Saturday, July 5, 2025
Home Blog Page 684

The Gambia: Seven Decades of Economic Development Part 1 1950 – 1959

 

Sheriff Kora

Introduction
Timothy Snyder in his epic work On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons of the Twentieth Century
remarked that “If young people do not begin to make history, politicians of eternity and
inevitability will destroy it. And to make history, they need to know some.” It is as a
result of this knowledge that I have decided to share parts of my thesis focused on the
economic development history of The Gambia from 1950 to 2015. During my research,
one of the biggest challenges I faced was the paucity of data and economic development
literature on our country’s economic development history. This is a common theme
among many ex-colonies especially in the early decades leading to independence and
shortly after. As a result, it is befitting to give credit to pioneers such as Tijan Sallah,
Harry Gailey, President Jawara, Ambassador Dr. Ebraima Manneh, Burama L.J. Jammeh
etc. without whose research work I used extensively in achieving this work.

For the sake of brevity, this article is only a synopsis of my research work, and is by no
means exhaustive of the development history that took place in this decade. This article
aims to contextualize the pre-independence development history of The Gambia between
1950 and 1959. It will attempt to highlight the indigenous and external actors within the
context of the development theories and strategies, the international system, donor
policies and programs of the era that drove the economic development ethos of the
country.

Country Overview

The Gambia is the smallest Anglophone countries in West Africa. The country
stretches about two hundred miles, and is surrounded on three sides by Francophone
Senegal, and opens to the Atlantic Ocean on the fourth. Unlike other Colonies and
Protectorates of Britain, The Gambia was the least endowed in matters of mineral
resources. However, it has the most navigable waterways in West Africa, which made it a
convenient and lucrative gateway for the Atlantic Slave trade. It is her strategic location
and the desire of the British to deprive the French political control of the river that the
boundaries of the colony were carved without regard to ethnicity or geographic
considerations.

As a means of saving cost and enhancing administrative efficacy, The Gambia,
under the indirect rule system was partitioned into a colony and a protectorate. A
Governor who was appointed by the colonial office in London administered the colony;
the protectorate before the introduction of divisional commissioners was indirectly
administered through the traditional chiefs. With an area of sixy-nine square miles and a
population of about 30,000 inhabitants, the colony was the seat of the capital Barthurst

and covered the area of Kombo St. Mary; the protectorate on the other hand covered an
area of over four thousand square miles with an average population of about 237,000.

By 1950, The Gambia was seriously underdeveloped, and agriculture was still the
basis of her economic life. Unlike the other colonies such as Senegal and others in the
sub-region that witnessed economic growth as a result of industrialization and
reallocation of labor from agriculture to the higher productivity non-agricultural sector,
the Gambia witnessed no significant economic growth or development from low scale
agriculture to the industrial sector. Without any other appreciable mineral resources, The
Gambia lagged behind in economic and social development. The colony was exposed to
the shocks of price fluctuations on the world market during this period. As a British
entity, the depth and breadth of The Gambia’s development between 1950 and 1959 was
driven largely by the colonial policies of that era. Most of the economic and social
development projects undertaken in The Gambia in this period derived from the policy
shift and attitude of the British Empire towards her overseas territories at the conclusion
of the Second World War. Trusteeship was constructively by the colonial office to
promote the welfare of the colonies.

Whether this was out of goodwill or imperial interest has been subject to debate.
However, the paradigm shift in colonial development policy has to be examined in the
context of events and the global actors at the onset and end of WWII. Development of the
colonies was not only a bid to impress public opinion in the wake of nationalism or to
counter Nazi argument of paternalistic neglect by Britain, but to guard against the
possibility of internationalization of the colonies at the end of the of the war. Colonial
economic development was also a strategy of the British government to improve colonial
infrastructure and institutions in order to retain and increase exports of commodities that
would have been hard to acquire from hard currency countries. Britain was determined to
alleviate the balance of payment deficit with the dollar area and to tackle the ‘dollar gap’
problem in the 1950s.

The birth of the United Nations in 1947 coupled with the Truman Doctrine that
espoused bettering the conditions of overseas possessions of all colonial masters as a
deterrent of communist encroachment were two other important incentives that set the
ball rolling for economic and social development in the British colonies. The Bretton
Woods system and the institutional underpinnings of the United Nations such as the Food
and Agricultural Organization (FAO) and the International Labor Organization (ILO)
gave technical assistance in the development of The Gambia in the 1950’s.

The combination of these politico-economic pressures and the expedience of the
British Colonial officials was the genesis of Colonial Development and Welfare Act of
1940 which mandated the Colonial Development and Welfare funds that were geared
towards creation or improvement of social services and public works and utilities in the
colonies. Colonies were seen as a viable source of dollar revenue through the triangular
trade model under the Marshall plan; consequently, the economic policy was drawn into
this strategy and the economic crisis of the post-war period shaped the way in which the
overseas development policies were implemented.

Two institutions were created to oversee the development goals of the colonial
office, namely: the Colonial Development Corporation and the Overseas Food
Corporation. As the names suggest, the former was charged with developing mineral
resources, improving communications, developing waterpower, electricity as well as
producing food and other agricultural products. The former had the sole powers of food
production for export to the United Kingdom. The colonial development policy in The
Gambia like elsewhere in the sterling group was yoked between two theories centered on
goodwill and imperial interest: modernization theory on the periphery, and the
dependency theory at the core.

Colonial Infrastructural Development

The financial plight and development trajectory of The Gambia in the 1950s is a
consequence of the colonial development policies leading to the 1940’s and how they
were applied. Despite the attractive outlook of the colonial development scheme, until the
end of the 1940’s, they were executed on a policy that each colony regardless of size
should be economically self-sufficient and not to be a charge on the Treasury of the
metropolitan country. Capital development projects were expected to be funded directly
out of the budget surpluses of the colonies from the export market boom of the war years
and later from the industry demands of the Korean War. However, the meager earnings of
monoculture countries such as The Gambia and the Seychelles Islands were unable to
carry out the physical improvement investments in school, bridges, hospitals etc. This
gave enough compulsion to the colonial office to pump in capital from the Colonial
Welfare and Development funds towards financing development projects.

Prior to the 1950’s development projects, the Colonial Development Corporation
undertook a large scale mechanized agricultural project in the 1940’s to cultivate and
harvest rice mechanically in Walikunda – in the hinterlands. The second project was the
Yundum Egg Scheme. After a hefty financial investment from the Colonial Development
and Welfare funds, both projects, which were thought to be profitable ventures, turned
out to be a disaster.The high sunk cost that followed the unsuccessful economic
experiments of the Colonial Development Corporation in the Walikunda rice project and
the Yundum Egg Scheme between 1947 and 1951 were glaring examples of projects that
failed due to corruption, mismanagement, and the lack of human capital necessary for
driving sustainable development of the Gambian colony. With the British public
perception that the economic situation in The Gambia was a drain on the colonial
Treasury the arrival of the Conservative Labor Party in 1951 prompted a risk aversion
stance when it came to development investment for overly dependent countries like The
Gambia.

These failures not only “convinced private and government investors that little
potential gain would accrue from development projects there”, they made the Governors
and other colonial officials reluctant at requesting funding for development projects to
improve agriculture, develop the harbor, airport of improve land and water
communication. Consequently, investment as witnessed in other colonies tended to

by-pass The Gambia. This will have far reaching consequences on The Gambia’s
post-war development history in the 1950’s and leading to its independence from Britain
in 1965. Between 1946 and 1958, The Gambia received a total of 1,240 million pounds
from the Colonial Development and Welfare funds . 1,058,800 was spent on colony
improvements of which 976,340 pounds was grants from the Colonial Development and
Welfare grants; the remainder was to be raised by the Government.

The major service departments of the colonial government were Agriculture,
Public Works, Marine, Education, and Public Health. The bulk of funds were allocated
for social development schemes in expanding education and health. Communication also
received a huge proportion in the 1950’s most of which went on road and bridge
construction, transportation etc. Economic development expenditure was primarily
centered on agriculture improvement and marketing. This was the period when a new
bridge and a high school were built in addition to water supply improvement and a street
drainage system for Barthurst. Despite the development bias that existed previously
between the colony and the protectorate, the protectorate areas received a sum of
£583,290 towards the construction of a rural asphalt road from the provincial
administrative seat of Brikama to Mansa Konko in this era.

In addition to construction of the asphalt road between Brikama and Mansa
Konko in 1955, the bridge at Pakali Ba was also constructed in the same period. The river
transport system was also revamped as a recommendation from the Blackburne Report,
which recommended development of building deep-water wharves in the capital
Barthurst and service wharves in up country river ports to link the protectorate with the
ocean. The capital was outfitted with two wharves and the groundnut ports of Kaur and
Kuntaur were also improved. A new river transport called Lady Wright, and a few old
hand operated ferries were procured to facilitate crossing along the banks of the river
Gambia. However, most of the equipment were old and ineffective, and unfortunately, the
ferry between the Barthurst – Barra crossing points capsized in 1957 claiming the lives of
over fifty people.

Health

Between 1950 and 1959, there were only two hospitals in The Gambia – The
Royal Victoria and Bansang Hospitals. Prior to 1938, there was no hospital in the
protectorate until the construction of a new hospital in Bansang, which served the entire
protectorate population of over a quarter million people. The medical services in the
colony were better than the ones in the protectorate. In 1953, the hospital in Barthurst
was replaced by the Colonial Welfare Development fund into a new facility called the
Royal Victoria Hospital. The biggest public health challenge of the period was mosquito
borne diseases such as Malaria and Yellow fever. This menace was relatively mild in the
Barthurst area where there were proper control measures in place. However, mosquito
borne diseases were prevalent in the protectorate where investigations have estimated the
infant mortality rate to exceed five hundred per thousand live births.

