Thursday, April 24, 2025
Home Blog Page 657

U.S. TO LIFT VISA BAN

 

The US Embassy in Banjul has confirmed to The Standard that a visa ban on Gambia Government officials could soon be lifted.

 
This reportedly follows the government’s acceptance to allow the return home of about 2,000 Gambians the US wanted deported.

 
The Jammeh Government had refused to accept these Gambians the U.S. was trying to deport, forcing the Obama administration to pull the trigger and refuse to grant visas to Gambia government officials, their families, and others associated with the government.

 

Delivering the news that ultimately affected hundreds of Gambian officials intending to visit the US since October last year, a State Department official said: “As of October 1, 2016, the US Embassy in Banjul, The Gambia has discontinued visa issuance to employees of the Gambian government, employees of certain entities associated with the government, and their spouses and children, with limited exceptions.”
But speaking to The Standard on Monday, Janel Heird, Public Affairs Officer at the Embassy in Banjul, said there are already encouraging steps by the new government to swiftly solve the problem.
“Yes, the Gambian Government has agreed to accept the return of its nationals who are not eligible to remain in the United States, as required by international law.

 
“Department of Homeland Security and State Department officials in Washington as well as officials here at the US Embassy in Banjul have been engaged with the Government of The Gambia on this matter.

 

The new Gambian government has been cooperative and we are encouraged that the Gambian government has taken steps which we hope will soon allow us to begin issuing visas once more,” Janel said.
The Gambia is the first country in 15 years to face such a penalty from the United States with Guyana incurring a similar wrath in 2001 but it cooperated in less than two months.

 

The American Thinker website last week quoted the Washington Times as stating: “After several months of negotiations, the Department of Homeland Security has successfully reduced the list of countries who refused US deportees from 20 to 12.

 

“Between cajoling, threats and actual punishments, Homeland Security has managed to drastically cut the number of countries that habitually refuse to take back immigrants whom the US is trying to deport, officials said Tuesday, notching an early immigration success for President Trump.

 

The number of recalcitrant countries has dropped from 20 to 12 over the months since the presidential election, and some longtime offenders – including Iraq and Somalia – have earned their way off the naughty list. The list of countries is the shortest this decade.”

 

While it stated that Guinea, Morocco and other countries are still blacklisted, it cited The Gambia together with Mali, Senegal and Sierra Leone as being removed from the list.

 

Officials at the Gambian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, International Cooperation and Gambians Abroad were not available for immediate comment on the matter by the time we went to press last night.

Source: Standard Newspaper

7 Farato youths arrested, charged

 

The police have arrested seven youths in Farato and took them to Brikama Magistrates’ Court where they were charged with willful damage of properties, assaulting police officers while on lawful duties, incitement of violence, and riotously destroying machinery.

Police spokesman, Inspector Foday Conta, said the seven were taken to the court on Wednesday at 4:15pm but the matter could not proceed for it was already closing time. The case was adjourned to Monday, 29 May.

Meanwhile the seven youths are currently in remand.

The youths were among many that took to the streets of Farato on Tuesday afternoon when a demolition team, including officials of Physical Planning under the Ministry of Works and accompanied by personnel of Police Intervention Unit, came with a bulldozer to demolish compounds and other settlements in Farato towards Bafuloto.

The demolition team came with some people who claimed to be the original owners of the disputed land, saying they had secured a ruling as the landowners and that the present occupants of the land should be evicted.

Lamin Cham, an eyewitness and resident of the area, said the demolition team immediately started to destroy the compounds, leaving residents in some compounds without an option of even moving out their belongings and sick people.

He said as the demolition progressed, residents of the area, mainly women and young people, gathered around and started throwing stones at the demolishers who had to run and seek for protection at the Farato Police Post.

Upon arrival at Farato Police Post, some youths and victims of the affected community began to take revenge by burning tires on the highway and also burned the Bulldozer used to demolish the compounds. The Mercedes Benz belonging to Saja Gibba, one of the people claiming to be original owners of the disputed land, was also burnt, Cham said.

As the tension increased, the police at Farato post sought reinforcement from PIU personnel to control the crowd.

Other eyewitnesses said the police used teargas to control the crowd.

Meanwhile, the office of the IGP, through the police spokesman, urged the general public to be law abiding and always refer to the due process of the law instead of taking matters into their own hands.

Source: Point Newspaper

Africans Rising Movement launched in Gambia

The Africans Rising Movement, Gambia Chapter was on Thursday, May 25th, 2016 launched at a ceremony held at the ActionAid – The Cambia conference hall along MDI in Kanifing.

The launching coincided with the Africa Day celebration throughout the continent.

Africans Rising is a Pan-African youth movement committed to expanding space for civic and political action; fighting for women’s rights and freedoms across society; fighting to ensure equity and dignity; demanding good governance by fighting corruption and impunity and demanding climate and environmental justice among others.

The process of the formation that started as the African Civil Society Center in October 2015, widened into the Africa Civil Society Initiative in May 2016.

On 23rd-24th August 2016, over two hundred and seventy two representatives from civil society, trade unions, women, young people, men, people living with disabilities, parliamentarian, media organizations and faith-based groups from across 40 African countries and the African Diaspora gathered at the MS Training Center for Development Cooperation (TCDC) in Arusha, Tanzania and committed to build a Pan-African movement that recognizes rights and freedoms of the people.

The movement is also determined to foster an Africa-wide solidarity and unity of purpose of the peoples of Africa to build the ‘future we want’, a right to peace, social inclusion and shared prosperity.

Speaking at the launching, Omar Badjie, executive director of ActionAid – The Gambia said Africans Rising was formed after rigorous and intense mobilization by different people, institutions and governments.

According to him, the formation of the movement is necessitated by the shrinking political spaces in the continent, citing the recent Gambia’s political impasse as a good example.

“Similar to the Gambia is what is happening in Uganda and Zimbabwe and many other countries. We then thought that we need to come together and work and fight such” he said.

Mr Badjie added that violation against women is also another genuine reason why the formation of the movement. He said in most or all African countries, women are denied taking part in decision making especially on matters that directly affect their lives.

“Corruption is another issue. Most African leaders do loot our monies and don’t keep it in Africa but outside the continent. Huge amount of money goes out of the continent at the expense of the poor people. This is hindering our progress. We think we need to rise as Africans and find a common solution. Inequality is also a major issue of concern to this movement” he said.

He then highlighted the major contribution by ActionAid towards the formation of this movement. He assured that the NGO will continue to collaborate and contribute in ensuring that tho movement goals are achieved.

Alimamo Barrow, head of Programmes and Policy at ActionAid – The Gambia (AAITG) gave an overview of Africans Rising Movement and its relation to the Gambian context.

He said Africans Rising is a growing and self- selecting collective of social movements, NGOs, peoples and popular social justice movements, intellectuals, artist, sports people, cultural activists and others across the continent and the Diaspora. He said people who have given input to the development of the movement agree that African unity reflected by greater social, political and economic integration is critical for Africa and its peoples, nations and nationalities – a united civil society should be the vanguard of such a movement for justice, peace and dignity.

“Africans and indeed civil society in Africa is under assault on many fronts. We are experiencing many restrictions on political space, the erosion of women’s rights, rampant corruption that aids illicit financial outflows, natural resources devastation and increasing threats to peace and security” he said.

According to him, we should be living in a peaceful, prosperous and health Africa buy instead, Africa becomes focused on mere survival. He said unity, political and economic freedom and prosperity is critical for Africa and its people to progress and thrive.

For his part, Alhagie Jarjue, Programme manager, National Youth Council recalled the calls made by various Pan-African leaders like Nelson Mandela, Nkwame Nkurumah whobhas ever been advocating for the continent to be united. He said Africa has ever been struggling to unite but to date cannot be possible.

He highlighted corruption and poverty as a major obstacle to Africa’s progress and urged the young people to fill the man power gap.

“Let’s work on the mindset of our young people. It is the responsibility of the government to provide jobs, education but unfortunately that has not been the case in the former regime. They should make relevance in our education system if we really need to fight poverty. There must also be a decent employment” he said.

He made it clear that the change has to begin in the young people who should sacrifice today to reap the benefits tomorrow without which the continent will never rise.

The launching ceremony ended with Isatou Jeng, NGBV and TGA reading the Kilimanjaro Declaration.

On Africa Liberation Day…Celebration or Reflection….

 

After more than half a century of independence, we are still largely dependant on the west. We do not have proper and established democratic institutions which will guard and protect our democracy. We are still struggling with poverty, want, disease and war. Africa has become a pariah continent. I call it the surrogate continent.

AFRICA: THE SURROGATE CONTINENT

We are satisfied with being a proxy

Always doing d bidding of the other

Fulfilling their each and every order

Leaving them to demarcate every border

 

Shouldn’t we try to ourselves extricate

Or are we satisfied being the surrogate?

Some want them to us compensate

Others want to their greed satiate

 

This notion we are ready to repudiate

Now, we should let no one us intimidate

It’s not that we intend to retaliate

We just need to do something, immediate

 

We’ll no longer be someone’s surrogate

We need to stand up and open the gate

For this, we need no one placate

We shouldn’t allow them to us suffocate!

