Friday, June 27, 2025
Home Blog Page 740

All schools in the greater Banjul area to be closed on Thursday as Jammeh prepares an assault on the opposition

The Fatu Network has intercepted a Government dispatch urging all schools in the greater Banjul area to remain closed from Thursday, May 5 through Saturday. Although no reason has been advanced for this abrupt decision, the Fatu Network has gathered from different security sources that Dictator Jammeh has decided to do this to clamp down on peaceful protesters who are now showing open defiance anytime The UDP leaders appears in court.

 

 

Our security sources have said that Dictator Jammeh is getting increasingly impatient and frustrated by the apparent show of bravely by Gambians who are showing solidarity with Lawyer Ousainou Darboe and the rest of the people arrested on April 14 and 16.

 

 

The dictator is said to have given specific orders to brutally crack down on peaceful protesters who always converge in court each time Lawyer Darboe’s case is set to be heard. The fact that the dictator has ordered all schools closed according to our sources, is a clear indication of seriousness that he is ready for a show down.

 

 

The Fatu network is monitoring the situation and any attempt to violate the rights of Gambians through heavy-handedness of the security will surely not be tolerated. We have also notified the International Community about the underline plans by dictator Jammeh to harm innocent and defenseless civilians.

 

 

 

Breaking: UDP claims that there are Possible Attempt To Poison its Leadership In Prison

Below is a press statement from the UDP claiming that there are possible attempts to poison its leadership in prison:

 

 

 

We have established that The Gambia government through the interior minister Ousman Sonko has embarked on quest to acquire poison through illicit sources in Eastern Europe.

 

 

 

The regime of Yahya JAMMEH has over the years employed various methodologies to carry out extra judicial killings and other atrocities ranging from outright execution with firearms, extensive torture leading to fatality and administration rudimentary poisoning from sources like acids from lead batteries.
For the first time, the government is attempting to source industrial toxins and add to its arsenal of terror.

 

 
We are serving notice that the government of The Gambia will bear full responsibility for all detainees under its custody who continue to be denied access by family members and medical care despite suffering injuries inflicted by agents of the state. Detainees are also denied food from family making the state the sole provider of everything they consume.

 

 
Consequently, the Gambian people will not tolerate any attempt to bring harm to the heroes illegally held in prison. We demand their full and unconditional release, a full accounting of all arrested personnel, and comprehensive reform.

 

 
To our compatriots in the fight for freedom, we urge you to redouble your efforts to see this seminal battle through.

 

 
Let us remain united in purpose, focused on our common objectives and get the job done together. A free and democratic Gambia is within grasp. Let us March on.

Thank you!

UDP

UDP Press Statement

The Executive Committee of United Democratic Party (UDP) wishes to inform the general public and the International Community, of its total condemnation on the high handedness of peaceful marches on Thursday 14th and Saturday16th April 2016 at West field and Kairaba Avenue respectively by the state security officials. The party further condemns the subsequent arrest, detention and torture of some of the party officials, members and other peaceful marchers.

 

 
On the 14th April 2016, a group of concerned Gambians demanding genuine electoral reform to open up the country to conducting credible, free and fair elections, were arrested and whisked away to an unknown destination by the officials of the Gambia’s Police Intervention Unit. They were reportedly subjected to severe torture. As a result, one of them Ebrima Solo Sandeng, the UDP National Organizing Secretary was reported to have died from the torture inflicted on him.

 

 
News of Ebrima Solo Sandeng’s death was as shocking as it was unbearable, compelling the leadership of the UDP to a peaceful march demanding that the authorities release him dead or alive, as well as the unconditional release of all the other detainees. On Saturday April 16th 2016 the executive of the United Democratic Party were also arrested and have been in enforced state detention since.

 

 
On Wednesday 20th April 2016 after more than 72 hours in detention, eighteen people were brought before a judge and charged with varying trumped up offences including conspiracy to riot and conducting a march without a permit etc. However seven of those arrested are yet to be produced in court; In essence, they still remain unaccounted for. They include: Ebrima Solo Sandeng, Nogoie Njie, Fatoumata Jawara, Fatou Camara, Modou Ngum, Kafu Bayo and Ebrima Jabang.

 

 
For those arrested on 16th April 2016 which include the UDP Leader Lawyer Ousainou Darboe and his executive, Nineteen (19) remain in custody while thirteen (13) have been released on bail. On Thursday 28th April 2016, the state produced one more person before the court who was also jointly charged alongside the UDP leader and his executive.

 

 
The Gambia government continues to flout the high court orders for the detainees to be allowed family visits, food from the families, access to lawyers and other rights and privilege under the prison rule to change of clothes. The UDP condemns in strongest possible terms the inhumane manner in which the detainees are being treated.

 

 
The UDP still remains deeply concern about the whereabouts of one of its supporters, Dembo S. Darboe (Touray Darboe). He is from Kafuta village Kombo East and was picked up by plain cloth security officers onSaturdayevening 16th April 2016 in the same village on his way from the mosque. His whereabouts are still not known.

 

 
The United Democratic Party noted with great concern, the actions and conduct of security forces for not only preventing and denying its members and other concern citizens from exercising their constitutional rights, but has gone to the extent of inflicting brutal and inhumane treatments on them.
The UDP expresses her total condemnation of the apparent bias of the security forces for breaking up its peaceful march while allowing the militants and members of the ruling APRC Party to conduct series of pro-government demonstrations in the past.

 

 
The UDP recognizes the concerns of the International Community and is grateful to the solidarity from civil society groups, Gambians and friends of The Gambia at home and abroad in this difficult moment.
The UDP will continue to remain steadfast in demanding for freedom, justice, rule of law and democracy in The Gambia. We continue to stand firm in the collective efforts to liberate our beloved country from the clutches of this tyrannical regime.

 

 
We salute the uncompromised support and solidarity of the party’s militants, youths and women in particular.
The UDP unreservedly demand:

 

 
1. That our party Leader and Secretary General Lawyer Ousainou Darboe and all other political detainees be immediately and unconditionally released;

2. That the torture and reported death of Ebrima Solo Sandeng be fully investigated and the culprits are brought to book;

3. That the severe torture of other detainees be also fully investigated and the culprits brought to book;

4. That the security force put a total stop to the excessive use of force in denying and preventing the citizens from exercising their constitutional rights to peaceful demonstration;

5. That the security of our party officials and members be guaranteed.

Mariam B. Secka
Deputy Secretary General and Deputy Party Leader

Opposition leader at the maximum security wing in Gambia’s notorious prison

The fatu Network has received disturbing news that The Gambia’s main opposition leader, Lawyer Ousainou Darboe is now moved to the maximum security wing of mile two prisons. Mr Darboe who is the leader and secretary general of The United Democratic Party (UDP) is now occupying cell number one..a cell that is notoriously known to have housed political prisoners since dictator Yahya Jammeh illegally took power in 1994.




Many of those political prisoner held at cell number one have either died in prison or have come out with severe health problems associated with lack of light and other prevalent inhumane conditions. The cell is said to be small, dirty, damped and infested with cockroaches and rats that compete with inmates for their food. Many Gambians are angry that Mr Darboe who is a senior citizen of The Gambia and who has spent all his life defending human rights, is now being maltreated in such a degrading magnitude.

 

 

Under The Gambia’s consititution, Mr. Darboe who is remanded in custody is not supposed to be kept at the maximum securing wing. But as all things Gambian, dictator Jammeh always uses the courts and the prison system to inflict maximum damage and impact on his perceived enemies.

 

 

Lawyer Ousainou Darboe and his party executives are expected to once more appear before Justice Ottaba of the special criminal court for a continuation of the bail hearing on Thursday, May 5, 2016. Already, defiance and agitation is growing in Banjul about the maltreatment of The UDP leader and other political prisoners by the dictatorship in The GambiaI.




It is most likely that the more the case keeps lingering in the already compromised court, the more Gambians will also be energized in their resolve to take on a dictatorship already described as one of the world’s most brutal.