The caloric intake and diet of the average Gambian was very low with little or no

protein. The average Gambian ate less vegetables and the staple rice was of low
nutritional value. Sleeping sickness, yaws, intestinal worms and malnutrition were all
endemic in the 1950’s Gambia. The medical and public health facilities of The Gambia in
1950 were also met by challenges of new drug shortage and the inadequacy of staff with
the proper medical training to serve the population. There was also the traditional
constraint of locals who were often unwilling to consult with Western trained doctors.
The vast distance and inaccessibility of medical facilities meant critically ill or injured
patients in outlying villages often died before they reached the hospital.

Education

In the area of education, the Government at the turn of the century did very little
investment. The policy of the colonial administration was to disassociate itself from
educating the people and to delegate the responsibility of education entirely in the hands
of missionaries. Educational development in this period was guided by the
recommendation a Government appointed commission in 1950 spearheaded by T.H.
Baldwin. By 1950, there was only a handful of primary school largely concentrated in the
colony. There were only four secondary schools in the entire country: St. Augustine’s and
St. Joseph’s run by the Catholic mission, and Armitage High and Gambia High schools
were government operated schools. There was very little investment in vocational or
agricultural training. The school curriculum was designed to teach the basic arithmetic,
reading and writing skills needed for carrying the clerical duties of the colonial
administration. There was no advanced education beyond the secondary school level. The
few Gambians with the means often travelled overseas to further their studies, and never
returned. This was the beginning of the Gambian brain drain and the problem of human
capacity development to improve the educational system.

However, the colonial administration undertook development of post-secondary
education when it purchased the abandoned buildings at the Yundum egg scheme, and
transformed it into the Yundum Teachers Training College in 1952. Although expenditure
in education has increased from less than £30,000 in 1948 to £124,000 in 1958,
enrollment in schools were generally low and primarily restricted to only boys. Schools
were disproportionately centered in the colony partly due to the stiff opposition from
many of the traditional rulers in the protectorate.

Following the low development of education in the 1950’s was the problem of
low human capital and the shortage of adequately trained Gambians to fill the important
administrative positions. By the end of 1948, there were seventeen Gambians in the civil
service compared to seventy-nine expatriates. However, due to the revolution of
education in the 1950’s, by 1959, there were fifty-three Gambians in all cadres of the
civil service compared to sixty-seven expatriates. It is important to note that the
Gambianization of the civil service did not gain steam until in 1963 when Gambians were
clamoring vigorously for a change in the administrative system.

Trade, Agricultural Exports and Economic Growth

Trade in the 1950’s was characterized by large development of cash crops –
groundnuts in the case of The Gambia that was exported or exchanged for imported
European goods. Thus the economic development investment of the colonial government
in the 1950’s was geared towards improving agriculture and the extractive industry in
The Gambia. Economic development had largely been associated with expansion and
promotion of minor export crops such as peanuts, sesame, cotton, and palm kernel seeds.
Fertilizer consumption, improved irrigation and agricultural machinery under the
‘oxenization’ project were also increased during this era. Gambia’s output of ground-nuts
(in shell) between 1950 and 1958 stand at the following: the country produced 61,000
tons in 1950, 69,000 in 1951, 58,000 in 1952, 63,000 in 1953, 59,000 in 1954, 58,000
tons in 1955, 80, 000 tons in 1956 and 90,000 in 1957. The country also produced 2 tons
of palm Kernels each year except in 1958 when output dropped to a thousand tons.

It is estimated that 98% of all exports from The Gambia were destined for Britain.
The surge in agricultural output and trade was facilitated by the demand and attractive
prices of commodities as a result of post-war reconstruction and the Korean War boom in
1951. Increased in exports in this period rose faster than imports and created a trade
surplus in The Gambia. This was facilitated by the introduction of the Gambia Oilseeds
Marketing Board (GOMB), which sold the groundnut cash crop. Trade licenses were
granted to natives or representatives of transnational firms such as the United Africa
Company and Maurel and Prom to purchase groundnuts from the farmers. Despite the
initial boom in the export trade, The Gambia could not cope with the fluctuations in
market prices, bad harvest and poor quality of nuts. The government ran a deficit of
£150,000 in 1953 that warranted investigation from the Colonial office, which resulted
into the incompletion of many projects. The dwindling of world prices between 1954 and
1955 forced most of the loss to be absorbed by the farmers’ fund, ultimately resulting into
loss earnings to the farmers.

There was very limited foreign direct investment into The Gambian economy, and
with the exception of development aid that came principally from the Colonial Office and
Treasury, the country witnessed a considerable outflow of capital from the few foreign
firms that made up the private sector. The prominent financial institutions in the country
in the 1950’s were the Standard Bank of West Africa and the Banque Centrale du
Commerce et L’industrie. Whilst most of the development initiatives came from the
Government itself, there has been assistance from the FAO which assisted the in the
eradication of the rinderpest disease that was ravaging cattle in the 1950’s. The ILO
visited The Gambia in 1952 in a regional visit to offer technical assistance and to ensure
fair labor practices in the both informal and formal labor sector. The development
literature of the country shows the only notable donors of the era as the Red Cross, which
trained Gambian medical orderlies to staff the health centers. The Anglican, Wesleyan,
Methodist and Catholic missions have had a long-standing presence in the country and
were actively involved in evangelism and education.

Political Development

Politically, the country was still under the colonial domination of the British

Empire with very little to no Gambian representation in policy matters. The protectorate
and the colony were deliberately divided with the former being excluded politically, and
bearing the brunt of taxes and agricultural production for exports. Development was
mostly centered in the colony whilst the protectorate was marginalized. There was a
serious case of inequity and distributive injustice in the 1950’s. In 1950 out of a budget of
over £1,000,000, a paltry sum of £37,000 was disbursed to the protectorate
administration. More money was expended to administer 30,000 in the colony. However,
following the decolonization efforts in 1946, the elections of 1951 was the real beginning
of active political parties and organized nationalism in the country. The democracy envy
that spread across the continent, empowered Gambians to demand more representation in
the colonial legislative council. The constitution was amended in 1953 and 1954. The
first political party the Democratic Party emerged in 1951, and in 1952 the Muslim
Congress Party was created, the United Party followed suit and finally following the
extension of the franchise to the protectorate, the Protectorate People’s Party was formed
in 1959 to represent the interests of the protectorate. A significant economic and political
development of the 1950’s was the emergence of The Gambian Workers Union in 1959.
These were the political forces to lead the country to self-attainment and independence in
the 1960’s.

The development performance of The Gambia in this period was defined by the
very nature of colonialism, its motives and development policies. Economic development
under the distortionary policies of colonialism was geared towards developing the natural
resources of the colonies for extraction and market profit. As a result, being a
monoculture, The Gambia did not provide adequate incentives for any significant
investments into its institutional and infrastructure development. Although there were
slight improvements in the agriculture sector and the public works sectors such as roads
and water communication that served as the lifeblood of the economy, these
improvements were not without their own shortcomings.

Agriculture was labor intensive and distorted gender roles. Women and children
entered into the heavy labor pool with the children deprived of any form of education.
The promotion of the groundnuts, sesame and cotton cash crops created a shift in
agricultural production from horticulture which led to inadequacy of food reserves and
subsequently chronic malnutrition and famine. The development challenges of the 1950
decade will later play a compounding role in the challenges and successes that will be
witnessed in the future development history of the Gambia.

Over 886 thousand voters go to the polls IEC chairman reassures spot counting as he calls on the media to transmit results as it unfolds

 

By Sarjo Camara-Singateh, Foroya Newspaper

 

Mr. Alieu Momarr Njai has assured the election observer community that the counting of the results would be on the spot and the media has a role to play by transmitting the process as it unfolds.

The Independent Electoral Chairman made this statement at the briefing of observers on Monday 3rd April 2017 at Paradise Suites Hotel ahead of the 6th April parliamentary elections, which was well attended by both local and international elections observers, (ECOWAS, AU, EU ) to name a few. He indicated that his institution’s motto is Fair-play, Integrity, and Transparency; that polls will open at 8am and close at 5pm, but if voters are in the queue at 5pm they should be allowed to vote. “Our electoral system is second to none in terms of its transparency, credibility, fairness and accuracy. NO ONE CAN RIG IT!!!” He noted that spot counting will be witnessed by IEC officials, party agents, polling agents, donors and observers.

“During this session, our able officers here will demonstrate to you the whole voting process, from A – Z. You will then see for your very-self come Thursday 6th April during your visits to the various polling stations country-wide that our voting system is fool-proof; tamper-proof and rig­ proof! COUNTING IS DONE RIGHT THERE AND THEN ON THE SPOT! The Media therefore have a pivotal role to play in this very crucial exercise by transmitting the process as it unfolds”.

He said during the four days in which the nominations were held, 239 candidates were nominated and one has since withdrawn. There are 886,578 registered voters and 1,422 polling stations in the country and the breakdown is as follows: Banjul Administrative Area, 35 polling stations, 22,731 voters; Kanifing Administrative Area 287 polling stations, 199,957 voters; Brikama Administrative Area 427 polling stations, 281,115 voters; Kerewan Administrative Area 183 polling stations, 101,717 voters; Mansakonko Administrative Area 90 polling stations, 49,198 voters; Janjanbureh Administrative Area 207 polling stations 116,675 voters and Basse Administrative Area 193 polling stations, 115,185 voters.

Njie remarked, “One Hundred and twenty-two Assistant Returning Officers have been hired to work in the 53 constituencies countrywide. Counting will be done at the polling stations at the close of polls. There are seven collation centres. Five thousand four hundred and sixty-two polling staff will be contracted to man the polling stations”.

