the-peoples tour, Barrow sent a veiled warning that the laws of Jammeh dictatorship, including the Executive Order, were still in effect and he had them at his disposal. To show skeptics he meant business, he embarked on a firing spree of cabinet members – mainly his coalition partners – senior civil servants, and a sitting member of parliament whose loyalties, he believed, lied elsewhere.

He must have acted out of firm belief that the dictator’s constitution empowered him to rule as he wished. Since then, he has committed numerous, glaring legal blunders in his quest to assert his authority and cling on to power. His actions have often sparked firestorms of outrage and created deep divisions within the country. Regrettably, Mr. President cannot be denied taking ‘controversial measures’ that are in line with the provisions of that constitution, even whereas they provoke public indignation.

Thus, a new constitution would have curtailed Barrow’s controversial powers, delivered justice to the victims and deterred corrupt practices. It might have even stipulated the transitional term to be served by him. In other words, a new constitution would have spared the nation much of the noise triggered by the president’s actions. Interestingly, that unique moment to draft our dream constitution presented itself while the coalition was still a united front. In fact, it’s public knowledge that the coalition had among its ranks the finest legal minds and renowned human rights advocates, who could have produced the people’s constitution within a short span of time. Its failure to identify this as an urgent priority and our collective silence have contributed to the emergence of the status quo.

Equally, the rise of partisan journalism in the new dispensation — precisely in the build-up to the legislative and municipal elections – is in my view one of the underlying causes of the existing situation. This was the period when the political climate became sharply polarized over the best winning formula the coalition needed to adopt. It was apparent that the coalition members were on a collision course. The traditional role of the Fourth Estate is to represent the diverse voices of the people and hold the leadership to account. Strangely, this core value of media profession came into the peripheral vision of ‘some’ media practitioners during that critical period of our history. They chose to act as the mouthpiece and frontline fighters of their party leaderships or those they sympathize with amid the political tensions. So, the tensions heightened and division took root since then.

Similarly, ‘some’ civil society members, who are prominent members or sympathizers of certain political parties, were seen to be representing the interest of their parties and, as a result, lost listening ears among their opponents. Their fiery rhetoric and constant criticisms of other political leaders, while sparing their own arouse suspicions that these organizations were being used by ‘some’ to attain political ends.

Consequently, instead of promoting convergence of views and preventing the coalition from disintegrating at that critical moment, they partook in exacerbating political animosity amongst the rivals. In fact, the level of mistrust reached a point that propositions put forward by one political party, however genuine and practical, were perceived by others as a premeditated move to score some political points. The principle that ideas should be gauged on the basis of their merits and not who advanced them was flouted time and again. This is how partisan politics poked its ugly nose into the politics of our transition period at a surprisingly early stage. One would have expected that the unity of purpose and pursuit of the greater good that brought the coalition to power would reign supreme throughout the transition, not partisan politics that took over almost from the start. Worse still, the same pattern of politicking continues unabated.

Finally, President Barrow was, at his election, a novice leader, who was devoid of political knowledge. But to give credit where credit is due, he never tickled our ears, if anything he was very forthcoming about his slender governing background. He allayed our fears, however, by assuring us that the country was in safe hands thanks to his coalition partners, including erudite scholars and seasoned politicians who would help guide us to the Promised Land. In essence, President Barrow unequivocally informed The Gambians that the country would be collectively run by the coalition members despite him being the president. His utterances were received by his colleagues with a silence of consent, without expressing reservations or objections. Thus, it would only be fair for the successes and failures of the coalition to be attributed to all the constituting members. Now that things have started to fall apart, if Barrow is blamed for plunging the country into chaos, his estranged colleagues should equally be blamed for dereliction of duty. We must not be oblivious of their role in the difficulties we are experiencing today. Remember, after the rift had widened among the members in the wake of local elections, some of his partners distanced themselves from the coalition. They then shifted their energy toward fishing for and exposing every misstep made by him without offering alternatives. Others continued to defend his actions; achievements and blunders alike, saying they wouldn’t abandon one of their own at any cost.

As we can see, the coalition’s failure to mend fences and rise above their differences created a virtual power vacuum that allowed Barrow and his loyal underlings to work towards the realization of his hidden agenda. As political rivalry gained momentum, Barrow reached out to enablers of the former regime and a coterie of other opportunists that were ever willing to do what they do best: grooming a dictator and plundering our meager resources. Barrow could have been denied the time and space to do the damage he has already done if the coalition members remained united.

Yes, hold him accountable for the terrible situation we have found ourselves in, if you must. But do not spare his coalition partners and other key players. They are equally guilty.
In short, our current predicaments are the result of a collective failure. And the situation calls for a thoughtful reflection on our own attitudes and approaches, putting aside our emotions and biases to see where we went wrong as a nation. If we do, we can avoid the recurrence of such mistakes including future Jammehs and Barrows.

The writer, Abdullah Samateh, is a Gambian academic resident in The Sate of Kuwait.

‘It’s not true, it’s not true’: Trade ministry dismisses claims President Barrow gave instructions for rice contract to be given to his ‘friend’ Abubakary Jawara

0

By Lamin Njie

The ministry of trade has dismissed claims President Adama Barrow gave instructions for the over 700 million dalasis foodstuff contract to be given to Abubakary Jawara.

Abubakary Jawara is a powerful businessman who owns Gach group and is reportedly a close friend and financier of President Barrow.

He was present when President Barrow launched his government’s food relief package in Banjul on Sunday. Reports later abounded that it was Mr Jawara and his sister who were given the exclusive rights to deliver rice, sugar and oil to the government to be distributed to Gambians.

Trade ministry permanent secretary Lamin Dampha told The Fatu Network on Monday the reports were not true.

Mr Dampha said: “It’s not true, it’s not true. In fact the president is not in charge of the process. Then how can he exclusively give the contract to Fatoumatta Jawara and Abubakary Jawara.

“Abubakary Jawara, his business is Gach and Gach has not applied. Fatoumatta Jawara… Because she’s a small business player. It belongs to a women’s group and the women group has applied and they won.”

Barrow taps Colonel Ousman Gomez as new commander of army as Colonel Sait Njie gets the nod to become new head of State Guards battalion

0

By Lamin Njie

President Adama Barrow has appointed Colonel Ousman Gomez as the new commander of the Gambia National Army, replacing General Mamat Cham.

Gen Cham got elevated to the coveted position of deputy chief of defence staff last month following the removal of powerful military leader Masanneh Kinteh.

Colonel Gomez’ appointment comes alongside that of Colonels Turo Jawneh and Sait Njie. Jawneh is the new head of the Republican National Guards while Njie is the new commander of State Guards Battalion.

Colonel Gomez was the head of the military police. The trained lawyer also held the role of legal adviser in the army.

Colonel Turo Jawneh has been the head of State Guard Battalion since his return to the army back in 2017. He’s now been tapped for the role of commander of the new Republican National Guards.

Colonel Sait Njie, the director of training in the army is now the new head of State Guards Battalion.

Njie was the commander of 1st Infantry Battalion who won admiration during the political impasse of 2017 when he dramatically pledged allegiance to the new government and set out to the border with a platoon to meet ECOMIG soldiers as they arrived in the country to ensure President Barrow is installed.

Reset password

Enter your email address and we will send you a link to change your password.

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

Sign up with email

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

By clicking the «SIGN UP» button you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Powered by Estatik