Tuesday, July 1, 2025
Home Blog Page 702

Is The 1997 Constitution Of The Gambia Yaya Jammeh’s Constitution?

By Bubacarr Drammeh

The Gambia gained its independent from Great Britain on the 18th February 1965. It was not until 1970 that it became a Republic. The first constitution of the country was the 1970 Constitution. The said constitution ceased to exist on 22 July 1994 when the constitutionally elected government was overthrown via a military coup. That led to the suspension of the 1970 Constitution. That marks the end of the First Republic and the 1970 Constitution.

The Gambia was governed by the AFPRC for 2yrs and the laws that were in existence were called military decrees. During that period a constitutional committee was setup to come up with a draft constitution that will be presented to the Gambian people in a referendum. The committee drafted the 1997 constitution and a referendum was conducted in 1996. The AFPRC regime at the time did not want the people of The Gambia to vote yes for the constitution because if the NO votes outweighed the YES, it means the committee will have to work on another constitution which will be presented again for another referendum. This will allow the AFPRC regime to continue ruling the country with their decrees. The people who were eligible to vote at the time voted yes, thus the birth of the 1997 Constitution of The Gambia and the Second Republic.

The preamble of the 1997 Constitution has succinctly affirmed that the 1997 Constitution is the will of the people of The Gambia . It states that

We the people of The Gambia have accomplished a great and historic task. We have had our say on how we should be governed. For this Constitution contains our will and resolve for good governance and a just, secure and prosperous society.

This Constitution provides for us a fundamental Law, which affirms our commitment to freedom, justice, probity and accountability. It also affirms the principle that all power emanate from the sovereign will of the people.

…This Constitution guarantees participatory democracy that reflects the undiluted choice of the people. The functions of the arms of government have been clearly defined, their independence amply secured with adequate checks and balances to ensure that they all work harmoniously together toward our common good.

As we usher in the Second Republic and beyond we give ourselves and generations of Gambians yet unborn this Constitution as a beacon of hope for peace and stability in our society and the good governance of The Gambia for all time…

In addition to the above statement of the preamble, section 1(2) of the 1997 Constitution also stated emphatically that the 1997 constitution is the expressed will of the people on how they should be governed. The said section provides that

The Sovereignty of The Gambia resides in the people of The Gambia from whom all organs of government derive their authority and in whose name and for whose welfare and prosperity the powers of government are to be exercised in accordance with this Constitution

From the above, it is clear that the 1997 Constitution of The Gambia is Gambia’s constitution not Jammeh’s constitution. That is why the 1997 Constitution (see section 5) gives the legal standing to any person (I will interpret this to include anyone resident in The Gambia and not necessarily limited to being a Gambian) who feels that the act of any person (including the President) or authority (including the National Assemble) is inconsistence or contravenes the constitution to file an action before a court of competent jurisdiction. Section 5 of the 1997 Constitution provides that:

A person who alleges that-

(a) any Act of the National Assembly or any thing done under the authority of an Act of the National Assembly, or

(1) any act or omission of any person or authority, is inconsistent with;
or is in contravention of a provision of this constitution, may bring an action in a court of competent jurisdiction for a declaration to that effect.

  • (2)  The court may make orders and give directions as it may considered appropriate for given, to such a declaration and any person to whom any order or direction is addressed shall duly obey and carry out the terms of the order or direction. 

  • (3)  The failure to obey or carry out any order made or direction given under subsection (2) shall constitute the offence of violating the Constitution and
    • (a)  shall, in the case of the President or Vice President, constitute a ground for his or her removal from office in accordance with section 67; and 

    • (b)  any other person who is convicted of that office shall be liable to the penalty prescribed by an Act of the National Assembly. 


This provision (i.e. Section 5) has been adhered to by Gambians in the past. In 1998, Lawyer Darboe and others filed a case against the government of Yaya Jammeh for violating the constitution. The case is called A N M Ousainu Darboe & Anor v Inspector General of Police & Anor. In that case, the first applicant (Lawyer Darboe) who was the leader and secretary general of UDP commenced proceedings in the High Court of The Gambia invoking the powers of the court under section 5 and section 37 of the Constitution. Darboe and others were seeking a declaration that the refusal of the respondents (the government especially IGP) to grant them permits to hold political meetings or to use loud speakers, without giving reasons, was inconsistent with section 17(2) of the Constitution and the constitutional rights to freedom of speech and expression (section 25(a)), freedom of assembly and association (section 25(d) and (e)) and freedom from discrimination on the grounds of political opinion (section 33(3)).

The High Court at first dismissed the application stating that it lacks jurisdiction to preside over the matter. The decision of the High Court was appealed by plaintiffs (Darboe and others) to the Court of Appeal. On appeal, the Court of Appeal held that the High Court has the jurisdiction to preside over the case since the action was commenced under section 5(1) and that the appellants’ allegations are related to the fundamental human rights entrenched in sections 18 to 33 of the Constitution. The case was accordingly referred back to the High court.

The High Court in its judgment held that The respondents’ (the government especially IGP) refusal to issue permits to the applicants to hold political meetings without giving any reason justifiable under the Act (or any other existing laws) is an infringement of the applicants’ rights under sections 17(2), 25 and 33(3).

See also the case of Ousman Sabally v. IGP & 2 ors

The constitution has also given us the right and duty to defend it. Section 6(2) of the constitution provides that:

  • All citizens of The Gambia have the right and the duty at all times to defend this Constitution and, in particular, to resist, to the extent reasonably justifiable in the circumstances, any person or group of persons seeking or attempting by any violent or unlawful means to suspend, overthrow or abrogate this Constitution or any part of it. 


The constitution further provides that a person who resists the overthrow, suspension and abrogation of the constitution did not commit any offence.

  • A person who resists the suspension, overthrow or abrogation of this Constitution as provided in subsection (2), commits no offence.

The above provisions have indicated one vital thing, which is that this constitution is the will of the Gambian people. The provisions of the 1997 Constitution must be adhered to by every person irrespective of your status, political belief, religious belief etc. There is no indication in any provision of the 1997 Constitution that it is Yaya Jammeh’s constitution. This constitution belongs to us and we must defend it at all times.

For the past 22yrs our constitution suffered abuses in the Jammeh regime. In some instances the regime was challenged (as indicated above) and many a times it was not. I acknowledged the fact that Yaya Jammeh’s regime was the worst era in the history of the Gambia. Due to his brutality, he was termed as one of the most brutal dictator to have ever lived in the surface of the planet. On human rights, Jammeh is accused of ensuring that there was no freedom of expression, association, liberty etc. he used the law enforcement agencies to eliminate anyone he perceived as a threat to his regime. Gambians were killed, tortured, imprisoned, forced to leave the country (exiled), and some disappeared. Jammeh will go on to terrorize Gambians. He put fear in the psyche of the average Gambian. He attacked people based on their religion practice, ethnicity and political affiliation. He is also accused of raping and molesting women and girls. He harassed people in public and once threatened to kill mandinkas.

Everything aforementioned is inconsistent with the 1997 Constitution of the Gambia, thus a grave violation of the 1997 Constitution. These amongst other reasons let to the movement or revolution or whatever you want to call it, that ousted Jammeh. Everything we did in ensuring Jammeh leaves office was done under the name of the 1997 Constitutions. From the nomination process, campaigns period, elections, announcement of results, resistance to Jammeh’s U-turn, ECOMIG and the swearing in ceremony of barrow. During this period we not claimed that the constitution is Jammeh’s constitution. In fact Jammeh was condemned by Gambians, non Gambians and institutions (such as UN, EU, AU, ECOWAS etc) for violating the 1997 constitution of the Gambia (when he refused to step down).