 

By this time we should have been integrated and working together in such a way that we would form a formidable force in the world. Africa is the foundation of civilization. Africa has more natural resources than any other continent in the world.

 

The biggest problem of Africa is misleaders who are only concerned about how long they will stay in power and how fat is their bank account; which ironically would be in the west. Thus they gather the little resources of their countries and keep it in the west. The west will in turn use it to work and increase their economy. When we need something again, we go there to beg.

When will Africa gain true independence?

Ask me again?

Takama takama is here again as Ramadan beckons

 

By Famara Fofana

 

With a tinge of guilt, I pen this piece not because of any failure on my part to fulfill my religious obligation of keeping fast in past Ramadans but because of the intense scrutiny someone like me go through anytime this holy month dawns on us. To cut it short, I have been at the receiving end of so many questions revolving around my plans for a lifelong partner whenever ‘Werri Korr’ is inching closer.

 

Until this Armageddon era that the world has find itself in, marriage has ever been that aged-old, highly sanctified union between man and woman. And despite having a number of people tying the knot every other day here in The Gambia , the expectation of most people in our deeply traditional and closely knitted society is that a single, fully grown man with the supposed financial muscle should not approach or spend the month of Ramadan languishing in the super bachelor club.

 

I do know a handful of fellas too whose membership in the much maligned ‘salibaterr’ group subject them to a sense of trepidation as we enter this period of intense worship. One has been reminded time and again both at home and in the work place about his sacred responsibility of taking   a wife in the run up to or during the month of Ramadan itself. This is due mainly to the multiple, yet massive benefits that a brand new ‘sohna’ brings to the home at a time when there tends to be a lot of food to be prepared and served. Beware folks in Jarra, this is no time for excesses in terms of the amount of consumables. What a pity it has become to see households throwing left over food when there might be others in need.

 

Based on anecdotal evidence, it appears the perfect time for most people when it comes to marriages here in Banjul is Ramadan. The frequency of the practice in recent times has led to the coining of the Wolof phrase ‘takama takama’ which translates in English marry me, marry me. In fact, for very stingy or poverty stricken men like me, tyeing the knot in the month known in Pular as ‘Lewru Korka’ comes as that stay of execution moment whereby the man is spared the almighty trouble of having to fulfill all the mindboggling expenses that are now symptomatic of many marriage ceremonies.

 

Fair deal from an economic sense of the word but personally I would not fall for such a marriage of convenience on the grounds that Ramadan would save me from some perceived astronomical wedding expenditure. I can state here with confidence that even that ‘month-long reprieve’ may not be a lasting saving grace, for out of tradition or for the sake of prestige , very few ladies or their parents may be willing to allow their daughters’ marriages run without doing some sort of programme; traditional, modern or quasi-modern. Such have almost become a rite of passage in the institution that is marriage.

 

Logic and received wisdom suggest that fasting is a much easier job for a married man than a celebatarian due to obvious reasons. Take for instance the time and effort needed for one to go buy condiments at the market not to mention the chores involved in their processing .The fast breaking meal alone is no easy affair for large families especially. The painstaking steps that go with the preparation of the many saliva inducing delicacies involved in both the ‘ndogu’ and the pre-dawn Ramadan dish ‘heda’ can prove a handful for even Star Boy, my old bloke who is not showing any signs of quitting the single men’s club. His insistence has been that his culinary skills can only be matched by few women and that marriage like any other facet of life falls within predestination. ‘It shall happen when the time comeths’, he would maintain.

Long before I had also taken my partner in life, I had faced not once questions like ‘ah boy nakala ? Ramadan is here, Doh def dara bi yon’, ‘ndongo nyaadilong’. These are concerns borne out of goodwill but for goodness sake, the prospect of ‘fasseh ma fasseh ma’ just after the holy month of Ramadan is even more of a concern.Long may we see more of ‘takama takama’s and no ‘fassehma fassehmas’.

RAMADAN KAREEM and May Allah cleanse us of our sins and strengthen us in faith.

This is Not My Africa. I want a New Africa!

 

By Madi Jobarteh

 