Mr. Njai stated that the Gambia’s Independent Electoral Commission is established under Chapter 5, Section 42 of the Constitution of the Republic of the Gambia, and it is mandated under the Constitution and Electoral Laws with: the registration of political parties; the conduct and supervision of the registration of voters for all public elections and referenda; the conduct of the Election of a Speaker and a Deputy Speaker; ensuring that the dates, times and places of public elections and referenda are determined in accordance with law and that they are publicized and elections held accordingly; and the Commission shall announce the results of all elections and referenda for which it is responsible. He noted, “The results of each of the 53 Constituencies must be collated at each of the 7 Administrative Areas before being announced by the Returning Officer and transmitted to me for announcement over GRTS. I cannot therefore announce any other result different from the actuality”.

The IEC Chairman, Njai noted that the IEC since its inception in 1997 has conducted four Presidential elections, three National Assembly elections and three Local Government elections and several by-elections for the National Assembly and Local Government. The fourth National Assembly Elections under the IEC’s purview is slated for Thursday 6th April 2017.

The IEC chairman said presently, there are nine registered Political Parties with the Commission and they are: Alliance for Patriotic Re-Orientation and Construction (APRC), United Democratic Party (UDP); National Convention Party (NCP), National Reconciliation Party (NRP), People’s Democratic Organisation for Independence and Socialism (PDOlS), People’s Progressive Party (PPP), Gambia Party for Democracy and Development (GPDP), Gambia Moral Congress (GMC) and Gambia Democratic Congress (GDC).

He also acknowledges the support made by ECOWAS, UNDP and the European Union as it has come at a time when help is really needed.

“Gambia can return to dictatorship if Gov’t is not properly directed” Halifa Sallah

 

By Kebba Jeffang, Foroya Newspaper

 

The PDOIS Secretary General and its Serekunda constituency National Assembly candidate Halifa Sallah says the Gambia could find itself back into dictatorship if the government is not properly directed by competent National Assembly members.

Sallah, who concluded his nation-wide tour meeting the electorate stressed the importance of the national assembly and carried the same message throughout the tour. The tour began on the 29th March in the Upper Nuimi in the North Bank Region and ended on the 2nd April, in Lamin, West Coast Region.

“It is a tradition in politics for politicians to seek for the mandate from their electorate when elections are approaching. This is what we are doing,” he said.

He informed his supporters across the country that the government has 3 branches in which the executive is charged with responsibility of handling state resources in order to create development for the people through different ministries.

He added that: “Members of the National Assembly are mandated to make laws and to guide the President along the right way whenever he or she should go. So it is very important to fill the assembly with experienced and knowledgeable people who will not be controlled by the executive but can question the government’s policies and programmes in the best interest of the Gambian people.”

Sallah said he could have been a Minister which has more privileges and requires no campaign for election as a portfolio, but he decided to seek for National Assembly mandate to ensure that The Gambia doesn’t get itself back into what it was. “If the government is not well directed it can return to dictatorship or what is even worse than that.”

He explained that PDOIS has a programme that it intends to deliver to the Gambian people and they have been putting forward such aims to the electorate for a long time. According to him, the concern of the electorate has always been the call for unity among the parties in order to remove President Yahya Jammeh from power.

“This is the call we looked into and decided to put our party interest behind and then invited other political parties for talks in order to join our forces together and remove the then incumbent. PDOIS paid Kairaba Beach Hotel and called all the Presidential candidates for talks at Kairaba Beach Hotel in September last year. We agreed on the method of electing one person among the political parties involved and we agreed that the person will resign from his party and stand as an Independent candidate and he or she will serve for 3 years in office,” he narrated.

The former minority leader in the National Assembly added that he was shocked to hear from certain people that he is the enemy of President Adama Barrow. He said this cannot be true as the allegation is baseless. He maintained that no one can pass judgment on him except President Adama Barrow whom according to him never claimed or justified that.

“We declined the ministerial posts because we believed that we can better serve in the National Assembly. All of us cannot be ministers because if the National Assembly is filled with incompetent members we will either return to dictatorship or even more than how we were,” Sallah asserted.

On what led to the split of the coalition in the National Assembly elections, Sallah explained that there were two positions on how to contest one of which requires the resignation of candidates from their parties and stand as independent candidates for coalition while the other was tactical alliance which was initially only supported by the UDP and NRP on the ground that they do not want their parties to die. He said they ended up agreeing on tactical alliance which requires candidates to stand in the name of their parties. He said in tactical alliance, candidates will not go against one another and each will be allowed to contest in the respective strong holds.

“However, during the talks, United Democratic Party (UDP) insisted that it cannot contest below 36 seats of the total 53 constituencies across the country. All other parties have their intentions too, some 20, 25 etc. We always adjourned the meetings on numerous occasions yet parties are not reducing their intentions. We then decided to go and get nominations under our various political parties since there could not be agreement and nomination was due,” he said.

According to him, it is confusing to see that certain parties are using coalition symbol and a photo of President Adama Barrow as if they are standing for the coalition. He clarified that no party is standing in the name of coalition as they failed to agree on that. He advised the constituencies to disregard such claims as it only represents falsehood. He said such parties are not sure of their popularity which makes them to do so.

Secretary General, Sallah, held meetings at the following constituencies to campaign for PDOIS candidates: Upper Nuimi, Lower Nuimi, Jokadu, Sabach Sanjal, Nianija, Niani, Sami, Upper Fulladu West, Niamina East, Bundungka kunda and Lamin.

More Calls To Revive Jahally-Pacharr Rice Project

 

Gambia’s import of rice has grown significantly in recent years compared to the past, the demand for the country’s staple food has increased. The more rice is imported, the more the price escalades in the local markets.

According to the Gambia Bureau of Statistics, an average of Nine Hundred Millions Dalasi was spent on the importation of rice from 2005 to 2014. The highest quantity was 143, 768,000 tons while the lowest was 35,553 000 tons in 2011 and 2006. This includes both commercial and food aid to the government.

The major importers of rice in the country are commercial owners who are mostly foreign business tycoons as the greater population of Gambians consumed rice daily as a staple food with rising demand in the market. The former President Yahya Jammeh who was also involved in business at the time has predicted more than 100 percent increment on the prices of rice in the country which has come to past. Since then a bag of rice has increased to the amount not affordable to many Gambians especially the poorly paid civil servants.

Experts who spoke to this medium about the lack of sustainability on the import of rice to the country at the expense of the growing population called on the government to revitalize the Jahally-Pacharr rice project. This project was first established as rice farm scheme for the large-scale irrigated and mechanised rice production. It is said no country can developed without food self sufficiency.

After several efforts of persuasions, Mr. Sambou Kinteh, former Principal Agricultural Officer responsible for the Central River Region (CRR) and Upper River Region (URR) has finally agreed to talk about the Jahally/Pacharr project, saying he is not selling himself or looking for a job in the new government.

Kinteh explained that the first attempt of Rice Farm Scheme RFS, suffered from poor engineering works with the result that attempts to irrigate failed and production had to depend on rain. He said the Taiwanese Technical Mission, World Bank and People’s Republic of China initiatives suffered from common weaknesses of omission of internal drainage systems, poor access, lack of flood protection work and high canal seepage losses. He added that Rice Development Project also failed without adequate financial provisions.

The former Principal Agricultural Officer and Permanent Secretary has highlighted valuable lessons accumulated from the past initiatives. He talked about the beneficiary involvement in the design and formulation of rice development project especially in site selection and choice of components. He also talked about the scale and level of sophistication of irrigation and mechanical technologies as well as the socioeconomic conditions of the farmers including sustainability of outputs like spare parts, local maintenance and repair services skills.

“Availability of support services: production inputs such as seed, fertilizer and chemicals; institutional support services such as extension, credit and markets; and mechanisation services such as land development, land preparation, irrigation and drainage, harvesting and post-harvest processing is critical for profitable production,” Sambou Kinteh said.

He further talked about a balanced division of management’s attention and emphasis between timely organization of production inputs and services on one hand and ensuring timely crop husbandry practices. He called for focus on development of rain fed swamps, tidal irrigated swamps, rehabilitation of small perimeter schemes and establishment of new perimeter schemes in descending order of priority.

Meanwhile, the recent visit to the camp at Sapo in the Central River Region was like walking in a ghost camp. There was barely a handful of people in the camp. Many of the buildings were old and abandoned.

“This place used to be lively with 24 hours electricity or generator like in the city. We have NARI, DOA, Water Resources, Mechanisation Team and Project Staffs. They were all working in high gear and was very instrumental,” NARI Farm Manager, Modou Sambou said.

Modou Sambou said their mandate was to make adaptive research on basic commodities like rice in low and upland including mangrove ecology. He explained the screening of different varieties of rice before selecting the best suitable for cultivation in the country. He also highlighted the lack of conducive working environment such as during flood, poor electricity and bad salaries among other things.

“Land is not a problem,” he pointed out.

The NARI Farm Manager called for the revival of the mechanisation team which he said would help to revive the rice project. He further called on the government to bring back Tractors and Power Tillers under one team with competent staff or mechanics. He added that the unit should have initial operating capital as a start for lubricants and spare parts.

“We need to have good salaries with hardship allowances. That will keep the workers to stay. It’s not like in the greater Banjul area where other avenues like treks are available,” he explained.

Mr. Modou Sambou said the Mechanisation Team can be providing services that will be responsible for ploughing the farmers fields which he said within one or two season will be able to stand on its own, saying it could cover all rice fields including the one in Kuntaur.

“When this is done there will be no need to import rice in this country,” he emphasised.

Meanwhile, Mr. Ousman Colley, Director of Agriculture covering both Central River Region and Upper River Region could not be reached for comments.

GBA sues AG, JSC over re-appointment of four judges

 

The Gambia Bar Association (GBA) has filed an action against the Attorney General and Minister of Justice, and the Judicial Service Commission over the re-appointment of four Nigerian High Court judges.

The judges are Justice Edward E.Ogar, Justice Martias O. Agboola, Justice Simeon A.Abi and Justice Martins U.Okoi.

The Gambia Bar Association claimed that the appointments of the Judges are not in line with the constitution of the Republic of The Gambia 1997.

Our sources revealed that the suit seeks to challenge the appointments and an order quashing their appointments.