 

 

Meanwhile, the following people who were arrested by Gambian authorities with Solo Sandeng during a peaceful protest on April 14, 2016  demanding for electoral reforms are still unaccounted for. They are: Nogoi Njie, Fatoumata Jawara, Fatou Camara, Solo Sandeng, Modou Ngum, Kafu Bayo, Ebrima Jabang, Lamin Jabang. Lamin Chakunding Barrow, Momodou Jabbie, Malamin Singhateh and Dembo S. Touray (Touray Darboe) were also arrested on April 16, 2016 at their homes by men in plain clothes and are still unaccounted for.

 

 

 

A LESSON FOR GAMBIA FROM EGYPT

 

By Lamin Gano

Mubarak ruled Egypt for 30 years until 2011 when Egyptians got fed up with him and forced him out of office in a popular uprising. In June 2012, Muhammad Morsi was sworn into office as Egypt’s first democratically elected president. Barely one year in office, Egyptians were back in Tahrir Square demonstrating against Morsi. As the voices of Egyptian disunity got unbearably loud combined with a downturn of the economy, social cohesion and national security, the military intervened, kicked out Morsi and in came General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi as President of Egypt.

 

 

 

Like the Egyptians, majority of Gambians have had enough of their president who has been in power for 22 years and working forward to be reelected at the end of this year for another five year term in office. In fact some people are so fed up with Jammeh and have so little or no faith in the electoral process that they are calling for the removal of Jammeh by means other than elections. Anything from an Arab spring/Burkinabe type of uprising, or a military coup, or even the impossible intervention of the Senegalese military to kick Jammeh out is preferable to going to elections. If this group of people had access to the Angel of Death himself (aka Malaikal Maut), I am sure they would have pleaded with him to pay Jammeh an untimely visit.

 

 

 

The political situation of the Gambia is indeed precarious and it is easy to figure out why a lot of people have lost faith in the ballot box as a means to a peaceful and positive change. For instance we are six months away from the presidential elections and the political field is still highly contaminated and heavily skewed in favour of Jammeh. And with exactly one month left for the deadline for electoral reforms, there is absulutely no chance on earth that Yahya Jammeh will succumb to electoral reforms as it tantamount to committing political suicide. And to insulate himself even further, Jammeh is dividing and frustrating the idea of an alliance of political parties by using such tricks as the current ongoing scam trial of the UDP leadership. This is mainly due to his well-founded fear that an alliance will not only nullify the intent and purpose of his bad electoral laws but that would clearly lead to his downfall in the December polls.

 

 

 

In spite of all this seeming complicated and myriad tapestry off gloom and confusion, it is important to keep cool heads in order to see through the smoke and focus on the ball/goalpost. In this regards, an important question that I would like to ask my readers is that if Jammeh should suddenly and unceremonious leave power (let’s say through an uprising and before the presidential elections in December), what do you people think is most likely to happen to the office of the president? Is it not possible that The Gambia will follow the example of Egypt leading to the military to take over the leadership of the country?

 

 

 

My opinion is that there is a a strong possibility for that to happen. The reason for my position is that if our opposition leaders cannot agree on a coalition flag-bearer in the face of so much adversity from Jammeh and so much pressure from the Gambian people, then they will not agree on an interim leader in the unlikely situation that Jammeh leaves power unceremoniously. Like the Egyptians, our divergent voices of disunity will be so unbearably loud and our opposition leaders/parties will turn against each other and fight so badly that the military will be forced to intervene and take over the leadership of the country.

 

 

 

As one of those Gambians who also maintain that Jammeh has indeed overstayed in power and must leave office, and also as an advocate of peace and security and a firm believer in the power of the ballot box, I believe that the unity of our opposition leaders by forming an alliance and rallying their support and loyalty behind one and only one coalition flag-bearer will serve two purpose. The first advantage is that there will be only one candidate to run against Jammeh in the very likely event that all this ends up in the polls and secondly in the unlike event that Jammeh disappears in thin smoke, there will be already an identified interim leader to hold the reins of power as The Gambia goes through its series of much needed reforms to prepare it for a viable transition to a democracy.

 

 

 

By now a flag-bearer should have been long identified and all parties should have been out on the ground in full force in galvanizing support and votes for that candidate. And must important of all, such a coalition should have long come up with a sound electoral campaign approach or policy on how to engage with the security sector as well as the government civil service in order to win their support in the December polls. In my opinion, the development of a sound security sector governance strategy should be one of the most important priorities of any leader who is aspiring to take over from Jammeh. Without winning the hearts, minds and confidence of our gallant and patriotic men and women in uniform, the Gambia could be in a long political merry-go-round process!!!!

 

 

Long live the Republic of The Gambia, long live our peace, security and harmonious co-existence.
Author Gano
Posted on April 30, 2016

New Gambia: Our “Vision of Tomorrow”?

 

By Sait Matty Jaw

 

I bet most of you think that this is a Manifesto. Well, it is not. But when critically discussed, we might be able to come up with one that highlights the agenda for a “New Gambia.” For now, let me share some lessons learned from the Students at Risk Conference in Oslo.

 

 

 

Last weekend, I attended one of the most refreshing workshops on Non-violent action thanks to the Norwegian Centre for the Internationalization of Education (SIU) and Students and Academics International Help Fund (SAIH). I must admit that the time was too short, but the lessons learned within the six or so hours of interaction can change a society for good. While seated and as the workshop lead from the Centre for Applied Non-Violent Action and Strategies (CANVAS) took us through the principles of non-violent actions, all I could think of was our very own struggle in The Gambia: the things we did right and those we either did not know or took for granted. I took away so many valuable lessons that the New Gambia movement can learn from. The purpose of this blog is to share some those ideas and hope that with clear reflection we will be able to continue our journey to not only liberate Gambia from autocratic rule, but to also inspire every Gambian to help Gambia adopt democratic principles for our own advancement. The interesting part about all I am about to raise is for us to discuss and debate amongst ourselves. As such one could either agree or disagree. But we must also pay attention to the very principles of the game.

 

 

 

In my study of People’s Democratic Organization for Independence and Socialism (PDOIS) I used Gene Sharp’s theory of power to help me understand the approaches and strategies of PDOIS. In case you do not know who Gene Sharp is, he is the world’s leading writer on non-violent actions (Google him). Sharp uses power to distinguish between rulers and subjects and on the withdrawal of consent as the key to effecting political change. That is, the power base of the ruler is constructed on the approval of subjects. The minute the subjects withdraw this consent, the ruler loses their support as well as the legitimacy to rule. My interest at that time was to see how PDOIS, a political party and a non-violent group was mobilizing the masses to withdraw the support base of Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara. We all know that it did not work due to many factors both structural and otherwise. Today, we have many groups (civil society, political parties, and movements) and individuals in The Gambia and in the diaspora working to effect political change in the country with the slogan “Jammeh Must Go.” However, the question with all that is going on, the misinformation, the blame game etc., I would like to ask whether we are trying to withdraw the support base of Jammeh or alienating the masses and forcing them to reject our movement?

 

 

 

I must admit that I am a very active participant in the New Gambia movement. I also strongly believe that Jammeh Must Go. He has done his part over the past 22 years. We appreciate all the projects he has to his name including my favorite: The University of The Gambia. Nonetheless, this does not guarantee him the right to continuously flaunt the laws of our land, abuse the rights of dissenting citizens and even those that support him. His actions and ways are not the ways of our country and people. He has divided us against each other, instilled fear in the minds of every Gambian, and forced many to leave the country in exile; there’s also less employment opportunities for our youth and above all, his attempt to turn the Gambia into an Islamic State. This, for me, is the last straw.