It is therefore wrong to say the 1997 Constitution of the Gambia is Jammeh’s Constitution. The 1997 Constitution is the Constitution of the Gambia and the will of the Gambian people.

I understand that the constitution has undergone several amendments (48 amendments to be specific). In my next article I will discuss the amendments and whether they are good or Bad.

 

Youth Minister Gomez visits hospitalized youth involved in Kitty accident

Gambia’s Youth & Sports minister Henry Gomez Monday visits the youth hospitalized at Edward Francis Small Teaching Hospital (EFSTH) in Banjul after their involvement in a car accident.

Minister Gomez conveyed President Barrow’s prayers for speedy recovery of the victims. He assured that government will do all that is necessary to save their lives.

The accident was happened Saturday at Kitty village injuring more than 30 youths when a vehicle ran into them.

Sources say the youth were celebrating the victory of President Barrow and the coalition when a Mercedes Benz taxi with BJL 9212 D from Brikama Nyambai tried to avoid a truck coming from Siffoe and ran on them and seriously injuring over 30 people.

But Police confirmed to local media that the vehicle ran into a jubilant crowd from a football game instead of election victory celebrants.

“The 30-year-old taxi driver lost control of the vehicle and ran into a crowd of football victory celebrants, causing serious injury to 30 persons. Four of the 30 injured were discharged from Brikama Health Centre since their injuries are minor.  Another four are under observation at the health centre, and two were referred to Serekunda General Hospital. The remaining 20, reported to be in a critical condition, were admitted at the Edward Francis Small Teaching Hospital (EFSTH) in Banjul, where they are receiving medical treatment. The taxi driver is under police custody to help in their investigation” Police Public Relations Officer Inspector Foday Conta told local media.

Meanwhile, Minister Gomez was accompanied by the Executive Director of the Gambia National Youth Council (NYC) and General Manager of National Enterprise Development Initiative (NEDI).

‘More unlawfully detained prisoners still languish behind bars’ – Police

Gambia’s police have confirmed that a good number of people unlawfully imprisoned by the former regime are still languishing behind the prison walls waiting to be release despite the number that have already been released.

President Barrow has since declared the release of prisoners that were unlawfully detained without being taken to a competent court of law by the former regime of Yahya Jammeh.

“Many people are released but still some are not because it has to take procedures to get them release,” Police Spokesperson Foday Conta said.

The Police spokesperson said that significant numbers of unlawful detainees were released but could not confirm the exact figure saying he was not with the exact figure at the time.

Conta said the declaration made by the new government to release those unlawfully detained is a gradual process, saying the releasing has to take one after another.

“There are people coming to find their missing families on a daily basis especially the first time the declaration was made,” he pointed out.

Answering to a question regarding the rumored arrest of Yankuba Badjie, former NIA Director who was fired a week ago, PRO Conta said it was not to his knowledge.

Swiss confirms probing Ex-Interior Minister Sonko for possible crimes against humanity

The Office of the Attorney General in Switzerland has confirmed it is investigating The former Gambian Interior Minister Ousman Sonko for possible crimes against humanity, the BBC is reporting.

Mr Sonko, who is seeking asylum in Switzerland, was taken into custody last month after a Geneva-based campaign group, Trial International, filed a criminal complaint accusing him of serious assault, coercion and false imprisonment, relating to his time in office in The Gambia.

The Attorney General’s office said it “would not rule out a suspicion of crimes against humanity”.

Mr Sonko has not commented on the accusations against him.

The former interior minister was one of the longest-serving members of ex-President Yahya Jammeh’s regime. He was also head of police but fell out with his boss in November last year – a month before the presidential election, which Mr Jammeh lost.

Ndey Jammeh Spotted At State House, What’s She Doing There?

0

Ndey Jammeh a close relative of former President, Yahya Jammeh who was also responsible for Jammeh’s VIP guests, was seen at the state house this morning, Febuary 6. Staff at the office expressed concern over her presence knowing how close she and her family are to Jammeh

Ndey’s sister, Jimbe Jammeh traveled with Jammeh and his family to Equitorial Guinea where they currently live in exile. Sources say Ndey cried until she fainted the night Jammeh and his delegation departed Banjul.

Security sources say Ndey was in the office this morning asking staff why they want to work with President Barrow, saying she now knows clearly that many supported former President for personal gains. “What is more confusing is the fact that she went straight to the kitchen, met the cooks then went to her former office”   a  source disclosed. “This is serious, only Allah can help President Barrow and his people” the source added.

Ndey Jammeh was dismissed about a year ago but was asked to report back to work in November shortly before The December Presidential elections. She was never officially reinstated, she was asked to report to work without an official letter.

Meanwhile, a group of women, called ‘The Jammeh Kunda Women’ have also resumed work at the state house kitchen Thursday. The women who cook for soldiers and staff there have not reported to work since Jammeh left the country on January 21.”They came on Thursday, cook, dished it out and went home. They are here again today” a source said. The source added that they are worried knowing what some of these women are capable of.

One Awa Jarju an intelligence officer who was attached to the state house was also seen there this morning.

 

Human rights and Justice: A revisit of Pinochet?

By Solomon Demba

To draw plausible conclusions as to whether justice would be served for alleged human rights abuses committed by state officers in the Second Republic, it is necessary for one to revisit the case of Senator Augusto Pinochet as it may allow us to understand the importance international law attaches to the protection of peremptory norms. This will also help us to examine the extent to which international human rights law has evolved to disallow the use of state immunity doctrine to shield perpetrators of deplorable crimes from prosecution.

Augusto Pinochet was significant and a symbolic figure in many ways. In diplomatic sense, it was unprecedented for a state to arrest another sovereign state’s former head at a request of another foreign power. It constituted the end of sates’ cautious approach to interfere in internal affairs of another state. No wonder it had generated ceaseless glare of media attention. The Spanish authorities were not prepared to settle for anything less than a speedy extradition of the General to face criminal trial for alleged human rights abuses   commissioned under his watch. .’It was contended that Chile had a vested right to immunity to the General and that no other State had the right to exercise jurisdiction over his crimes.

Moreover, such protection is in accord with the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Protection which provides former heads of state with immunity ratione materiae. It follows that Chile as an independent and sovereign state has the necessary legal capacity to confer such right on its former head of state.The House of Lords rejected this argument by displacing the state immunity doctrine for justice to take its course.

Your lordships took the view that state immunity should not be invoked as facade to cover up international crimes. Certainly, it defies common sense for an abstract state to commit serious crime against the very citizens it has a sovereign duty to protect. In the words of Lord Slyn ‘it is artificial to say that an evil act can be treated as a function of a head of state’. In my view, perpetrators of such crimes represent the controlled mind of the state. Therefore, they should face the full force of the law if found guilty of their crimes. There can be no doubt if international law fails to hold such men responsible for culpable crimes; impunity seems the likely consequence.