It could be recalled that these four Nigerian High Court judges – Justice Edward E. Ogar, Justice Martias O. Agboola, Justice Simeon A. Abi and Justice Martins U. Okoi – were among several other judges that had their contract renewed late last year for January to December 2017 but as a result of the political impasse that gripped the country, some of the judges travelled out of the country.

But after the political impasse, some of the judges returned to resume work but were informed to hold on pending the swearing in of the new Chief Justice as the erstwhile Chief Justice who facilitated the renewal of the judges had resigned few days before former President Jammeh left the country.

After the new Chief Justice was sworn in and assumed office, the judges did not resume work as there were reports that some members of the Gambia Bar Association (GBA) would not appear before any foreign judge if they were re-appointed.

Meanwhile, sources disclosed that the appointments of judges are done in consultation with the Judicial Service Commission and not with the Gambia Bar Association, citing sections 138 and 145 of the 1997 constitution of The Gambia.

Source: Point Newspaper

Darboe urges APRC supporters to join UDP

 

The leader of the United Democratic Party, Ousainou Darboe, has called on opposition APRC supporters and others to join the UDP and work for the development of the country.
Speaking on the campaign trail Darboe also urged the UDP supporters to open their arms to all those who are willing to come to the party and forget about past differences.

He pointed out that UDP has no grievances against any individual and called for unity among Gambians.
Darboe further added that UDP is a peaceful party that is open to all regardless of tribes. “We must continue to maintain our relationship at all times and reject any temptation to harm our long standing unity and one family existence,” he said.

Darboe saluted Abdoulie Suku Singhateh, the former APRC NAM for Lower Baddibou and his colleagues who cross-carpeted to the UDP, describing them as patriotic citizens and true believers in national interest.
For his part Abdoulie Suku Singhateh urged the electorate to vote for UDP candidates because they are the right candidates who can bring development for them. The tour party has now returned to the Kombos.

Source: Standard Newspaper

KORO CEESAY’S FAMILY ASKS GOV’T TO INVESTIGATE DEATH

 

The family of the late Ousman Koro Ceesay, a former Finance Minister under the former regime of Yahya Jammeh, has called on the new government to launch an inquiry into his mysterious death and brought the culprits to justice, The Standard has learned.

Mr Ceesay died on June 23, 1995 as the Finance Minister under AFPRC regime in mysterious circumstances when his incinerated body was found inside his burnt official vehicle near Jambur village.
The family claimed that despite the fact that Koro was a serving cabinet minister at the time, no member of his family was spoken to by any member of the security forces nor were they informed about any police investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death.

The petition, which is signed by fourteen members of the family and sent to the Ministry of Interior, demands the new government to immediately launch an inquiry into Koro Ceesay’s death so as to know the truth and bring the perpetrators to justice.

In the petition, the family said it is their view that such monumental abdication of state responsibility can only lead to strong suspicion of foul play and consequently the family members demand that the new coalition government initiate an urgent investigation into his death so as to know the truth, hold any guilty party to account and bring about a long awaited closure for the whole family.

 

Source: Standard Newspaper

GOOD MORNING PRESIDENT BARROW

 

Lately, a lot of chit chat aimed to malign you and your rainbow government has gone under the bridge. Many have and will continue to be tough on you not to disparage but entreat you to deliver the best for new Gambia. Information is power. It liberates. But it also enslaves. Unfortunately, new Gambia is caught in a treacherous information cross-fire which threatens to lacerate its social web, undermines its stability, security, new found democracy and development. Regrettably, blame has been unduly apportioned on the diaspora as being bossy, unpatriotic and misrepresenting national interest.

 

When all hope was lost and the fight was fierce, the diaspora was the darling of the nation. It not only led and took the fight to the doorsteps of the dictator and relevant stakeholders who exerted pressure on monster Jammeh but provided finance and moral support for you and your MOU colleagues. Similarly, there are some who gave up their lives for us to be free today. They knew and believed despite one’s tribe, religion and political affiliation, no Gambian was exempted from Jammeh’s death squad. Others in the background who opted not to be seen of men equally gave their all for our freedom. They are here in the diaspora and did not expect any return for their deeds, time and resources. Therefore to box all diaspora Gambian activists under a single tag is dishonest, ungrateful and appalling.

 
Albeit, you have erred in the past and has gone back to right them manifest your admirable leadership quality. Your Banjul rally also gave me a lot of solace that with time we notice and appreciate the much expected delivery from you. You emerged authoritative, focus and ready to right not only the wrongs of a 22 years repressive government but desk the Gambia where every Gambian will be proud of.

 

Furthermore, you have vividly demonstrated that sceptics will not derail you and above all you have a thick skin for criticisms. This you manifested by encouraging your cabinet to allow the media do its job unpoliced. I am not a journalist and had no formal or informal training in the industry but I know there is a thin margin between informing a people and being sensitive to their feelings. Some are in it for money, others for fame and a few to inform, educate and entertain. Occasionally, one is caught in the heat of the moment and tends to lose their moral and ethical barometers in the process. But to deliberately tune the drums of instability and violence is callous and selfishly immoral.

 
New Gambia is in mourning and grieving period as a result of chilling unearthing of Jammeh’s unsettling atrocious. Yes, it not an excuse to issue a blanket leeway to you and your government but efforts should be directed in helping the nation heal, reconcile and brace the gnawing revelations yet unborn. We need to responsibly guide the government to succeed in transforming what we all fought for into visual reality. Holding a government responsible does not punctuate blinding its citizens with hate.

 

Identify the errors and provide alternation means to right the wrongs. Focus on the issues and not the personality of leaders. They are humans just like us with fears, dreams and shortfalls. Therefore to expect them to act godly is unrealistic and malicious. Mr President, Einstein postulated “peace is not merely the absence of war but the presence of justice, of law, of order-in short, of government”. In other words, it is prudent and helpful if your government avoids been seen as radiating rays of constitutional disregard and abuse of office. Many still find the continued vacancy of the Vice President’s office unjustifiable.

 

The minister of Interior, Mai Ahmad Fatty admitted, “We in the leadership remain aware of the difficulties in the land. We urge all Gambians to bear with us. Ideas shall be sourced from all quarters on how to put our nation on a path of integrity and prosperity”. Another caressing reassurance from a minister. However, there is already a fountain of ideas readily available for resourcing.

 
We should stop perceiving one another as strange bedfellows. Every day, both Gambians at home and in the diaspora freely give productive ideas and suggestions as to hoe to steer our fragile nation to safe shores but no evidence of them being taken on-board. We have allowed partisan politics to drive a wedge between us at the detriment of nation peace, stability, unity and development. Our political leaders and governments will come and go but Gambia will remain.

 

Sulayman Jeng
Birmingham, UK

APRC Crimes: Insulting our Intelligence, Our Faith and Our Dignity

 

By Madi Jobarteh

 

It is true that inflicting physical bodily injury or robbing someone of his or her property or taking human life is indeed painful and grievous. But it is also true that injuring the dignity, intelligence and name of a person or society can be equally quite deep and painful. In his 22 years of misrule this is what Yaya Jammeh did to the Gambia and Gambians. He injured us both physically and psychologically thereby subjecting us to trauma that will take years to heal, if ever.

 
We can all recall when Yaya Jammeh had the audacity to put it to our face that ‘his money’ was coming from ‘Allah’s Bank’. Yet as a society with longstanding Islamic awareness and traditions, we know that either metaphorically or literally, Allah has no bank for a human being to claim. But as he stole and plundered our public money, as he liked, Yaya was insulting our intelligence and faith with such a blasphemous statement.

 
As if that was not enough, this man would face us, live and direct to tell us that even if we refused to vote for him, the djinns would vote for him. Yet we are supposed to be a democratic republic in which power resides only with the people who choose to give it to whoever they desire through elections. In which society would a politician therefore tell the members of that society that whether they like it or not, he shall be the leader because he or she has djinns to vote for him or her? Once again we had to live with such insult and disrespect, as one man would seize our collective power and yet claim that even if we did not give him power, the djinns would. Insulting!

 
As if that was not enough, Yaya Jammeh further insulted our sovereignty and dignity by telling our people that if they did not vote for him, then he will bring no development to their community. Meantime, it is these same people who own the Gambia and all of its resources and institutions. The people elect trustees as president and parliamentarians to manage those institutions and resources. When we pay tax, it all goes into one big box as the national treasury. Yet Yaya Jammeh had the guts to insult our sense of sovereignty by telling us that he will decide who will benefit from our national wealth or not? Could there be a greater insult that this?

 
To show the sheer disdain and disrespect that Yaya Jammeh thought of Gambians, just imagine when he would say that he would rule this country for as long as he wished and then decide who to hand over to when he was ready! Can we imagine this for a minute? Not because such a statement is itself, of course absolutely ignorant, but to imagine that a leader would face his people in this modern era to talk to them on that line is indeed the height of humiliation inflicted on Gambians. Indeed this man had absolutely no respect for any Gambian.

 
But such a statement also reflects the level of arrogance and ignorance of the man. By uttering such statements, Yaya had forgotten that no human being is omnipotent. Only God is omnipotent and everlasting. He failed to realize that no individual has power, but power resides with only the people as a collective. Hence after making such humiliating utterances, at the end of the day he came to leave like a mosquito. But the fact that this man could face his own society to speak to them in such paganistic parlance reflects both his own emptiness as well as his contempt for his fellow citizens.

 
It is such vanity that made Yaya Jammeh to utter that if he wanted he would rule for billion years. Which human being lives for 100 years nowadays much more 500 or a billion years? Thus a person who could make such empty claim is himself the epitome of imbecility. Yet it was this imbecility with which Yaya Jammeh ruled the Gambia and subjecting fellow citizens to daily indignation and disrespect.