Yet again May 25 has come this year marking the 54th anniversary of African Liberation Day without the continental unity that was envisaged as a means to economic empowerment, security and independence. In Europe, it took them 37 years to transform the European Economic Community to the European Union. Today the EU as a collective makes nothing less than 150 billion US dollars in trade with Africa. In the same vein the US makes nothing less than 100 billion dollars out of Africa, while China collects at least 200 billion dollars a year in Africa. Meantime the total intra-African trade amounts to only 11.3% of Africa’s total trade with the world. For example, non-African airlines account for 80% of the intra-continental market share. Consequently, Brookings Institution and other experts report that 75% of the world’s poorest countries are located in Africa. In simpler terms 408, 213, 640 people, i.e. almost half of the population of Africa lives in extreme poverty.
Nonetheless, experts tell us that one of the fastest growing regions of the world is Africa with average growth rate of 5.2%. For that matter some claim that therefore Africa is rising. Yet it is estimated that Africa imports nearly 83 per cent of its food and losing on trade with the world. For example, the International Coffee Organization reported that in 2014 Africa —the home of coffee— earned nearly $2.4 billion from the crop, yet Germany, a leading processor, earned about $3.8 billion from coffee re-exports. The reason for this anomaly is because the EU imposes tariff barriers for which non-decaffeinated or unroasted green coffee is exempt from the charges, while a 7.5% charge is imposed on roasted coffee. As a result, the bulk of Africa’s coffee export to the EU is unroasted green coffee. This means technically the EU disadvantages African farmers and consequently undermines industrialization in Africa through tariffs. This is possible because, aside of all other things the EU is united, while African leaders have failed to create such a unity.
According to World Bank, by the end of 2015 Africa imported 221 billion US dollars far more than it exports which stands at 166 billion dollars. Among the seven regions of the world, Africa’s share of global trade is only 1.91% slightly higher than only South Asia at 1.86%, which is a region composed of several tiny island nations in the Pacific. In 2016, the World Bank noted that sub-Saharan Africa exported only 28.8 million US dollars of consumer goods, while it imported a whopping 80 million US dollars worth of consumer goods. What these facts and figures indicate is that in the first place Africa is only a consumer society and not a producer of manufactured goods. Thus it merely exports raw materials as always. Consequently this points to the fact that until today the resources of Africa continue to enrich and benefit the rest of the world more than they benefit ordinary Africans so long as it exports raw materials. This has been a point that Nkrumah lamented in the 1960s claiming that if the resources of the continent were put into the use of Africa, this would have made the homeland one of the most advanced places on earth.
To understand the significance of the resources of Africa, one can recall the former US Senator Jesse Helms during the Reagan Administration in the US. This was a man who strongly supported the Reagan Administration in the 1980s to oppose any attempts to impose sanctions against Apartheid South Africa on the basis that such an action would effectively hamper American interests. He stated clearly at the time that South Africa was the source of over 80% of America’s mineral supply, noting that there is no substitute for chrome in their military and industrial manufacturing. Thus he argued that without South Africa’s chrome, no engines for modern jet aircraft, cruise missiles, or armaments could be built. He went further to say that without Africa’s chrome, surgical equipment and utensils could not be produced, and their hospitals and doctors would be helpless. A former US Secretary of State Alexander Haig further buttressed this point that the loss of the mineral output of South Africa could have the severest consequences to the existing economy and security of the world! This shows that Africa in fact has the world’s richest individual countries in almost any kind of mineral resources, and yet the African is the poorest person in the world. Hence Africa is not poor, but it is Africans who are made to be poor.
Of course Kwame Nkrumah had argued that the Congo Basin alone holds enough hydro energy sufficient to power every village, town and city in Africa. The British bank, HSBA has noted that 0.03% of the solar energy in the Sahara Desert is enough to power the whole of Western Europe. Yet so long as Africa’s resources are not in the control of Africans to be exploited for their benefit, the spectre of poverty, powerlessness and oppression shall not end on the continent. For Africa to be able to control and exploit its resources primarily for themselves would require that Africa have democratic and visionary leaders who build strong institutions and ensure good governance. Since 1963 the building of such institutions and good governance have been the bane of the continent because in most part we lacked the right political leaders and intellectuals to do so. Consequently oppressive regimes with weak and corruption leadership have come to characterize most states in Africa. The evidence of that is also glaring.
A 2017 report by Amnesty International have revealed that human rights defenders, journalists and protesters in West and Central Africa are facing ever-higher levels of persecution, intimidation and violence. It says there is a growing onslaught of attacks against brave individuals standing up to injustice. The Mo Ibrahim Foundation’s 2016 governance report stated that over the past decade, i.e. from 2006 to 2016, the continental average score in overall governance improved by only one point. But the report noted that two-thirds of the countries on the continent, representing 67% of the African population, have shown deterioration in freedom of expression over the past ten years. It says further that 11 countries, covering over a quarter (27%) of the continent’s population, have declined across all three civil society measures – Civil Society Participation, Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Association & Assembly – over the decade.
According to Heritage Foundation in its ‘Freedom in the World 2017’ report, Africa is beset by entrenched autocrats and fragile institutions. Consequently more than 75% of Africans live in ‘Not Free’ societies thanks to weak and corrupt leadership of the continent. Transparency International noted that even countries that have been noted to be models of stability, the incidence of corruption has risen significantly. In its Corruption Perception Index 2017, the organization noted that it was the rampant corruption in Ghana that led citizens to voice their frustrations through the 2016 presidential election, resulting in an incumbent president losing for the first time in Ghana’s history.
Consequent we have seen that despite stable governments with free and fair elections and peaceful change of power in Ghana and Senegal as examples, the dividends in terms of social and economic progress are quite low. In the UNDP Human Development Index 2016, both Ghana and Senegal rank as least developed countries at 139 and 162 respectively. Life expectancy in Ghana is 61.5 years while at 66.9 in Senegal while poverty rates stands at 45.4% in Ghana and 53.3% in Senegal. One may therefore ask, what has democracy brought to the people of these countries? The answer lies in their weak and corrupt leadership, which are not pursuing the relevant social and economic policies that should have transformed their countries after 20 years of stable democratic experience. Even the biggest economy of Africa, Nigeria life expectancy stands at 53 years while 88% of the population are below the poverty line and ranked at 152 as a least developed country thanks to poor leadership!
Weak and corrupt leadership has therefore severely defrauded Africa and thereby deny the continent huge opportunity to transform itself into a modern advanced society within a generation. The effect of such weak and corrupt leadership can now be seen in the level and amount of illicit financial outflows from the continent. A 2015 report by the High-level Panel on Illicit Financial Flows from Africa established by the African Union and United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) puts the average financial losses at between 50 billion and 148 billion dollars a year through trade mispricing. This is more than the combined foreign direct investment and aid (ODA) to Africa thereby proving that Africa indeed has the capacity to finance its own development if indeed the continent has democratic leadership and strong institutions of good governance.
The incidence of such weak leadership is attested by the fact that as of today, 16 African countries have presidents who have been in power for more than 10 years. Some of the most corrupt and brutal dictators on earth can be found in Eritrea, Uganda, Ethiopia, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Chad, Mauritania, Cameroun, Zimbabwe, Burundi, Sudan, Congo and DRCongo. Others such as the presidents of South Africa or Kenya are notorious for corruption and vanity.
The effect of such poor leadership can now be seen in the levels of poverty, deprivation and oppression across the continent. Consequently such weak leadership and poor governance environment generated all forms of conflicts that have produced more than nine million refugees and internally displaced people. The situation further deteriorated into a high rate of brain drain and illegal migration where the youth of the continent embark on dangerous journeys only to perish in the Sahara Desert and the Mediterranean Sea or trapped in the conflict in Libya.
What is to be done?
The masses of Africa must be angry and impatient. The increasing military and economic presence of America, Europe and China among other players in Africa in their quest to dominate and control the continent’s resources is a direct threat to the security and future of Africa. There is no doubt that the continent is now a leading theatre of international rivalry thanks to its poor leadership, which must be reversed. For far too long Africa has been at the mercy of outsiders who invade the continent for their own benefit at the detriment of the continent’s benefit. This has been largely possible because of fragmented and weak leadership. The lessons of African history clearly show that its lack of unity was the fundamental disadvantage that enabled Europeans and Arabs to enslave and colonize the continent and continue to dominate the region until today. So long as Africa fails to engage in self-examination in order to restructure and reposition itself it shall remain weak and dominated as the wretched of the earth.
There are lessons for Africans to learn from the experiences of US, Europe and China. The case of China is particularly instructive. Starting in 1949, the Chinese have shown that with determination and visionary leadership, despite all the shortcomings, a vast nation like Africa can also uplift itself to become a major power in the world. Today china has become a leading political, economic, social, cultural, military and intellectual power in the world thanks to their leadership. Both China and the West offer a lesson to Africa that every country has to identify its supreme interests to pursue them uncompromisingly and to depend on itself in order to build its own capacity. This is the lesson of history that Africa must learn to embrace and put it into practice.
On 5 May 2017 China launched its first passenger aircraft. Already they have built their own naval aircraft carrier while their divers reached the deepest levels of the ocean as their astronauts shoot up to the highest points of space. China is already a nuclear power. In 2013, Pres. Xi Jinping launched his ‘Belt and Road Initiative’, a visionary blueprint for global economic development in the 21st century for China. Taking reference from the historic Silk Road, which transformed the nature of international trade links in ancient times, the Belt and Road Initiative is essentially a strategy of the Chinese for global dominance. For that matter they are building roads, railways and sea routes from China across to Europe, Asia, Middle East and Africa covering more than 60 countries carrying merchandise from and to China. The first of such routes already opened between China and UK on 19 January 2017 when the first ever-direct freight train service from China arrived in London after an epic 17-day journey spanning ten countries on its 7456-mile trip.
One may not agree with the system of governance in China and certainly it has a horrible human rights record. However the facts also speak of a determination of a people who are prepared to stand on their own in the world. Africa does not have to copy the political system of China but certainly Africa has to learn from the experience and determination and initiatives of not only the Chinese but also of the Europeans and Americans as peoples and regions who are committed to the upliftment of their peoples by any means. History has confirmed that no one can develop another people but all peoples develop themselves based on their conscious ideas and actions. Until now, Africa has not proved that it is prepared and committed to produce its own ideas and put then into practice.
Even when those ideas exist, the vast majority of African leaders and intellectuals ignore those ideas for foreign ideas. For example there cannot be a better, more relevant and pragmatic ideas for African progress, security and power than those of Kwame Nkrumah. Yet since the 1960s many African politicians and intellectuals completely ignore and ridicule his ideas even though he was the first and only leader to propose a clear strategy, actions and timeline for a unified Africa. Despite ignoring his ideas, yet since then until now both the OAU and AU continue to refer to his proposals in a half-hearted manner. Furthermore there cannot be a more relevant blueprint for African integration and development than both the OAU Lagos Plan of Action 1980 and the OAU Abuja Treaty 1991. Yet these documents were also completely neglected as the AU went ahead to development its own Agenda 2063 without any bearing on the Lagos and Abuja documents. It is clear that if Africa had the right leadership at the time that pursued to the letter the Lagos Pan of Action to be followed by the Abuja Treaty, today the face of Africa would have been different.
Unsurprisingly, the African politicians and intellectuals completely ignore these relevant and instrumental tools as they opt for the more irrelevant World Bank and IMF-inspired ideas such as their Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs), the Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSP) and the Highly Indebted Poor Countries Initiative (HIPC). These strategies, programs and initiatives promoted the idea of foreign investment, privatization, limited public spending and unregulated or liberalized economies with no agenda for industrialization when it is clear that none of such ideas were ever used by the US, Europe and China to develop and reach where they are today. But the African politician and intellectual allowed these foreign entities to impose such programs on their countries only to produce more poverty, corruption and high cost of living in Africa.
As we mark the 54th anniversary of African Liberation Day, the average African must seriously reflect on these issues in order to take a definitive position that Africa demands and deserve democratic and visionary leadership and strong institutions of good governance. This must be the position of each and every African if we are going to transform this most endowed continent into one of the most advanced places in the word in our lifetime. Let Africans demand a New Africa. This current Africa is decadent and wretched. It must be killed for a New Africa to emerge. For that to happen, each and every African must be a new citizen as defined by Kwame Nkrumah,
“Africa needs a new type of citizen: A dedicated, modest, honest, informed man and woman who submerge self in service to the nation and mankind. A man and woman who abhor greed and detest vanity. A new type of man and woman whose humility is his and her strength and whose integrity is his and her greatness”.
Forward To One Unified Democratic Africa Now!

Fundamental beliefs of the Ahmadiyyah or Qadianiyyah

 

Following the recent infamous incident at the Talinding cemetery which has unfortunately galvanised a lot of ignorant and uninformed utterances from many pseudo religious authorities on the social media platforms, I am compelled to debunk some mysteries surrounding this very controversial issue. Most of us should understand that Islam is clearly defined and as such only folks with the right accreditation and authority should engage in such discourses and not reduce it to a debate of philosophical ideas or modernity. In this piece, I will endeavour to shed light on some radical beliefs of this group comparative to mainstream Islamic beliefs.

 
The founder of this group (Ghulam Ahmad) systematically transformed himself from a caller to Islam to a “Mujaddid” (revivalist) inspired by Allah to the claim of being the Promised Messiah (Mahdi) and then finally to be most ludicrous –claiming to be prophet whose prophet hood was higher than that of Muhammad (PBUH). They also believe that prophet hood did not end with Muhammad (PBUH), but that it is ongoing, and Allah sends a messenger when there is a need, and that Ghulam Ahmad is the best of all the prophets.

 
They believe that the Angel Jibreel used to come down to Ghulam Ahmad and he used to bring revelation to him, and that his inspirations are like the Quran.