It was a known fact that the Senator had a well-established close nexus with the UK’s political establishment. But as a state party to the Torture Convention, the UK has an obligation to make sure that crimes within the scope of the Convention are punishable by national laws. It is also the case that the UK has extradition treaty with Spain which provides that the perpetrators such of offence be extradited within a reasonable time. Undoubtedly, the case affirmed that no head of state has blanket immunity against crimes that have a character of Jus cogen. Importantly, it places the community’s security over individual’s security that is crafted in state immunity doctrine.

Turning to human right abuses allegedly committed by state officers in the Second Republic. Firstly, The Gambia must bring criminal charges against those perpetrators for their role in such distasteful crimes to create the right momentum. Indeed, the perpetrators must be presumed innocent until proven guilty by a competent court. That is an important principle of fair trial. It will be against all principles of justice for defendants to be tried by the public opinion or the media.

Subsequently, the government may choose to seek extradition of the perpetrators provided that there is enforceable extradition treaty between The Gambia and their country of residence. Absent of extradition treaty is likely to stall any proceedings. For instance, In 2004 Equatorial Guinea did not secure the extradition of foreign mercenaries who were allegedly involved in a plot to oust its government because there was no extradition treaty. A deliberate omission designed to insulate a culture of impunity, but sounded death knell for the efforts to bring the perpetrators to justice.It is interesting to note that, there is no extradition treaty agreement Equatorial Guinea and The Gambia. Perhaps, this explains why Equatorial Guinea is seen as a preferred destination for anyone who might be implicated in the alleged human rights abuses that occurred in the Second Republic.

What is more striking is that The Gambia has not yet ratified the Torture Convention. This raises the question whether state officers who were complicit in commission of torture could be brought to justice under the Convention. It is indisputable fact that the both Republics had abysmally failed to give effective to one of the most seminal human rights instrument that accords comprehensive protection to the citizens’ human rights. The Torture Convention has been ratified by majority of states; even Equatorial Guinea has acceded to the Convention in 2002.The inaction of successive Gambia governments suggests, there could be inherent difficult legal challenges ahead to bring any successful prosecution. Nevertheless, if justice is to be delivered the new government must be ready to take bold actions to overcome such challenges.

The 1997 constitution of the Gambia prohibits torture under Section 21. However, it could be argued that it is not precise to make attempts and complicity as criminal offences. If there are no national laws pertaining to such offences, the secret services agents and law enforcement officers may be absolved from certain criminal liabilities under the Convention. The other important point is that the Convention has the necessary ingredients that can compel state party to take training and educational measures, in order to equip relevant state officers with the knowledge and skills on how to relate with the civil populace. That way , they can perform their duty with diligence in respect of citizens’ human rights. Therefore, It is incomprehensible, a government that supposed to have the interest of its people at heart failed to confer much needed protection on citizens. The omission can only be seen as a travesty to the intelligence of Gambians, an absolute failure to govern in good faith. It suggests here that governments were more interested in asserting their grip on power rather than guaranteeing the security of Gambians.

Notwithstanding,the torture Convention categorically prohibits torture and no state can derogate from it because it has become peremptory norms. That been the case there is  a glimpse of hope for justice if Equatorial Guinea and other state parties adhere to their obligation under the Convention, by taking reasonable steps and facilitate proper dispensation of justice.

They could either execute arrest warrant put forward by a requesting state, or they may well assert jurisdiction over the crimes under the ambit of the Convention. This is illustrated in the recent Swiss case where a former government officer was reportedly arrested for crime against humanity. Such decisive action is likely to be lauded by many around the world. Importantly, it would provide an opportunity for state such as Guinea to unmask its perceived ‘rough state image’ and uphold international justice.

While punitive justice seems desirable because of its deterrence effect on the perpetrators, the truth reconciliation process may also deliver justice as well as unify the nation. The story telling of the historical facts can bring closure to the sufferings and pains of those affected by the atrocities as they learn the unambiguous truth about what had happened.  Despite this, there is a danger that the process may be stymied, if tension is allowed to rife between those who want retributive justice as opposed to those who favour reconciliation. Therefore, there is a need for an active political leadership to engage all stakeholders in good faith for the construction of the Commission. Whatever the circumstance, it helps greatly if the perpetrators are remorseful about their crimes.

If the new government managed to reverse the decision of leaving the ICC, it can allow court to have jurisdiction over some cases. However, crimes against humanity must meet the requirement of widespread and systematic to fall under the ambit of the ICC. This requires abduction of creditable evidences that are crucial to the success of any future trial. The Chief Prosecutor could invoke the power of proprio motu power to investigate any relevant crimes if they meet the necessary criteria.  The power has been a subject of selectivity because it has been mostly deployed to investigate African cases.

Although the court has been seen by some African leaders as an instrument of foreign powers that only target Africans, the court is treaty based on state’s consent, depriving its authority from the membership. Bensouda, the Chief Prosecutor, responding to such criticism said this:  ‘‘What offends me most when I hear criticisms about the so-called African bias is how quick we are to focus on the words and propaganda of a few powerful, influential individuals and to forget about the millions of anonymous people that suffer from these crimes.’’ Surely such propaganda’s are designed to undermine the authority of the Court. Let me make it clear, the court has achieved justice for powerless Africans who were brutalised by repressive regimes. I wonder if there is any strength in the ‘African bias argument when in fact these atrocities were committed on African soils by callous Africans for political power.

The case of Augusto Pinochet illustrates the point that international law has fundamentally changed to make it difficult for the perpetrators of international crimes to escape justice by hiding in safe haven. Individual criminal act cannot be attributable to impersonate state for the purpose of absolving one from criminal liability.  It is not only unrealistic but also offensive to all notions of justice if state immunity is employed to cover up serious crimes committed by state officers who have fallen from grace. Therefore, it is incumbent on the new government to take all measures necessary and deliver justice for the victims. This can be achieved through truth and reconciliation mechanism or proper application of the law. From now on wards, the clock starts ticking while the jury is sent out to consider verdict as to whether the government has the tenacity to avoid ‘‘Show Trials’!!

Former Information Minister Seedy Njie Returns Home

0

Former Information minister Seedy Njie has returned to Banjul few hours ago on board Royal Air Maroc from Mongomo, Equitorial Guinea. Seedy’s flight landed at The Banjul International Airport in the early hours of Monday, February 6, 2017.

Njie returned to Banjul with one Buba Demba former chief of protocol, who was also part of former President, Yahya Jammeh’s delegation to Equuitorial Guinea where he currently lives in exile.

The two are said to have been isolated and kept in a motel very far away from Jammeh’s residence. They did not have access to him and his family and had limited access to food and other needs. “They followed Jammeh thinking he will give them money, but he never gave them a dime, they seem to be really disappointed with him” a source disclosed to The Fatu Network.

Meanwhile, sources say Jammeh’s mother Aja Asombi Bojang has been complaining to family members back in Gambia that she wants to head home. Former first lady, Zineb is said to be very uncomfortable with the presence of her mother-in law around the house. ‘Do not be surprised if she heads back home soon, she is complaining daily” a source said.

According to internet search, Mongomo is a town in Wele-Nzas Province in mainland Equitorial Guinea, roughly 1km west of Gabon’s Woleu-Ntem Province. The nation’s first president and the current president, Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo both originated from there. Mongomo, Jammeh’s new home was named a host city of the 2015 Africa Cup of Nations.

 

Foni Jarol Elders Call For Unity

0

The elders of foni Jarrol District residing in the Kombos Sunday, February 5, held a meeting at Masey Njie’s compound in Bundung. Among them were the Alkalo of Abuko, Botto Tamba and Alkali James Gaye who both advised the gathering to unite and become one big family and forget about everything that happened in the past.

