By Cherno Baba Jallow
In the presidential elections of 2016, Gambians were presented with a Hobson’s choice: return an erratic dictator to power or hand the presidency to an inestimably inexperienced candidate.
Enter President Adama Barrow.
Gambians were never in doubt about Barrow, the man they were going to entrust with the custodianship of their national affairs. He was a complete greenhorn in statecraft. He knew nothing about governance, about government, this sprawling industry of institutions and personalities and policies and ideas.
Getting rid of Jammeh was key to the Gambian voters. It offered them a much-needed springboard for a fresh start, a new direction. Jammeh had to go. The country had to be pulled back from the looming possibilities of societal disintegration. But the voters were also hopeful that his replacement, though woefully ill-equipped, would do better at some point in the long-run.
How? First, by surrounding himself with the right people, the people with the ideas on the knots and bolts of governance. And second, by the gradual process of self-inculcation, learning on the job, immersing himself in the conceptual and deliberative processes of decision-making, understanding policies and messaging, presentational and aspirational leadership.
Gambian voters didn’t expect Barrow to be proficient in his job as soon as he entered the State House. But they expected him, and time permitting, to master, at least, the rudiments of leadership, and in consonance with the aspirations of the people who voted for a change.
But like a man caught in a quicksand, Barrow is either stuck or drowning. He has been unable to impress with any new-found skills. It’s not even the fact that he has been snail-slow in the leadership-learning process. It’s the fact that he hasn’t learned anything at all. There are many factors to account for that, but his failure to thrive is mainly because he has had advisers who don’t know anymore than he does. It’s the blind leading the blind.
Consider Barrow’s recent proclamation that he would stop political rallies if he won the forthcoming elections in December. No leader who had been well-served by his advisers and who understood the basics of electioneering, would reveal such a hostile mindset, and certainly not in an election year.
Barrow, in barricading himself and in a desperate attempt to mollify our fears over his recent faux pas, can’t do himself any good by hiding behind the recent press release of his spokesman or by expecting us to accept the famous quip that leaders should never be judged by what they say but rather by what they do. This is no waiting game.
This is a matter of immediacy. A leader threatening to end political campaigns —- the lifeblood of any democracy —- shouldn’t be ignored. He should be put under the microscope. All the way to Election Day. Gambian voters shouldn’t wait until Barrow acted on his threat before they took him seriously. They should. Now.
Banning political errands or speech is the legerdemain of dictators or leaders hankering after power, the concentration of its allocation and the pervasiveness of its reach. It is dictators like Saddam or Jammeh or Hoxha who show such perniciousness. Leaders, like Barrow, whose ascendancy arose out of the crucible of democracy, and who, in particular, defeated one of Africa’s last hold-outs of dictators, ought to know better. They are expected to be staunch allies of democracy, promoting and strengthening the ideals of free speech and association, the rule of law and citizen-sovereignty.
But Barrow has gone off-tangent. This is the first time he has shown flickers of arrogance of power. This is out of character. Until now, Barrow had carried himself well. He hadn’t cared publicly about the acerbic criticism, ridicule even, some in the citizenry had been throwing his way. He knew how to tune it out. He didn’t howl back. He didn’t arrest or detain journalists or opposition leaders. He just kept to himself, taking the vitriol on the chin and moving on and confounding his critics with his reticence.
Going into the elections later this year, Barrow’s strongest suit has been his tolerance for dissent. The Gambia is enjoying an unprecedented level of freedom of speech. Barrow isn’t the provider of this freedom. This was earned. But in Barrow, a man known for his humility and not easily thrown into irritability, The Gambia’s new-found and healthy expressiveness has found the right ally.
No longer? By his recent pronouncement, and which was, by no means, an unforced error in political speechifying (he was both blunt and precise), Barrow has begun squandering away his most substantial political capital. And on this issue, he has both shaken the confidence the people had in him and gifted the opposition a strong talking point going into the elections.
Should he lose in December, Barrow should look back on his recent speech as the catalyst for his political demise. We will find out in the coming months.
About the author: Cherno Baba Jallow is a native of Basse and currently lives in New York City. You can personally write to him at: [email protected]
What happened to D14 million airport project and D35 million Banjul rehabilitation project: Corruption is a human rights issue
By Sariang Marong
Corruption as the name implies is an enormous obstacle to the realization of human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural, as well as the right to development. Corruption violates the core human rights principles of transparency, accountability, non-discrimination and meaningful participation in every aspect of the life of the community. Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status.
For the past two years, Gambians have sounded the alarm of corruption and ineffectiveness of their government led by President Adama Barrow. Conversely an incompetent government who time over time failed to deliver on its basic obligation should be a concern to all citizens. We have seen major projects which cost taxpayers millions of dalasi’s just to find out the architecture was poorly planned as well as executed. The government procurement process was full of kickbacks and back door deals which breeds inefficient execution of project management methodology.
Corruption affects human rights both directly and indirectly, for example corruption in our government can impact the proper and efficient execution of public policy initiatives. But also contributes to an environment in which our government cannot function in carrying out its basic mandate. When many of us decided to join the fight to uproot dictatorship in the Gambia, we want a better and a prosperous Gambia where its citizens will enjoy twenty first century amenities. In hindsight, who could have thought our current situation will threaten our peace and security? Who would have thought those who have given all to salvage our country from the brink of civil war will be forgotten too soon? Who would have thought President Barrow will continue to appoint his friends and close allies who lacked the experience to function in key positions in our government? Who would have thought President Barrow will appoint four presidential advisers who lacked the necessary requisite to be advisors?
Our country needs reforms for our government to function properly, the notion that we need to proof that there is corruption in Barrow administration is laughable. The proof is in the projects they have undertaken so far; check the quality of work on the end product after millions of dalasi are spent. The upcoming Presidential elections should be an indictment of Barrow administration; from millions of taxpayer money spent on the various commissions without implementing the commission’s report! Can we ask ourselves are we better off now than four years ago? These elections should be about the future versus the status quo; a more transparent and efficient government that will serve the interest of all Gambians versus a government that serves the interest of few individuals. The elections should be about recruiting technocrats and experience professionals who understand the function of a government against an administration who filled key positions with friends and allies who cannot deliver on key government functions.
I will urge all Gambians to look beyond the idiosyncrasy of their political beliefs and vote with their conscience to effect change. Our people, our country need all of us to create a path for equality and economic prosperity. We have few months before Gambians cast their votes, reflect on those shared values; the right to a better healthcare, the right to cleaned water, the right to stable electricity, the right to better education system, and the right to equality and good governance. As I conclude this writeup; can we collectively effect change come December and fundamentally change the direction of our country for good. I believe we can for a path forward.
May God bless the Gambia and her people.
The writer, Sariang Marong (pictured below), is based in the United States.