 
They say there is no Quran other than what the “Promised Messiah” (Ghulam Ahmad) brought, and no hadeeth except what is in accordance with his teachings, and no Prophet except under the leadership of Ghulam Ahmad. They also believe their book was revealed. Its name is al kitaab al-Mubeen and it is different from the Holy Quran.

 
They believe that Qadian (the birth place of its founder in Punjab, India) is like Makkah and Madeenah, if not better than them, and that its land is sacred.
In their view every Muslim is Kaafir unless he becomes a Qadiani, and everyone who married a non Qadinani is also kaafir.

 
As for their beliefs about Allah, they believe that He fasts, prays, sleeps, wakes up, writes, makes mistakes and has intercourse — exalted be Allah far above all that they say.
From the above, even the most basic of Muslims would find these beliefs repugnant and unacceptable to Islam. Therefore, our scholars unanimously agreed that this group is misguided, and not part of Islam at all because its beliefs are completely contradictory to Islam.

 
In April 1974, a major conference was held by the Muslim World League in Makkah, which was attended by representatives of Muslim Organisations from around the world. This conference announced that this sect is Kaafir and beyond the pale of Islam, and told Muslims to resist its dangers and not to corporate with the Qadianis/Ahmadis or bury their dead in Muslim graveyards.

 
The Islamic Fiqh council of Capetown, South Africa also issued the following statement:
Firstly, the claims of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to be a prophet or a messenger and to receive revelation are clearly a rejection of proven and essential elements of Islam, which unequivocally states that Prophet hood ended with Muhammad (PBUH) and that no revelation will come to anyone after him. Thus, this claim by Ghulam Ahmad makes him and anyone who agrees with him an apostate who is beyond the fold of Islam.

 
In conclusion, I challenge any Ahmadi who refutes these things to a debate because these are found in their own books, writings and publications of their founder. The Talinding cemetery altercation can be avoided in future if these Ahmadis improvise their own grave yards just like they do for their mosque. How can you claim to be a Muslim when you don’t pray behind us yet ironically you want to share graveyards with us? Nobody is asking Ahmadis to leave but let them keep their religion and let us keep ours. By the way Imam Fatty’s stance on this issue is the position of all our mainstream Islam scholars and we should desist from labeling him as an element that is fanning religious intolerance in the Gambia.

BB SANNEH

WHY BARROW’S SUDDEN VISIT TO THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA

 

I am not critical of Adama Barrow as a person, because from my observation I gave him a lot of credit based on his person, he is calm, easy-going, and above all humble, With this qualities together with other traits I believe he is an introvert and from my perspective he is frangible (weak) person.

 
Is just over a couple of weeks since a confrontation happened between the Ahmadiyya muslims and non-Ahmadi muslims in the Gambia, this lead Mr. Abdoulie fatty of bakoteh to speak and preach hate amongst our beloved Gambian people and a few days later Religious Elders visited the president which is very much welcome by many folks, and Friday 19th May 2017 the president’s visit to the kingdom of Saudi Arabia is quickly scheduled. I have no objections on his visit to Saudi provided it is based on genuine reasons and for the betterment of the republic of the Gambia and its people. On his visit Mr Barrow must be briefed about saudi’s foreign policy and their willingness to spread their ideologies by any means necessary. They have tried it in many countries and those that fell in to their trap are still in trouble and will continue to be in trouble unless they change their minds.

 
The idea of WAHABISM is Saudi’s principal interest in Muslim nations especially in poorer nations, Pakistan, Indonesia, Bangladesh are examples of countries they try to use to oppress and suppress other faiths and even other Islamic minority sects. They were behind the 1970s meeting of the world Islamic nations where they make a FATWA ( declaration) that Ahmadis are non-muslims and that is over 3 decades now and are still funding groups and even states who will try to fight Ahmadis and other sects once their ideology differes from wahabish SIR DAWDA JAWARA WAS THERE BUT DIDN’T SIGN TO IT.

 
Barrow must know that the monarch of Saudi is not the custodian of the Islamic faith even in Saudi much more in the world because the monarch has had several confrontations with scholars in Saudi over the improper management of the affairs of the kingdom and how they want to control the minds of the masses in propagating their ideas about faith to be specific islam. And that even in the Gambia during jammeh’s era they have tried to use him through our so-called scholars, he adheres to their demand but the execution of the deal was the problem, he was a little bit reluctant considering his interest on the other hand he needed the money from Saudi, but let me make it very clear fighting Ahmadiyyat spreads it more to people that don’t even know about the jamat.

 
It could be worry some but perhaps the truth, the kingdom of Saudi promotes intolerance and extremist wahabi creed domestically and internationally, they have been lavishing over $100BILLON in the past 3 decades in exporting fanatical ideas across the globe especially in poor Muslim countries. Because of the intolerance and the extremist idea, in July last year the US government called on Saudi to respect the right of private worship or faces sanctions as they were violating the obligation under the human right convention on right to worship. PEOPLE MUST DIFFERENTIATE ISLAM FROM THE MONARCH OF SAUDI, the monarch is the world’s leading sponsors of Islamic extremism.

 
Therefore, I highly welcome Barrows visit to Saudi but he must be careful of the things they will like to install in his fragile and delicate mind, the people of the Gambia are tired and can no more take any form of intimidation or oppression take note of that and if you took the extremist ideology you will be doomed like others before you who stand in the ways of the righteous, may Allah forbid.I love you like I love every other Gambia but Gambia come first.

Lamin Darboe

GUNJUR-CHINESE SYSTEMATICALY ENDANGERING OUR SEA, BEACH AND ENVIRONMENT

 

The odour is unmistakable, the stench is unavoidable, fish price skyrocket, frustrations abound, Bro you don’t know the extent to which our patience has been exercised said Mr Bojang.

 
I intimated, Bro, stench and odour is the same and Mr Bojang sighed with a deep breath to collect himself. Imagine someone come to your compound, dump sewage, put herbicide on your lawn and throw some cyanide into your well, how will you feel. I said definitely that will trigger war. He went on, what is more frustrating is; the Chinese have the audacity to threaten us, and frustrating still, they are exploiting our own brethren to perpetrate their odious crime against our environment and fish resources for only fifty cents. These our brethren have no conscience and only care about their pockets at the detriment of our community and environment. I said hmmm this is ugly business and definitely it’s time to show the Chinese who the boss is.

 
Mr Bojang went on, Mr Darboe can you imagine a Gambian doing this sort of stuff in China or India. Chinese and Indians who kill black folks just for dating their girls. We put the government in power to protect our livelihood, our environment and resources but the former government colluded with some notable Gunjurians to establish this Chinese factory on our pristine beach which is our heritage and great source of tourist attraction; is being systematically destroyed by Chinese with excuse of providing local employment. The former Yaya government has no respect for the will of the people and certainly no respect for the environment or our local beaches. Yaya plus local henchmen have been a continuing sources of despair for Gunjur, first he usurped it’s Kenyekenye Jameng area, fence it with high walls and allowed this notorious Chinese company to rape our fish resources, pollute the beaches and gas us with this foul stench which we don’t actually know what type of gas it is.

 
Fare enough I have heard it all. This issue cannot be brush aside any more, it has to be brought the attention of the new administration to take urgent action.
The fracas about the Chinese company started barely some two years ago and the fish factory as was superficiality named was initially slated as manufacturing plant for fertilizer production but unknowing to the generality of Gunjur citizenry, was a plant for manufacturing fish products in form of pellets for Chinese market. It’s products still shrouded in secrecy is sent to China in packages and even the local workforce don’t actually know the complete production process. There are certain stages according some staffs which only the Chinese know. Also there are certain areas of the plant which is restricted, a no go area for the local Gunjur staffs according sources familiar with the workings of the plant.

 
The whole process was established without proper consultation with local stakeholders and if local grapevine is to be trusted, it’s only the chief, the alkali and some village authorities who were in the know of the full extent of this notorious Chinese enterprise. The name of some local big fish, a prominent businessman surfaced as the mastermind of the plant. According to sources the plant was purportedly setup for fertilizer manufacture but a month into the process people noticed dumping of unwanted fish on the beaches, on road sides and places proximal to dwellings.

 
Chinese normally build local infrastructure when they set up plants like this to attract local empathy and support; they build roads and sometimes hospitals. However in this case they ignored our people’s aspirations and invited no input from them since they knew that they have Yaya government’s backing as well some local power brokers in their pocket. Power brokers who can easily sell their land and sea resources for a dime.

 
The road to the beach plied by their heavy lorries and vans is in disrepair and cannot cater for such a high volume of traffic. It is a feeder road made of gravel which Yaya ignored even though he has been frequenting the place to visit kenyekenye Jameng.

 
Simply because Gunjurians have inconsequential political clout in his calculations or out of pure disdain. For years our people have been silent bystanders out of fear of their lives, hopelessly acquiesced. Just as in many part of Gambia, Jammeh’s pervasive dominance of the political, economic and social life of the Gambians citizenry has haply been challenged. He succeeded systematically in dividing the people and inserting his loyal enablers in form of local power brokers and NIA to intimidate and coalesced people to submission.