SARJO M DARBOE, a strong supporter of the coalition appealed to the people of Foni Jarrol district to come together as one family and work for the betterment of the country, as well as continue to pray for peace and stability for which the country is known for. He prayed for peace to continue in Foni Jarrol District as well as in other districts.

Sarjo further said that Politicians come and go reason why everyone should remain as one family. He finally thanked the elders for their wonderful intervention.

Sakey Sanyang, Lamin Tamba, Lang Camara, Ali Barrax Bah an Alhajie Masane Camara were all present at the gathering. The next meeting is scheduled for Sunday, February 12.

Mahawa Cham and Saul Ndow’s abductors are being rounded up.

0

By Ebrima Sillah

Two of the main masterminds who sold Mahawa Cham and Saul Ndow to dictator Jammeh are now arrested and in police custody.

 

So far both police insiders and closed relatives of Mahawa Cham have confirmed that Lawu Jarju from Kaing Nema and Swanding Camara from Brikama have been arrested since Tuesday and are helping the police in their investigations.

 
In fact Lawu Jarju and Mahawa Cham are first cousins from the same village. Both Swanding and Lawu are accomplished mercenaries who fought for Charles Taylor’s rebel movement in Liberia. And both are known for their brutality in the battle front.

 
Lawu Jarju is said to have already confessed his involvement in the planning and execution of the abduction of Mahawa and Saul Ndow.

 
What happened next is too graphic to explain here but it’s not looking good. Currently Mahawa Cham’s relatives are preparing to organize a Muslim prayer for him tomorrow Sunday the 5th to pay their last respect to him.

 
Mahawa Cham and Saul Ndow were abducted in Senegal’s Cassamance province in April of 2013. The duo were setup by Lawu Jarju and Swanding Camara who were agents working for Dictator Jammeh and they lured both Mahawa and Saul to go to Casamance hoping that they could help them get to Gambia to get rid of Yahya.

 
But unknown to Saul and Mahawa was that the very people they were relying on were in fact paid by Yahya to infiltrate their group. Immediately they arrived in Cassamance, they were kidnapped and taken to Gambia in waiting pickups.

 
Allegations are that Elements of Senegalese intelligence who were on Yahya’s payroll were also involved in this. Saul Ndow had a bodyguard while in Dakar provided to him by a private security firm headed by a certain Mr Mbye. He was an ex-police officer.

 
Immediately Saul and Mahawa were kidnapped, that Mbye rushed to the ministry of interior that the duo (Saul and Mahawa) had travelled to Cassamance against his advice and now they could not be reached on their phones. It was meant to absolve himself from any blame.

 
Gambian police are said to be closing in on a number of leads including the involvement of senior officials of the state guards (the dictator’s body guards) in the abduction and subsequent disappearance of Mahawa and Saul Ndow.

 
Some names said to have been involved in this dastardly act have already surfaced including that of one Lt Colonel who has just been released from long term detention.
We are following this story with keen interest. We urge the police to bring to book the perpetrators of this heinous crime soonest.

THE LONG ROAD TO REBUILDING THE GAMBIAN NATION

By Alhagi T. S. Alieun Njie

Introduction
Developments since the crisis triggered by former President Yahya Jammeh’s refusal to relinquish the reins of government to the President-elect Adama Barrow, following the December 1 polls, are known to all and need not be recounted. We are now faced with a long road to travel which will not be an easy walk as it is riddled with obstacles and difficulties that will challenge our collective capacity and wisdom as a nation. What is most urgent and essential is to move on with the business of creating and administering a government that seeks to satisfy the hopes and aspirations of a citizenry that has suffered for 22 years, under an administration that regarded itself as master and not as servant of the people.

The transition time frame of three years which the Coalition has set itself is in contrast with a five years term mandated by the Constitution for an elected President. While the reasoning of the Coalition members can be understandable, one has to point out that three years is too short a time for the transition government to deliver on the aspirations and expectations of the population, as well as create a political environment to permit future elections to be conducted in a free, fair and credible political atmosphere, given the various activities and governmental reforms that MUST be undertaken.

Time for concrete action
The Coalition would not and cannot expect to enjoy a long period of honeymoon as the Gambia public, particularly the youth, down trodden and ignored or deceived for too long are eager for the jobs and empowerment promised by both the erstwhile and incoming governments. Barrow’s administration has to address, and fast enough, the issue of jobs and the creation of a level playing field in the private and para-public sector that would smooth the path to jobs and opportunities creation for the youth and jobless.

To fully appreciate the magnitude of the activities to be undertaken by the new government it should be understood that whatever the case, the machinery of government should be kept in motion, at least in the interim, to provide needed public services, without which society will be chaotic. In addition, there are the results of the Jammeh administration’s mismanagement of the affairs of the state that must be addressed to ensure rule of law and democratic governance.

Institutional and Socio-economic Reforms Needed
For the new administration to function efficiently and effectively, the following actions must be taken immediately or as soon as possible:

• Reforming the civil and public services to ensure a transparent and corruption-free administration of public affairs without political influence in the discharge of official functions.

• Reforming the Constitution to ensure that a better constitution befitting the status of The Gambia as a sovereign, democratic republic is crafted.

• Reforming the Electoral Laws to create a level playing field for all who aspire to elective political office.

• Expunging from our Laws provisions that have stifled decent, such as the Public Order Act which prohibits the gathering without permit of more than five persons, a draconian colonial relic that has no place in a democracy.

• Reforming Press Laws to allow the existence of a free press which will hold the present, and any other Government, accountable to the Gambian public.

• Reforming the Judiciary to make it robust and efficient, and composed of Gambian legal luminaries as judges, especially in the Supreme Court, to guarantee that what obtained under the Jammeh regime is never experienced again in this land.

• Reforming of the Public Enterprises Sector to make it more efficient, viable and accountable and not posing a threat to either private enterprise or creating any distortions in the allocation of resources within the economy.

• Working out social and economic reform programs, preparing policy papers and sensitizing potential donors for a Donors’ Conference before the end of the three year transition, to mobilize the needed resources for the nation’s economic and social transformation.

Managing the Transition
The diverse motivations and aspirations of the coalition parties give rise to inbuilt fragility in the organic structure of the Coalition, which if not carefully managed could lead to its break up as the component parts compete for dominance and control.

Identifying the problem is a lot easier task than proffering solutions. The suggestions proffered are intended to trigger insightful thoughts and discussions such that we can arrive at a consensus which will enable the paving of the way to a peaceful and stable nation.

How we navigate our way out of this seemingly intractable and untenable situation would be a determinant of results that serve to guarantee the best chances for success during the three years transition period. Our best strategy lies in organization structure and management. The type of organization that is put in place to ensure the completion of required reforms (of which there would be many) would determine the efficiency with which targeted activities are executed and objectives attained, given the constraint imposed by the three years transition already set by the Coalition leadership.

Managing the transition requires time and expertise which are not likely to be combined in the same personalities. Therefore, if Coalition leadership decide to take cabinet level appointments, it is unlikely they will have time enough to supervise and adequately participate in the reform processes that should form a major component of the reforms to be undertaken during the transition as a matter of necessity.