 
These utterances of vanity and imbecility reflect the mind of a person who lacks any modicum of respect and humility. They reflect an attitude and a mindset that is filled with ego and inferiority complex as well as a personality bereft of self-esteem. But also the utterances that came out of the mouth of Yaya Jammeh speak to his personal life story, which is void of culture and values. For what culture can we relate with Yaya Jammeh? Certainly not any of our cultures and religions in the Gambia. He does not represent any of our norms and values and this was why Yaya Jammeh could insult his own people and along the way insult himself as well without knowing it.

 
For example, when he impudently said no Mandinka would sit his or her “behind” on the presidency, it clearly reflected a mindset and a personality that was weak, inferior and corrupted. It speaks of a person who is greedy and hateful and who sees nothing good in his people and society but only himself. He was ready to maim and kill. Hence such ugly utterance was not more about the Mandinka rather it was more about the person who made such despicable statements. It showed a person who loved power and materials more than his people as all persons of vanity do.

 
It is the same vanity and emptiness he demonstrated when he stood in the middle of Banjul to shamelessly claim that women bleach all parts of their body except “their private parts”. How on earth could a son of the Gambia make such outlandish utterance in the midst of our mothers and fathers, brothers and sisters and children? Which man could insult women and degrade them to such level when you have a mother and sister? But again, the issue was not about women, rather it was about Yaya Jammeh as a person who lacks everything and anything that represents our good cultural norms and values.

 
Therefore it is such deranged mindset that can brag about killing fellow citizens and burying them six feet deep. This was a song for Yaya Jammeh. Even Satan has some respect for human life. But here was a man who could face his own people and boast that he could take their lives as if he was God. What arrogance! What imbecility!

 
Yet as Yaya Jammeh bragged about sending people to his ‘Five Star Hotel’ and bury them six feet deep, meantime we had a bunch of Gambians in the name of APRC NAMS and his Cabinet ministers and mayors and governors who would continue to mobilize our poor masses for Yaya Jammeh to continue to insult them. They would organize solidarity marches and spend public resources to transport our girls and women to Kanilai or to McCarthy Square just for the satisfaction of Yaya Jammeh.

 
We can see such people until today who lack any iota of conscience or self-respect as they continue to rally around APRC and trumpeting the name of Yaya Jammeh. They cannot see that for the first time in the Gambia, mass graves are being dug because Yaya Jammeh indiscriminately butchered Gambian sons and daughters as if we are cattle. Yet these people lack any sense of decency and honesty to feel any remorse or shame but to promote a murderer in our society.

ZERO Votes for APRC!

God Bless The Gambia.

‘I did not know that I would survive’: Frederick woman recounts life in Gambian prison

 

By Danielle E. Gaines [email protected]

 

With an empty belly in a crowded Gambian jail cell, Fanta Jawara had moments — during sleepless nights and sweltering days — when she worried she wouldn’t survive.

The 46-year-old mother of two teenage girls from Frederick is a naturalized U.S. citizen. She returned to her country of birth for a three-week vacation last year. But during a tumultuous time in Gambia’s political history, she was caught up near a march led by her uncle, beaten, jailed and sentenced to three years in the country’s notorious Mile 2 prison. On the first night after her arrest, Jawara’s surroundings were almost unbelievable.

“The environment was not the environment that I was expecting. Yes. It’s a prison, but it’s a very terrible environment,” she said.

She was put in a cell, with murderers, drug dealers, “baby dumpers,” bad people.

In a space as large as Jawara’s Frederick living room, the women in Mile 2 slept two to a twin mattress, four women each clumped under a single mosquito net. The bare mattresses laid on the bare floors. Without floor space, their clothing and belongings hanged from bags attached to the ceiling and walls.

“It’s very small, congested,” Jawara said. “That night, I could not sleep.”

It was her first time sleeping under a mosquito net, she was squished with people she didn’t know — and she was next to the single, small, dank bathroom all of the women shared.

A barred window opening on the splotchy green-painted exterior wall of the cell offered little breeze during the hot, rainy season when Jawara was held, but the opening beckoned mice, snakes and frogs inside.

Jawara has lasting scars dotting her forearms where ants would bite her in her sleep.

There were other hazards.

She feared fights, or being snatched from bed in the middle of the night and taken to a separate facility where political prisoners were known to be tortured.

“That was ringing in my mind every night that I would be picked up and taken … to be tortured,” Jawara said. “I was praying to God: Let that not be me.”

The women were locked in at 5 p.m. And there they stayed until 8 a.m., breakfast time.

“The food? Forget it,” Jawara said, describing the balls of porridge cooked the day before and topped with new hot water the next morning. And even if the porridge was good, she’d seen cockroaches climb out of the flour bags, ensuring it would not go into her stomach.

“Honestly, I did not know that I would survive the eight months that I did,” Jawara said.

After months of diplomatic maneuvering, impassioned pleas by family members, and a final historic vote by the Gambian people that cemented her release, Jawara is home in Frederick now, healing mentally and physically.

As Gambians look to rebuild the country they lovingly call “the smiling coast of Africa,” Jawara and other former political prisoners in Gambia have started speaking about their ordeals.

How she got there

On April 16, near the nation’s capital and just down the street from her family’s home, Jawara was swept up and arrested as part of a crackdown against political protests.

Her uncle, Ousainou Darboe, a political opposition leader, was hosting a march down Kairaba Avenue — a major road that runs nearly to the ocean on one end and is a bustling business district near the Darboe family home, across from the American embassy.

Darboe and others were demanding the return of Gambian youth political activist Solo Sandeng, who was tortured to death after a demonstration demanding electoral reform ahead of the country’s 2016 election.

A coalition of political parties banded together last year in opposition to the 22-year authoritarian rule of former President Yahya Jammeh. Jammeh assumed power in a bloodless 1994 coup that deposed Dawda Jawara, the grandfather of Fanta’s husband, Ebrima. The elder Jawara had served as the country’s first president since 1970, when Gambians won independence from the United Kingdom.

Jammeh ruled the country as a dictator, cracking down on civil servants, the media and political opponents through forced disappearances, torture and worse, according to Human Rights Watch.

On the day of the march, Fanta Jawara was on Kairaba Avenue at the same time as marchers, headed to the bank with fresh braids in her hair as she prepared for her trip back to the United States two days later. She was not marching, she said.

About a half-mile down the road from Darboe’s home, police units joined the marcher’s ranks from behind, and soon there was a barricade up front.

Cellphone videos show flashes of chaos after that. Gunshots and crying can be heard in the streets. Limbs of protesters and the batons of police can be seen flailing.

Jawara was caught up in it all.

“I was slapped. I was kicked. I was tortured,” she said. “… I was soaked in blood. Blood all over. My blood and other people’s.”

Jawara could not see out of her left eye and she feared she would lose it. Her head throbbed. She’d been dragged by her braids and remembers seeing strands of them on the ground. A large section of skin was torn off her left thigh.

“Some of the pain you don’t even notice. You just see the blood. You don’t know where the pain is coming from,” she said.

She saw her uncle — who she calls “Dad” — at the police building where they were both held for one night.

“He looked at me and said ‘What are you doing here? Didn’t I ask you guys to stay home?’” Fanta remembers. “I said ‘I was not a part of this. I went to pick up money and I got arrested on the way home.’”

Darboe’s head was split open and his shoulder was dislocated.

The next morning, the group of prisoners was led to a big truck.

“I said, ‘Dad, where are they taking us?’” Fanta remembered.

He said, “I don’t know. I don’t know where they are taking us.”

How she survived

Jawara would spend a total of 233 days in custody, and 231 nights at Mile 2, the country’s central prison.

The days were monotonous.

In the run-up to Gambia’s presidential election, the prison’s televisions and radios were taken away. Guards were not permitted to bring their cellphones to work. There was little news from the outside world.

“Sometimes you even lose track of time and day,” Jawara said. “You get up in the morning, all you have to do is sit in one place.”

There was a courtyard, but Jawara could reach both sides of the narrow space with her arms and the walls were so tall, you could not see the tops of the trees — just blank sky overhead. There was no air, as if a Tupperware cover were over the top of the walls.

As her wounds began to heal, Jawara would look to help others. To tamp down fights during the 15 hours when prisoners were locked in their cells overnight, Jawara started a physical activity program.

“It was a total body workout,” but it was too tiring for many women without proper nutrition, Jawara said.

She and the inmates also engaged in a nightly “talk show,” dreaming up topics that even included cooking segments, when they would call out local Gambian dishes and talk about how to cook them.

Jawara, who worked at Physicians Surgery Center of Fredrick before she left for Gambia, said her nursing background helped her to try to maintain her health and that of other inmates too.

Women went to the infirmary for medical issues and often returned with the same pain pills they’d already been prescribed or with a medication that had nothing to do do with their ailments, Jawara said.

“They were like overdosing themselves on pain pills,” Jawara said. She had women bring her their full supplies of medications and she taught them how to properly take the medicine.

How she was freed

Jawara was arrested in April and sentenced in July to three years in prison.

The judge concluded that Jawara did not appear to be a part of the protest, but she also refused to give a defense in court and was therefore found guilty, according to documents forwarded by her husband, Ebrima.

As Jawara and others idled in prison cells, the country stewed as voters pushed for Jammeh’s ouster.

Election Day was tense in the prison.

When the morning crew arrived the next day, the prisoners asked: “How are things?”

“We don’t know,” came the response.

That was a clue that Jammeh was not winning, according to the women who were in Mile 2 during the last election.

On Saturday morning, the officers came and called out the political prisoners.

“Get ready and stand by,” Jawara recalled.

“Stand by for what?” she asked.

“Oh, you guys are going home,” came the response. “… You guys got what you wanted. Yahya Jammeh lost.”

On Monday, the political prisoners went to court. Jawara wore a bright turquoise dress and headscarf her sister brought to the prison.

She was released on bail shortly before Jammeh declared that he would not leave power or the country.

After a tense month, Jammeh left Gambia on Jan. 21 and coalition candidate Adama Barrow freely assumed power.

