Dawda Ndure, a native of Tujereng village and civil servant working with the then National Intelligence Agency (NIA) now State Intelligence Services (sis) has informed the High Court in Banjul that late Solo Sandeng was buried with the bed sheet wrapped around the body and mattress he was lying down.
According to him, Tamba Mansary (7th accused person), Baboucarr Sallah (4th accused person) and Sheikh Omar Jeng (3rd accused person) and some other boys from the patrol team buried the remains of late Sandeng inside the NIA Tanji Training School.
Ndure was testifying as First state witness in the ongoing murder trial involving the erstwhile NIA Director General Yankuba Badjie, Louis Richard Leese Gomez, his deputy, Saihou Omar Jeng, ex- director of operations, Babucarr Sallah, Yusupha Jammeh, Haruna Susso, Tamba Masireh, Lamin Darboe and Lamin Lang Sanyang.
The nine former officers of the then National Intelligence Agency (NIA) are charged with twelve counts offences, ranging from conspiracy to commit murder, murder, assaults causing actual bodily harm amongst other charges.
Narrating what happened, Ndure said on 14th April 2016, while in office, information came that they should stay in the office to obtain statements from some people arrested. He said after sometimes, some people were brought in the NIA Campus.
“After sometimes, Leeze Gomez (2nd accused person) , Sheikh Omar Jeng (3rd accused person) and Tamba Mansary (7th accused person) came into the Counter Intelligence Office with late Solo Sandeng and Nogoi Njie. I was asked to obtain information from late Solo Sandeng and Nogoi Njie. Late Solo Sandeng wanted to sit on the chair but Sheikh Omar Jeng denied him and asked him to sit on the ground. After a while, Solo Sandeng, Nogoi Njie left with Sheikh Omar Jeng” he said.
He said after a while, Solo Sandeng was brought back to the Counter Intelligence Office by James Mendy and Tamba Mansary. Ndure said he was asked to take the background information of Solo Sandeng.
“I took up the background Check-Up Form. I left my desk, come and sit in front of Solo Sandeng. Then I asked him if I can offer him anything like tea or coffee before we start. He responded that he preferred to have water. I then opened the fridge and gave him water. I started asking him some questions via the check up form” he said.
According to Ndure, during the discussion, Solo Sandeng highlighted some points to him that their protest was not to conceal the government but their main agenda was to go and drop a letter to IEC that that was signed by all party militants. He said Sandeng even mentioned some of the details in the letter.
“I obtained the background information as instructed. Solo Sandeng signed the document. After signing, I asked him if he wants to pray and he responded positively. I then took him to the bath room to perform abolition and after i gave him a mat and he prayed” he explained.
After praying, Ndure said Tamba Mansary and his boys came and collected Solo Sandeng and went away with him.
He said Nogoi Njie was later brought in by James Mendy and he took another Check-Up form and started asking her questions pertaining to the background information. He said he obtained Nogoi’s background information which she also signed accordingly.
“After signing, the officers led by Tamba Mansary came in and collected her. We then started preparing our report and it took hours before we finalize it. And after finalizing the report, we gave it to our then boss Sheriff Gassama who gave it to Sheikh Omar Jeng” he noted.
State witness Ndure said he then told his boss (Sheriff Gassama) that he wanted they go home but he told we can’t all fit in the car. He told me to wait for him Sheikh Omar Jeng and he then stepped out of his office.
“After a while, my former boss (Sheriff Gassama) came back and told me that he has spoken to Sheikh Omar Jeng who said that the vehicle was out. I told Gassama that since there is no vehicle, he can take along the other men in the office. They left and I was left alone in the office” he told the court.
He said “I felt bored and decided to have a walk within the NIA Campus. During the walk, I went around the back gate of the campus. I passed through the security room at the back gate and suddenly saw late Solo Sandeng lying down on a mattress, covered with bed sheet to the neck. I stood for sometimes and looked at him and I became emotional and left. This was around 03:00am. There was light were Solo Sandeng was lying down. I went back to my office and I was wondering how can this happen because I was the one talking to Solo Sandeng not long ago. So, I wondered how it happened”.
He explained that after sitting in his office for a while and so lonely, he closed the office and left for the office of Sheikh Omar Jeng and told him he wanted to go home because it was going late. He said Sheikh Omar Jeng told him to wait as the vehicle was coming to drop him. He said after a while, the vehicle came in with one Dr Lamin Lang Sanyang.
“After a while, I went back to Sheikh Omar Jeng. I met him standing with some boys from the Patrol Team. I don’t know their names but Sheikh Omar Jeng was talking to them. He was telling them that they (NIA) lost one of their detainees. He selected 3 boys among them and ordered them to go get Spades at the newly constructed building in the NIA Campus. The boys rushed and brought the Spades and he told them to put it in the car. I told Sheikh Omar Jeng that I was going home but he asked me to join the vehicle to Tanji” he said.
He said upon arrival at Tanji at the NIA Training School, the driver horn but there was no response. He said one of the boys then climbed over the fence and entered to open the gate.