 
Gunjur was no exception and this has led to the current imbroglio which has so far prove perilous to not only to the environment and sea resources but to the standard of living of our people. As Tuklor Sey eloquently put it, Gunjur’s environmental ruination by the Chinese is a national challenge because that sea once was a honey comb for many Gambians. The Gunjur catfish with its distinctive taste and Gunjur smoked fish used to be an excellent source of protein for many towns villages from Kombo to Basse. Since Yaya government came in, Gunjur’s pre-eminence in fish production dwindled to near extinction and Tangi took over.

 
Gunjur is a prolific settlement to a diversity of tribes and people from Gambians regions; it’s widely acclaimed reputation as the most welcoming town to people from many areas in the Gambia as well as the sub-region. It’s is one of the few prominent Mandinka dominated towns where people will give their daughter in marriage to foreigners without much attention to the backgrounds of the spouse in contradistinction to many other towns in the Gambia. In many towns, especially in Badibu, they want to know your background first, especially, to authenticate whether you are of a Karanke, or Jali background before they decide to offer you spouse. In some places even grave yards exhibits people status in life, a distinction of Fooro and Jongo, not in Gunjur the town of scholars of distinction and pre-eminence, in the person of Bun Jeng and Hatab Bojang; not to forget Kombo Sillah the king and emir of Kombo.
Not to be distracted from the burning issue at hand, the people of Gunjur deserve more. It provided the sand mining which generated huge cash flows for the country for decades yet the local infrastructure benefited nothing from those resources and it has been documented that Yaya Jammeh solely monopolized those cash flows at the detriment of our environment. Just as KARTONG beach was close to decimation, so was Gunjur yet the denizens sheepishly acquiesce out of fear of persecution by Jammeh henchmen.

 
The Chinses fishing methods fall below international standards and is very destructive to fish resources. They will soon deplete our fish resources because the type of net they use does not discriminate between the fish species they need and the type they don’t need. That’s why they dispose the unwanted fish to the dismay of the local populations who find it expensive to buy local Chalo.
The local fishermen cannot compete with a well resourced and technologically advance fishing equipment that the Chinese deploy and therefore the local industry is slowly shrinking with consequential loss of revenue and standard of living.

 
Our environment is a sacred heritage which we shall protect with blood and sweat come what may and the current government’s sluggish and apparently insignificant efforts despised our contributions in enthroning their candidate who happen to be the majority leader in parliament. Perhaps now the issue has been thrust to the fore-front of national discourse some urgent action will be taken to address the situation. It has been grapevine news that the environment minister who is purportedly out of town will visit the location once he returns.

 
The Chinese must either have to put their act together, stop this senseless rape of our environment and sea resources or they totally close down. If the government failed to prevail on them which we hope not, we will not hesitate to unleash local activism which may germinate some unintended consequences.
The saddest and most disappointing aspect that bedevil this episode is the collusion of our own brethren out of sheer opportunism and ignorance. Th Chinese may be gone but Gunjur stays and recriminations may make it difficult to look at folks in the eye. SALAM

L Darboe Leicester

Gambia: Using Guarantees of Non-Recurrence to Prevent Past Atrocities

 

Daniel Bekele

Senior Director for Africa Advocacy, HRW

 

The following is the transcript of a speech given by Daniel Bekele, Human Rights Watch senior director for Africa advocacy, at the Gambia National Stakeholders Conference on Justice and Human Rights, May 23-25, 2017.

Introduction

Thank you to the Gambian government and Justice Minister Tambadou for inviting Human Rights Watch to contribute to this important conversation.

Over the last 20 years, I have made many visits to Gambia. I was last in Banjul in October 2016 at the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, where Human Rights Watch participated in a panel to discuss threats to freedom of speech ahead of December’s presidential election.

It’s a real pleasure to be here today to see how Gambia has changed since then, and to have the chance to discuss with you how to ensure that Gambia capitalizes on its hard-won freedoms.

When I was asked to speak on this topic, I was reminded of a tweet from a Gambian journalist the day after former president Jammeh had left for exile: The sun is smiling on #Gambia. Not because #Jammeh has gone. Or, #Barrow is coming. But because #GambiaHasDecided that #NeverAgain.

This tweet captures exactly what is meant when we discuss guarantees of non-recurrence – thinking through the reforms necessary to ensure that, whomever governs Gambia, be it today, in 5 years, or 50 years, the human rights violations of the Jammeh era are not repeated.

I want to focus my remarks today on four key areas pivotal to ensuring lasting respect for the rule of law and human rights: ensuring the neutrality of the security sector; ending impunity; strengthening the independence of the judiciary; and reforming the legal framework.

1. Ensuring the neutrality of the security sector

Ensuring the police, intelligence services and the armed forces can carry out their mandate in a neutral and professional manner should be a key priority for the new government. Jammeh’s government used Gambian security institutions to arrest, intimidate and coerce his real or perceived opponents, turning the police, intelligence services and elements of the army into instruments for his own political and even personal goals.

Gambia’s new government, although it has only been in office for a short time, has begun the process of transforming the police and security services into institutions that Gambians trust to protect and respect them. The new government has released dozens of political prisoners, and ended the powers of arrest and detention of the feared National Intelligence Agency, now known as the State Intelligence Services.

The government, with support from its international partners, should now implement a longer-term security sector reform program, including by passing legislation setting out in detail the role of the police and intelligence services in domestic law enforcement. The government should also establish a mechanism for vetting the security forces to investigate and sanction individuals most responsible for grave human rights violations in the past.

The government should also establish independent civilian institutions capable of providing effective oversight of government institutions. We commend the Ministry of Justice for its commitment to the creation of a national human rights institution, and urge it to be given the financial and functional independence it needs to be effective, in line with the Principles relating to the Status of National Human Rights Institutions (known as The Paris Principles). The Gambian National Assembly also has an essential role to play in holding the executive to account, and its members would benefit from training on international human rights standards relating to law enforcement.

2. An end to impunity

During our research into Jammeh-era abuses, we could find no example of members of the police, intelligence services or military who were convicted or held to account for torture, killings or other serious violations. The government’s failure to investigate and prosecute abuses enabled future violations.

This March, we wrote to Justice Minister Aboubacarr Tambadou to welcome the important steps the Gambian government had taken to end this state of impunity including reversing Gambia’s withdrawal from the International Criminal Court and committing to investigate the fate of individuals who were forcibly disappeared during the Jammeh era. We also commended President Barrow and his government’s stated intent to establish a truth, reconciliation and reparations commission to investigate crimes committed during Jammeh’s rule. A truth commission offers the potential for families to learn the fate of their loved ones, as well as the opportunity to begin a national dialogue on reforms to assure that Jammeh-era abuses are never repeated.

The announcement of a truth commission should be part of a wider effort to hold accountable those most responsible for human rights violations during Jammeh’s rule. While criminal prosecutions of past human rights violations can present challenges, especially to a newer administration facing many competing demands, we have seen the benefits of ensuring such cases do not fall off the agenda. Victims need to have the opportunity for redress for the crimes they have suffered. In addition, fair trials in accordance with international standards build respect for the rule of law. They send a clear message that serious crimes will not be tolerated, while also signaling that justice – not vengeance – will prevail.

As the Gambian government sets out the function and structure of a truth commission in the coming weeks and months, it should consider how the commission will work alongside and complement judicial prosecutions. It is also crucial to consider how judicial institutions and a truth and reconciliation commission might share information while protecting the rights of victims and witnesses as well as respecting the rights of the alleged perpetrators.

3. Strengthening and ensuring the impartiality of the judiciary

Ending the impunity of the Jammeh era will also require efforts to strengthen the Gambian justice system, which faces significant challenges as it struggles to overcome more than two decades of neglect and misuse. Human Rights Watch documented widespread executive interference in the judiciary when Jammeh was president, including executive pressure on foreign judges on temporary assignment in Gambia. The new Gambian chief justice should work with the Ministry of Justice to devise a system for the training and appointment of judges that protects them from executive interference, both in law and practice. Thought should also be given to the creation of independent complaints commissions to provide oversight of the police and office of the prosecutor.

Gambia should also consider the reforms needed to develop the investigative, prosecutorial and adjudication techniques and capacities necessary to prosecute torture, enforced disappearances and extrajudicial executions. Gambia now has the unique opportunity to build such a capacity including by inviting international experts to work alongside Gambian investigators and prosecutors. Gambia also currently lacks any formal program for victim or witness protection, and should devise mechanisms, ideally through the passage of legislation, to protect victims and witnesses involved in sensitive cases.

4. Reforming the legal framework to better protect human rights

Gambians fought hard for the right to freedom of expression including expressing criticism and opposition to the government. It is vital that Gambia now revises its legal framework to reflect these values. Jammeh’s government used a series of draconian and overly broad laws to suppress activists and opponents and target vulnerable groups he sought to demonize. An arrest pursuant to one of Gambia’s old repressive laws was often a gateway to far more serious human rights violations, including prolonged incommunicado detention and torture.