 

 

 

That being said, I think we need to revisit our approach so as to have an effective campaign that not only removes Jammeh but also changes the entire Gambian society. I have had this debate many times before. Jammeh is just part of our problem. One may argue that he is the greater part or the lesser part of it. I think he may sound and look rash, but he has great influence on us as a people. For a very long time, he directed the game and all we did as a people was to react. For change to come we must turn the tables around, we must control the narrative and attack with evidence so as to weaken his support base. We must also know this support base. It is not only the security forces. It is his personal economy and the many people promoting his agenda. Again, we must be able distinguish between civil servants and what we call the “Jammeh enablers.” For most of us, we consider anyone working for government as an enabler. I don’t think that should be the case. This whole struggle is about who controls information. What Jammeh wants to do like many other lunatics before him is to control the flow of information; under-serve the masses and keep them ignorant and disenfranchised. We have been helping him to some extent by sending out scary images­–some of them seemingly propaganda material– that do not reflect what was on the ground around April 14th and 16th.

 

 

 

We have also weakened his power, yet we do not realize this. Solo’s march for electoral reform shocked the entire Gambian community. In one of my previous writings, I did warn that Gambians are no longer governed by fear. I gave an example of the standoff at Fass Njaga Choi as well as NRP’s defeat of the APRC government in the Saloum by election. What is happening now is just part of the entire game. Everything happening slowly but surely.

 

 

 

So, what do we do now to maintain this momentum? Firstly, as active participants in the New Gambia movement, we must realize that each individual or group have their personal and group agenda tied to the removal of Jammeh. My own agenda is to change Gambian society (democratize) and I believe my greatest obstacle like many of us is Jammeh. However, I believe we will not be able to achieve this if we continue to tell the people — that we expect to act through mass protest or election — what we want and reject especially where we do not understand their own personal agendas. I have quite often seen many people in the diaspora or even at home and on the same team calling each other hypocrites. The reason I believe is, we do not understand our personal interest in this whole movement. I strongly believe and it is evident that people only engage in most cases when issues affect them personally. It is true that unemployment is high; the human rights abuses are rife, but why are some people indifferent and why do others act? For the activists, we can argue it is their work and that even where they are not paid to push an agenda, the abuse of human rights makes it personal for them. But for the ordinary person to act, either a family member or close relative or friend must be affected. I must also say that in my own experience, I saw many people that I did not know on a personal level show concern about my safety. This, however, could be a limitation to what I am trying to put across.

 

 

 

Secondly, the general picture in The Gambia is a weak opposition and a strong incumbent party. For the longest, the contention has been between the weak opposition parties interested in political power and the ruling party that will do anything to stay in power. Now enters a third group mostly young people with no interest in political power. Dealing with such group especially when they are extremely organized is a huge challenge for any autocratic government. However, the danger with this group, especially when they realize their worth, is that they can threaten the survival of the state and society. Hence, they need to be controlled and by control, I mean there needs to be a form of leadership within them — people leading the actions. Power within such group must be horizontal and not hierarchical. The current challenge with our movement is that power is diffused randomly. No one knows who does what and when. It must be harnessed. When Ibrahim Ceesay, based on his activism, stood up, putting his life and that of his family on the line, we could detect a huge interest in the youth. With our situation, what the young people need is a face that will lead them. I have had this discussion with friends and the consensus was that if people are really concerned they will not wait for a face to lead, however, based on our context and history, our movement needs a face to champion the course.

 

 

 

In my last article, I argued that even if the opposition in The Gambia formed a coalition, they will be defeated by the ruling party. Yes, that was before all these events happened. It might be too early to conclude the outcome of the election later this year, but now more than ever, the movement must put pressure on the political parties to unite. I am sure the fate of UDP has also shown the party the need to stand up together to achieve their dream for political power. Even if we lose the election to Jammeh this year, I can guarantee that this will be his last term in office. I know some of you do not want to hear that, but it just might happen.

 

 

 

The third point or lesson that I have learned from the workshop and want to conclude with is the organizational bit. I briefly mentioned the leadership issue, I think the reason why the New Gambia movement — despite having people on the ground ready to get to the street and face the paramilitary — did not materialize, was due to lack of proper planning and organization. Everything was spontaneous. I learned that the worst enemy for a non-violent action is spontaneity. Our approach this time like always was reactionary. I think this should serve as a lesson for all of us involved. We must organize and strategize, understand deeply the need of our people on the ground and attract them to take action. We must not in any way also underestimate our opponent — Jammeh. His tactic is to not inform the people, whilst ours is to use information to bring him down. Hence, the information must be credible and should be channeled in a way that will make people act. I also do understand that there is a whole team on Jammeh’s side posting information to distract us from achieving our agenda. Their aim is to discredit our movement and render it untrustworthy. We must be careful before sharing anything. We must make sure the sources are credible. I can understand that at some point, the idea is to get people to act, but for a country with a history like ours, people do not react to things they have no idea about. We should take note of that.

 

 

 

Finally, what is our vision of tomorrow? What is it that we want to achieve from this engagement? What capacities do we have individually that can help us get to where we want to be? How do we harness all our efforts and channel it towards a strong movement that is responsive to the need of every Gambian; one that is respected and trusted by the international community? These among others are questions we need answers to. Our quest should not be to make Gambia ungovernable. We need the institutions no matter how ineffective they are in governing.

 

 

 

We must continue to engage in non-violent actions, not actions that may cause injury or lead to death. This was a valuable lesson that I learned. In non-violent or peaceful struggle, we need our numbers and every life counts. We will not move ahead if we lose our ranks. We must understand that we are dealing with a government that is willing and ready to shoot people to death. Hence, let us not give them that opportunity to kill and maim. It is true that non-violent actions are not usually violent free; however, we must always try as much as possible to avoid actions that might lead to death. As yet, I do not have answers to questions regarding the best actions that suit our context, but I hope in due course we will come up with various campaigns that will slowly weaken the power base of Jammeh and shift it to the people.

Aluta Continua

The Gambia: The way forward!

By Sheriff Kora

There is no tragedy greater than the citizens of a nation resigning their citizenship due to the lack of faith in their own abilities to change their political condition. This is the unfortunate reality in The Gambia — a country clutched in the hands an autocratic regime with less regard for human rights or the rule of law.

Whilst the greater part of the West Africa region is embracing the democratic ideals of freedom of expression, assembly, free and fair elections, and transparency, Gambians are confronted by a state of misrule and intolerance to any opposition and political dissent. Arbitrary arrests, torture and disappearances of political opponents have become the mainstay of the current regime. Fear of repression has left the country without any strong political action groups to exert any formidable democratic pressure on the government. Since, the democracy envy of the Arab Spring swept past The Gambia, Gambians have generally been left in a state of simmering frustration. The recent electoral reform laws, which, are poised to tilt the scales in favor of the ruling APRC party, have further heightened the political misery of the Gambians, and led to a boiling point between the APRC and the opposition UDP.

Despite the heavy criticisms levied in the past against the opposition parties for their passivity towards the excesses of the government, the bold actions of Lawyer Ousainou Darboe, and his executive members of the United Democratic Party on April 18, to march on the streets in a peaceful protest to demand justice for Solo Sandeng and his fellow arrested and tortured protesters, is not only an exemplary act of citizenship, but demands commendation from all genuine Gambians and true defenders of human rights. The key lesson in the events that transpired between April 16 and April 16 is that the strength and weakness of democracy resides in the people.

For a country to be liberated from dictatorship, citizens have to be willing to sacrifice some of their interest to guarantee the freedom and liberty of others. This has been the hallmark of all revolutionary leaders in history. Nelson Mandela gave up his liberty for his people, Kwame Nkrumah was jailed in his independence struggle for Ghana, Steve Biko was murdered fighting to end apartheid in South Africa, and most recently, Aun Sung Suu Kyi kept under house arrest for decades, emerged as the leader of the ruling party in Myanmar.

Ousainou Darboe left his house armed only with words of peace and his convictions that enough was enough, and there was no more time to watch illegal behaviors pass with impunity. As pictures of the armed security forces arresting Lawyer Darboe and his party members with miniature Gambian flags emerged, a huge contrast was drawn to remind every Gambian that true leaders should serve as missionaries and mercenaries to their people.