“I dropped at the gate and the boys entered inside the campus. Later, I went there to check what they were doing. I met them digging a grave. I then left them there and went to perform ablution. During that time, the vehicle then entered the complex. Sheikh Omar Jeng who was onboard a different car following the car carrying the body of late Solo Sandeng, arrived and came down and asked me how far the boys have gone. I told him they are at the back. I then went to pray. After praying, I followed them at the back to see what is going on. Then the vehicle carrying the body of late Solo Sandeng drove up to the grave. I was standing and watching. Tamba Mansary, Baboucarr Sallah and the boys where all present. Then Sheikh Omar Jeng ordered that the body be brought down and it was brought down” he said.
He then stated that the body was brought down with the mattress and bed sheet covered to the neck of late Solo Sandeng.
“They buried the body of Solo Sandeng with the bed sheet together with the mattress he was lying down. Tamba Mansary, Babucarr Sallah, Sheikh Omar Jeng and the boys buried the body of Solo Sandeng. During all this happening, I was standing few meters away from them. After that, Sheikh Omar Jeng told the driver to drop me at home” he concluded.
The case was then adjourned to Tuesday, May 9th, 2017 for continuation of cross examination by defends team.
My take on The Standard’s news story captioned “Police brokers Tallingding cemetery standoff”
In the Standard issue of 8 May 2017, a statement by the police was published. Unfortunately, the statement by the police leaves much to be desired.
The police should know that words matter and let them ensure that they use the right words in their statements. This is a sentence in the police statement: “Police in the Kanifing Municipality intervened and resolved a situation, which was heading to be a serious confrontation between the Muslims and Ahmadis of Tallingding on Saturday.” I unapologetically say here that this statement by the police is very disappointing. This statement by the police has deliberately put the Ahmadi Muslims outside the fold of Islam. The police of Kanifing Municipality know very well that this is the second of this kind of incident in Tallinding within a two year period and that the main cause of the problem is that those obstructing the burial believe Ahmadis are not Muslims.
Therefore, what does the police think it is doing by deliberately referring to Ahmadis as non-Muslims? The police is in effect supporting the position of the people of Tallingding and further inflaming the problem. Ahmadis consider themselves Muslims and the police must always refer to them as such if they make their statements. The police should not discriminate. If this statement was an error, then they must apologise to the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at through the media that they have used to send the message. If the statement was deliberate, then they have failed in being nondiscriminatory and impartial.
The other issue is that the incident is considered a misunderstanding. This contradicts the facts. How was it a misunderstanding? Two different episodes of an issue in the same community in two years! You termed that a misunderstanding? You have got it all wrong or you deliberately twisted it! This is what happened and you know it very well: a handful of people around Tallinding Sicap tried to obstruct the burial rites of a deceased resident of Tallinding. The police were informed and they came there before the arrival of the burial team. When the burial team arrived, the police did not open the gate of the cemetery until after almost two hours of waiting. This delay increased the tension as more obstructers gathered.
To further clarify that this was not a misunderstanding, I refer you to the previous incident in September 2015. The words of the President of the Supreme Islamic Council were that the council was appealing to the entire Muslim Ummah to strictly monitor their cemeteries in order to know who will be buried in these cemeteries and that if they, the ‘custodians’ of faith, receive reports that Ahmadis have buried their dead at any Muslim cemetery and the people are not happy about it, the Ahmadis will be asked to exhume it and bury it elsewhere. It is therefore absolutely wrong and dangerous to consider the incident a misunderstanding. The police should not mince words. The police should present the facts as they are.
It was not necessarily the intervention of the police that relatively resolved the issue; it was the sense of maturity and respect for the rule of law displayed by the Ahmadiyya Muslm Jama’at. The members of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama’at will never put the law into their own hands because they consider obedience to the law a religious duty. Anyway, the point I am trying to make is that considering the incident a misunderstanding is a misrepresentation of the facts.
Another issue that needs clarification is the role of the Supreme Islamic Council in the whole issue. What makes them stakeholders? Were the obstructers under the command and instruction of the Supreme Islamic Council? If no, then why are they considered ‘stakeholders in the conflict’? If yes, then they must be taken to task for instigating a potential national strife. If they are considered ‘stakeholders in the conflict’ because they are considered as the body responsible for Islamic religious affairs in the country as they ascribed to themselves in their press release of 23 January 2015, then some other questions also have to be answered. Who has given them that mandate? Are they a branch of the state/government constitutionally mandated to take up such a responsibility? If no and also if they are not the force behind the obstruction, then I believe they should not have any role in the further dialogue. Let us please try to distinguish the State and its apparatuses from religious groups and/or organisations.
I have always said this and I will repeat it once again, no individual or group of individuals own a cemetery. It is a communal property and a deceased resident of a community has the right to be buried in the cemetery of the community or any other cemetery in the country.
Let those parading themselves as custodians of the faith be told their limitations by the Police, the Ministry of the Interior and by extension the entire Government. The authorities should take to task whoever is trying to create disorder and unrest. That is the only solution to the problem. What is there to dialogue when what should be done is clearly known? The statement by the police is in fact more dangerous than the obstruction of the burial by people who took the law into their own hands. The Police must not turn a blind eye to the facts. The police had better not even given any statement on the issue than giving a statement that could be more inflammatory.
May Allah Almighty continue protecting the Gambia. Aameen
Written by:
Tahir Ahmad Touray