I want to add Human Rights Watch’s voice to calls to immediately repeal or substantially amend the laws that Jammeh’s government used to suppress freedom of speech and assembly, including on sedition, criminal libel, “spreading false information,” giving false information to a public servant and on the censorship of online expression. The government should also amend the Public Order Act requirement of permits for public assemblies, so as to require only notification to the authorities of planned public assemblies.

Gambia should also adopt a comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation prohibiting discrimination on the basis of religion, ethnicity, disability, sexual orientation and gender identity. Any laws that run contrary to these values should be repealed or amended.

Conclusion

I have covered a lot of ground, and made perhaps too many recommendations to the Gambian government, which has after all only been in office for a few months.

But if we and other human rights groups are demanding a lot of our interlocutors in the Gambian government, it is because we sense both a true opportunity and the political will to build a truly rights-respecting and democratic Gambia.

Many of the members of President Barrow’s government, like much of Gambian civil society, have a proud and courageous history of human rights activism, while Gambia itself is the home of the African Union’s flagship human rights institution.

At a time when the human rights movement is looking for flickers of light in an ever-darkening world, Gambia truly has the chance to cement its status as the human rights capital of Africa and to develop the legal and institutional guarantees to ensure that Gambia truly can say, “Never Again.”

Talking Human Rights in the New Gambia

 

By Daniel Bekele

Senior Director for Africa Advocacy

 

Truth Commission Should Complement Justice for Jammeh-era Crimes

 

“This is the new Gambia,” Jobe, a Gambian taxi driver told me, as I arrived in the country for the first time since the inauguration of President Adama Barrow. Three months after erstwhile strongman Yahya Jammeh left Gambian soil, the capital, Banjul, is buzzing and Gambia, known as the “smiling coast of Africa,” is still celebrating the end of more than two decades of dictatorial rule.

I have traveled regularly to Banjul over the past 20 years to attend the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, whose presence in Gambia belied the arbitrary arrests, torture, and enforced disappearances committed by the government during the Jammeh era.

Since Jammeh’s defeat in the December 2016 presidential elections, Gambia has promised to become the “human rights capital of Africa.” Barrow’s government has emptied jails of political prisoners, renewed its commitment to the International Criminal Court, and overseen legislative elections deemed free and fair by international observers.

This week, Gambians and friends of Gambia from many walks of life gathered for a conference to consider how to build on this early promise, and create the laws, institutions, and values necessary to protect human rights and secure the rule of law for the country.

A key question posed at the gathering was how to address the terrible crimes of the past to ensure a better future. The government has announced plans to create a truth, reconciliation, and reparations commission, to begin later this year, that would help families learn the fate of their loved ones and provide closure to victims.

And while the government has also promised thorough investigations into Jammeh-era abuses, there is concern that setting up a truth commission might cause criminal investigations to be delayed, or even forgotten. Yassin Senghore, a Gambian lawyer and human rights activist, told me, “Gambian victims know that Jammeh-era judges and courts failed to protect them. They don’t want to be cast aside by the justice system a second time.”

When I addressed the conference, I said that while truth commissions can be meaningful, they should always be part of a wider, complementary effort to bring human rights violators to justice. At a time when the global human rights movement is looking for flickers of light in an ever-darkening world, Gambia has the chance to show that, as the home of Africa’s flagship human rights institution, the values of justice and human rights still burn bright.

GOOD MORNING PRESIDENT BARROW

 

What is really going on in beautiful Gambia? Why are we so laid back, Mr President? Everything little thing which oozes no immediate physical harm is rubbished as insignificant without any thorough examination. Mr President, your biggest diminish prospect is security. Every other day, in new Gambia, we witness instances where security of our country is severely tested by a bunch of irresponsible citizens. We have seen it happened in Bakau when a group of drug peddlers stood up and obstructed law enforcement officers from executing their duties. The same was mirrored at Tanji beach where security officers had to contain youths armed with cutlasses, matchets, stones and sticks. Similar episode also was manifested in Kanilai by a group of women threatening to bare their essential just to stop security officers carry out their duty. No government can compromise security and survive Mr President.

 
A video is currently circulating on Gambian social media of a fella threatening to open the gates of hell is any security officer dares step in Kanilai to execute a court order on Goloh’s frozen assets. Worryingly, many take his threat with a teensy weensy pinch of salt. And case closed. Seriously? It is about time even if his “bravado does not amount to a hell of beans” for government to quickly response to such threats and make the public aware that no threat on the person, life or property of anyone in the Gambia will be rubbished as childish banter. Jammeh with all his anything anything did warn you, Mr President, not to compromise security of the country. We may downplay the looming threats showing their ugly heads in our midst but the country is being tested for ungovernability. Something must be done about it if any development is to take place. How can you govern in the heart of insecurity and instability? It is these little threats that we hastily bin as rubbish which mutate into the Farato rioters’ rampage. I am concerned because I can foresee the far reaching and costly security ripples this is leading to.

 
It really beats any reasonable imagination how we as citizen architect our abysmal doom. The minster of Fisheries and water resources rested the coastal line of Gunjur disaster on the heads of few poor fishermen. How convenient Mr President? Even a minute old baby knows the Hon Minister was nothing but a glue-huffing imbecile covering up for corporate exploitation of our environment. His reasoning that Golden Leaf Factory had to go though vigorous vetting before issuing its operational licence is likened to averting a rainfall with one’s palm. They may have complied with all government protocols but is that a guarantee that they will uphold those protocols after a year or so operation? Everything from the galaxy of washed out dead fish to the illegal dumping of chemical and fish waste all accentuate their breach of those very protocols. Acts and atti6from ordinary citizenry and government officials are the marinating ingredients for insecurity, dissent and rampage.

 
No one is insinuating you issue threats like Goloh to get things done. One thing about him though, he is known for carrying out his threats perhaps that explains why what obtains in Gambia now was only imaginable in our forlorn dreams. The laws are there, Mr President. All you need is to implement them. Inciting and threatening violence is a felon. Corruption is equally a felon. You want to be taken seriously? Be serious Mr President.

 
Karamba Touray has this to add, “Impeding or even attempting to impede legitimate law enforcement even of the slightest kind is intolerable. It must be swiftly dealt with . I believe the police have been entirely too soft on the enforcement side in this new democracy in their quest to shed the excesses of the tyranny that subverted them as an institution and the laws they are sworn to serve. That may be having the unintended consequences of emboldening miscreants to challenge law and order itself. It has stop. Fidelity to the law which lies at the heart of a democracy is contingent on full and uniform enforcement by those charged with the responsibility. People who stand in the way of legitimate police work must be severely punished whatever their purported grievances”.

Sulayman Jeng
Birmingham, UK

Founder Of GambiaHasDecided Explains The Role Of Civil Society In Building The New Gambia

 

 

Mr. Salieu Taal, one of the founders of The Gambia Has Decided movement has highlighted the role of civil society organizations in building a better Gambia. Mr Taal was speaking at the national stakeholders conference on justice and human rights at Kairaba Beach Hotel.

“We must create a new Gambian who is educated, enlightened and informed to build a better Gambia for all,” Salieu Taal stated.

Mr. Taal explained that the role of civil society is advocacy for justice, human rights and good governance, saying it is a barometer of telling the government what the people really want. He talked about the need for institutional reforms, respect for human rights and democracy to value the change that happened in the country. He also talked about the need for communication between the government and the civil society because they are not enemies.

“The civil society makes the government to govern better in the best interest of the country,” he pointed out.

The co-founder of the GambiaHasDecided made a brief explanation of how the movement was formed. He said the movement was non partisan which was initially formed to amplify the voice of the Gambian people when they went to the December 1 presidential polls to removed dictatorship. He said the first hashtag “Jammeh Must Go” came up after the former president rejected the results and later it was changed to “GambiaHasDecided”.

Mr. Taal explained that the idea of forming a movement came after the former dictator rejected the results causing confusion in the country. He said there was ranting on the social media against the actions of the former dictator which they felt was not enough so they decided to come up with the movement. He said they first started to change their profiles on the social media, print t-shirts and later printed billboards.

Mr. Gaye Sowe, Executive Director of IHRDA has elaborated on the need for institutional building and strengthening as a key to a functional democracy. He talked about the prison laws which he said are redundant and outdated because many of the rules were colonial laws. He made recommendations to change them to international best practices.

Director Sowe highlighted the independence and challenges of the national centre for civic education particularly problems of staff training and funds to execute its functions of civic awareness on the media. He talked about the inadequate governing structures of the country’s police force relating to political interference, low salaries and human rights training among other things. He also talked about the lack of resources and executive interference of the Ombudsman.

Director Sowe further highlighted the need to amend the section that empowers members of the National Intelligence Agency now State Intelligence Agency to arrest and detain anyone without any warrant. He also made recommendations to increase salaries to retain Gambian lawyers in the justice department. He called on the executive to stop meddling in the justice department.

Meanwhile, Ms. Sabrina Mahtani of the Amnesty International added her voice to encouraged dialogue between the government and the civil society.