It is now up to the Gambians to decide whether they will choose a missionary leader or a mercenary. Solo Sandeng, Fatoumata Jawara and co paid the ultimate price sacrifice for guaranteeing our freedoms. It is very uplifting to see Gambians both at home and abroad reciprocate by rising to the occasion to put the government in check. Not only is this is an unprecedented act of bravery and citizenship, but a clear sign that nothing binds people more than a common enemy. The events of the past few days not only show the rage, disenchantment and the lack of fear in Gambians, but they also highlight the significant reformation going on in our beloved country. The masses are now aware of the hypocrisy and the lies that have sustained the system for all the past 22 years. The plain defiance and open condemnation of awakened Gambians who took to the streets of Kairaba Avenue or Independence Drive may not be able to predict the immediate or long-term impact of their political actions, but their boldness is evident that they know the prevailing system in their country is a farce, frustrating and utterly hopeless. Thus there is an urgent need for a political change.

Reformation is undoubtedly a pre-requisite and an antecedent to any successful political revolution or reform. Gambians should be proud and praised for reclaiming their sovereignty. However, despite the rising hopes of many Gambians for a regime change, it is important not to relent or draw into a comfort zone. One must not fall under the illusion for an instant and a dramatic political change. Social movements for political change require effective organization, discipline and a depth of persistence. By all measure of the current situation, the mounting forces clamoring for change are undoubtedly having the upper hand against the status quo. Gambians have garnered the attention and sympathy of the international community, and Gambians should forge ahead with their coalition building of essential partners, however, it will be a farfetched wish, and ignorance of the conventional norms of the international system to believe that the United States will deploy the 82nd Airborne Division on our behalf; or that Senegal will invade the country to free us.

We have to scratch our own itch. Nobody else will sweat our fever for us. In every new creation is also an inherent danger of destruction. To succeed, the masses have to adapt to the tactics and strategy of the regime. The current withdrawal of the security forces and the allowance of free expression of opinions should not be taken as a total victory. Whilst applaudable, we should be equally skeptical. Dictators are expedient creatures full of patience and tricks. This act of restraint could be a normalization strategy to create militancy fatigue and eventually blow steam out of the current situation back home. It’s wise to be optimistic yet weary. Adaptation and unpredictability is the lethal force to counter tyranny. What will determine the success of our current experiment is how effectively we manage the crisis at hand.

Political action comes from persistence and keeping the heat on. The events in Burkina Faso, Senegal, Ivory Coast, Egypt and Tunisia have shown that no political leader sits on a hot issue if you make it hot enough. It is a smart thing for all Gambians to remain peaceful, but we must also be steadfast and keep to our convictions. We must not let this crisis fizzle out as the current regime is hoping. God bless The Gambia, and long live peace and freedom.

Sheriff

 

Blind prejudice of Yaya Jammeh

This court case reveals something interesting about Yaya Jammeh’s character. He is stranger to most of what would generally be considered the Gambian virtues: humility, mercy, compassion and grace. It is very clear he is interfering with this court case by instructing Nigerian mercenary judges not to allow oral argument before the open court. They keep adjourning this court case to psychologically punish all UDP executives and innocent protesters to break them down, hurt Gambian pockets with constant back and forth to courts, pitch Gambians among each other. He sows bitterness, influences his followers to lose all sense of proportion and teaches them to answer with hate to their innocent brothers, sisters and parents.

 

 

Gambians are alien to these rebel virtues. Instead, his actions are marked by a long list of enemies he vows to sack, exile, crush, shred, destroy, jail and bury whomsoever he wants without proper rituals. He constantly manufactures an atmosphere of menace in which there is no room for compassion for his opponents, for anything but disgracing and counterattack of severe punishment. He exploits and exaggerates everything about him in such a hateful combative manner that is destined to further marginalize weak Gambians. This guy was on welfare from day one of his life; from food he eats, school fees, and generous Gambian hospitality. In return, everything he does is such with pagan brutalism, overzealous application of the letter of his draconian law in a way that violates the spirit of fairness and mercy.

 

 

According to the point newspaper, Hawa Sisay-Sabally made an application with regards to be given medical care and to also have food from their families which are being denied by prison officials. This instruction is clearly from dictator Jammeh. There is not a hint of compassion, gentleness and mercy. He constantly lays down an atmosphere of apocalyptic fear. This court case is tailored such a way that is guaranteed to bring out fear-driven reactions and this time, he can’t survive this by GOD’s grace. Everything he does is to deny the slightest acknowledgment of our common humanity, take the bully’s maximum relish in his power over the weak and innocent.

 

 

Like everyone, I am revolved by Yaya Jammeh treatments of Gambians. It is not on only the horrendous way he does it but – the monstrous way he does things beneath even the minimal standards of modern civilization. The question for Gambians is: How many infants should be fed to crocodile? How many Gambians deserved to be buried without proper janazah? How many of our dead deserved to be given to the jalangs for rituals purposes? Gambians, please put this man out of his misery and give power back to the people.

 

By Habib

Torture at mile 2; Life of a Prison Officer in danger

The Fatu network is getting disturbing reports of severe torture inflicted on a junior officer of The Gambia Prison Services at Mile 2 Central Prison.




According to credible sources, Borry Jallow, a 27 year old prison officer was accused of helping inmates in getting essential support from their families. Mr Jallow was arrested last week during a routine search by prison officers who accused him of smuggling letters and other essential needs for inmates at mile 2.

 

 

Mr Jallow is said to be a kind hearted young man who always sympathizes with inmates. However this time around he was said to have been caught with the usual things that inmates badly need in prison such as toiletries. It was there that authorities at mile 2 arrested him and subsequently subjected to severe torture.




Prison authorities have accused him of being a possible threat to national security. Since his arrest last week, he spent more than five days at a notorious single cell in mile 2 where our sources say all forms of torture are administered.

Prison Officer Jallow

 

 

As it is now, Mr. Jallow has been handed over to The National Intelligence Agency for further interrogation. We have also been informed of torture and other forms of degrading punishment being inflicted on him right now at the NIA. As one of our sources said, the way Mr. Jallow is being mercilessly tortured could lead to his death.




The Fatu Network is seriously monitoring this situation and we are warning the security forces that The International Community is already informed of the situation this young security officers finds himself in at the moment.

Prison Guards Warned To Show No Mercy To UDP Leader Lawyer Darboe and Co As They Continue To Languish In Illegal Detention

The Fatu Network is getting disturbing reports that the Director General of the Prisons David Colley has warned his officers not to show any form of mercy towards Lawyer Ousainou Darboe, leader of the opposition United Democratic Party (UDP) and his party militants being detained at Mile II prison.




 

According to insiders who narrated the story to us, David Colley has given a stern warning to his staff not to particularly show any respect or sympathy towards Lawyer and his co detainees since according to him they came out in the streets to disrupt the peace and stability of the country.

 

 

 

Although staff are said to be afraid to openly sympathize with the detainees, a source inside Mile II said they are also cautious in doing anything illegal because of the high profile nature of some of the people currently being detained at Mile II.




 

That notwithstanding, conditions at Mile II prison have always been a source of deep concern to rights groups. Each year several inmates die in captivity due to poor diet, torture and overcrowding. The recent death in Mile II was just two months ago when one of the transport union leaders died mysteriously while in remand there.

 

 

 

David Colley who is the prison director has been described by people who know him as someone notorious for showing and administering cruelty towards detainees brought to Mile II especially those branded as enemies of dictator Yahya Jammeh’s government. He and the dictator are from the same village of Kanilai and he was himself sacked several times and kept in Mile II as a form of punishment for being disloyal.




 

The Fatu Network has got credible news that some of the detainees including female detainees, have varying degrees of bruises on different parts of their body. The UDP leader himself has a bandage on his forehead. His daughter is also said to have bruises on her legs and a bandage on her finger. The Fatu Network has confirmed that these bruises might have emanated from the initial confrontation at the protest site when overzealous security officers roughened up peaceful marchers and were seen even throwing some of them in waiting military trucks like a pack of wood.




 

We are monitoring this story and any maltreatment of any prisoner will be fully documented and the perpetrators reported to the relevant international organizations for appropriate action.