Barrow’s inauguration was set for Feb. 18, Independence Day.

Feb. 18 represented a moment of independence for Jawara, too: she and other political prisoners were freed from their “criminal” pasts with presidential pardons.

She recalled joy in the streets.

“People were free … They gained their liberty back, their freedom. All of that came back,” Jawara said. “Because they were quiet for 22 years. They could not open their mouth. Walking in the streets, I thought, ‘Man, this country is back. Gambia is back.’”

Soon, Jawara would be on a flight home to see her daughters in person for the first time in nearly a year.

“It is the vote of the Gambian people and the support of people and their efforts around the world that stood up for us, for our release. That’s what got us out,” Jawara said.

What she looks forward to

Before she left Gambia, Fanta and Ebrima Jawara went to the prison to bring back medicine and brooms for the women who were still inside. Brooms, because the prisoners had to use the same unsanitary broom to clean the outdoors, bathroom and cell.

She hopes other prison reforms will come to Gambia.

Gambia’s new interior minister recently toured Mile 2 and said the conditions will no longer be tolerated.

“Prisoners are human beings, too, so they should be treated humanely,” Minister Mai Ahmad Fatty said on the prison grounds last month.

Jawara is monitoring her uncle’s health through news reports. After the election and his release, Darboe became the country’s foreign minister.

She is still going to doctor’s appointments herself. When she returned, Jawara learned that she had a ruptured membrane in her ear. She also still has tenderness under her eyes and strong headaches.

“I’m not yet back to my routine. But I think I’m working towards that. It’s getting nice outside, so I need to get up and start,” she said.

For now, Jawara is enjoying simple comforts of home: taking a shower where she can regulate the temperature of the water, boiling a kettle of tea when she wants. She is considering writing a book.

Jawara recently shared her story with Fatou Camara, a Gambian radio and television personality who was forced out of the country and her former job as Jammeh’s press secretary after a falling-out. Camara, who runs a Gambian-focused news operation from the U.S., served time at The National Intelligence Agency (NIA) before fleeing Gambia while released on bail.

“It was a very terrible experience,” Camara said. She dealt by doing interviews with anyone who asked and starting her radio show.

“I talked it out,” Camara said. She’s moving back to Gambia in June, eager to see the country rebuild its spirit.

“Sometimes I say we need nationwide therapy. Because we’ve all been traumatized. I saw torture myself when I was arrested. And people have family members who were snatched at night, they never come back home,” Camara said.

She said a recently established Truth and Reconciliation Commission will help the country heal, even as new mass graves are being discovered.

William Cecil Roberts, an anthropology professor at St. Mary’s College of Maryland, has worked in Gambia since he served as a Peace Corps volunteer there in the early 1980s.

Roberts said one thing Gambia has going for it during this time of political transition is its small size, because Gambians generally see themselves as related and very close. The country is slightly less than twice the size of Delaware, with about 2 million people.

Roberts said people around the world — and especially in the U.S. where Gambians were brought to the Annapolis City Dock as slaves — should be engaged in rebuilding efforts.

“If we really think that history matters and that what our forebearers have done matters, we should do whatever we can to support the Gambians,” Roberts said.

As for Fanta, if you’d asked her while she was at Mile 2 if she’d ever go back to her birth country, she would have said no.

The family has a vacation home under construction in Sukuta, near the ocean; while in jail, she considered telling Ebrima to sell it.

“I said when I leave this country, I would never come back,” Jawara said.

Now she thinks she will return someday.

“I’m very, very hopeful that they will bring Gambia back,” she said.

14 EU Short Term Election Observers deployed ahead of Thursday polls

A total of 14 short-term election observers (STOs) from the European Union Election Observation Mission (EU EOM) on Monday departed to their respective areas of observation across the country ahead of the upcoming Parliamentary elections on April 6th.

The observers were seen off by the Chief Election Observer Miroslav Poche at a ceremony held at the Ocean Bay Hotel in Bakau.

The EU has established an election observation mission for the National Assembly elections following an invitation from the Independent Electoral Commission of The Gambia. The mission is led by Chief Observer Miroslav Poche, a Czech MEP and comprises of seven international election experts who are based in Banjul.

Meanwhile, prior to their deployment, the EU EOM’s Short-Term Observers received comprehensive briefings on a wide range of issues, including on the electoral process, political environment and media landscape. They also took part in a briefing organised by the IEC.

The Short-Term Observers (STOs) will primarily observe the proceedings on Election Day as well as the tabulation of the results.

“This team of short-term observers brings a wealth of diverse experience and reflects the interest of the European Union in the upcoming National Assembly elections,” said the Chief Observer, Mr. Miroslav Poche.

He added: “The EU strongly stands by the understanding that election observation is not a one-day event and that an informed assessment of an election cannot be made if observation is limited to election-day monitoring. Therefore, the EU has deployed its observation mission three weeks prior to Election Day and will remain in The Gambia to observe the post-election environment, including the adjudication of complaints, if any.”

It could be recalled that on 21 March, 2017, 14 long-term observers in multinational teams of two were deployed to all of the seven regions.

According to the EU, the mission’s scope of observation will be broadened as 14 STOs and a dozen of locally-recruited short-term observers from EU member states’ embassies accredited to The Gambia have joined the mission.

On 4 April, a ten-member delegation of the European Parliament (EP) will also be integrated into the mission. The EP delegation is headed by Ms. Jean Lambert, the MEP from the United Kingdom. Around Election Day, the EU EOM The Gambia will comprise up to 50 observers drawn from 27 EU member states, as well as Norway and Switzerland.

The mission operates in accordance with the “Declaration of Principles for International Election Observation,” adopted under the auspices of the United Nations in 2005. In addition, observers are bound by a Code of Conduct that assures strict neutrality and impartiality in the course of their duties.

Gambia Press Union unveils US$220, 000 UNDEF funding

The Gambia Press Union (GPU) on Saturday, April 1st, launched a two-year United Nations Democracy Fund (UNDEF) sponsored project titled ‘Enhancing Government-Media Relations to Improve the Legal Environment for Freedom of Expression in The Gambia.’

During the commemoration of the World Press Freedom Day last year – 2016, the GPU launched the ‘Decade of Campaign for the Protection and Promotion of Freedom of Expression in the Gambia’.

“We have since started work to realize the objectives of this declaration. On March 21, 2017, UNDEF approved a grant of US$220,000 to the GPU, after negotiations that lasted more than one year” a statement from the body said on Monday.

Through this project, the GPU said it will work with national and international partners to complement the efforts of the government of President Adama Barrow, aimed at promoting an enabling environment for freedom of speech and responsible and investigative journalism in The Gambia.

“In this regard, the GPU and its partners will engage in consultations with a wide range of stakeholders, including media, lawyers, students, youth, security forces, National Assembly, judiciary, government agencies and civil society. This will lead to the establishment of the National Freedom of Expression Committee that will work towards a comprehensive review of existing freedom of expressions and advocate for the introduction of laws that are conducive to freedom of speech. The union will also come up with annual state of freedom of expression report” the GPU statement noted.

Furthermore, the GPU will set up an independent media self-regulatory mechanism to monitor compliance and enforce the code of conduct while serving as a platform for the public to lodge complaints against media infringements on the rights and freedom of the members of the public.

Major U.K Newspapers’ alleged blunder brings distress to a Gambian Family!!!

 

Describing his feeling as “shock and stress” when he received a call from a friend in the UK telling him that they saw his wife on the paper of Daily Mirror newspaper claiming she is the wife of Khalid Masood, the terrorist who recently killed several people in a recent Westminster terror attack, the husband of Rohey Hydara, Musa Jammeh is seeking answers as to how this terrible mix up could happen, especially coming from reputable internationally known and read newspapers. For starters, Rohey Hydara whose pictures was plastered on the Daily Mirror is currently and has always been married to a Gambian, neither does she know a person by the name of Khalid Masood, nor has she even ever set foot in the U.K – does not even own a passport.

As if that is not enough distress, he came to discovered that the Daily Mirror is not the only culprit – the Mail Online, the Telegraph, and most of all the other major newspapers in the U.K had made the same blunder – his wife’s picture, instead of the real “Rohey Hydara” who lives in the U.K and is allegedly the wife of Masood was all over the place.

What makes this case so bizarre is that a simple due diligence would have raised a red flag for these widely read papers – Rohey is a very common name in The Gambia, so is the last name Hydara. This is akin to randomly grab the picture of a William Murphy from Ireland and present him as the criminal law enforcement is looking for without making the effort to confirm that is the right William Murphy’s picture, which makes it both irresponsible and ignorant – the family therefore wants these papers held responsible for such blatant laziness leading to the heavy unnecessary distressed caused by this confusion.

The Fatu Network was not able to talk to Rohey (the wrong one) but her husband was happy to share their ordeal – how their kids are already being mocked in school, the hundreds of calls they have been getting from all over the world accusing him of being terrorists (since the story alleges that the husband is the terrorist), how this will potentially impede their ability to travel to anywhere in the world, and adversely affecting their job prospects.

Meanwhile, efforts to reach The Telegraph, Daily Mirror and Mail Online proved futile.

Landmine Kills 3 People In Foni

 

By Lamin Sanyang

 

Landmine explosion has killed three people in Wassadu, Foni Jarrol District.

The incident which occurred last Thursday morning claimed the lives of one Sulayman Jonkong Sanneh and his two young sons Sheikh Omar Sanneh and Yahya Sanneh who were eleven and eight years old respectively. They were reportedly riding on a horse cart fetching firewood, on their way about 300 meters away from The Gambia/Senegal borders was where the explosion took place killing all three of them instantly. The issue has raised eyebrows for it is the first time such a thing happened in the Gambia.

“This is a foul play,” a distraught family member said.

He added: “Whoever did this has intention of killing Gambians because there is no war here. How can anyone plant a bomb on a road that people use daily?”