To reduce the pecuniary urge by Coalition members to take cabinet level appointments, the President may, under provisions in the 1997 Constitution, create a Reform Council and various other Special Committees headed by key members of the Coalition to be remunerated (salary and benefits) at levels not inferior to those given cabinet level appointees. Granting this arrangement, the day-to-day administration of Government ministries during the three years transition may be devolved to technocrats with relevant expertise and track record to ensure that the social and economic programs elaborated are efficiently executed with periodic monitoring and vetting by an oversight body made up of selected Coalition members.

Once the management structure of the transition program is agreed, there would need to be developed a matrix of implementation outlining, among other things, the tasks to be carried out; the time frame by which target activities have to be completed and by whom; reporting requirements and when reports should be submitted to Cabinet for consideration; a scheduled date for a referendum on the new constitution; and a projected date for the Donors’ Conference and which donors to be invited.

Conclusion
With these tasks properly programmed and executed, the transition would stand a better chance of success than any other ad hoc arrangement tossed around in the guise of a reform policy. “Team Barrow” should allow itself reasonable time to reflect on the issues raised and map out a considered approach that would best address the challenges that lie ahead. No one expects the journey to be easy but with commitment and transparency, The Gambia would have a second chance of creating a democratic society that would be the envy of all.

Bearing in mind that one never has a second chance of making a first impression, any time taken to effectively plan and launch a program of reforms and development would be time well spent.

It is hoped that the activities and findings of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission President Barrow plans to constitute would make it possible for Gambians to fully reconcile their society in order to forge ahead with the task of rebuilding our nation.

Alhagi T. S. Alieun Njie

Gambia: Washington Embassy Unveils Barrows Portrait

0

By Ajong Mbapndah L

After 22 years, a portrait other than that of former President Yaya Jammeh now adorns the walls of the Gambia Embassy in Washington,DC.

At a solemn ceremony at the Embassy on February 2, Ambassador Omar Faye was joined by staff, a few Gambians and friends of Gambia in unveiling a portrait of new President Adama Barrow.

Gambia is back on the rails and it is time for all hands to be put on deck in writing the next chapter of the country’s history, said Ambassador Omar Faye. Gambians are a proud, noble and a dignified people and that the recent political crisis were resolved without a shot or bloodshed speaks volumes to the political maturity of the people Faye said.

Faye said, President Barrow was speedily building up cabinet and called for unity and a common vision as Gambia starts another very important chapter in its history. Ambassador Faye lauded the support from the international community and from all friends who stood by Gambia in the last few months.

In a sign of growing confidence, visa demands to Gambia from the USA have experienced a surge.

“I have hoped and prayed hard for this moment,” said a lady who told this reporter she had not gone to Gambia for the last twenty years.

“We will continue to serve all Gambians and people interested in Gambia without fear or favor,” Ambassador Faye said as he declared the doors of the Embassy very open. From Gambians who need services, to people interested in investment opportunities in the Gambia, the doors of the Embassy are open, Omar Faye said.

Many Gambians and Africans too a sigh of relief with a peaceful transition that was not very obvious. In power for some 22 years, President Yahya Jammeh was surprisingly beaten by little known opposition challenger Adama in elections last year. Yahya who initially conceded and even called to congratulate Barrow for his election, reversed his own decision and created a political crisis in the country with his refusal to handover. It took a combination of international diplomacy and military action led by the Economic Community of West African States(ECOWAS), for Jammeh to leave the country. Initially installed in Senegal, President Barrow made a triumphant return the capital Banjul after Jammeh’s departure.

Shadowboxing lunatic beats Bronx neighbor to death in ‘completely unprovoked’ attack

0

An NYU lab technician forgot his wallet in his apartment — and paid for it with his life when an ex-con neighbor yanked him from an elevator and beat him to death, cops said.

Bakary Darboe, 46, was riding the lift in his Bronx building — after returning home to grab his billfold — when he fell victim to the “completely unprovoked” attack, police said.

“To do this to Bakary, to just kill him like that, we cannot forget,” said the victim’s brother Mbemba Darboe, 61. “We can forgive, but we cannot forget.”

Relatives said the father of six was on his way to Mercy College, where he was taking classes, when he realized he forgot his wallet and returned home to grab it just before 5 p.m. Thursday.
Darboe jumped back into the elevator after leaving his ninth-floor apartment. Now carrying his wallet, Darboe made it to the seventh floor of the building on E. 156th St. in Melrose when the elevator doors opened.

A deranged 40-year-old parolee — identified as Junal Jordan — had been shadowboxing in the hallway, sources said. As soon as the elevator doors opened, Jordan launched into a ferocious attack, sources said.

“The guy is shadowboxing in the hallway,” a police source said. “The elevators open up and he pulls the guy out of the elevator and beats him.”

A security camera captured Jordan dragging Darboe out into the hallway and then pummeling the older man, sources said.
“Please get off me … I can’t breathe!” Darboe screamed at one point, sources said.

The video shows Darboe managing to get back to his feet. He started to stagger away — but the suspect then delivered several blows to the bloodied victim’s head until he collapsed.

Darboe was found dead at the scene in a pool of blood, sources said.

One of his knocked-out teeth was found nearby, along with a bloody backpack, two cell phones and a set of keys. Spots of blood stained the hallway walls.
Cops found Jordan a few blocks away and took him into custody.

The suspect, who had blood on his hands and clothing, admitted to getting into a fight “in his girlfriend’s building.” But he wouldn’t say anything else, police sources said.

Jordan, a career criminal with a long rap sheet, was later charged with murder and manslaughter, police said.
The accused killer has been arrested 20 times since 1993 for many crimes including assault, robbery, reckless endangerment and drug possession, cops said.
He was sentenced to nine years in prison following a 1999 conviction for attempted criminal sale of a control substance.

Jordan was released in 2005 and put on parole until 2008, but he couldn’t stay out of trouble.

He was arrested in 2006 after being charged in a series of robberies in Manhattan. Jordan was sentenced to eight years in prison — and walked free in 2014. He was placed on parole until 2019, cops said.

On Friday afternoon, some 30 Darboe relatives were gathered at the family home mourning the Gambian immigrant who arrived in the United States 12 years ago.

In addition to his job and studies, Darboe was an active member of his mosque and the secretary general of the Gambian Islamic Society, relatives said.

“Every time he came home late he would help me with my homework,” said his 8-year-old daughter Jakong.
“He was very busy but he always had time.”

Mustafa Darboe, 14, sat quietly in the corner on a computer, holding back tears as his sister talked.

“He was just a good guy,” he said of his father.

Brother-in-law Demba Sanyang described Darboe as a “highly educated person” who was heavily involved in the Muslim community.

“We are deeply sad,” Sanyang, 58, said

The doomed man’s neighbors were stunned.

“(I) knew him from dropping our kids at the school bus stop,” neighbor Bademba Diallo, 48, said. “He was a very nice man, always great.”

“It’s very heartbreaking,” he said. “I’m shocked about what happened.”

WITH ROSS KEITH

Nigerian Air Force contingent on ‘Operation Restore Democracy in Gambia’ returns home

The Nigerian Air Force (NAF) contingent deployed on the ‘Operation Restore Democracy in Gambia’ finally returned home in Nigeria from Dakar, Senegal.

The 200 officers of the air wing contingent joined the ECOWAS forces that were deployed to remove former President Yahya Jammeh who lost the December Presidential election to President Adama Barrow but refused to step down after graciously conceded defeat even before the final results were announced.