April 24 – Building a Sovereign Gambian and Gambia

By: Madi Jobarteh
Introduction

 
Today 24 April 2016 marks the 46th independence anniversary of the Republic of the Gambia. The start of independence was marked by a ceremony on that day in the capital then called Bathurst when the British-born Gambian Chief Justice Sir Philip Bridges sworn in Dawda Jawara as the first president of the Gambia as per Section 32 of the 1970 constitution, and following the republican referendum held two days earlier on 22 April.

 

 
Forty six years after independence, the Gambia is yet to become an independent country because the Gambian person is yet to become a sovereign citizen. This is a malaise that was created by our independence leaders and intellectuals that continues to be perpetuated through the years until today 24 April 2016. After the defeat of formal colonialism which was introduced all over the Gambia by 1902, the new independent state that emerged on 24 April 1970 and its officials failed to politically educate the Gambian citizen to realise that indeed independence means the nation is one unified entity in which the owners of the voice, power and resources of the new nation are the people themselves. Rather since independence, the rulers in the first and second republics protected state sovereignty, but weakened and hijacked citizenship sovereignty and national independence. This is the crux of our malaise as a nation.
What is Sovereignty?
Chapter 1 Section 1 of the 1970 Constitution stated that the Gambia is a sovereign republic. This constitution went further to identify fundamental rights and freedoms, thus manifesting citizenship sovereignty under Chapter 3 as belonging to Gambian citizens that must be protected by the state. These rights include the right to life, liberty and security of the person, speech, association, assembly, privacy, and property among others. These are entrenched clauses that can only be changed by a referendum because these rights are sovereign rights establishing our self determination as a people.
In the 1997 Constitution, not only did Section 1 states that the Gambia is a sovereign secular republic as an entrenched clause changeable by only a referendum, but also Section 2 went further to unequivocally stipulate that the sovereignty of the Gambia resides in the people of the Gambia and that the state derives its legitimacy from the people and on whose behalf it performs it functions. Furthermore, Chapter 4 identified a set of fundamental rights and freedoms in entrenched clauses for which it categorically places the primary obligation for their protection and fulfilment on the State in Section 17. Again these fundamental rights and freedoms are the basis of our sovereignty. It is these rights that colonialism seized and damaged with impunity. Thus with independence, it is these same rights which were rescued and restored to us as a sovereign people.

 

 
The essence of sovereignty therefore is that people who are sovereign determine their destiny by being their own law and policy makers in all aspects of their lives. It means power and voice of the nation resides in the people who are the independent owners of the wealth of the country. Sovereignty means the State is an instrument of the people charged with the responsibility to manage the affairs and resources of the people for the benefit of the people. The State is fundamentally tasked with only two functions in a sovereign republic which are; first, to respect and protect the fundamental rights of the people as specified in the constitution and other laws as sovereign rights. Secondly, to fulfil the needs of the people as emanating from those rights which are now claims that citizens can make on the state. It is in the fulfilment of these sovereign rights and needs that citizens enjoy public goods and services hence development in the form of affordable, accessible and quality healthcare, education, good roads, water and electricity supply and protection of personal liberty and exercise of personal freedoms among others.

 

 

Thus in Chapter 4 of the 1997 constitution, Gambians have a list of sovereign rights such as right to life, liberty, education, political participation and association and peaceful demonstration among others. The role and responsibility of the state is to establish the necessary institutions and employ competent citizens to utilize our national or sovereign wealth which comes from our taxes, loans and grants to fulfil the needs of our people as their rightful claims by law. In this case therefore, the state is nothing other than a servant of the people because the state emerged from the will of the people and charged with the responsibility of fulfilling the will of the people. Thus in a sovereign democracy, the State cannot be more powerful than the people, or citizens become afraid of the government or the state. Rather it is the state that is afraid of the people because the people are the owners and masters of the State and all its agencies and officers.
Our Malaise
The failure of the Gambia since independence, and therefrom the poor human development and limited civil liberties of Gambians emanates from our failure as citizens and as well as officers of the state to realise the value and purpose of sovereignty and act on it accordingly. For this reason, instead of the governments in both the first and second republics protect our fundamental rights and needs as entrenched in both the 1970 and 1997 constitutions, these governments have served to mainly trample on these rights and abandon these needs. This situation became more aggravated by the masses, who, by lacking in political consciousness and republican values as sovereign citizens only served to rather help and strengthen the irresponsibility and violations of the state. There is no gainsaying that the average Gambian public officer including security officers considers himself and herself as not a servant but a master of the people who is beyond reproach and scrutiny by the people, when they perform their duties such as delivery of goods and services.

 

 

Public servants act as if they are first and foremost doing a favour to the people. They hold that these public goods and services are a charity for which the people must be grateful to them. These public officers do not know or just ignore the fact that they are merely performing their obligation according to law to protect the rights and fulfil the needs of the people.
Conversely, our people, because of their limited sense of sovereignty, generally also perceive the State and its institutions and officers as more powerful masters. The product of this malaise is therefore a culture of impunity in which state institutions and officials not only fail to fulfil their responsibilities to the people, but continuously violate citizens’ rights with impunity, while the people even defend and support them in this tragedy. To further fester this malaise, both the state and the masses have infused misconceived Islamic beliefs and oppressive and exploitative socio-cultural ideas to perpetuate the disempowerment of the masses and the abuse of the state.

 

 

This state of abnormality consequently made the people lack the capacity to hold the state to account and ensure transparency of state institutions, officials and processes. In this way, we have collectively inflicted excruciating harm on ourselves that has continued for 46 years unabated thus making us all both victims and oppressors at the same time.
Our political parties, both ruling and opposition since the first republic, also became complicit in this national malaise by not only failing to provide the necessary political education (excepting PDOIS), but also failed to create the necessary policies, institutions and processes within these parties to nurture a culture of rights and good governance, hence disempowered our citizens to exercise their rights to informed political participation and nation building. It can be seen therefore that since independence, each and every political party in the Gambian continues to be engaged only in sham internal party democracy while the levers of power, voice and control in them are held only by one person or few individuals who are mainly men. This is also the reason why no opposition party becomes viable enough, while the PPP in the first republic and the APRC in the second republic became quite powerful only because of their control of state power.

 

 
The manifestation of our low level of citizen sovereignty can be seen in the current political crisis unfolding in our country. After 46 years of independence today, we have an opposition leader and his team incarcerated for exercising a fundamental right that is entrenched in our 1997 constitution. We have political activists that are being arrested and detained by the police and some died in custody for merely exercising their sovereign rights in Section 25 of the 1997 Constitution. While these people are denied their entrenched fundamental rights by our State, one would see in a faraway but truly sovereign nation, Norway where both the State and citizens enjoy sovereignty, a mass murderer could have not only his life spared, but even enjoys human dignity by the conditions in his prison and been able to even take the State to court for what he considered as damages to his sovereignty and getting them restored to him.

 

 
Thus if we look at various social, economic and political indicators of the Gambia, one can therefore realise that we face an abysmally poor state of civil liberties, an expensive and erratic delivery of public goods and services which are largely unavailable to all citizens, and a limited space for popular participation of citizens in national issues. This is clearly a manifestation of the poor level of citizenship sovereignty.

 

 
What is to done?
The task before Gambians therefore is a collective and individual question as to how sovereign are you, and how much are you exercising your sovereignty? How much of your voice and will determine the manner of the State, and how is the state protecting your rights and fulfilling your needs? The question must be extended to our political parties as to whether we deserve parties in which only individuals and cliques control them yet they use our voice and power to exert themselves on us without transparency and accountability. We must engage in honest self examination as to whether as an individual public or private citizen, one is fulfilling his or her role to ensure that each and every Gambian is an embodiment of dignity.