The deceased was alleged to be a staunch supporter of the coalition who was very instrumental in bringing together the supporters of other political parties especially the former ruling party to joined the coalition government. They said he was part of those who went to welcome President Barrow during his recent “Thank You Tour” in Kalagi.

According to sources the police investigators have taken the bodies to the mortuary to conduct postmortem but the family members turned it down.

Meanwhile, the bodies were laid to rest on Friday. Some of the family members called on the government to investigate the matter.

Defense Says Court Lacks Jurisdiction In Former NIA Director General & Co Case

 

Justice Kumba Sillah Camara of the Banjul High Court has pushed the case of the former NIA officers after their lawyers made an objection to the jurisdiction of the court to hear the case.

The criminal trial involving the nine officers was scheduled for plea taking but failed to proceed after the defense lawyers objected to the jurisdiction of the court to hear the case. The twelve fresh charges filed by prosecutors includes conspiracy, murder, assaults, forgery and making documents without authority. They could not take their plea due to the submissions made by their lawyers.

The officers standing trial include the former NIA Director General Yankuba Badjie, Deputy Director General Louis Gomez and Director of Operations Sheikh Omar Jeng along with Babucarr Sallah, Yusupha Jammeh, Tamba Massireh, Haruna Susso, Lamin Darboe and Lamin Lang Sanyang.

When the case was called this afternoon the defense team representing the nine accused persons drew the attention of the court to a motion filed objecting to the jurisdiction of the court to hear the case. The state lawyers have requested time to look into the summons to respond accordingly. The request was granted by the court.

The lawyer of the 9th accused person, Lamin Lang Sanyang, also applied bail for his client which was adjourned for ruling on Tuesday, 11 April 2017.

There was high security at the court premises with rifles and riot gears. The courtroom was full to capacity with family members, supporters and sympathisers of the dead opposition activist and also the accused persons. The accused persons were handcuffed and escorted to the waiting prison bus that whisked them away to the Mile II Central Prisons.

Meanwhile, the case has been adjourned to Monday, April 10, for ruling on the jurisdiction of the court to hear the case.

Gambia’s Ousted Dictator Is Living the Good Life in a Palace in Equatorial Guinea

 

BY COLIN FREEMAN, Foreign Policy

 

Yahya Jammeh has kept a low profile since he was run out of Banjul in January. FP finds him holed up at a luxurious villa in another African kleptocracy.

For a town of 7,000 in the middle of Africa’s densest jungle, Mongomo boasts an impressive list of attractions. Carved out of Equatorial Guinea’s virgin rainforest is a private airport, a football stadium that hosted games for the 2015 Africa Cup of Nations, a deserted three-lane highway leading to a “six-star” hotel in the nearby city of Oyala, and a new international-standard golf course, its pristine fairways cutting through the plant life that encroaches everywhere else.

The Presidential Golf Course is named in honor of Teodoro Obiang Nguema, the country’s long-standing dictator and self-styled “Guarantor of Peace and Propeller of Development,” who has a well-documented record of jailing and torturing political opponents. Backed by his country’s vast oil wealth, Obiang, who grew up in Mongomo when it was a rural backwater, has spent the past few years turning the area into a vanity project.
But, for the moment at least, opportunities to bask in Mongomo’s faux grandeur seem mostly to be enjoyed not by Obiang, but the former president of another African country who took up residence in Equatorial Guinea after being deposed earlier this year. An investigation by Foreign Policy suggests that former Gambian President Yahya Jammeh, whose own record of corruption and abuse is being scrutinized by his successor’s administration, has been using Obiang’s personal sanctuary as a sanctuary from Gambian law.

After his brutal, 22-year reign came to a spectacular end in January, Jammeh was welcomed by Obiang, whose country is not a signatory to the statutes of the International Criminal Court. Jammeh had lost an election in December, conceded defeat, but then refused to step down. He finally fled Gambia on his presidential jet on Jan. 21 as troops from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) massed on the border, threatening to oust him by force.

Since then, little has been heard of the ex-Gambian dictator beyond claims from the country’s new government that he took $11 million from state coffers and a fleet of luxury cars as his parting shot. His arrival in Equatorial Guinea was greeted by near-silence in his new homeland, save for a single protest banner reportedly unfurled in Malabo, the country’s island capital. Hung outside the offices of Convergence for Social Democracy, Equatorial Guinea’s tiny and much-harassed opposition party, it declared, “We do not want another dictator in our country.” Police later tore it down.

But while Jammeh may be keeping a low profile — a difficult adjustment, perhaps, for someone used to having his portrait plastered everywhere — FP has narrowed his likely whereabouts to one of Obiang’s presidential palaces in Mongomo. “Obiang has three palaces in Mongomo — all big, gaudy-looking places like Saddam Hussein had,” said Tutu Alicante, a human rights lawyer from Equatorial Guinea, who now runs EG Justice, a Washington-based human rights group. “We’ve heard from contacts that Jammeh is in one of them.”
A diplomat in Malabo independently confirmed that Jammeh is in an “Obiang-owned villa” in the region of Oyala and Mongomo while several nongovernmental organizations and human rights groups indicated that they viewed Alicante’s intelligence as credible.

Earlier this month, the French publication Jeune Afrique reported that Jammeh had requested land to farm in Equatorial Guinea, something he had planned to do in retirement in Gambia, where he owned a large farm in his hometown of Kanilai. According to Alicante, land has been set aside for him in the Moka Valley, a picturesque tract of mountains and waterfalls which, like Mongomo, is away from Equatorial Guinea’s oppressive coastal humidity. “The ruling family already [has] land here themselves, and they’ve given a chunk to him,” he said. It’s unclear whether Obiang intends to farm eventually or if he will continue to live in Mongomo.

To date, Jammeh and Obiang have not been seen playing rounds of golf, but an unauthenticated photo that emerged this month shows the two admiring what appears to be Jammeh’s new farm. They previously had a cordial relationship, with Obiang making a state visit to Gambia in 2013. They have also been neighbors before, owning adjacent mansions in the wealthy suburb of Potomac, Maryland, according to The Washington Post.
An unverified photo shared widely on social media shows Jammeh and Obiang admiring what appears to be Jammeh’s new farm in Equatorial Guinea.

But they have more in common than expensive second homes. Both spent decades in office after seizing power in coups. Jammeh ruled for 22 years while Obiang, who has been in office since 1979, is now the world’s longest-serving president. And both have had coup attempts launched against them, which helps explain why Obiang is building Oyala, described by the diplomat in Malabo as “an entire new city carved out of nowhere.”

In February, the country’s entire administration officially relocated to Oyala from Malabo, despite the new city remaining unfinished. Like Naypyidaw in Burma, it’s designed to be an alternative capital for the regime to hole up in during an uprising from within or a coup attempt from without. As Obiang put it in a rare BBC interview in 2012, “We need a secure place for my government and for future governments.”

In a region where deposed dictators can quickly find themselves in search of retirement homes, Obiang seems to have recognized that his personalized capital can give him diplomatic power. “I think he saw that Jammeh was behaving outrageously badly and that there was a chance to help out,” said Simon Mann, a former mercenary who tried to overthrow Obiang in the infamous Wonga Coup of 2004, and whom Obiang later pardoned from a 34-year jail sentence in 2009. Mann added that like his old friend and mentor, the late Libyan leader Muammar al-Qaddafi, Obiang’s fearsome reputation is partly the result of an act. In person, he said, Obiang is “pleasant” and has a philanthropic side.

But there are those who are determined to force Obiang to reverse his most recent act of pan-African philanthropy. Gambian lawyers and human rights activists have already launched a campaign to extradite Jammeh and force him to stand trial at an international court. Gambia’s new president, Adama Barrow, has been coy about whether Jammeh should be put on trial, wary of being seen as prejudging his predecessor’s guilt. But the new president has pledged to form a truth and reconciliation committee to investigate crimes during the Jammeh era, and his police force is reportedly looking into the cases of at least 30 people who disappeared or were killed under the previous government.

Last month, the head of Jammeh’s intelligence agency, Yankuba Badjie, also appeared in court along with nine other officers accused in last year’s slaying of Solo Sandeng, an opposition leader who died in government custody. A fortnight after their court appearance, Sandeng’s body was found in an unmarked grave. Police had reportedly been informed of his whereabouts by one of the accused, the agency’s operations director, Saikou Omar Jeng.

Gambian officials say now that Jammeh’s former henchmen are facing murder charges, they may directly point to him. In Sandeng’s case at least, Jammeh can hardly claim ignorance. Last year, when both Amnesty International and the United Nations called for an investigation into Sandeng’s death, Jammeh famously told them to “go to hell.” In words that may one day come back to haunt him, he said it was “common” for people to die in custody in Gambia.

But building a case against Jammeh is far from the only obstacle. Even if Barrow were to call for his extradition back to Gambia, Obiang is under no obligation to comply. The only thing that is likely to sway him, regional analysts say, is pressure from the regional bloc that ousted Jammeh.

“Our job is to persuade both ECOWAS and CEEAC [the central African equivalent] to get Obiang to relinquish Jammeh,” Alicante said. “If we Africans don’t force our leaders to push for accountability, I doubt anything is going to happen.”

Such a push would have to focus on the bigger regional players like Nigeria and Ghana, since many of Obiang’s neighbors — like Benin and the Central African Republic — are too dependent on his oil largesse to kick up much of a fuss. That may prove easier said than done, since Jammeh is seen as a relatively minor thug by global standards and the region is awash with more pressing problems. The diplomatic hassle of convening a regional court to try him may not be deemed worth it, especially when putting him in the dock could reopen old wounds at home.

“There is no will in ECOWAS to prosecute Jammeh right now,” said Alex Vines, head of the Africa program at Chatham House, a think tank in London. “The sense is right now that Gambia needs stability.”

Things might change, of course, if Obiang, now 74, were to die or step down. And given that Jammeh is only 51, that is likely to happen during his lifetime. The presumed heir to power is Obiang’s playboy son, also Teodoro, already notorious for having a fleet of luxury cars seized as part of a Swiss corruption probe.