“I think The Gambia should be the human rights capital of West Africa,” Sabrina Mahtani said.

Ms. Mahtani expressed hope in the new government to create better environment for human rights defenders in the Gambia.

“Cases Of Remand Prisoners Should Be Treated With Urgency” Deputy Speaker Tells Authorities

0

 

By Lamin Sanyang

 

Honourable Momodou LK Sanneh, Deputy Speaker of the National Assembly has called on the office of the Inspector General of Police and The Ministry of Justice to urgently look into the continuous detention of prisoners who are locked up for decades without trial at the remand wing of the State Central Prison in Banjul.

Honourable Sanneh raised these concerns at the national stakeholders conference on justice and human rights at Kairaba Beach Hotel.

“I am appealing to the Inspector General of Police and Ministry of Justice to urgently look into the cases of those detained at remand for 10–15 years without being taken to court,” Deputy Speaker Momodou LK Sanneh asserted.

He further pointed out: “We have to act quickly to solve these problems now that we are living in a new Gambia.”

Deputy Speaker Sanneh who was incarcerated along with the executives of the United Democratic Party by the former dictator said there are many people languishing in the remand wing for more than a decade without being charged. He added that over twenty people are locked up in small cell of 4 by 4 metros.

“These cells are unventilated,” he lamented.

Lawyer Janet Sallah Njie, former President of the Female Lawyers Association Gambia FLAG also emphasised on some of the issues raised by the deputy speaker. She argued that focus should not be place only on the past but the present is equally important. She said some of the prison conditions under the past regime still exist in the present administration.

Lawyer Sallah Njie explained her recent visit to the Janjangbureh Prisons at the provincial part of the country. She called on the need to improve the conditions of the prisons. She further called for institutional reforms of the judiciary and professional conducts of magistrates in the dispensation of free trial.

Meanwhile, several issues of transitional justice as a mechanism to overcome past human rights violations, prosecution as a form of transitional justice mechanism and forms of reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence were among the topics discussed at the national stakeholders conference on justice and human rights.

Managing The Frustration….

 

There is no doubt that there is a lot of anger and frustration among the youth of this country. What with the long reign of terror unleashed on the people of the country by a brutal government that was supposed to protect and serve them! Then there is the issue of the lack of adequate employment opportunities and the seeming injustices perpetrated on our people.

 

There is a widely held perception that the justice system in the previous government was compromised and is thought to have been corrupt. One potential problem and threat to peace and security is the issue of land ownership. It is believed that the former president interfered with the ownership of lands in many parts of the country. As such, judgements that have to do with land, and emanated from the justice system of the previous government are likely to be controversial and contentious.

 

Many there are who paid huge amounts of money for lands which they genuinely believed belonged to the people who sold it to them. So, they bought these lands, had their papers drawn and started construction on said lands. If therefore it is found out later that the land did not in fact belong to the sellers in the first place, one can imagine their anger and frustration. Add to that the fact that these people believe that the courts are compromised.

The fracas that occurred in Farato and Bafulotoo yesterday was therefore a boil over of pent up anger which had been suppresseed for a long time coming.

 

In my humble opinion, this matter should be thoroughly looked into by the Barrow Government and then amicable solutions sought. Whatever the case, dialogue should be a key element in trying to solve the problem. If need be, those people who had spent money to buy, construct, and move into those houses should be compensated. They should be given lands and an amount of money to construct houses similar to the ones that were demolished if their claims are established by a competent authority.

 

I think it is necessary for the government to revisit the court cases presided over by all those judges who are deemed to have been in Jammeh’s pockets. Justice should then be restored and those who were wrongly denied of the lands, and/or monies should be compensated. Let us use dialogue to solve our problems.

 

Having said all that, I should also say that it is wrong to take the law into one’s hands and wreak havoc on property – be it public or personal property. Whatever the case, we should never revert to violent protests. If we do, we will simply be destroying our country for no good reason. Everyone is allowed to demonstrate peacefully; but this must never be abused. Let us always remember that we are one country, one family, and one nation!

 

Let us love our country!

 

Tha Scribbler Bah

A Concerned Citizen

Jammeh should never be forgiven, says Sarjo Barrow

 

Veteran broadcaster Sarjo Barrow has that former President Jammeh should never be forgiven for he had committed a lot of atrocities during his 22-year reign as president of The Gambia.

“He should be prosecuted at the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague like they did to Charles Taylor [of Liberia] and Lauren Gbagbo [Ivory Coast],” Mr Barrow said in an interview with The Point newspaper recently.

Barrow, Gambia’s renowned Mandinka language broadcaster, accused the former president of destroying The Gambia.

The veteran journalist accused the former President Jammeh of inciting and promoting hatred, and demonising and bringing division among Gambians.

“He tribalised the army and other security outfits,” said journalist Barrow who shared the same surname with the President Adama Barrow even though there is no known blood relation between.

“Even the civil service was tribalised,” he added.

Not a member of UDP

Asked why he never spoke out against Jammeh during his presidency, Mr Barrow said “I was very angry and terrorised that I decided to keep quiet”.

“I never like Jammeh or ever voted for him since the formation of his political party and even my colleagues at GRTS [the state broadcaster] can attest to that,” he said. “I always avoided attending his immature programmes.”

The Brusibi-based journalist also rubbished rumours that he is a member of the United Democratic Party (UDP) saying: “I have never been a member of any political party since former President Jawara’s era.”

Barrow said no one can find his name in any political party’s record.

“I want to remain an independent journalist,” he asserted.

Mr Barrow started his broadcast career in May 1979 as a temporary announcer at Radio Gambia and rose through the ranks to become manager of radio programmes.

Source: Point Newspaper

UDP is not tribalistic

0

 

The deputy party leader of the United Democratic Party (UDP) Aji Yam Secka has refuted criticisms that the UDP is a tribal party.

Speaking at a recent meeting in Brikama, Madame Secka said the (UDP) party is established to serve the interest of all Gambians irrespective of tribe. “Let me state clearly that, the UDP was not formed by only Mandinkas but individuals from different tribes and religions,” Aji Yam Secka, herself Wollof speaking said. She added that the executive of the UDP has since emphasized that the party is and must never be a tribe-based party but one that belongs to all Gambians. “I believe that all Gambians should work together for the betterment of the country regardless of background,” she said. The UDP deputy leader further stressed that no tribe in the country irrespective of size or number can stand by its own.

The UDP Diaspora chairperson, Alkali Conteh said politics is all about building connections and friendships with people and organizations and serving one’s people to better lives and living conditions. “All genuine politicians must first have the country’s interest than tribal considerations,” Conteh said.

Source: Standard Newspaper

Time Has Come to Ban the APRC!

 

By Madi Jobarteh

 

After 22 years of misrule, the evidence of the carnage and plunder of Yaya Jammeh and APRC exposes itself every day, which shall continue till eternity because their victims and effects of their atrocities shall continue to exist forever. The sole beneficiary of the atrocities and plunder of public wealth has been none other than Yaya Jammeh himself and is party. When Yaya Jammeh steals public money it benefits himself and his party to stay longer in power. When Yaya Jammeh ordered the killing of opponents, it serves him and APRC to stay in power. Thus APRC is a direct beneficiary of the misrule, plunder and atrocities of Yaya Jammeh.

 
We now know that a large number of our citizens lost their lives in mysterious circumstances during the APRC reign. The recent indictments of tens of soldiers for murder clearly indicates that indeed Yaya Jammeh and the APRC had presided over the most brutal destruction of uncountable number of Gambian lives through strangulation, suffocation, beheading, shooting and hacking. They then went further to conceal dead bodies in bushes and forests, thrown into wells and crocodile ponds among other ungodly places in and around Kanilai, Foni and Kombo. The exhumation of dead bodies attests to the grisly conduct of this undesirable regime. Yet the APRC, which formed the government, failed to ensure justice and protection of the rights of Gambians. As a party, they enjoyed their dominance on the misery and disempowerment of Gambians.

 
From 11 November 1994 when AFPRC began its reign of bloodshed by summarily executing tens of our soldiers, we saw how this criminal military junta metamorphosed into the APRC as a political party to continue the same bloodshed. The most tragic part of that history is when you have Gambian civilians embrace this party to provide it the necessary power base and legitimacy to perpetuate murder and pillage in our country. Hence from 1997, the leading violator of the Gambia had been the APRC. With their control over the legislature and local government structures, this party had provided the perfect cover and support for Yaya Jammeh to destroy the Gambia. APRC failed to not only stand up for the Gambia, but went further to legitimize ad legalize the misconduct and violations of Yaya Jammeh with much fuel and fire. The legacy of APRC therefore is maiming and murder of Gambian lives and the plunder of public wealth.

 
This evidence can be traced to the several concocted coups from 1997 to 2000 during which Yaya Jammeh eliminated perceived and real opponents only to see the APRC as a party and lawmakers rally around this despot to validate his atrocities. The most tragic event came in the Year 2000 when on April 10 and 11, he ordered Gambian soldiers to open fire on innocent and defenseless schoolchildren. The response of the APRC lawmakers was to merely pass an indemnity act to protect the killers. Even when a commission of enquiry was conducted which had identified the perpetrators yet the APRC decided to ignore and forget.