 

 
In the height of the liberation struggle in Guinea Bissau, Amilcar Cabral made the point that our nation and struggle must be led by our best sons and daughters. As a Gambian, are you among the best sons and daughters of the Gambia? How have you raised your consciousness to realise that the sovereignty of the Gambia resides in its citizens and that the sole purpose of the state is to fulfil the will of the people? Have you positioned yourself, regardless of your station in life to identify yourself with the deepest aspirations of the people? In other words, are you able to commit, what Cabral calls ‘a class suicide’ in order to join the masses of the people? This is particularly significant for the middle class and the pretty bourgeoisie in the public sector, private sector and civil society sector, who thanks to the opportunities provided by the Nation-State that they enjoy, now remove themselves from the people. They do not share in the concerns and legitimate interests of the masses rather continue to take advantage of the unjust socio-economic and political system to make more money and enjoy more privileges when all around them are oppression and exploitation of fellow citizens. When the members of the middle class and the petty bourgeoisie, the nouveau riche, lack the necessary political consciousness they can only become oppressors and exploiters of the people creating huge inequalities, poverty, powerlessness and voicelessness in society.

 

 
This is why Thomas Sankara noted that a soldier (and we can add that a business executive, a police officer, a civil servant, a law maker, an NGO worker, a chief, an imam or priest, a judge, a lawyer, an opposition party leader, etc) without political education is a virtual criminal. A person without political education is one who does not identify himself or herself with the concerns, aspirations and interest of the masses, but rather considers only his or her individual concern, interest and aspirations and utilise the wealth and privileges and opportunities provided by the nation and the state to his or her individual benefit without regard to those of the masses. Just as a police officer or soldier without political education would beat and shoot to death fellow citizens without remorse, so also a policy or law maker or civil servant would not cringe at making unjust laws and stealing public money to benefit only him or herself. It is a parasitic form of life in which such a person only seeks avenues that provide undue advantages even if these unjust opportunities only serve to perpetuate injustice and inequality in society.

 

 
Raise your Political Consciousness

 

 
Frantz Fanon said each generation must discover its mission, to fulfil or betray. Are you a Gambian who has discovered your mission to your society, i.e. to realise that you bear an obligation to serve your people, to stand for the welfare and rights of your people and to stand up for justice and human dignity. One cannot discover one’s mission if one lacks the political consciousness talked about by Sankara. Thus given the current state of affairs in the Gambia and Africa in general, one can confidently diagnose this malaise as the lack of discovery of our mission by the masses of our people, particularly our youth, the middle class and the petty bourgeoisie due to our low political awareness.
At 46 years and going beyond, I urge each and every Gambian to look beyond one’s position, and one’s party, and one’s tribe, and one’s religion, and one’s family, and one’s business, and one’s institution or organization and one’s selfish interest and see the Gambian Nation. Only then can we build a nation that fits our humanity and can deliver and ensure our dignity. It is such a society that can deliver development to us from the unlimited wealth and opportunities that abound in our country. Gambia and Gambians are still unable to realise their full human potential and tap their huge resources and opportunities because the individual Gambian citizen is yet to be sovereign and independent. But to create this dignified and sovereign independent Gambian and Gambia, we must become new citizens to exhibit qualities that Nkrumah said constitutes the African Personality,
“Africa needs a new type of citizen, a dedicated, modest, honest, informed man and woman who submerges self in service to the nation and mankind. A man and woman who abhors greed and detests vanity. A new type of man and woman whose humility is his and her strength and whose integrity is his and her greatness.”

 

 
Just imagine if Edward Francis Small, the Father of our Nation did not discover his mission to realize that he was an embodiment of dignity and sovereignty? EF Small cried out that there must be no taxation without just representation because he realized that no human being is a donkey to be exploited by another human being. It was that cry for sovereignty that eventually gave birth to the Republic of the Gambia as our collective sovereign property. How come 46 years down the line, we face worse conditions than those faced by EF Small in 1920?

 

 
Creating a New Gambian

 

 

It is distressful that for 46 years we have failed to build sovereign citizens. So long as our people are not sovereign, not only the State and its officers will fail to become responsible as a means to protect our rights and satisfy our needs, but also each and everyone one of us as well as our businesses, NGOs, political parties, traditional and religious institutions and indeed our young people cannot become an embodiment of dignity, and nurture a culture and a society of justice and equal rights. We cannot find our ability to do for ourselves even when we sit on a mountain of wealth and opportunities. Our fertile land and all the cereals, crops and plants that can grow on it, our unlimited waters underground, in our rivers and tributaries and our rains, our wind and sunlight, and our almighty people with unbound intelligence and strength will all be inadequate to provide us the quality and dignity of life we deserve. We shall continue to be a society of wretched people who can only find solace and hope outside of the Gambia, while we continue to oppress and exploit each other in our country.

 

 
Let us build a sense and a culture of sovereignty based on republican values which hold that the people are the owners and masters of the country. Republican values are established on the incontestable fact that all citizens are equal and all of us have equal right to all opportunities. Republican values require that we remove from our midst all ideas, institutions, practices, relationships and systems that oppress and exploit and dehumanize the human being. Whether these are cultural or religious beliefs or unjust and unfair laws and practices in our homes, offices and communities, oppression and exploitation of one human being by another human being has no place in a sovereign republic. All human beings, men and women are equal.

 

 

No tribe, no culture and no religion have precedence or significance over another. In a sovereign republic, there is no majority and minority tribe or religion or better culture. All cultures must be civilized and democratized to liberate the human being, and not to enslave some sections. Let us create a society of just and fair systems and laws and institutions that develop and upheld human dignity, knowing full well that in any society the only guarantor of peace and stability and human development is the respect, protection and fulfillment of human rights. Positions, guns, tribes, religion and culture have never provided safe haven for individuals in history. Only human rights protect and develop the human being. When a right is damaged in any society, and it is not repaired immediately and in full, then no one is safe in that society regardless of your position, religion, tribe or ammunition.
Forward to the Building of a Sovereign Gambian and Gambia.

 

From Madi Jobarteh’s Facebook page

Open Letter to UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon

Secretary General Ban Ki-moon
United Nations
405 E 42nd Street
New York, NY 10017
United States
Cc. Yahya Jammeh
President of The Republic of The Gambia
℅ Permanent Representative of The Gambia to the UN
336 E 45th St.
New York, NY 10017
April 19, 2016
Dear Sir,
“If I were there, and I was in charge, I WOULD F*CKING OPEN FIRE ON THEM” – Gambian diplomat tells citizen about unarmed peaceful protesters.
These are the words of Samsudeen Sarr, Deputy Permanent Representative, Permanent Mission of The Gambia to The United Nations on April 18, 2016, speaking on the arrest, torture and killing of unarmed peaceful protesters in The Gambia.
On April 14, 2016 a group of Gambian political activists decided to stage a peaceful protest march to demand electoral reforms. As anyone who is aware of the modus operandi of the 21-year regime of Yahya Jammeh would know, they were met by security officials dressed in full riot gear with batons, tear gas and guns. “Thankfully”, they only used their boots, batons and tear gas this time. The unarmed peaceful protesters were only beaten, kicked and arrested. Oh, it’s terrible alright. I only use “thankfully” because the last time unarmed students decided to stage a peaceful march to protest the rape of one of their peers, and the murder of another, both by uniformed security officials, they were met with live ammunition, killing and maiming tens of Gambians in what was, until then, the darkest day in Gambian history. That was on April 10 and 11, 2000. What came out of it? Well, the government later passed The Indemnity Act of 2001, indemnifying all the criminals involved in this act of brutality and passed the Public Order Act, a law that requires people to obtain a permit from the police to stage a peaceful protest. So yes, I say “thankfully” because these security officials had all the encouragement and licence from the APRC government to murder again.
Two days later, reports emerged that the arrested protesters had been severely tortured and their leader, Solo Sandeng, National Organizing Secretary of the opposition party, UDP, had been killed while in detention and two other female protesters were each in a coma. The party leader, Ousainou Darboe, along with his senior executive, led a peaceful march demanding to see Mr. Sandeng “dead or alive”. Again, in typical fashion, they were quickly and forcefully rounded up, again with batons, boots and tear gas, and sent to jail.
As a Gambian citizen living in the USA, I decided on the morning of April 18, 2016, to visit the Gambian Mission to the United Nations in New York, to demand answers from my representatives. I met Mr. Sam Sarr (no relation to the author), Deputy Permanent Representative, Permanent Mission of The Gambia to The UN. I identified myself as a Gambian, showed him my Gambian ID card and stated that I was there as a citizen seeking answers from my representatives. On that premise, I am of the belief that Mr. Sarr’s statements are representative of the Gambia Government’s position on the matter. The fact that Mr. Sarr also told me that his secretary had informed him that I had a recording device leads me to further believe that he wants to be quoted and that the government would stand by his statements. In a discussion that lasted over 2 hrs, at no point did the Gambia Government, through this diplomatic representative, express any regret over what had taken place. Instead, he was adamant that “anyone taking such action (of a peaceful demonstration) should have been ready to lose his life”. Mr. Sarr was also very clear and unapologetic when he told me “If I was there, and in charge, I would f*ucking open fire at anyone (demonstrating peacefully)!!!”, after admitting that he had not seen even a single footage, and had no indication that any of the protesters was armed or was seen throwing so much as a punch or a stone, even in self defence.
For a government whose leader has publicly threatened to behead homosexuals, claimed he can cure several diseases including HIV and more recently declared The Gambia an “Islamic State” without any referendum or consultation with the citizens, I am not surprised that the Gambia government would appoint such an insensitive and callous individual to be its second highest-ranking diplomat at the UN. I cannot, however, for the life of me, reconcile how the United Nations, an organization millions around the world look to for any hopes of justice and human dignity, or at least diplomacy to foster such, can have such an individual continue business as usual while uttering such statements that go against everything the UN stands for.
Addressing the same incidents in The Gambia, on April 17, 2016, a day before my discussion with Sam Sarr, a press release http://www.un.org/press/en/2016/sgsm17678.doc.htm issued on your behalf stated, “The Secretary-General is deeply concerned about the apparent use of excessive force and the arrest and detention of peaceful demonstrators on 14 April 2016. He calls on the authorities to immediately and unconditionally release all those arrested, including UDP leader Ousainou Darboe, and uphold the rights of the Gambian people to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly.”
The UN Human Rights Commission expects nations to be guided by “Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials”. This Document, adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana, Cuba, 27 August to 7 September 1990 states that,