Receiving the contingent on arrival at the Murtala Muhammed International Airport, Air Vice Marshall James Gbum, Chief of Policy and Planning of the Nigerian Air Force on behalf of the Chief of Staff and top command relayed Nigeria’s goodwill message to the troops, and applauded the gallantry of the personnel.

“Your cooperation and coordination with sister services as well as other friendly forces from other nations that constituted the ECOWAS mission in the Gambia is highly commendable. We are glad that democratic order has been preserved in The Gambia and stability of the country has been sustained. On behalf of the Chief of Air staff and the entire Nigerian armed forces, I want to thank you all for a job well done.

The leader of the contingent, Air Commander Tajudeen Yusuf said the troops have played its role and it is now left to political leaders to ensure its sustenance.

“As we arrived, we went to the state house of former President Yahya Jammeh. I think he was actually very prepared for the war but the air power show scared him and he doubt he could control and contain everything.

Jammeh, a former military officer and the second President of the Gambia ruled the tiny West African nation for 22 years after toppling the democratically elected government of first post-independence President Alhaji Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara.

After a transition, he was later elected as President in 1996. He was re-elected in 2001, 2006 and 2011 elections.

The 2016 election took a U-turn as he was defeated and graciously conceded defeat on December 2nd, 2016. However, a week after, he reversed his decision and announced he was rejecting the results and called for a new election. This sparked a constitutional crisis and immediate mediation deployed by the sub-regional body ECOWAS.

After several failed attempts to convince him to hand over power, ECOWAS had no option but to deploy troops to forcefully remove him and restore democracy.

As the troops – air, sea and ground forces where surrounding The Gambia, Jammeh on January 21st was scared and agreed to hand over power peacefully and left the Gambia for an ECOWAS-arranged exile, allowing the transition of power to take place. He now lives in exile in Equatorial Guinea.

President Barrow pays historic visit to Gambia’s first President Jawara

Gambia first post-independence and democratically elected President Alhagie Sir Dawda Kairaba Jawara on Friday received the new President Adama Barrow at his residence in Fajara.

This is the first meeting between President Barrow and former President Jawara. It is described by many as a historic and a sign of the new Gambia that every citizen was yearning for.

The meeting accorded former President Jawara the opportunity to congratulate President Barrow on his election victory. He assured of his guidance and solidarity prayed for the President and the people of The Gambia.

Former President Jawara ruled The Gambia from 1965 until 1994 when he was toppled in a military coup that ushered in the former President and dictator Yahya Jammeh who is now living in exile in Equatorial Guinea after loosing the December elections to President Barrow.

Ex-President Jawara who was living in the UK on exile after the 1994 coup, returned to the Gambia in 2002 after almost eight years in exile, following an announcement in 2001 by coupist Yahya Jammeh of an unconditional amnesty.

Apprentice Flogged At Fajara Barracks

0

By Yankuba Jallow

Foroyaa Newspaper

Modou Bah, a 19 year old apprentice of a commercial van, has accused a senior military officer of flogging him at Fajara Barracks and inflicting severe injuries on him before his release last week.

The 19 year old who was unable to walk properly when he visited Foroyaa last week, explains that his driver was driving their van with some passengers on board the vehicle when he had a dispute with this senior officer.

He said subsequently the apprentice was arrested and detained at Fajara Military Barracks on the orders of this officer.

Bah who was accompanied by four men including the driver due to his condition, narrated how he was tortured. The apprentice said he was undressed and ice water poured on him while he was under a mango tree and from there the officer ordered for his continued detention and decreed for no one to release him without his approval.

“On Wednesday, January 25, 2017, around 7pm, the officer came and ordered for my release but before he did so, he treated me badly,” said Bah. Bah told Foroyaa that the officer flogged him while he was laid on a table and inflicting injuries on him.

The officer maintains that he gave him ‘a good hiding to teach him a lesson’ because a 19 year old (the apprentice) insulted a 49 year old (the officer) which is unacceptable in our culture and tradition. The apprentice denied insulting him.

Bah’s driver, Muhammed Touray told this reporter that the boy received treatment at the Serrekunda General Hospital in Kanifing through a police medical report from the Kanifing Police Station. The Kanifing Police Station transferred the case to Tallinding Police Station which has jusrisdiction to handle the case.

The real dictators of Potomac, Maryland

0

By Max Bearak

The Washington Post

The 22-year reign of one of Africa’s most eccentric and self-serving dictatorships came to an end last month when the president of Gambia — whose full title was His Excellency Sheikh Professor Alhaji Dr. Yahya A.J.J. Jammeh Babili Mansa — finally ceded power to his democratically elected rival and fled to a similarly tiny fiefdom farther south along the continent’s western coast.

Teodoro Obiang Nguema, now his host, has led Equatorial Guinea for 37 years, making him the world’s longest-serving head of state. Both men came to power decades ago in coups, and brutally quashed dissent while enriching themselves and their families. Investigations by activist groups and Western governments have found evidence that both siphoned off vast quantities of money from state coffers. With that money, they lived lavish lives, amassing dozens of expensive cars and houses around the world while the majority of the people in their countries continue to live in poverty.
If their proclivities weren’t already similar enough, it so happens that both men own palatial multimillion-dollar houses right next door to each other, at 9908 and 9909 Bentcross Dr., in a luxurious subdivision of Potomac, Maryland, about 20 miles from downtown Washington.

Bentcross Drive is a ribbon of mansions. Their looping driveways, manicured lawns, tennis courts and swimming pools are guarded almost universally by iron gates with passcodes and security cameras. Prominent signs warn against trespassing.

The subdivision, Falconhurst, is home to doctors, lawyers, business executives and even professional basketball players. Calbert Cheaney, whom the Washington Bullets (now Wizards) picked sixth overall in the 1993 NBA draft, sold 9908 Bentcross to Jammeh’s family trust for $3.5 million in September 2010, according to public property records. A 2013 CNNMoney.com article titled “Where the money makers live,” listed Potomac as the most affluent town of more than 25,000 people in the United States — and Falconhurst is a warren of its richest.

The World Bank’s latest figures indicate the average Gambian earns $460 a year. Equatorial Guinea has the highest per-capita income of any sub-Saharan country, but is so unequal that two-thirds of the population lives in extreme poverty and infant mortality rates are some of the worst in the world.
Neither Jammeh’s nor Obiang’s house had cars in the driveway last week, and D.C.-based activists from Gambia and Equatorial Guinea said that both residences usually remain unoccupied. Sohna Sallah, vice chairwoman of the Democratic Union of Gambian Activists, said that as far as she knows, Jammeh has been to the Potomac house twice since it was purchased, while his wife uses it on a monthly basis for shopping excursions and to see their daughter, who attends boarding school in McLean, Virginia.

The listing for Jammeh’s house on Maryland’s property records portal says it has 11 bathrooms. The house is 8,818 square feet and sits on 2.3 acres of land. Obiang’s house on Bentcross is bigger, at 9,261 square feet, and was bought for $2.6 million in 2000. The Obiangs also own a second house in Potomac that is, relatively speaking, more modest.

In fact, none of the houses is exorbitantly expensive by U.S. standards. But they are only three out of a constellation of villas owned by the two men’s families in locales stretching from Morocco to Malibu, California.

Repeated requests for comment to the ambassadors of both Gambia and Equatorial Guinea on their states’ roles in purchasing or using these houses went unanswered.
Tutu Alicante, a U.S.-based Equatorial Guinean human rights activist, explained why leaders like Obiang and Jammeh would want to buy houses in Potomac in the first place.