 
Since April 2000, series of atrocities continued in this country such as on 16 December 2004 when a veteran journalist Deyda Hydara was shot dead. This was followed by the summary execution of Daba Marenah and four other soldiers on 4 April 2006. On 23 August 2012 the regime illegally executed nine prisoners in Mile 2 Prisons without following the rule of law. On 30 December 2014, Gambian Freedom Fighters were captured alive and summarily butchered to death. On 14 April 2016 scores of peaceful protestors led by Solo Sandeng were violently arrested and subjected to the most severe torture and rape leading to the immediate killing of Sandeng. Since then many more protestors have succumbed to the severe tortures such as Solo Koroma, Lang Marong and Ebrima Ceesay.

 
Today, thanks to the Barrow Administration Gambians also know the source of Yaya Jammeh’s ‘Allah’s Bank’. After all the open secret is that this ungodly son of the land has in his name 131 landed properties, 86 bank accounts and 14 companies. He had also directly taken out of SSHFC the amount of D189 million as well as 50 million US dollars from the International Gateway Project Account. Under the watch of the ruling APRC, Yaya Jammeh had opened special accounts while he continued to use public enterprises such as Gamtel, Gambia Ports Authority as well as NAWEC to bleed the country of its hard earned money. As if this was not enough, Yaya Jammeh went further to directly interfere with business entities to the point of causing the country to lose millions of dalasi in lawsuits. The cases of Alimenta, Carnegie Minerals and CONAPRO are all clear examples of abuse and impunity for which the Gambian people were forced to pay bitterly for the mess of one citizen! Yet APRC key mute but benefiting!
The fact that Yaya Jammeh as a single person can acquire so much properties, bank accounts and companies in the Gambia alone and not to mention his overseas concerns clearly shows that APRC was indeed a serious liability for Gambians. Therefore until now I had held the view that the APRC party should not be banned in the Gambia but today I wish to change my position to demand that APRC be banned in the Gambia from henceforth. This is because the APRC had been the container in which Yaya Jammeh delivered his venom on Gambians. APRC as a party gave Yaya Jammeh a cover and a conveyor to kill and defraud the Gambia and Gambians.

 
APRC cannot be separated from Yaya Jammeh and his atrocities because APRC is the political powerbase of the Government of Yaya Jammeh. In a democracy, presidents or prime ministers are elected on the basis of a party or as independents. In our case Yaya Jammeh was elected on the APRC ticket. It was APRC that formed the majority of the members of the National Assembly. Hence whatever Yaya Jammeh was able to do, it was directly possible because of his power base, the APRC. Hence if Yaya Jammeh is exiled, he certainly must go with APRC as his coat.

 
Until today, the Nazi party has not been officially banned in Germany. But Nazi symbols, flags, ideology, offices and materials have been completely closed, banned and criminalized. No one in Germany can promote in any way anything associated with the Nazi party. Thus effectively the party is banned even if by law there was no specific court order banning the party. Germany banned all elements of the party because of the intolerable atrocities, plunder and destruction that Hitler and his band of criminals caused Germany.

 
The APRC does not certainly match the scale of atrocity of the Nazi party, but in our history, the Gambia has never seen such carnage led by a political party. For that matter, the APRC deserves to be banned in the Gambia just like Yaya Jammeh. The APRC is a party of shame, destruction and murder. We had Yaya Jammeh because there was AFPRC and then APRC. We experienced atrocities because of APRC. We are defrauded because of APRC. The APRC as the dominant party in parliament failed as a legal and official entity tasked with a constitutional mandate to protect the supreme interests of the nation.

 
The APRC has a constitutional obligation to abide by the Constitution of the Gambia yet it chose to ignore and at the same time go against that Constitution. It chose to damage the sovereignty and national security of the Gambia. It chose to put the name and dignity of the Gambia into disrepute and ridicule worldwide. APRC like any other party or citizen has no choice or right to impose a religious state on the Gambia, or to disregard the rule of law or to aid and abet tyranny in the Gambia. Yet this was exactly what APRC decided to do wilfully in the Gambia. Why therefore should APRC survive! Any person who commits these crimes will face the law hence any group of people who constitute themselves into any entity, more so a political party will be liable for the same penalty if they commit the same crime.

 

Keeping the APRC in Gambian society means digging our wounds everyday as APRC represents the wounds of Gambians. Allowing APRC to continue to exist means we have exonerated it from its failures, complicity and direct participation in the abuse of human rights, disregard of the rule of law and killing of Gambians by the Yaya Jammeh Government. If we could credit the opposition parties for ousting Yaya Jammeh, then what can we claim to be the benefit and contribution of APRC. It is clear that APRC had one position and contribution, which was to maintain dictatorship because they benefitted from that dictatorship. Thus keeping APRC alive means we disrespect and dishonour the departed souls and those who were raped, beaten and tortured in every unimaginable way. The APRC has no value in the Gambia other than to further torment and traumatize victims and survivors of the atrocities of Yaya Jammeh. If there is a benefit provided by the presence of APRC, what is it?
Ban The APRC! NOW.

President Barrow Due In Banjul Today

 

President Adama Barrow and delegation have left Jeddah Royal Airport, Saudi Arabia this morning at 9am local time after a four day visit to the Kingdom. Barrow and delegation traveled to Riyadh on Friday, May 19 to attend The Arab Islamic American Summit on the invitation of Salman Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, king of Saudi Arabia, custodian of the two holy mosques and head of the house of Saud.

During his stay, President Barrow had the opportunity to perform Umra with members of his delegation before their departure from the holy land.

He also had the opportunity to meet with other African heads of state including Senegal’s Macky Sall, leaders of the Arab world and members of the Gambian community in Riyadh. President Barrow did not meet with US President, Donald Trump who was also in Riyadh for the summit. African leaders are said to have attended the summit as observers, they were not given any major role during the entire summit.

President Barrow was accompanied to the summit by Foreign Affairs Minister, Lawyer Ousainou Darboe, Interior Minister, Mai Ahmad Fatty, Tourism Minister, Ahmad Bah, the director of the state intelligence service (SIS), Ousman Sowe, Secretary General, Dawda Fadera, Permanent Secretary Foreign Affairs, Njogu Saer Bah and a few other government officials.

Barrow and delegation are expected to arrive at the Banjul International Airport at 5pm local time.

Compounds demolished in Bafuloto causes riots in Farato, Police clarifies

A number of compounds were on Tuesday demolished in Farato Medina otherwise call Bafuloto, causing bloody riots in the area.

The people of Farato embarked on the demolition exercise in Bafuloto through a court order.

The demolition team led by Momodou Secka from the Sheriff Division accompanied by a team of Police Intervention Unit PIU officers were drove away from Bafuloto with stones up to the Police station in Farato.

Their cars were burnt down, the grader hired by physical planning to demolish the compounds was burnt down and tires burnt on the highway blocking traffic in Farato.

Several people suffered injuries and rushed to the nearest hospital.

This land dispute according to residents has been in court since 2006.

Giving a clear picture of what caused the violence, Police Public Relations Officer Inspector Foday Conta said the tension is caused by a court order issued to some individuals to go and make demolitions in Farato Medina ( Bafuloto).

According to him, upon arrival and as they were on the demolition exercise, some people in Bafuloto village came out and stoned them.

“As the stoning was going on, they ran for their lives. There was security but it wasn’t that strong to resist and control the crowd. So, they all have to run for their lives. Through the help of the security, the demolition team ran to the Police station in Farato for safety” he explained.

PRO Conta said because Farato stations is a small station, when the demolition team arrived for their safety, the mobs from Bafuloto also followed them and the security there could not control them before the arrival of the reinforcement.

“For that matter, the Grader was burnt down with another Mercedes Benz 190 and road blocked” he said.

He confirmed that the Police has arrested many people and are currently detained at Brikama Police station helping them in their investigation. He wouldn’t give the specific number of arrests or names of those arrested for security reasons saying the case is at its preliminary stage. He said investigations will follow suit and from there whosoever is found wanting will face the full force of the law.

The police spokesperson advised the general public to desist from this attitude saying if anyone is dissatisfied with a court ruling or whatsoever, he or she has the right place to go for an appeal.

“So, going to the court means you can get justice but if you take the law into your own hands, it is very unfortunate. We will advise that in whatever they are doing, let them put the law into consideration” he advised.

He reminded the occupants of the disputed land that this is a court order issued for them to be evicted and if they feel offended, they should go to the court and raise their points but they cannot obstruct the people demolishing the place or obstructing the police performing their duties.

“If the court has ordered that they vacate, of course they will vacate and if they are dissatisfied they shoud take a proper procedure by going back to the courts” he concluded.

Reset password

Enter your email address and we will send you a link to change your password.

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

Sign up with email

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

By clicking the «SIGN UP» button you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Powered by Estatik