 

 

4. Law enforcement officials, in carrying out their duty, shall, as far as possible, apply non-violent means before resorting to the use of force and firearms. They may use force and firearms only if other means remain ineffective or without any promise of achieving the intended result.
7. Governments shall ensure that arbitrary or abusive use of force and firearms by law enforcement officials is punished as a criminal offence under their law.
8. Exceptional circumstances such as internal political instability or any other public emergency may not be invoked to justify any departure from these basic principles.
Sir, for a nation to not only flout these binding agreements, but to have their senior diplomats openly contradict the organization’s principles and challenge the Secretary General’s very objective statements, is disturbing. What would be even more disturbing is the thought that the organization has no standards for members who serve in top positions. Would it be too much to expect senior diplomats at the UN to have at least some basic sense of decency, a moral compass or belief in basic respect for principles of human dignity? What is the point of the UN and all the meetings, resolutions, principles and other agreements if the senior diplomats cannot be held to any standards? For the dictatorial regime of Yaya Jammeh in The Gambia, I would not be surprised if this letter helps Mr. Sarr get rewarded with a promotion for his “bold” threats to shoot unarmed civilians. But having such individuals at the UN is like appointing vampires as the custodians of a hospital blood bank.
Meanwhile, at the time of writing this piece, April 19, 2016, 11:59pm, all the protestors arrested on April 14 and April 16 are still in detention. The state media of The Gambia is yet to acknowledge the protests or the arrest, detention and torture of the protesters! So much for the statements by the UN Secretary General.
Sincerely,
Sana Sarr

Cc. General Assembly of the UN
℅ President Mogens Lykketoft
United Nations General Assembly
405 E 42nd Street
New York, NY 10017
Cc. Department of Political Affairs
United Nations
405 E 42nd Street
New York, NY 10017
Cc. Ousman Tangara
Permanent Representative of The Gambia to the UN
336 E 45th St.
New York, NY 10017
Cc. Sam Sarr
Deputy Permanent Representative of The Gambia to the UN
336 E 45th St.
New York, NY 10017
Cc. The Attorney General and Minister of Justice
Republic of The Gambia
℅ Permanent Representative of The Gambia to the UN
336 E 45th St.
New York, NY 10017
Cc: Amnesty International USA Headquarters
5 Penn Plaza, 16th Floor
New York, NY 10001
Yahya Jammeh
President of The Republic of The Gambia
State House
Banjul, The Gambia
Cc: Mama Fatima Singhateh
The Attorney General and Minister of Justice
Attorney General’s Chambers
Ministry of Justice
Marina Parade
Banjul, The Gambia

 

By Sana Sarr

Seven Days Of Madness In The Gambia But Its Also Seven Days Of Public Defiance To The Dictatorship

It is now one week today when The Gambia Government through its security agents descended on peaceful, unarmed protesters comprising mainly youths that were out in the streets on Thursday April 14 demanding electoral reform ahead of the 2016 general elections.




 

The state security agents armed with batons, teargas and AK47 guns seriously manhandled the protesters before whisking them away to an unknown destination. Although the exact number of arrests made at the protest site is still being compiled, sources have told The Fatu Network over 50 people were arrested.

 

 

 

All those arrested according to our sources were brutally tortured in groups of four at the headquarters of the National Intelligence Agency (NIA). Apparently, the head of the peaceful protest Solo Sandeng who at the time of his arrest was also the National Organizing Secretary of the UDP was so brutally tortured that he eventually died in the hands of his torturers. The government has still refused to acknowledge that he died.




 

After two days of frantic efforts by the leadership of the UDP in demanding answers from the authorities without success, the party leader Lawyer Ousainou Darboe led a hand full of party stalwarts towards the police station which arrested Mr Sandeng.

 

 

 

But no sooner had they gone a few meters, than the security forces started descending on them. They were doused with teargas and beaten with batons before they were thrown into the back of waiting military trucks. Some of the marchers especially the elderly were wounded.




 

Events continue to move fast amid a high tempo likely to degenerate into violence. The European Union and other diplomatic missions accredited to Banjul have been making subtle trips on both the government and the house of the UDP leader where the party’s executive have assembled for the past five days. The diplomats have been pushing for a solution to the current crisis.

 

 

 

Meanwhile Lawyer Ousainou Darboe and some members of his executive are still held in communicado detention amid reports that some of the detainees especially the elderly have been already released.




 

Reports coming from Banjul also say that the authorities are planning to take Lawyer Darboe and his executive to court where they are likely going to be charged under the Gambia’s Public Order Act which forbids anyone to organize certain category of procession without a permit from the police.

 

 

 

Meanwhile, Gambians in different parts of the world came out in their large numbers to protest against what they called the brutal crackdown on innocent, peaceful marchers. They also demanded that the international community do more to stand in solidarity with the Gambian people who they say have suffered two decades of brutality under Yahya Jammeh who has been ruling the country with an iron fist.

 

 

 

The UDP has also released a statement insisting a broad range of demands as shown below in the statement:

 

 

Petition On The Continued Illegal Detention Of The Executive Members Of The United Democratic Party (UDP) and The Death Of Solo Sandeng While Under State Custody

Introduction:
The leader of the United Democratic Party (UDP) Lawyer Ousainou Darboe and five members of his executive remain in state custody after being picked up by members of the Gambian security forces on Saturday 16th April 2016 as they embarked on a peaceful march. What precipitated their peaceful march was the arrest two days earlier of about 25 youth activists drawn from across the political spectrum who gathered to demand comprehensive electoral reform in the run up to the December 2016 elections. They have been kept in communicado detention since and their conditions are still unknown. They are denied family access and legal representation in total violation of the constitution of The Gambia.
Seven of those arrested were youth members of the UDP executive. Credible reports are that they were brutally tortured leading to the death under custody of the UDP National Mobilizing Secretary, Mr Solo Sandeng. Three other female youth executive members of the UDP (Ms Fatoumata Jawara, Ms Nokoi Njie and Ms Fatou Camara) remain in critical conditions following two days of sustained brutal torture and other forms of inhumane treatment.