“There are big public relations firms in Washington that specialize in catering to dictators, if you can believe it,” he said. “Someone like Obiang comes to the U.S. maybe twice a year, say, for a checkup at the Mayo Clinic and an appearance at the U.N. General Assembly meeting. After the General Assembly meetings in New York, the firms bring them down to D.C. and connect them with corporate leaders and help them whitewash their image with shiny events.”

“The most disgusting days in this country are the days of the U.N. General Assembly,” echoed Kambale Musavuli, a human rights advocate from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. “Banks, P.R. firms, marketing firms falling over themselves to court them.”

One U.S. bank played a key role in helping Obiang launder money from his country’s oil boom into immense privately held wealth. In a 2004 inquiry, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations found that accounts in Riggs Bank, which closed in 2005, were the destination for Equatorial Guinea’s oil revenue. Senior government officials held more than 60 accounts at the Washington branch of the bank, valued at up to $700 million.

The bank would then transfer massive sums of cash to offshore shell companies it created for Obiang, who could then spend the money on a house in Potomac, for instance. The Senate committee also found that some of Obiang’s money came from oil funds explicitly established to be redistributed among Equatorial Guineans.

Obiang has escaped prosecution in part because going after heads of state presents an array of complications. A Justice Department official who was not authorized to speak with the press and requested anonymity said, “In addition to possible immunity issues, heads of state sometimes have significant control over the degree to which their law enforcement officials can cooperate with U.S. investigators. Moreover, it can be very difficult to convince witnesses and others with evidence of foreign corruption to come forward — they often are worried about their economic well-being, and sometimes even their safety or the safety of their family members.”

On the other hand, Obiang’s son and presumed heir has been the subject of sweeping investigations in the United States, France, Switzerland and the Netherlands regarding his multitudinous assets. In 2014, Teodorín, as he’s known, settled a case brought by U.S. federal prosecutors and agreed to sell a $30 million mansion in Malibu and a Ferrari, but was allowed to keep a Gulfstream jet and $2 million worth of Michael Jackson memorabilia including a diamond-studded glove, a jacket the star wore in “Thriller” and six life-size statues. He also avoided criminal prosecution. In a statement, prosecutors said Teodorín “received an official government salary of less than $100,000 but used his position and influence as a government minister to amass more than $300 million worth of assets through corruption and money laundering.”
The United States doesn’t have an “ill-gotten wealth statute” that would allow investigators to act on the simple suspicion that a government employee couldn’t possibly be earning enough to afford certain assets. So even though Yahya Jammeh isn’t a head of state anymore, it might still be very difficult for U.S. authorities to mount a case for seizing his property.

“To bring a civil forfeiture case, we need evidence of the crime and the link to the asset we seek to forfeit,” said the Justice Department official. Evidence can be hard to come by, but nongovernmental organizations that work in Equatorial Guinea, for instance, have helped U.S. investigators by convincing witnesses of corruption to come forward.

Sallah, the Gambian activist, said she was returning to her country for the first time in eight years to try to collect some of that evidence. She’s hoping that officials from the central bank will be confident enough of Gambia’s weeks-old democracy to help her pinpoint instances of illegal withdrawals Jammeh made from the state treasury.

That would be the first step to challenging Jammeh’s ownership of houses like the one on Bentcross Drive. Jammeh’s house is listed as belonging to “Trustees of the MYJ Family Trust,” which activists like Sallah have long known is tied to Jammeh’s family, but now they can endeavor to make the link tangible. When asked how many other foreign power brokers own property in Falconhurst, Eric Stewart, a real estate broker who has sold houses in Potomac for 25 years, said the common practice of listing caretaker trusts as owners makes it hard to tell.

Stewart is trying to sell the house on the other side of Obiang’s on Bentcross, which currently belongs to Serdal Adali, a Turkish businessman whose company provides “full contingency support to US Military and Coalition forces” in places like Iraq. Adali once served jail time and was barred from Turkish soccer stadiums for match-fixing when he was on the board of the wildly popular Istanbul club Besiktas. Adali bought the house from Ayman Hariri, the billionaire son of Lebanon’s slain former prime minister Rafiq Hariri and heir to his father’s huge construction company.

Falconhurst is flush with money, both ill-gotten and not.

Nixon Clermont, a part-time cabdriver who grew up around Potomac, said he feels a twinge of disgust when he drives around the neighborhood and sees what he takes to be evidence of misused state wealth.

“I’m from Haiti, man. In Haiti, my people can’t find the food to eat,” said Clermont.

“Our ambassador used to live here. Paid for with money that could have saved people. It makes me so angry, man. So sad.”

Julie Tate contributed reporting to this article.

Jammeh’s Kanilai Weapon Cache Finally Secured In Fajara Barracks

0

The cache of weapons discovered at former president, Yahya Jammeh’s villa in Kanilai has finally be collected and transported to Faraja Barracks this morning.

The cache which includes lethal weapons were transported in military trucks by the combined ECOMIG and Gambia Armed Forces officials who stored them at a secure place at the barracks.

At the start of the intervention of the ECOMIG forces in The Gambia, there has been concerns about the fate of former dictator Jammeh’s weapons. Credible reports were that, the dictator and his ‘Enablers’ in the army, set up mobile armories embedded in civilian populated areas as part of the broader plan to commit genocide in the country.

The discovery of the Kanilai cache and its transportation to the Fajara Barracks for secure keeping is part of the first initiative to account for any missing weapons from The Gambia Armed Forces armories.

 

Gambia College Student Raises concern

0

In a letter addressed to the editor at The Fatu Network, a student at the Gambia College in Brikama asked why the vice principal and head of the school of Education Isatou Ndow, is not allowing students to re register after they returned back to school. The break was due to a political impasse the country was faced with after the December 1 Presidential elections.

Below we publish the full letter:

Dear Editor,

This is a current news emanating from the Gambia, since after the realization of our dreams of ending the dictatorial regime of Yahya Jammeh.

When the political crises reached climax, the Gambia college students union in collaboration with the college principal Abubacarr Jallow decided to inform students to stay at homes until the impasse is solved.

When the college reopened the vice principal of the Gambia College and head of the school of Education Isatou Ndow, said all students should re register at the college to show that they are back for the term. This is because every term students need to register if not they will be ruled out of the college even if they are in their second year at the college.

Only a few students came to register as some had traveled to the hinterland as the situation was so tense, reason why they could not report back to the college on time. Now that classes are commencing next week, Isatou Ndow is not allowing 95% of the students to register which could ignite a protest at the college at anytime.

Why is Isatou Ndow refraining students from registering for the term? Is it that she does not want jammeh’s oppressive rule to end by keeping students at homes? Also some other major institutions have also boycotted their activities until Isatou is stopped.Why is Isatou Ndow doing this to us?

Two Bodyguards, Camera Crew Return To Banjul

0

Cameraman Sankung Fatty, photographer Ebou Taru Njie and bodyguards Major Muhammed Sambou and Captain Ousman Jallow alias ‘High Speed’ have all returned to Banjul, Thursday evening, February 2.

The two GRTS crew returned without their camera equipment.

The four were part of the delegation that traveled with former President, Yahya Jammeh and his family on January 21, 2016. They were detained at the border town of Karang for questioning after Jammeh abandoned them in Guinea Conakry. 