But while Teodoro is already vice president and thought to be eager to take over, that could be the moment when the regime finally wobbles, according to the Malabo-based diplomat. “He is totally unsuitable for the role, so the main concern is what happens when the old man disappears,” he said.

Of course, even a non-Obiang in charge in Equatorial might still look kindly on Jammeh as a long-term tenant farmer. But equally, a new leader might decide that handing him over would be a good way to repair the country’s image in the wider world. For that reason, some analysts suggest, Jammeh should not get too comfortable in Obiang’s palace.

“A prosecution may only come in the long term, after the truth and reconciliation committee plays out, but I think the new government in Banjul will pay attention to those campaigning for it to happen,” says Jeffrey Smith, executive director of Vanguard Africa, an American pro-democracy NGO. “I wouldn’t be surprised if ultimately one day we see Jammeh in handcuffs.”

Charges Dropped Against Single Mother Accused Of ‘Insulting’ President Barrow

Magistrate AR Bah of the Brikama Magistrate Court today, Monday, April 3, struck out the case of one Fatou Badjie who was charged with insulting President Adama Barrow.

The case was struck out following an application by State Counsels.

According to the particular of the offense, Fatou Badjie on or about February 19, 2017 at Jabang village, Kombo North, West Coast Region in The Gambia, used abusive or insulting words to His Excellency the President of the Republic of The Gambia and one Awa Jadama, with intent to provoke a breach of the peace thereby committed an offense.

Applying for the case to be struck out, a team of state counsels led by Lamin Jarjue supported by Bubacar Jaiteh, submitted that the state had filed a nolle prosequi in respect to the said case dated March 31, 2017 pursuant to Section 64 of the Criminal Procedure Code informing the court of the intent to discontinue the said suit as envisaged under Section 85(1)C of the Constitution which empowers the state to discontinue any criminal or suit filed.

“We applying that Criminal Case BRK/CC/028/17 be struck out in respect of all the counts filed against the accused person. We urged the court to grant our application” State Counsel Jarjue submitted.

Ebrahim Jallow, counsel for the accused person raised no objection but applied for the court to first acquit and discharged the accused and not only strike out the case. He said with the present circumstances and level of the case in which the accused was supposed to open her defense, it will be proper to acquit and discharge her first and then strike out the case.

This prompted state counsel Jarjue to raise objection saying Section 68 of the Criminal Procedure Code provides that if an accused person is charged and an application for withdrawal is made, the reason for which the counsel s relying on will be applicable.

“What is before the court is a nolle prosequi and not a withdrawal. Under this circumstances, the accused person cannot be discharged and acquitted. The only thing the court can do is to strike out the case directly. That is the procedure. We urged the court not to grant the application by the defense counsel but strike out the case straight” Jarjue said.

In her ruling, Magistrate AR Bah said Section 68(1) is very clear about the application made by the state counsel. She granted the application for the case to be nullified and accordingly struck out the case, thereby discharging the accused person.

Magistrate Bah further warned the accused to avoid breaching the peace saying such will not be tolerated and people must respect the laws of the land.

Gov’t explains stance on Casamance

 

Following widespread rumours on the new Gambia government’s alleged position on Casamance, the government over weekend issued a statement explaining The Gambia’s position on the matter. Below is the full statement.

“The government of The Gambia under the leadership of His Excellency President Adama Barrow wishes to reassure the Gambian people of its commitment to peace in the Gambia, the sub-region, especially the southern Senegal region of Casamance and the world over.

“It is in this light that President Barrow being a true believer in the value of peace and peaceful neighbourliness during his recent visit to Senegal offered to his brother President Macky Sall and the people of Senegal his personal commitment and the willingness of his government to support the sisterly republic of Senegal in finding a lasting solution to the over-three-decade-old conflict in the Casamance region of southern Senegal.

“President Barrow and his government believe that sustainable and positive peace in the Casamance is in the common interest of all people, both governments and the entire sub-region.
“The Gambia government therefore considers it as a common moral duty to work together with Senegal and indeed all foreign countries for the stability of our region so that our citizenry can pursue their daily lives in peace and to enable government to bring about much needed development.

“Therefore on the Casamance issue, again the position of The Gambia government is to sincerely and in good faith adopt and pursue a friendly and impartial stance in the search for a durable solution to this conflict. This is the pledge, plea and prayer of The Gambia government.
“However, in recent days the Gambia government has noted with concern, that many debates and discussions in various quarters across the Gambia and abroad on the position of The Gambia government on the Casamance situation has been misconstrued.

“This is amidst speculations that the Gambian territory will be used as launching pad by Senegalese ECOMIG troops to carry out attacks on MFDC bases in the Casamance with others going further to assert that Gambian soldiers will participate in the event of military attack on the MFDC.
“Such rumours have apparently placed great pains on Gambian communities living along the Foni/Casamance border who are apprehensive over the consequences of an outbreak of hostilities between Senegalese military and MFDC.

“This statement seeks to assure these affected communities in particular and the Gambian populace in general, that whereas The Gambia government has committed itself to supporting the Senegalese government find durable peace in the Casamance, The Gambia is neither considering placing troops on Casamance soil nor offering the use of its territory as a launching pad for any attack on the MFDC.
“The affected communities, citizens of The Gambia and all people living in The Gambia are hence advised to go about their normal business in peace and contentment.

“That said, The Gambia government wishes to categorically state that The Gambia will not also on the other hand allow the use of its territory by any person or groups of armed or unarmed individuals to destabilise or incite violence in the Casamance or any other part of the world.”

Source: Standard Newspaper

POLICE EXHUMED ‘BODIES’ OF LAMIN SANNEH & CO.

Bodies suspected of being those of former State Guard Commander Lamin Sanneh and other alleged attackers on State House on 30th December, 2014 were exhumed by police crime and forensic department on Friday.

The bodies of the trio, Lamin Sanneh, Njaga Jagne and Alhagie Yaya Niass were pulled out of an unmarked grave beneath a swampy sandy hill at Tintiba, near the River Gambia, North West of Bwiam. The area, according to senior security sources, was also secretly used as a firing range for heavy weapons by the previous regime.

Sanneh and Co. were part of a group of Gambian dissidents who flew in from the US and other places with a plan to overthrow former president Yahya Jammeh by use of force.
According to a government statement at the time, the trio died in a gun battle at or around the State House where their attempt was foiled by loyal troops. A few who escaped and their collaborators in the US were prosecuted by the American authorities for offenses relating to the incident.

However, according to police PRO Foday Conta, their bodies were never released to the public or their families but were instead kept and guarded at the mortuary until not long ago when they were secretly buried in the bush. He said the graves were discovered through information obtained from suspected ‘Junglers’ currently in detention. He disclosed that the reason for exhuming the bodies is for proper investigation to be made on them and identification made before handing over the bodies to the families.
It took the experts over three hours to complete the exhumation, a laborious and meticulous exercise marked by emotions and a somber mood as the gruesome sights of the three advancedly decomposed bodies became clear.

Family members of the deceased present at the scene made emotional remarks about their feelings. Mamour Malick Jagne who represented Njaga Jagne’s family said his main interest in this case and another cases is for the exact truth to be established and not fiction or rumours so that all Gambians will know what happened and then appropriate actions taken. “This is a very difficult moment for the whole of The Gambia where everyone is one family. What has happened in The Gambia over the past 22 years should serve as a lesson to all Gambians to try and ensure that a similar thing never happens again. The only way to avoid these types of things is to reform and strengthen institutions and not to worship a human being,” he said.

Another relative Malleh Jagne who was arrested and later released because of relations with the late Njaga, said the day was a very sad one even though the incident happened nearly two years ago. He described Njaga as a man who laid his life to rescue the Gambia.

Momodou B.E Njie, a former soldier, and an uncle to Lamin Sanneh, said he brought up the former commander and knew him to be a good soldier. He described the late Sanneh as a martyr who came to rescue The Gambia from the tyranny that has affected all. “I want the new government to be alerted to the fact that threats of the former regime are still here and they must confront it,” he said.

Source: Standard Newspaper

Jammeh’s HIV treatment didn’t work — former patient says

 

Lamin Ceesay, the first Gambian to go public with his HIV status 17 years ago, has said that former president Jammeh’s treatment of the virus didn’t work on most patients, saying many have actually died during the treatment.

Jammeh stunned the world in 2007 when he claimed he could cure HIV and AIDS with his cocktail of herbal concoction.
But according to Ceesay, who was the first to drink and apply Jammeh’s herbs at the beginning of the treatment, the herbs left him with a running stomach for months.

“I cannot even count the number of people that died during the treatment. Most of those who were there until the programme ended died shortly after. The treatment wasn’t good. The only thing that made it better was the food because we ate roasted meat every time, vegetables and fruits were all in abundance. Naturally, you would put on weight but that doesn’t mean the treatment was working. Majority of them died. Those herbs were all zero. If I had remained there myself, I would have died a long time ago.

“Jammeh asked for ten people from Santa Yalla to join his treatment. I was among the ten who went there. He gave us strict warning that smoking, drinking attaya, chewing cola nut, engaging in sexual intercourse, etc., were all forbidden as soon as the treatment starts. I was the first patient he started the treatment on. But his medicine caused me serious diarrhoea. In fact, before I left MRC to join his treatment, my viral load was almost undetectable. It was during his treatment my condition worsened because I ended up having tuberculosis too as we were all grouped together and some already had TB. For seven months I was very sick until I decided to quit the treatment and return to MRC, where I am until now.

“I was in the treatment programme with my first wife who eventually died. But the saddest thing was, the president never even sent a delegation to pay their condolences to me,” he said.

Source: Standard Newspaper

Reset password

Enter your email address and we will send you a link to change your password.

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

Sign up with email

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

By clicking the «SIGN UP» button you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Powered by Estatik