 
The state has since expanded its brutal crackdown to include the systematic rounding up of dozens of supporters and community leaders of the United Democratic Party. The exact number of the abductees remains unknown but so far the UDP has confirmed that 50 people are held in different detention centers.
Demands
1. The UDP urgently demands the unconditional and immediate release of all political prisoners.
2. We demand The Gambia Government fully account for Mr Solo Sandeng and all of his colleagues he was detained with.
3. We also demand a full, thorough and a credible, independent investigation into the conduct of state security agents that brutally assaulted and detained peaceful, unarmed citizens who were exercising their constitutionally guaranteed rights.
4. We insist that the electoral reform demands that were put forward by the group of six opposition political parties by fully complied with before any elections can be held.
5. We call on the international community to take note of the existential threats The Gambia Government poses to its people.
Consequently, we urge the international community, especially the regional bloc, ECOWAS to take appropriate steps to mitigate the very significant dangers the regime poses to its people.

How AU and Ecowas have let down Gambians

By D. A. Jawo

 
Once again, our African institutions have failed us, with both the African Union and Ecowas keeping so mute over the deplorable and naked human rights violations being perpetrated against innocent Gambians by their very government.

 
We have heard the swift condemnations of the atrocities being committed in the country from the United Nations, the European Union as well as the United States and other members of the international community, but we are yet to hear any condemnation of the situation from our very own continental institutions as if they do not care about the welfare of ordinary Africans. This is no doubt why the AU is making frantic efforts to facilitate the withdrawal of its member states from the International Criminal Court apparently because while it is always ready to come to the defense of those despotic leaders who would do anything to cling on to power, they do not care about the welfare of ordinary Africans.

 
Any reasonable being would have expected that both Ecowas as the sub-regional bloc and the AU, as the continental body should have been the first to react to the situation rather than behave as if they do care what happens to Gambians. This is indeed a shame that those institutions we expect to defend ordinary people do not seem to care what happens to those people.

 
It is even ironic that the atrocities are going on in the Gambia at the very time that the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights, the continent’s leading human rights institution, is going on in the country, and yet, there has so far not a single reaction from the Commission itself. One would therefore wonder where ordinary Africans should turn to for protection against their own despotic leaders when the very regional institutions that should have protected them seem to be more concerned about the welfare of the leaders than that of ordinary Africans.

 
The torture and ill treatment is being meted out on ordinary Gambians by our own security forces, whose sole crime is to peacefully protest against the unfair electoral system in force as well as the bad governance in place in the country.

 
It is indeed had to imagine that the whole world is talking about the torturing to death of opposition members as well as the incarceration of the entire leadership of the UDP and yet, there has so far not a single official communication from the government, as if the lives of the people do not matter to those in authority.

 
To add insult to injury, we have all seen how the people were mobilized to sing and dance to welcome back President Yahya Jammeh from Turkey, as if everything is rosy and no Gambian is in distress. It is indeed very un-Gambian to see some people jubilating and dancing whilst many innocent people were being rounded up and subjected to torture and even death simply for exercising their constitutional rights to protest against injustice.

 
It is indeed hard to see how the international community and all people of conscience would continue to ignore the gross injustices going on in the Gambia. Gambians definitely need someone to rescue them from the clutches of impunity where members of the security forces seem to be given a carte blanche to mal-treat the ordinary people anyhow they like, including torturing them to death and get away with it.

April 18, 2016 #TheGambiaRising Lets end dictatorship NOW

0



Gambia Rise up and lets end dictatorship

My message is to the government employees, especially members of the security forces – the army, police intervention unit and police officers. I want you to be honest with nobody but yourself.

– Are you happy with the life you are living? Are you satisfied with the salary you take home every month? Is it ever enough to cover your living expenses? Do you own a home or are you renting? Do you own a car or do you take public transportation to work? Better yet, do you stand on the roadside waiting for a ride?

 
– How many of your friends, colleagues and family members receive a monthly salary that covers their living expenses? How many of them come to you to assist them with money for food, fares, rent or other basic necessities?

 
– Is this really the life you envisioned for yourself when you decided to join the security forces? Is this the best you can do in your life or do you think you deserve better? Would a regime that cares about you leave you in this condition?

 
How many times have you, your family members, neighbors or friends been sick and unable to get treatment at the hospital, or had to scramble to get money for medication?
Just think about it!

 
Compare the life you’re living to the life Yahya Jammeh and his family are living. While you’re struggling to get to Serekunda Market, Zeineb Suma is flying first class between Dubai, New York and Paris to do her shopping. While you’re struggling for D200 for your child’s school fees, Mariam Jammeh is chilling in a private high school in New York, fees over $20,000 per year. While you cannot afford cash power, or even candles when NAWEC goes out, Jammeh has 24hrs electricity both in Banjul and Kanilai.
Just think about it!

 
With all this, i did not see Jammeh beating, kicking or arresting anyone during the recent protests. It was YOU and your colleagues! Jammeh was not even in the country. In case you missed it, i would like to point out that this man is NOT worthy of your loyalty or respect. It is sad for you to allow him to continue to use you against your own people. Jammeh cares only about himself and staying in power, and he will do everything to achieve that. He will not hesitate to arrest, torture and murder you like he has done to many others once he is done with you. Where is Lang Tombong Tamba who was so loyal to him? Where is Solo Bojang? Where are Edward Singateh, Yankuba Touray, Sana Sabally and Sadibou Hydara? Where is his cousin, Pa Bojang?

 
Is this the man you will commit crimes to protect? What is in it for you? What do you get for following orders to arrest, beat and torture PEACEFUL protesters?
Just Think about it!

 
See these protesters? These are not strangers. They are not criminals and they are not your enemies for you be aggressive to them. These are your brothers, sisters, cousins, friends and neighbors. The people you live with. Your former school mates or their relatives, your colleagues, the people you meet and share a public transportation with…etc…All they want is for a better life for you and for themselves. All they’re doing is walk the streets and ask that ALL Gambians, including YOU, be treated with the respect every human being deserves – the same oath you made when you signed up for the job you currently have.
Guess what? You are welcome to join them. Yes, you can simply stand and march with them. If you’re sick or in trouble, i promise you you’ll see them before you see Yaya Jammeh by your side!

 
And if you’re not strong enough to join them in the peaceful march, you can stand by them and do your job…of making sure you protect them so nobody can harm them! It is your obligation to disobey any illegal orders, and any order that tells you to harm innocent Gambians is ILLEGAL!

 
My brothers, i beg you to obey your conscience and do what you know in your heart is right! Do it for peace, do it for justice, do it for humanity, do it for Gambia…but above all, DO IT FOR YOURSELF!

 

Sana Sarr

United States Condemns The Gambia’s Response to Peaceful Protests

The United States condemns the Government of The Gambia’s severe response to recent peaceful protests. We call for an immediate end to violence and urge all Gambians to exercise restraint and remain calm.

 
The United States calls on the Government of The Gambia to uphold its international obligations under the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, including the right to peaceful assembly.

STATEMENT BY SPOKESPERSON JOHN KIRBY

US Department Of State

Statement attributable to the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General on the death of Gambia opposition party members

New York, 17 April 2016

 
The Secretary-General learned with dismay of the death in detention in Gambia of political activist and opposition United Democratic Party (UDP) member Solo Sandeng and two fellow party members. They died following their arrest on 14 April 2016 for participating in a peaceful protest in Banjul.

 

 

The Secretary-General extends his heartfelt condolences to the families of the deceased. He calls on the authorities to conduct a prompt, thorough and independent investigation into the circumstances that led to their death while under state custody.

 

 

The Secretary-General is deeply concerned about the apparent use of excessive force and the arrest and detention of peaceful demonstrators on 14 April 2016. He calls on the authorities to immediately and unconditionally release all those arrested, including UDP leader Ousainou Darboe, and uphold the rights of the Gambian people to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly.

Reset password

Enter your email address and we will send you a link to change your password.

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

Sign up with email

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

By clicking the «SIGN UP» button you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Powered by Estatik