According to highly placed sources, Jammeh took off with Sankung’s video camera and Ebou Njie Taru’s photographic camera which all belongs to the state, gave them $100 dollars each and took off with his family leaving them in the cold in Guinea Conakry.

It would be recalled that both Fatty and Njie traveled with former president without their passports.

Meanwhile, Bora Colley and two other military officers are still detained in Senegal undergoing questioning by authorities there.

 

Position of international law on despots-turned asylum seekers: Case of Jammeh – OpEd

By Kwadwo Appiagyei-Atua

Under unremitting pressure from the regional bloc ECOWAS, the African Union and the UN, Gambian strongman Yahya Jammeh fled into exile in Equatorial Guinea. There are credible allegations of serious human rights violations against him, covering his 22 years in power. Jammeh can run but cannot hide. Everything possible must be done to bring him to justice.

The ultimatum by ECOWAS to Yahya Jammeh to leave The Gambia by noon local time on January 20, 2017 or face a forceful removal or arrest is interesting to note. The Chairman of the ECOWAS Commission, Marcel Alain de Souza, is quoted as saying that “If by midday, he [Mr Jammeh] doesn’t agree to leave The Gambia under the banner of President Conde, we really will intervene militarily.”

The main reason Jammeh wanted to stick to power was to avoid possible prosecution for the numerous heinous human rights violations which he is alleged to have committed which, if proven, would constitute crimes against humanity. It is the same reason (fear of prosecution) which forced him out of the country on Saturday, 21 January 2017.

This view is confirmed by his statement of January 11 2017 in which he is quoted as having appointed a national mediator to meet “all parties to resolve any mistrust and issues” and draft an amnesty bill to ensure there was “no witch-hunt so that we can restore a climate of confidence and security.”

It is to avoid such scenarios that the framers of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), in their wisdom, provided in the Statute and endorsed the position that for certain acts which violate jus cogens norms, sitting heads of state should be brought before the ICC to face justice if their state is unable or unwilling to try them.

Jammeh’s human rights record

The litany of violations Jammeh is alleged to have committed is well-documented by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the UN Human Rights Council and many other bodies. They cover violations of the right to self-determination of the people of The Gambia (on two occasions – how he came to power through unconstitutional means and how he attempted to cling to power, also through unconstitutional means).

The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights issued 5 resolutions against Jammeh on his poor human rights record. In one of such (Resolution 134), the Commission summarized the state of human rights in The Gambia by referring to the “routine allegations of unlawful arrests and detentions, torture in detention, unfair trials, extrajudicial executions and enforced disappearances by State Security Forces, which target human rights defenders, journalists, and all persons suspected of involvement in the attempted coup to overthrow the Government of The Gambia.” It also requested for the immediate and unconditional release of Chief Ebrima Manneh, Kanyie Kanyiba and all prisoners of conscience.

This resolution was issued in support of the 5th June 2008 judgement of the ECOWAS Community Court of Justice which had ordered the release of Chief Ebrima Manneh from unlawful detention and the payment of the damages awarded by the Court.

The legality of granting refuge, immunity, impunity to rights violators

ECOWAS’s decision had been pre-empted by Nigeria’s Lower House of Assembly which voted on Thursday, January 12, 2017 to offer Jammeh asylum if he stepped down. While he initially declined that offer, ECOWAS and the AU piled pressure on him to accept that or face forceful removal from office and arrest.

However, that decision is in violation of international law, which includes AU and ECOWAS laws. First, according to Article 1(F) of the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, a person is not entitled to be granted refugee status if,

(a) He has committed a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity, as defined in the international instruments drawn up to make provision in respect of such crimes;

(c) He has been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations

While this provision seems to indicate that the person should have already been convicted of the crime, the AU position is different. Article 5 of the 1969 OAU Convention Governing Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa,

“The provisions of this Convention shall not apply to any person with respect to whom the country of asylum has serious reasons for considering that:

(a) he has committed a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity, as defined in the international instruments drawn up to make provision in respect of such crimes;

(c) he has been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the Organization of African Unity;

(d) he has been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations” [Emphasis added].

One may further argue that the particular country of refuge may not have such “serious reasons” to consider that Jammeh has committed any of these crimes. However, to take such a stance will be in violation of the AU Constitutive Act which provides that the organization shall function in accordance with the following principles, which include “respect for the sanctity of human life, condemnation and rejection of impunity  …  and subversive activities; and, “condemnation   and   rejection   of unconstitutional   changes   of governments.”

It is also important to refer to the High Court of Nigeria case of Egbuna v Taylor, Anyaele v Taylor, brought against Charles Taylor in 2004 while he was in exile in Nigeria, which technically ruled against the Nigerian government and the AU. The applicants instituted the action to determine whether they could seek judicial review, in a domestic court, of an executive decision granting asylum to a person indicted by an international tribunal, arguing that Taylor had been wrongly granted asylum in Nigeria. The court rejected the argument of Nigeria that the act of granting asylum was a diplomatic issue and not one for the applicants. This is a very important decision which should guide any country that would want to grant asylum to Jammeh.

The legal obligations that will be violated if Jammeh is granted refuge anywhere include the non-recognition of refugee status to persons in violation of international crimes and also the duty not to grant amnesty in relation to crimes that are contrary to jus cogens norms.

Therefore, any state that would purport to give asylum to Jammeh should reckon that that decision will come back to haunt it because, like the Habre case, the victims will not keep silent.

The best option for Jammeh?

The Gambia is a State Party to the ICC. Therefore, it is expected of it to try Jammeh for possible crimes against humanity within its domestic courts. If it proves unwilling or unable to try him, then under the complementarity rule, jurisdiction will be transferred to the ICC to do the same.

For that matter, President Adama Barrow may have suggested a soft landing for Jammeh when he proposed the setting up of a truth and reconciliation commission. Yet, even in that case, as was in Sierra Leone, there are some serious crimes which cannot be swept under the carpet and for which the perpetrators should be made to face full justice, internally or externally.

What is clear at this point is that Jammeh will face justice for the crimes he is alleged to have committed, possibly alongside some other Ministers of State and the Chief of Defence Staff. But the question then is, will Jammeh be better off facing the music within The Gambia or outside? It is the author’s view that it would have been better for Jammeh to stay within and negotiate for a softer landing.

The likely scenarios when outside The Gambia is that he will be subjected to a Hissene Habre-style Special Chambers trial as recommended by the Committee of Eminent Jurists of the AU, or he will be taken to the ICC. One thing which is sure is that he will not enjoy amnesty or immunity, as it happened to other leaders like Idi Amin (Uganda) or Haile Mariam (Ethiopia) who is alleged to be still in hiding in Zimbabwe. Times have changed.

It is also important to note that the ACDEG provides in rticle 25(5) thereof that “Perpetrators of unconstitutional change of government may also be tried before the competent court of the Union.”  Therefore, Jammeh can run but he cannot hide.

The lesson for all African leaders is to respect human rights, the rule of law and democratic principles while in power in order to enjoy life in dignity and in respect after leaving office.

The Author: Kwadwo Appiagyei-Atua is a Senior Lecturer at the School of Law, University of Ghana, Legon where he teaches Public International Law and International Human Rights Law. He can be reached at [email protected]

Reset password

Enter your email address and we will send you a link to change your password.

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

Sign up with email

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

By clicking the «SIGN UP» button you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Powered by Estatik